Search (1311 results, page 1 of 66)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsdienstleistungen"
  1. Auster, E.; Lawton, S.B.: ¬The negotiation process in on-line bibliographic retrieval (1979) 0.13
    0.13107225 = product of:
      0.34952602 = sum of:
        0.066795126 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066795126 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
        0.26488012 = sum of:
          0.035312846 = weight(_text_:on in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035312846 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
          0.22956727 = weight(_text_:line in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.22956727 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.9913358 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 4(1979) May, S.86-98
  2. Havener, W.M.: Answering ready reference questions : print versus online (1990) 0.12
    0.12257639 = product of:
      0.32687038 = sum of:
        0.02342914 = weight(_text_:of in 2869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02342914 = score(doc=2869,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 2869, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2869)
        0.28385925 = sum of:
          0.037843075 = weight(_text_:on in 2869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037843075 = score(doc=2869,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.4166639 = fieldWeight in 2869, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2869)
          0.24601619 = weight(_text_:line in 2869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24601619 = score(doc=2869,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              1.0623668 = fieldWeight in 2869, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2869)
        0.019581974 = product of:
          0.039163947 = sum of:
            0.039163947 = weight(_text_:22 in 2869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039163947 = score(doc=2869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the findings of an experiment designed to compare on-line data bases and equivalent printed versions in 1 area of reference services, the answering of ready reference questions. 68 reference librarians searched for answers to the same set of 12 questions using either print or on-line sources. Details of the questions are given. In the case of conceptual questions on-line proved faster than print, particularly for 2-concept questions, and the increased speed was not at the expense of accuracy. In the case of factual questions, print sources proved to be considerably faster than on-line. Suggests 2 guidelines: when bibliographic information is available in both print and on-line formats, on-line should be the tool of choice, particularly for multi-concept questions; simple factul questions can be answered more quickly using printed sources.
    Source
    Online. 14(1990) no.1, S.22-28
  3. Public libraries and the Internet (1994) 0.08
    0.0823097 = product of:
      0.13169552 = sum of:
        0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029222867 = score(doc=830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=830)
        0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029945528 = score(doc=830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=830)
        0.020662563 = weight(_text_:of in 830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020662563 = score(doc=830,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 830, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=830)
        0.007724685 = product of:
          0.01544937 = sum of:
            0.01544937 = weight(_text_:on in 830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01544937 = score(doc=830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.044139877 = product of:
          0.088279754 = sum of:
            0.088279754 = weight(_text_:computers in 830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088279754 = score(doc=830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.40661687 = fieldWeight in 830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    Abstract
    Summarizes results of a survey of 1.495 libraries carried out by the National Commission on Libraries and Information SCience (NCLIS) which sought to provide benchmark data for public library use of the Internet. Covers: connections to the Internet, type of connection and network provider, average cost of connection and future resource allocation, uses of the Internet, Internet-based user services, public access terminals, provision of hard-copy materials, community information services, computers and phone lines, factors affecting involvement with the Internet, primrary motivation for interest in the Internet, roles perceived as appropriate for public libraries and federal government. The study includes recommendations for policy makers, public libraries and the NCLIS
    Source
    Information retrieval and library automation. 30(1994) no.2, S.1-4
  4. Balas, J.: ¬The Internet and reference services (1995) 0.07
    0.07287404 = product of:
      0.14574808 = sum of:
        0.06049911 = weight(_text_:use in 860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06049911 = score(doc=860,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.47845137 = fieldWeight in 860, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=860)
        0.011156735 = weight(_text_:of in 860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011156735 = score(doc=860,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 860, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=860)
        0.0110352645 = product of:
          0.022070529 = sum of:
            0.022070529 = weight(_text_:on in 860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022070529 = score(doc=860,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 860, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=860)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.06305697 = product of:
          0.12611394 = sum of:
            0.12611394 = weight(_text_:computers in 860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12611394 = score(doc=860,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.58088124 = fieldWeight in 860, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=860)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Looks at resources available on the Internet to help librarians use it effectively in reference services. Covers: resource guides, subject guides to resources, and directory services and indexes. Difficult reference questions can be answered through use of mailing lists e.g. Stumpers-L
