Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  • × theme_ss:"Formale Begriffsanalyse"
  1. Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995) 0.04
    0.044626094 = product of:
      0.119002916 = sum of:
        0.0154592255 = weight(_text_:of in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0154592255 = score(doc=1901,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
        0.08116429 = product of:
          0.16232859 = sum of:
            0.16232859 = weight(_text_:line in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16232859 = score(doc=1901,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.7009803 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0223794 = product of:
          0.0447588 = sum of:
            0.0447588 = weight(_text_:22 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0447588 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    TOSCANA is a computer program which allows an online interaction with larger data bases to analyse and explore data conceptually. It uses labelled line diagrams of concept lattices to communicate knowledge coded in given data. The basic problem to create online presentations of concept lattices is solved by composing prepared diagrams to nested line diagrams. A larger number of applications in different areas have already shown that TOSCANA is a useful tool for many purposes
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.78-81
  2. Kollewe, W.: Data representation by nested line diagrams illustrated by a survey of pensioners (1991) 0.04
    0.042029146 = product of:
      0.16811658 = sum of:
        0.017463053 = weight(_text_:of in 5230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017463053 = score(doc=5230,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 5230, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5230)
        0.15065353 = product of:
          0.30130705 = sum of:
            0.30130705 = weight(_text_:line in 5230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.30130705 = score(doc=5230,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                1.3011283 = fieldWeight in 5230, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    With formal concept analysis surveys are analyzable in the way that a meaningful picture of the answers of the interviewed persons is available. Line diagrams of large concept lattices might become less readable up to the point that it is impossible to pursue the line segments with the eyes. Nested line diagrams give the opportunity to overcome these difficulties. The main idea of nested line diagrams is to partition the line diagram into boxes so that line segments between two boxes are all parallel and may be replaced by one line segment. The possibility to draw line diagrams with more than two factors does allow it to describe concept lattices with many hundred or thousand concepts in a clear structure. In practice it has often been proven useful to take standardized scales for the single levels
  3. Neuss, C.; Kent, R.E.: Conceptual analysis of resource meta-information (1995) 0.03
    0.034213267 = product of:
      0.09123538 = sum of:
        0.033397563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033397563 = score(doc=2204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2204)
        0.03422346 = weight(_text_:use in 2204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03422346 = score(doc=2204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 2204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2204)
        0.023614356 = weight(_text_:of in 2204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023614356 = score(doc=2204,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 2204, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2204)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    With the continuously growing amount of Internet accessible information resources, locating relevant information in the WWW becomes increasingly difficult. Recent developments provide scalable mechanisms for maintaing indexes of network accessible information. In order to implement sophisticated retrieval engines, a means of automatic analysis and classification of document meta information has to be found. Proposes the use of methods from the mathematical theory of concept analysis to analyze and interactively explore the information space defined by wide area resource discovery services
  4. Sedelow, W.A.: ¬The formal analysis of concepts (1993) 0.03
    0.028921712 = product of:
      0.077124566 = sum of:
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=620,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
        0.008828212 = product of:
          0.017656423 = sum of:
            0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017656423 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.050445575 = product of:
          0.10089115 = sum of:
            0.10089115 = weight(_text_:computers in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10089115 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.464705 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    The present paper focuses on the extraction, by means of a formal logical/mathematical methodology (i.e. automatically, exclusively by rule), of concept content, as in, for example, continuous discourse. The approach to a fully formal defintion of concept content ultimately is owing to a German government initiative to establish 'standards' regarding concepts, in conjunction with efforts to stipulate precisely (and then, derivatively, through computer prgrams) data and information needs according to work role in certain government offices
    Source
    Behavior research methods instruments and computers. 25(1993) no.2, S.314-317
  5. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.02
    0.02485046 = product of:
      0.06626789 = sum of:
        0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029222867 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
        0.017463053 = weight(_text_:of in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017463053 = score(doc=2654,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
        0.019581974 = product of:
          0.039163947 = sum of:
            0.039163947 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039163947 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  6. Priss, U.; Jacob, E.: Utilizing faceted structures for information systems design (1999) 0.02
    0.022074789 = product of:
      0.058866106 = sum of:
        0.03422346 = weight(_text_:use in 2470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03422346 = score(doc=2470,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 2470, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2470)
        0.018400159 = weight(_text_:of in 2470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018400159 = score(doc=2470,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.28494355 = fieldWeight in 2470, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2470)
        0.0062424885 = product of:
          0.012484977 = sum of:
            0.012484977 = weight(_text_:on in 2470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012484977 = score(doc=2470,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.13746344 = fieldWeight in 2470, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2470)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Even for the experienced information professional, designing an efficient multi-purpose information access structure can be a very difficult task. This paper argues for the use of a faceted thesaurus as the basis for organizing a small-scale institutional website. We contend that a faceted approach to knowledge organization can make the process of organization less random and more manageable. We begin by reporting on an informal survey of three institutional websites. This study underscores the problems of organization that can impact access to information. We then formalize the terminology of faceted thesauri and demonstrate its application with several examples.
