Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Saracevic, T."
  1. Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.B.: Studying the value of library and information services : Part I: Establishing a theoretical framework (1997) 0.03
    0.030673757 = product of:
      0.061347514 = sum of:
        0.061347514 = product of:
          0.12269503 = sum of:
            0.12269503 = weight(_text_:services in 352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12269503 = score(doc=352,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.64392245 = fieldWeight in 352, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses underlying concepts related to value that must be clarified in order to proceed with any pragmatic study of value, and establishes a theory of use-oriented value of information and information services. Examines the notion of value in philosophy and economics and in relation to library and information services as well as the connection between value and relevance. Develops 2 models: one related to use of information and the other to use of library and information services. They are a theoretical framework for pragmatic study of value and a guide for the development of a Derived Taxonomy of Value in Using Library and Information Services
    Footnote
    1st part of a study to develop a taxonomy of value-in-use of library and information services based on users assessments and to propose methods and instruments for similar studies of library and information services in general
  2. Saracevic, T.: Information retrieval (1985) 0.03
    0.027051711 = product of:
      0.054103423 = sum of:
        0.054103423 = product of:
          0.108206846 = sum of:
            0.108206846 = weight(_text_:services in 3302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108206846 = score(doc=3302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.56788623 = fieldWeight in 3302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3302)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Imprint
    Philadelphia, Pa : National Federation of Abstracting and Indexing Services
  3. Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.B.: Studying the value of library and information services : Part II: Methodology and taxonomy (1997) 0.03
    0.025924055 = product of:
      0.05184811 = sum of:
        0.05184811 = product of:
          0.10369622 = sum of:
            0.10369622 = weight(_text_:services in 353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10369622 = score(doc=353,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.5442138 = fieldWeight in 353, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=353)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Details with specifics of the study: importance of taxonomy; the method used for gathering data on user assessments of value in 5 research libraries, involving 18 services and 528 interviews with users; development and presentation of the taxonomy; and statistics and tests of the taxonomy. A novel aspect is the division of value of information services into 3 general classes or facets; reasons for use of a service in the given instance; quality of interaction (use) related to that service; and worth, benefits, or implications of subsequent results from use
    Footnote
    2nd part of a study to develop a taxonomy of value-in-use of library and information services based on users assessments and to propose methods and instruments for similar studies of library and information services in general
  4. Brenner, E.H.; Saracevic, T.: Indexing and searching in perspective (1985) 0.02
    0.02318718 = product of:
      0.04637436 = sum of:
        0.04637436 = product of:
          0.09274872 = sum of:
            0.09274872 = weight(_text_:services in 8129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09274872 = score(doc=8129,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.4867596 = fieldWeight in 8129, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8129)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Imprint
    Philadelphia : National Federation of Abstracting and Information Services
  5. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.02
    0.017579244 = product of:
      0.03515849 = sum of:
        0.03515849 = product of:
          0.07031698 = sum of:
            0.07031698 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07031698 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
  6. Kantor, P.B.; Saracevic, T.: Quantitative study of the value of research libraries : a foundation for the evaluation of digital libraries (1999) 0.02
    0.016733907 = product of:
      0.033467814 = sum of:
        0.033467814 = product of:
          0.06693563 = sum of:
            0.06693563 = weight(_text_:services in 6711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06693563 = score(doc=6711,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.3512885 = fieldWeight in 6711, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6711)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In anticipation of the explosive growth of digital libraries, a complex study was undertaken seeking to evaluate 21 diverse services at 5 major academic research libraries. This work stands as a model for evaluation of digital libraries, through its focus on both the costs of operations and the impacts of the services that those operations provide. The data have been analyzed using both statistical methods and methods of Data Envelopment Analysis. The results of the study, which are presented in detail, serve to demonstrate that a cross-functional approach to library services is feasible. They also highlight a new measure of impact, which is a weighted logarithmic combination of the amount of time that users spend interacting with the service, combined with a Likert-scale indication of the value of that service in relation to the time expended. The measure derived, incorporating simple information obtainable from the user, together with information which is readily available in server/client logs, provides an excellent foundation for transferring these measurement principles to the Digital Library environment