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 15(1995) no.6, S.39-41
  5. Furlong, K.; Roberts, F.D.: If you teach it, will they learn? : Information literacy and reference services in a college library (1998) 0.07
    0.06983251 = product of:
      0.18622003 = sum of:
        0.014968331 = weight(_text_:of in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014968331 = score(doc=3880,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
        0.006621159 = product of:
          0.013242318 = sum of:
            0.013242318 = weight(_text_:on in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013242318 = score(doc=3880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.16463055 = sum of:
          0.13106145 = weight(_text_:computers in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13106145 = score(doc=3880,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.6036695 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
          0.033569098 = weight(_text_:22 in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033569098 = score(doc=3880,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the development, funding and staffing of the Information Literacy Program (ILP) at the Mantor Library at the University of Maine at Farmington (UMF). The programme aims at helping both UMF students and community patrons to understand better how and where to look for information. Instruction takes place in an electronic classroom equipped with 21 computers running campus-standard Web-browsers and word processing; the instructor's station can control all of the computers in the classroom, or the instructor may pass or share control with students. Discusses issues relating to campus politics, the positioning of the programme in the college experience, the necessity of teaching evaluation skills, and the programme's impact on reference services. gives advice to other libraries considering a similar project
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 18(1998) no.5, S.22-25
  6. Smet, E. de: Evaluation of a computerised community information system through transaction analysis and user survey (1995) 0.07
    0.069537334 = product of:
      0.111259736 = sum of:
        0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029222867 = score(doc=2304,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2304, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2304)
        0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 2304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029945528 = score(doc=2304,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 2304, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2304)
        0.019129815 = weight(_text_:of in 2304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019129815 = score(doc=2304,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 2304, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2304)
        0.013379549 = product of:
          0.026759097 = sum of:
            0.026759097 = weight(_text_:on in 2304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026759097 = score(doc=2304,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.29462588 = fieldWeight in 2304, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2304)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.019581974 = product of:
          0.039163947 = sum of:
            0.039163947 = weight(_text_:22 in 2304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039163947 = score(doc=2304,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2304, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2304)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the results of a transaction analysis and user survey, evaluating a pilot system for computerized community information in a public library, based on the GDIS system (Gemeenschaps Informatie Documentair System). The non hierarchical and global approach to the integrated database proved to be useful for novice users. Out of many parameters only frequency of use correlates with retrieval success. The online questionnaire proved to be worthwhile although restricted in scope. The logbook transaction analysis yielded a rich amount of useful management information for the systems managers. The user survey yielded a rich set of data on which to perform statistical analyses according to social science practice, from which some interesting relations could be detected
    Date
    23.10.1995 19:22:11
  7. Schaefer, M.T.: Internet information retrieval for libraries : four keys & sites that use them (1998) 0.07
    0.068983875 = product of:
      0.13796775 = sum of:
        0.047231287 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047231287 = score(doc=99,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
        0.048399284 = weight(_text_:use in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048399284 = score(doc=99,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3827611 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
        0.019957775 = weight(_text_:of in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019957775 = score(doc=99,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
        0.0223794 = product of:
          0.0447588 = sum of:
            0.0447588 = weight(_text_:22 in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0447588 = score(doc=99,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Provides illustrative examples of the methods, tools and resources that enable librarians, information specialists and end users to make the most of the WWW. The 4 key factors that facilitate access are location, evaluation, organization and communication. Outlines how a number of sistes make use of these factors. Describes: the Internet Library for Librarians, Argus Clearinghouse's Digital Librarian's Award; FEDSTATS, the University Library System, chines University of Hong Kong, the WWW Virtual Library, the Finnish Virtual Library Project, and BIBNET
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:19:44
    Source