    The writers show that a faceted navigation structure makes web sites easier to use. They begin by analyzing the web sites of three library and information science faculties, and seeing if the sites easily provide the answers to five specific questions, e.g., how the school ranks in national evaluations. (It is worth noting that the web site of the Faculty of Information Studies and the University of Toronto, where this bibliography is being written, would fail on four of the five questions.) Using examples from LIS web site content, they show how facets can be related and constructed, and use concept diagrams for illustration. They briefly discuss constraints necessary when joining facets: for example, enrolled students can be full- or part-time, but prospective and alumni students cannot. It should not be possible to construct terms such as "part-time alumni" (see Yannis Tzitzikas et al, below in Background). They conclude that a faceted approach is best for web site navigation, because it can clearly show where the user is in the site, what the related pages are, and how to get to them. There is a short discussion of user interfaces, and the diagrams in the paper will be of interest to anyone making a facet-based web site. This paper is clearly written, informative, and thought-provoking. Uta Priss's web site lists her other publications, many of which are related and some of which are online: http://www.upriss.org.uk/top/research.html.
    Series
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
  7. Ganter, B.; Wille, R.: Formal concept analysis : mathematical foundations (1998) 0.02
    0.021691285 = product of:
      0.057843424 = sum of:
        0.013388081 = weight(_text_:of in 5061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013388081 = score(doc=5061,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 5061, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5061)
        0.006621159 = product of:
          0.013242318 = sum of:
            0.013242318 = weight(_text_:on in 5061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013242318 = score(doc=5061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 5061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.037834182 = product of:
          0.075668365 = sum of:
            0.075668365 = weight(_text_:computers in 5061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075668365 = score(doc=5061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.34852874 = fieldWeight in 5061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    This is the first textbook on formal concept analysis. It gives a systematic presentation of the mathematical foundations and their relation to applications in computer science, especially data analysis and knowledge processing. Above all, it presents graphical methods for representing conceptual systems that have proved themselves in communicating knowledge. Theory and graphical representation are thus closely coupled together. The mathematical foundations are treated thouroughly and illuminated by means of numerous examples. Since computers are being used ever more widely for knowledge processing, formal methods for conceptual analysis are gaining in importance. This book makes the basic theory for such methods accessible in a compact form
    Content
    Order theoretical foundations. - Concept lattices of contexts. - Determination and presentation. - Parts and factors. - Analysis, construction and properties of concept lattices. - Context comparison and conceptual measurability
  8. Wille, R.: Concept lattices and conceptual knowledge systems (1992) 0.01
    0.012611394 = product of:
      0.10089115 = sum of:
        0.10089115 = product of:
          0.2017823 = sum of:
            0.2017823 = weight(_text_:computers in 3142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2017823 = score(doc=3142,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.92941 = fieldWeight in 3142, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3142)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Computers and mathematics with applications. 23(1992), S.493-515
  9. Priss, U.: ¬A graphical interface for conceptually navigating faceted thesauri (1998) 0.01
    0.007096852 = product of:
      0.028387409 = sum of:
        0.017463053 = weight(_text_:of in 6658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017463053 = score(doc=6658,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 6658, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6658)
        0.010924355 = product of:
          0.02184871 = sum of:
            0.02184871 = weight(_text_:on in 6658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02184871 = score(doc=6658,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 6658, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6658)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a graphical interface for the navigation and construction of faceted thesauri that is based on formal concept analysis. Each facet of a thesaurus is represented as a mathematical lattice that is further subdivided into components. Users can graphically navigate through the Java implementation of the interface by clicking on terms that connect facets and components. Since there are many applications for thesauri in the knowledge representation field, such a graphical interface has the potential of being very useful
    Source
    Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
  10. Prediger, S.: Kontextuelle Urteilslogik mit Begriffsgraphen : Ein Beitrag zur Restrukturierung der mathematischen Logik (1998) 0.00
    0.0034967812 = product of:
      0.02797425 = sum of:
        0.02797425 = product of:
          0.0559485 = sum of:
            0.0559485 = weight(_text_:22 in 3142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0559485 = score(doc=3142,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3142, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3142)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    26. 2.2008 15:58:22
  11. Luksch, P.; Wille, R.: ¬A mathematical model for conceptual knowledge systems (1991) 0.00
    0.0029286426 = product of:
      0.02342914 = sum of:
