Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Abstracting"
  1. Robin, J.; McKeown, K.: Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation (1996) 0.06
    0.059043027 = product of:
      0.118086055 = sum of:
        0.118086055 = sum of:
          0.06183248 = weight(_text_:services in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06183248 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
          0.05625358 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05625358 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051899735 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a system for summarizing quantitative data in natural language, focusing on the use of a corpus of basketball game summaries, drawn from online news services, to empirically shape the system design and to evaluate the approach. Initial corpus analysis revealed characteristics of textual summaries that challenge the capabilities of current language generation systems. A revision based corpus analysis was used to identify and encode the revision rules of the system. Presents a quantitative evaluation, using several test corpora, to measure the robustness of the new revision based model
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  2. Gomez, J.; Allen, K.; Matney, M.; Awopetu, T.; Shafer, S.: Experimenting with a machine generated annotations pipeline (2020) 0.02
    0.01545812 = product of:
      0.03091624 = sum of:
        0.03091624 = product of:
          0.06183248 = sum of:
            0.06183248 = weight(_text_:services in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06183248 = score(doc=657,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The UCLA Library reorganized its software developers into focused subteams with one, the Labs Team, dedicated to conducting experiments. In this article we describe our first attempt at conducting a software development experiment, in which we attempted to improve our digital library's search results with metadata from cloud-based image tagging services. We explore the findings and discuss the lessons learned from our first attempt at running an experiment.
  3. Goh, A.; Hui, S.C.: TES: a text extraction system (1996) 0.01
    0.014063395 = product of:
      0.02812679 = sum of:
        0.02812679 = product of:
          0.05625358 = sum of:
            0.05625358 = weight(_text_:22 in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05625358 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 2.1997 10:22:43
  4. Jones, P.A.; Bradbeer, P.V.G.: Discovery of optimal weights in a concept selection system (1996) 0.01
    0.014063395 = product of:
      0.02812679 = sum of:
        0.02812679 = product of:
          0.05625358 = sum of:
            0.05625358 = weight(_text_:22 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05625358 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  5. Haag, M.: Automatic text summarization : Evaluation des Copernic Summarizer und mögliche Einsatzfelder in der Fachinformation der DaimlerCrysler AG (2002) 0.01
    0.01159359 = product of:
      0.02318718 = sum of:
        0.02318718 = product of:
          0.04637436 = sum of:
            0.04637436 = weight(_text_:services in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04637436 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    An evaluation of the Copernic Summarizer, a software for automatically summarizing text in various data formats, is being presented. It shall be assessed if and how the Copernic Summarizer can reasonably be used in the DaimlerChrysler Information Division in order to enhance the quality of its information services. First, an introduction into Automatic Text Summarization is given and the Copernic Summarizer is being presented. Various methods for evaluating Automatic Text Summarization systems and software ergonomics are presented. Two evaluation forms are developed with which the employees of the Information Division shall evaluate the quality and relevance of the extracted keywords and summaries as well as the software's usability. The quality and relevance assessment is done by comparing the original text to the summaries. Finally, a recommendation is given concerning the use of the Copernic Summarizer.
  6. Wang, W.; Hwang, D.: Abstraction Assistant : an automatic text abstraction system (2010) 0.01
    0.01159359 = product of:
      0.02318718 = sum of:
        0.02318718 = product of:
          0.04637436 = sum of:
            0.04637436 = weight(_text_:services in 3981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04637436 = score(doc=3981,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 3981, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3981)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In the interest of standardization and quality assurance, it is desirable for authors and staff of access services to follow the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) guidelines in preparing abstracts. Using the statistical approach an extraction system (the Abstraction Assistant) was developed to generate informative abstracts to meet the ANSI guidelines for structural content elements. The system performance is evaluated by comparing the system-generated abstracts with the author's original abstracts and the manually enhanced system abstracts on three criteria: balance (satisfaction of the ANSI standards), fluency (text coherence), and understandability (clarity). The results suggest that it is possible to use the system output directly without manual modification, but there are issues that need to be addressed in further studies to make the system a better tool.
  7. Vanderwende, L.; Suzuki, H.; Brockett, J.M.; Nenkova, A.: Beyond SumBasic : task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion (2007) 0.01
    0.010547546 = product of:
      0.021095091 = sum of:
        0.021095091 = product of:
          0.042190183 = sum of:
            0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042190183 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, there has been increased interest in topic-focused multi-document summarization. In this task, automatic summaries are produced in response to a specific information request, or topic, stated by the user. The system we have designed to accomplish this task comprises four main components: a generic extractive summarization system, a topic-focusing component, sentence simplification, and lexical expansion of topic words. This paper details each of these components, together with experiments designed to quantify their individual contributions. We include an analysis of our results on two large datasets commonly used to evaluate task-focused summarization, the DUC2005 and DUC2006 datasets, using automatic metrics. Additionally, we include an analysis of our results on the DUC2006 task according to human evaluation metrics. In the human evaluation of system summaries compared to human summaries, i.e., the Pyramid method, our system ranked first out of 22 systems in terms of overall mean Pyramid score; and in the human evaluation of summary responsiveness to the topic, our system ranked third out of 35 systems.
  8. Wu, Y.-f.B.; Li, Q.; Bot, R.S.; Chen, X.: Finding nuggets in documents : a machine learning approach (2006) 0.01
    0.008789622 = product of:
      0.017579244 = sum of:
        0.017579244 = product of:
          0.03515849 = sum of:
            0.03515849 = weight(_text_:22 in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03515849 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:25:48
  9. Kim, H.H.; Kim, Y.H.: Generic speech summarization of transcribed lecture videos : using tags and their semantic relations (2016) 0.01
    0.008789622 = product of:
      0.017579244 = sum of:
        0.017579244 = product of:
          0.03515849 = sum of:
            0.03515849 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03515849 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:29:41
  10. Oh, H.; Nam, S.; Zhu, Y.: Structured abstract summarization of scientific articles : summarization using full-text section information (2023) 0.01
    0.008789622 = product of:
      0.017579244 = sum of:
        0.017579244 = product of:
          0.03515849 = sum of:
            0.03515849 = weight(_text_:22 in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03515849 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:57:12
  11. Jiang, Y.; Meng, R.; Huang, Y.; Lu, W.; Liu, J.: Generating keyphrases for readers : a controllable keyphrase generation framework (2023) 0.01
    0.008789622 = product of:
      0.017579244 = sum of:
        0.017579244 = product of:
          0.03515849 = sum of:
            0.03515849 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03515849 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051899735 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 14:55:20