    Information retrieval and library automation. 33(1998) no.8, S.1-3
  8. Tenopir, C.; Ennis, L.: ¬The digital reference work of academic libraries (1998) 0.07
    0.06505494 = product of:
      0.17347983 = sum of:
        0.022089208 = weight(_text_:of in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022089208 = score(doc=5170,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
        0.007724685 = product of:
          0.01544937 = sum of:
            0.01544937 = weight(_text_:on in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01544937 = score(doc=5170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.14366594 = sum of:
          0.088279754 = weight(_text_:computers in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.088279754 = score(doc=5170,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.40661687 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
          0.05538619 = weight(_text_:22 in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05538619 = score(doc=5170,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a survey of all academic members of the Association of Research Libraries in the 4th quarter of 1997 which examined how academic libraries incorporate electronic information sources into their reference activities and the effects on libraries services. There was a response rate of 68 per cent, Compares results surveys carried out in 1991 and 1994. The survey covered: numbers of computers access options (intermediary, end user online, CD-ROM locally loaded databases or those accessible through the library catalogue and the Internet. There is a trend away from print resources, particularly indexing and abstracting materials, and away from CD-ROM LANs and local loading of databases towards remote online resources
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.22-28
  9. Micco, M.; Smith, I.: Designing a workstation for information seekers (1989) 0.06
    0.0647849 = product of:
      0.17275974 = sum of:
        0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029945528 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
        0.015619429 = weight(_text_:of in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015619429 = score(doc=1515,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
        0.12719478 = sum of:
          0.026759097 = weight(_text_:on in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026759097 = score(doc=1515,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.29462588 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
          0.10043568 = weight(_text_:line in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10043568 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.4337094 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on research into the use of new technologies in providing more sophisticated delivery systems where the services of skilled reference librarians are not available. Describes a workstation equipped with a CD-ROM jukebox of reference books and vocabulary control tools on laser discs with keyword access. The user interface will include an expert system to guide users in selecting the types of material and in developing the best search strategy by mapping the terms selected by the users to contolled vocabularies. Searches will be narrowed or broadened as appropriate. The system will also be designed to connect to a full service integrated library network enabling the user to access the on-line card catalogue, check circulation and perform interlibrary loans.
  10. Wildemuth, B.M.; Cogdill, K.; Friedman, C.P.: ¬The transition from formalized need to compromised need in the context of clinical problem solving : opportunities and possible problems for information use studies of health professionals (1999) 0.06
    0.063634 = product of:
      0.101814404 = sum of:
        0.029519552 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029519552 = score(doc=189,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
        0.030249555 = weight(_text_:use in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030249555 = score(doc=189,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23922569 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
        0.01850135 = weight(_text_:of in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01850135 = score(doc=189,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
        0.00955682 = product of:
          0.01911364 = sum of:
            0.01911364 = weight(_text_:on in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01911364 = score(doc=189,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.21044704 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013987125 = product of:
          0.02797425 = sum of:
            0.02797425 = weight(_text_:22 in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02797425 = score(doc=189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    Abstract
    Almost 30 years ago, Taylor (1968) postulated that each information need moves along a continuum from the visceral need through the compromised need. The current study examines the final transition in this continuum: from formalized need (expressed in an explicit verbal statement) to compromised need (represented in the language of the retrieval system). This transition is primarily concerned with vocabulary: the searcher attempts to translate an explicit statement of need into a search term (or terms) that can be interpreted by the retrieval system. A few studies have empirically examined the match between the end-user searcher's formalized need and the compromised need (i.e., search terms). Markey (1984) compared the searcher's expressed topic (the formalized need, expressed in just a few words) and the search terms (the compromised need), and then went on to compare the search terms with the library catalog terms available for subject searching. She found that the search term matched or was a partial form of the expressed topic in 71% of the searches, and that over 75% of these searches matched a catalog term. Allen (1991) examined the relationship between logical reasoning ability and selection of search terms. He asked college students to read a magazine article (which could be seen as a very rich statement of the formalized need) and then to perform a search for articles on the same topic (expressing the compromised need).