        0.02342914 = weight(_text_:of in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02342914 = score(doc=3033,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Objects, attributes, and concepts are basic notations of conceptual knowledge; they are linked by the following four basic relations: an object has an attribute, an object belongs to a concept, an attribute abstracts from a concept, and a concept is a subconcept of another concept. These structural elements are well mathematized in formal concept analysis. Therefore, conceptual knowledge systems can be mathematically modelled in the frame of formal concept analysis. How such modelling may be performed is indicated by an example of a conceptual knowledge system. The formal definition of the model finally clarifies in which ways representation, inference, acquisition, and communication of conceptual knowledge can be mathematically treated
    Source
    Classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization: models and methods with applications. Proc. of the 14th annual conf. of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Univ. of Marburg, 12.-14.3.1990. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. P. Ihm
  12. Scheich, P.; Skorsky, M.; Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Conceptual data systems (1993) 0.00
    0.0028986046 = product of:
      0.023188837 = sum of:
        0.023188837 = weight(_text_:of in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023188837 = score(doc=5262,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Information and classification: concepts, methods and applications. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, University of Dortmund, April 1-3, 1992. Ed.: O. Opitz u.a
  13. Rusch, A.; Wille, R.: Knowledge spaces and formal concept analysis (1996) 0.00
    0.0028986046 = product of:
      0.023188837 = sum of:
        0.023188837 = weight(_text_:of in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023188837 = score(doc=5895,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Data analysis and information systems, statistical and conceptual approaches: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., University of Basel, March 8-10, 1995. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. W. Polasek
  14. Sedelow, S.Y.; Sedelow, W.A.: Thesauri and concept-lattice semantic nets (1994) 0.00
    0.002494722 = product of:
      0.019957775 = sum of:
        0.019957775 = weight(_text_:of in 7733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019957775 = score(doc=7733,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 7733, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7733)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Formal concept lattices are a promising vehicle for the construction of rigorous and empirically accurate semantic nets. Presented here are results of initial experiments with concept lattices as representations of semantic relationships in the implicit structure of a large database (e.g. Roget's thesaurus)
    Source
    Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
  15. Reinartz, T.P.; Zickwolff, M.: ¬Two conceptual approaches to acquire human expert knowledge in a complex real world domain (1996) 0.00
    0.002415504 = product of:
      0.019324033 = sum of:
        0.019324033 = weight(_text_:of in 5908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019324033 = score(doc=5908,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 5908, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5908)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Data analysis and information systems, statistical and conceptual approaches: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., University of Basel, March 8-10, 1995. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. W. Polasek
  16. Ganter, B.; Wille, R.: Formale Begriffsanalyse : Mathematische Grundlagen (1996) 0.00
    0.002231347 = product of:
      0.017850775 = sum of:
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 4605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=4605,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4605, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4605)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    This first textbook in the field of formal concept analysis provides a systematic presentation of the mathematical foundations and their relation to applications in informatics, especially data analysis and knowledge processing
    Content
    Order theoretical foundations. - Concept lattices of contexts. - Determination and presentation. - Parts and factors. - Analysis, construction and properties of concept lattices. - Context comparison and conceptual measurability
  17. Groh, B.; Strahringer, S.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA-systems based on thesauri (1998) 0.00
    0.0019507777 = product of:
      0.015606222 = sum of:
        0.015606222 = product of:
          0.031212443 = sum of:
            0.031212443 = weight(_text_:on in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031212443 = score(doc=3084,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.3436586 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Conceptual structures: theory, tools and applications. 6th International Conference on conceptual Structures, ICCS'98, Montpellier, France, August, 10-12, 1998, Proceedings. Ed.: M.L. Mugnier u. M. Chein
  18. Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Data analysis based on a conceptual file (1991) 0.00
    0.0019311713 = product of:
      0.01544937 = sum of:
        0.01544937 = product of:
          0.03089874 = sum of:
            0.03089874 = weight(_text_:on in 3140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03089874 = score(doc=3140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 3140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3140)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  19. Kent, R.E.: Implications and rules in thesauri (1994) 0.00
    0.0015778005 = product of:
      0.012622404 = sum of:
        0.012622404 = weight(_text_:of in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012622404 = score(doc=3457,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    A central consideration in the study of whole language semantic space as encoded in thesauri is word sense comparability. Shows how word sense comparability can be adequately expressed by the logical implications and rules from Formal Concept Analysis. Formal concept analysis, a new approach to formal logic initiated by Rudolf Wille, has been used for data modelling, analysis and interpretation, and also for knowledge representation and knowledge discovery
    Source
    Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al