    Date
    22. 3.2002 8:54:11
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 13-15 August 1998, Sheffield, UK. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  11. Case, D.O.: Looking for information : a survey on research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2002) 0.06
    0.062973216 = product of:
      0.12594643 = sum of:
        0.03067762 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03067762 = score(doc=1270,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.24559249 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
        0.022228792 = weight(_text_:use in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022228792 = score(doc=1270,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.17579426 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
        0.02063242 = weight(_text_:of in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02063242 = score(doc=1270,freq=76.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3195122 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
              8.717798 = tf(freq=76.0), with freq of:
                76.0 = termFreq=76.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
        0.052407596 = sum of:
          0.009363732 = weight(_text_:on in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009363732 = score(doc=1270,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.10309757 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
          0.043043863 = weight(_text_:line in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043043863 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.18587546 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 54(2003) no.7, S.695-697 (R. Savolainen): "Donald O. Case has written an ambitious book to create an overall picture of the major approaches to information needs and seeking (INS) studies. The aim to write an extensive review is reflected in the list of references containing about 700 items. The high ambitions are explained an p. 14, where Case states that he is aiming at a multidisciplinary understanding of the concept of information seeking. In the Preface, the author characterizes his book as an introduction to the topic for students at the graduate level, as well as as a review and handbook for scholars engagged in information behavior research. In my view, Looking for Information is particularly welcome as an academic textbook because the field of INS studies suffers from the lack of monographs. Along with the continuous growth of the number of journal articles and conference papers, there is a genuine need for a book that picks up the numerous pieces and puts them together. The use of the study as a textbook is facilitated by clearly delineated sections an major themes and the wealth of concrete examples of information seeking in everyday contexts. The book is lucidly written and it is accessible to novice readers, too. At first glance, the idea of providing a comprehensive review of INS studies may seem a mission impossible because the current number of articles, papers, and other contributions in this field is nearing the 10,000 range (p. 224). Donald Case is not alone in the task of coming to grips with an increasing number of studies; similar problems have been faced by those writing INS-related chapters for the Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST). Case has solved the problem of "too many publications to be reviewed" by concentrating an the INS literature published during the last two decades. Secondly, studies an library use and information retrieval are discussed only to a limited extent. In addition, Case is highly selective as to studies focusing an the use of specific sources and channels such as WWW. These delineations are reasonable, even though they beg some questions. First, how should one draw the line between studies an information seeking and information retrieval? Case does not discuss this question in greater detail, although in recent years, the overlapping areas of information seeking and retrieval studies have been broadened, along with the growing importance of WWW in information seeking/retrieval. Secondly, how can one define the concept of information searching (or, more specifically, Internet or Web searching) in relation to information seeking and information retrieval? In the field of Web searching studies, there is an increasing number of contributions that are of direct relevance to information-seeking studies. Clearly, the advent of the Internet, particularly, the Web, has blurred the previous lines between INS and IR literature, making them less clear cut. The book consists of five main sections, and comprises 13 chapters. There is an Appendix serving the needs of an INS textbook (questions for discussion and application). The structure of the book is meticulously planned and, as a whole, it offers a sufficiently balanced contribution to theoretical, methodological, and empirical issues of INS. The title, Looking for Information: A Survey of Research an Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior aptly describes the main substance of the book. . . . It is easy to agree with Case about the significance of the problem of specialization and fragmentation. This problem seems to be concomitant with the broadening field of INS research. In itself, Case's book can be interpreted as a struggle against this fragmentation. His book suggests that this struggle is not hopeless and that it is still possible to draw an overall picture of the evolving research field. The major pieces of the puzzle were found and the book will provide a useful overview of INS studies for many years."
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  12. Ford, B.J.; Jacobs, S.J.: Academic libraries (1997) 0.06
    0.06243493 = product of:
      0.16649315 = sum of:
        0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 7311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029945528 = score(doc=7311,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 7311, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7311)
        0.020662563 = weight(_text_:of in 7311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020662563 = score(doc=7311,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 7311, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7311)
        0.11588505 = sum of:
          0.01544937 = weight(_text_:on in 7311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01544937 = score(doc=7311,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 7311, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7311)
          0.10043568 = weight(_text_:line in 7311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10043568 = score(doc=7311,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.4337094 = fieldWeight in 7311, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7311)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    The increased interconnectivity of academic library resources has led to a growth in the use of electronic media and diminishing dependence on print. An expanding number of remote users and the growth of distance education have led to increased expectations for access. Whether they call themselves digital, virtual or electronic, academic libraries force the challenge of preparing for the millenium through technology. Discusses the role of academic libraries and librarians; cooperation between the library and the computer centre; leading and managing libraries; measurement of library effectiveness; financial resources; staffing; diversity; customer service; reference services; library instruction; library design for technology; the Internet; library automation; integrated systems; cooperative computer networks; document delivery; collection management; digitization and electronic publishing; and cooperation between libraries; vendors and publishing
    Source
    Librarianship and information work worldwide 1996/97: an annual survey. Ed.: M.B. Line u.a
  13. Basu, G.: Using Internet for reference : myths versus realities (1995) 0.06
    0.06014774 = product of:
      0.12029548 = sum of:
        0.048399284 = weight(_text_:use in 2161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048399284 = score(doc=2161,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3827611 = fieldWeight in 2161, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2161)
        0.012622404 = weight(_text_:of in 2161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012622404 = score(doc=2161,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 2161, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2161)
        0.008828212 = product of:
          0.017656423 = sum of:
            0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 2161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017656423 = score(doc=2161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 2161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2161)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.050445575 = product of:
          0.10089115 = sum of:
            0.10089115 = weight(_text_:computers in 2161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10089115 = score(doc=2161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.464705 = fieldWeight in 2161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2161)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    42 academic libraries in New Jersey were surveyed in 1994 to investigate the use of the Internet for reference work. 27 responses were received. The survey questions focused on: how many reference librarians used the Internet for reference queries, what training they had received, what types of reference activities were being conducted, how successful the searches were, what subject categories were searched, and what were the problems/barriers that prevented more frequent use. Reports the results and indicates possible solutions to problems
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 15(1995) no.2, S.38-40
  14. Coles, C.: Information seeking behaviour of public library users : use and non-use of electronic media (1999) 0.06
    0.059562325 = product of:
      0.09529972 = sum of:
        0.016698781 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016698781 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
        0.04191501 = weight(_text_:use in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04191501 = score(doc=286,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.33148083 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=286,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
        0.007645456 = product of:
          0.015290912 = sum of:
            0.015290912 = weight(_text_:on in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015290912 = score(doc=286,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.16835764 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0111897 = product of:
          0.0223794 = sum of:
            0.0223794 = weight(_text_:22 in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0223794 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper highlights some of the significant findings from author's PhD: "Factors affecting the end-use of electronic databases in public libraries." Public libraries have a wide range of different types of users who, unlike academic or special library users, are not necessarily information-trained (see Coles, 1998). Whereas the academic, special library user may have specific information needs that can be met by electronic sources, public library users do not necessarily have such specific information needs that can easily be identified and met. Most user surveys have tended to concentrate on the searching and retrieval aspect of information seeking behaviour, whereas this study's user survey focused more on how people perceived and related to Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). It was not how people searched a particular electronic source, in this case CD-ROM, that was of prime interest but rather whether or not people actually used them at all and the reasons why people did or did not use electronic media. There were several reasons the study looked at CD-ROM specifically. Firstly, CD-ROM is a well established technology, most people should be familiar with CD-ROM/multimedia. Secondly, CD-ROM was, at the start of the study, the only open access electronic media widely available in public libraries. As well as examining why public library users chose to use electronic sources, the paper looks at the types of CD-ROM databases used both in the library and in general Also examined are what sort of searches users carried out. Where appropriate some of the problems inherent in studying end-users in public libraries and the difficulty in getting reliable data, are discussed. Several methods were used to collect the data. I wished to avoid limiting research to a small sample of library sites, the aim was to be as broad in scope as possible. There were two main groups of people 1 wished to look at: non-users as well as CD-ROM users
    Date
    22. 3.2002 8:51:28
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 13-15 August 1998, Sheffield, UK. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  15. Holland, M.P.; Powell, C.K.: ¬A longitudinal survey of the information seeking and use habits of some engineers (1995) 0.06
    0.055291414 = product of:
      0.11058283 = sum of:
        0.033397563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033397563 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
        0.048399284 = weight(_text_:use in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048399284 = score(doc=909,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3827611 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
        0.019957775 = weight(_text_:of in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019957775 = score(doc=909,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
        0.008828212 = product of:
          0.017656423 = sum of:
            0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017656423 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    From 1978 to 1990 the College of Engineering, Michigan University, offered a course: 'Technical Communications: Information Resources for Engineers' to students working on research projects. Reports results of a 1993 follow up study, to assess the impact of the course. The study also revealed that many engineers have access to the tools needed for electronic information retrieval, and that while few receive formal training in their use, there is widespread interest in learning more
  16. Subramanian, J.M.: Patron attitudes toward computerized and print resources : discussion and considerations for reference service (1998) 0.05
    0.05157958 = product of:
      0.10315916 = sum of:
        0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029222867 = score(doc=2193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
        0.042349376 = weight(_text_:use in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042349376 = score(doc=2193,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.33491597 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
        0.020662563 = weight(_text_:of in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020662563 = score(doc=2193,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
        0.010924355 = product of:
          0.02184871 = sum of:
            0.02184871 = weight(_text_:on in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02184871 = score(doc=2193,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that users in academic libraries have preconceived attitudes regarding the use of particular formats of indexes and other materials, and that these attitudes frequently interfere with the successful retrieval of the resources they need, by leading them to their preferred format rather than allowing them to choose the best means to access what they need. Discusses the significance of such preconceived views on the provision of reference services
    Footnote
    Part of an issue devoted to electronic resources and their use in libraries, from the viewpoint of reference services, with an emphasis on the Internet and Geographic Information Systems
  17. Bittner, E.: Bildschirmtext im Angebot einer öffentlichen Bibliothek : das Beispiel Bielefeld (1992) 0.05
    0.051211316 = product of:
      0.10242263 = sum of:
        0.03422346 = weight(_text_:use in 3127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03422346 = score(doc=3127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 3127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3127)
        0.008925388 = weight(_text_:of in 3127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008925388 = score(doc=3127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 3127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3127)
        0.008828212 = product of:
          0.017656423 = sum of:
            0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 3127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017656423 = score(doc=3127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 3127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.050445575 = product of:
          0.10089115 = sum of:
            0.10089115 = weight(_text_:computers in 3127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10089115 = score(doc=3127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.464705 = fieldWeight in 3127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Since 1991 Bielefeld municipal library has participated in the North Rhine-Westphalian project on new technology in public libraries, which should modernise information provision and rationalise work processes. One new technology, Bildschirmtext, takes data from the telephone network and changes them into a form suitable for computers and comprehensible to users. There are several thousands item of information from public and private organisations. Bildschirmtext has proved flexible, topical and user-friendly, through personal use or dialogue call
  18. Marcella, R.; Baxter, G.: Information need, information seeking behaviour and participation, with special reference to needs related to citizenship : results of a national survey (2000) 0.05
    0.050980076 = product of:
      0.10196015 = sum of:
        0.021389665 = weight(_text_:use in 4547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021389665 = score(doc=4547,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.1691581 = fieldWeight in 4547, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4547)
        0.024947217 = weight(_text_:of in 4547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024947217 = score(doc=4547,freq=40.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 4547, product of:
              6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
                40.0 = termFreq=40.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4547)
        0.0110352645 = product of:
          0.022070529 = sum of:
            0.022070529 = weight(_text_:on in 4547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022070529 = score(doc=4547,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 4547, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4547)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.04458801 = product of:
          0.08917602 = sum of:
            0.08917602 = weight(_text_:computers in 4547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08917602 = score(doc=4547,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.41074508 = fieldWeight in 4547, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4547)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports the results of the second stage of the Citizenship Information research project funded by the BLR&IC: a nation-wide survey, by personal doorstep interview, of the citizenship information needs of almost 900 members of the UK public. Major findings include: that the public obtain most of their information on current issues via the mass media, and that they generally feel well informed on these issues. The public feel, however, that government is not doing enough to inform them on European Monetary Union and on local government cutbacks. Small proportions of the sample had encountered problems concerning employment, education, housing or welfare benefits, and had consulted a range of information sources in order to overcome these problems. Over a quarter of respondents had experienced disadvantage through a lack of access to information. The majority of respondents felt well informed about areas relating to citizenship, but significant proportions were poorly informed in legal rights, welfare benefits and local politics. A highly significant majority (91.7 per cent) believed that freedom of information was important for exercising their rights as citizens. Respondents tended to overestimate their voting patterns, but there was little evidence of participation in other forms of political activity. Although access to computers in the home is presently limited, the majority of respondents would use computers to vote, convey opinions to government and obtain government information. Public libraries were the preferred source of government information, and were seen as appropriate locations for a range of other types of citizenship information.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 56(2000) no.2, S.136-160
  19. Johnston, S.: Training for the information economy : a study of the information culture of a graduate business school (1999) 0.05
    0.049815115 = product of:
      0.1328403 = sum of:
        0.021389665 = weight(_text_:use in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021389665 = score(doc=192,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.1691581 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
        0.017640345 = weight(_text_:of in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017640345 = score(doc=192,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
        0.0938103 = sum of:
          0.022070529 = weight(_text_:on in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022070529 = score(doc=192,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
          0.07173977 = weight(_text_:line in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07173977 = score(doc=192,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.30979243 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    As the corporate world becomes increasingly entwined with technological change and information systems, it is vital to examine the role of the information intermediary within such a context. The role of the trained information professional intermediary, whether a reference librarian, special librarian, on-line searcher or researcher, come under continual scrutiny as the corporate world undergoes radical transformation. This paper reports on a study which examines the role of the information professional within the library of a major academic business library. It has been observed that Wall Street functions almost entirely on information (Baldwin & Rice, 1997). Technology and the increasing need for a global perspective have challenged traditional corporate assumptions as the task of the contemporary business employee increasingly demands obtaining and working with information. In business environments, where the overriding goal is the economic progress of the company, information seeking must take place in rapidly changing, complex situations. The new business professional is not just someone familiar with the latest in management techniques. It is someone able to obtain, absorb and synthesize relevant information.
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 13-15 August 1998, Sheffield, UK. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  20. Yu, L.: Geographic information systems in library reference services : development and challenge (1998) 0.05
    0.04872883 = product of:
      0.09745766 = sum of:
        0.048399284 = weight(_text_:use in 2184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048399284 = score(doc=2184,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3827611 = fieldWeight in 2184, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2184)
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 2184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=2184,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2184, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2184)
        0.008828212 = product of:
          0.017656423 = sum of:
            0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 2184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017656423 = score(doc=2184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 2184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2184)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0223794 = product of:
          0.0447588 = sum of:
            0.0447588 = weight(_text_:22 in 2184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0447588 = score(doc=2184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2184)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the concept and function of GIS and compares the use of GIS in libraries with library map collections. Reviews GIS projects in libraries and examines GIS user services and the challenge they pose. Discusses user access to GIS and argues that simplified and varied user interfaces are important to improve user access
    Date
    17. 1.1999 13:50:22
    Footnote
    Part of an issue devoted to electronic resources and their use in libraries, from the viewpoint of reference services, with an emphasis on the Internet and Geographic Information Systems

Languages

Types

  • a 1129
  • m 105
  • s 67
  • r 12
  • b 11
  • el 11
  • x 6
  • i 2
  • ? 1
  • u 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications