Search (84 results, page 1 of 5)

0.08836691 = product of:
  0.17673382 = sum of:
    0.17673382 = sum of:
      0.0772906 = weight(_text_:services in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0772906 = score(doc=4872,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051899735 = queryNorm
          0.405633 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
      0.09944322 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09944322 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051899735 = queryNorm
          0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes the development of EEVL and outlines the services offered. The potential market for EEVL is discussed, and a case study of promotional activities is presented

Date

22. 6.2002 19:40:22

0.07184895 = product of:
  0.1436979 = sum of:
    0.1436979 = sum of:
      0.08744433 = weight(_text_:services in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08744433 = score(doc=628,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051899735 = queryNorm
          0.45892134 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
      0.05625358 = weight(_text_:22 in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05625358 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051899735 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Charts the history and development of the UK's Resource Discovery Network, which brings together under a common business, technical and service framework a range of subject gateways and other services for the academic and research community. Considers its future relationship to other services, and position within the information ecology

Date

22. 6.2002 19:36:13

0.062867835 = product of:
  0.12573567 = sum of:
    0.12573567 = sum of:
      0.07651379 = weight(_text_:services in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07651379 = score(doc=4866,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051899735 = queryNorm
          0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
      0.04922188 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04922188 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051899735 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Information subject gateways provide targeted discovery services for their users, giving access to Web resources selected according to quality and subject coverage criteria. Information gateways recognise that they must collaborate on a wide range of issues relating to content to ensure continued success. This report is informed by discussion of content activities at the 1999 Imesh Workshop. The author considers the implications for subject based gateways of co-operation regarding coverage policy, creation of metadata, and provision of searching and browsing across services. Other possibilities for co-operation include working more closely with information providers, and diclosure of information in joint metadata registries

Date

22. 6.2002 19:38:54

0.062867835 = product of:
  0.12573567 = sum of:
    0.12573567 = sum of:
      0.07651379 = weight(_text_:services in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07651379 = score(doc=631,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051899735 = queryNorm
          0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
      0.04922188 = weight(_text_:22 in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04922188 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051899735 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

'Quality-controlled subject gateways' are Internet services which apply a rich set of quality measures to support systematic resource discovery. Considerable manual effort is used to secure a selection of resources which meet quality criteria and to display a rich description of these resources with standards-based metadata. Regular checking and updating ensure good collection management. A main goal is to provide a high quality of subject access through indexing resources using controlled vocabularies and by offering a deep classification structure for advanced searching and browsing. This article provides an initial empirical overview of existing services of this kind, their approaches and technologies, based on proposed working definitions and typologies of subject gateways

Date

22. 6.2002 19:37:55

0.059043027 = product of:
  0.118086055 = sum of:
    0.118086055 = sum of:
      0.06183248 = weight(_text_:services in 4875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06183248 = score(doc=4875,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051899735 = queryNorm
          0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 4875, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4875)
      0.05625358 = weight(_text_:22 in 4875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05625358 = score(doc=4875,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051899735 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4875, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4875)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The key political and strategic issues which needs to be addressed for the future development of the Australian subject gateways are: continued quality of content creation, integration of access to print and electronic resources, archiving and persistent identification, sustainability of services and service integration. These issues will be more effectively tackled internationally, and the Australian subject gateways are keen to work with international collaborators to achieve a mutually beneficial outcome

Date

22. 6.2002 19:41:16

0.05388672 = product of:
  0.10777344 = sum of:
    0.10777344 = sum of:
      0.06558325 = weight(_text_:services in 2420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06558325 = score(doc=2420,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051899735 = queryNorm
          0.344191 = fieldWeight in 2420, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2420)
      0.042190183 = weight(_text_:22 in 2420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042190183 = score(doc=2420,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051899735 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2420, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2420)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The German information science community - with the support of the two main funding agencies in Germany - will develop a scientific portal, vascoda, for cross-searching distributed metadata collections. In platitudinous words, one of the services of vascoda is going to be a ldquoGooglerdquo-like search for the academic community, an easy to use, yet sophisticated search-engine to supply information on high-quality resources from different media and technical environments. Reaching this objective requires considerable standardisation activity amongst the main players to harmonise the already existing services (e.g. regarding metadata, protocols, etc.). The co-operation amongst the participants including both of the funding agencies is creating a unique team-work situation in Germany thus strengthening the information science community.

Source

Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003

0.035924476 = product of:
  0.07184895 = sum of:
    0.07184895 = sum of:
      0.043722164 = weight(_text_:services in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043722164 = score(doc=1447,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051899735 = queryNorm
          0.22946067 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.02812679 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02812679 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051899735 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.

Date

21. 4.2002 10:22:31

0.035924476 = product of:
  0.07184895 = sum of:
    0.07184895 = sum of:
      0.043722164 = weight(_text_:services in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043722164 = score(doc=3231,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051899735 = queryNorm
          0.22946067 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
      0.02812679 = weight(_text_:22 in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02812679 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051899735 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

ADEPT is a 5-year project whose goals are to develop, deploy, and evaluate inquiry learning capabilities for the Alexandria Digital Library, an extant digital library of primary sources in geography. We interviewed nine geography faculty members who teach undergraduate courses about their information seeking for research and teaching and their use of information resources in teaching. These data were supplemented by interviews with four faculty members from another ADEPT study about the nature of knowledge in geography. Among our key findings are that geography faculty are more likely to encounter useful teaching resources while seeking research resources than vice versa, although the influence goes in both directions. Their greatest information needs are for research data, maps, and images. They desire better searching by concept or theme, in addition to searching by location and place name. They make extensive use of their own research resources in their teaching. Among the implications for functionality and architecture of geographic digital libraries for educational use are that personal digital libraries are essential, because individual faculty members have personalized approaches to selecting, collecting, and organizing teaching resources. Digital library services for research and teaching should include the ability to import content from common office software and to store content in standard formats that can be exported to other applications. Digital library services can facilitate sharing among faculty but cannot overcome barriers such as intellectual property rights, access to proprietary research data, or the desire of individuals to maintain control over their own resources. Faculty use of primary and secondary resources needs to be better understood if we are to design successful digital libraries for research and teaching.

Date

3. 6.2005 20:40:22

0.033467814 = product of:
  0.06693563 = sum of:
    0.06693563 = product of:
      0.13387126 = sum of:
        0.13387126 = weight(_text_:services in 4466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13387126 = score(doc=4466,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051899735 = queryNorm
            0.702577 = fieldWeight in 4466, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4466)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reference services have taken a central place in library and information services. They are also regarded as personalised services since in most cases a personal discussion takes place between a user and a reference librarian. Based on this, the librarian points to the sources that are considered to be most appropriate to meet the specific information need(s) of the user. Since the Web and digital libraries are meant for providing direct access to information sources and services without the intervention of human intermediaries, the pertinent question that appears is whether we need reference services in digital libraries, and, if so, how best to offer such services. Current digital libraries focus more on access to, and retrieval of, digital information, and hardly lay emphasis on the service aspects. This may have been caused by the narrower definitions of digital libraries formulated by digital library researchers. This paper looks at the current state of research in personalised information services in digital libraries. It first analyses some representative definitions of digital libraries in order to establish the need for personalised services. It then provides a brief overview of the various online reference and information services currently available on the Web. The paper also briefly reviews digital library research that specifically focuses on the personalisation of digital libraries and the provision of digital reference and information services. Finally, the paper proposes some new areas of research that may be undertaken to improve the provision of personalised information services in digital libraries.

0.02461094 = product of:
  0.04922188 = sum of:
    0.04922188 = product of:
      0.09844376 = sum of:
        0.09844376 = weight(_text_:22 in 6483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09844376 = score(doc=6483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051899735 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2002 19:43:01

0.021861082 = product of:
  0.043722164 = sum of:
    0.043722164 = product of:
      0.08744433 = sum of:
        0.08744433 = weight(_text_:services in 3660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08744433 = score(doc=3660,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051899735 = queryNorm
            0.45892134 = fieldWeight in 3660, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3660)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Das Fachportal Pädagogik (www.fachportal-paedagogik.de) bildet den zentralen Einstiegspunkt zur pädagogischen Fachinformation. Ziel des Angebotes ist es, für alle in Erziehungswissenschaft und pädagogischer Praxis Tätigen eine integrierte Recherche- und Informationsplattform bereitzustellen, die die Literatursuche und Volltextversorgung mit einem Angebot umfangreicher Kontextmaterialien und nutzerbezogener Services verbindet.

0.021095091 = product of:
  0.042190183 = sum of:
    0.042190183 = product of:
      0.084380366 = sum of:
        0.084380366 = weight(_text_:22 in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084380366 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051899735 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2002 19:41:59

0.021095091 = product of:
  0.042190183 = sum of:
    0.042190183 = product of:
      0.084380366 = sum of:
        0.084380366 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084380366 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051899735 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2002 19:42:47

0.01932265 = product of:
  0.0386453 = sum of:
    0.0386453 = product of:
      0.0772906 = sum of:
        0.0772906 = weight(_text_:services in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0772906 = score(doc=3596,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051899735 = queryNorm
            0.405633 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Recent, rapid changes in technology have resulted in a proliferation of choices for music storage and access. Portable, web-enabled music devices are widespread, and listeners now enjoy a plethora of options regarding formats, devices, and access methods. Yet in this mobile music environment, listeners' access and management strategies for music collections are poorly understood, because behaviors surrounding the organization and retrieval of music collections have received little formal study. Our current research seeks to enrich our knowledge of people's music listening and collecting behavior through a series of systematic user studies. In this paper we present our findings from interviews involving 20 adult and 20 teen users of commercial cloud music services. Our results contribute to theoretical understandings of users' music information behavior in a time of upheaval in music usage patterns, and more generally, the purposes and meanings users ascribe to personal media collections in cloud-based systems. The findings suggest improvements to the future design of cloud-based music services, as well as to any information systems and services designed for personal media collections, benefiting both commercial entities and listeners.

0.019128447 = product of:
  0.038256895 = sum of:
    0.038256895 = product of:
      0.07651379 = sum of:
        0.07651379 = weight(_text_:services in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07651379 = score(doc=1153,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051899735 = queryNorm
            0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) was established in the late 1990s as a response to several perceived problems of traditional map libraries, notably access and organization. By 1999 it had evolved into an operational digital library, offering a well-defined set of services to a broad user community, based on an extensive collection of georeferenced information objects. The vision of ADL continues to evolve, as technology makes new services possible, as its users become more sophisticated and demanding, and as the broader field of geographic information science (GIScience) identifies new avenues for research and application.

0.017579244 = product of:
  0.03515849 = sum of:
    0.03515849 = product of:
      0.07031698 = sum of:
        0.07031698 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07031698 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18174402 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051899735 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2002 19:41:31

0.0174172 = product of:
  0.0348344 = sum of:
    0.0348344 = product of:
      0.0696688 = sum of:
        0.0696688 = weight(_text_:services in 1219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0696688 = score(doc=1219,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051899735 = queryNorm
            0.36563262 = fieldWeight in 1219, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1219)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

For those building digital library services, the organisational barriers are sometimes far more intractable than technological issues. This was firmly flagged in one of the first workshops focusing specifically on the digital library research agenda: Digital libraries are not simply technological constructs; they exist within a rich legal, social, and economic context, and will succeed only to the extent that they meet these broader needs. The innovatory drive within the development of digital library services thrives on the tension between meeting both technical and social imperatives. The Renardus project partners have previously taken parts in projects establishing the technical basis for subject gateways (e.g., ROADS, DESIRE], EELS) and are aware that technical barriers to interoperability are outweighed by challenges relating to the organisational and business models used. Within the Renardus project there has been a determination to address these organisational and business issues from the beginning. Renardus intends initially to create a pilot service, targeting the European scholar with a single point of access to quality selected Web resources. Looking ahead beyond current project funding, it aims to create the organisational and technological infrastructure for a sustainable service. This means the project is concerned with the range of processes required to establish a viable service, and is explicitly addressing business issues as well as providing a technical infrastructure. The overall aim of Renardus is to establish a collaborative framework for European subject gateways that will benefit both users in terms of enhanced services, and the gateways themselves in terms of shared solutions. In order to achieve this aim, Renardus will provide firstly a pilot service for the European academic and research communities brokering access to those European-based information gateways that currently participate in the project; in other words, brokering to gateways that are already in existence. Secondly the project will explore ways to establish the organisational basis for co-operative efforts such as metadata sharing, joint technical solutions and agreement on standardisation. It is intended that this exploration will feed back valuable experience to the individual participating gateways to suggest ways their services can be enhanced.
Funding from the UK Electronic Libraries (eLib) programme and the European Community's Fourth Framework programme assisted the initial emergence of information gateways (e.g., SOSIG, EEVL, OMNI in the UK, and EELS in Sweden). Other gateways have been developed by initiatives co-ordinated by national libraries (such as DutchESS in the Netherlands, and AVEL and EdNA in Australia) and by universities and research funding bodies (e.g., GEM in the US, the Finnish Virtual Library, and the German SSG-FI services). An account of the emergence of subject gateways since the mid-1990s by Dempsey gives an historical perspective -- informed by UK experience in particular -- and also considers the future development of subject gateways in relation to other services. When considering the development and future of gateways, it would be helpful to have a clear definition of the service offered by a so-called 'subject gateway'. Precise definitions of 'information gateways', 'subject gateways' and 'quality controlled subject gateways' have been debated elsewhere. Koch has reviewed definitions and suggested typologies that are useful, not least in showing the differences that exist between broadly similar services. Working definitions that we will use in this article are that a subject gateway provides a search service to high quality Web resources selected from a particular subject area, whereas information gateways have a wider criteria for selection of resources, e.g., a national approach. Inevitably in a rapidly changing international environment different people perceive different emphases in attempts to label services, the significant issue is that users, developers and designers can recognise and benefit from commonalties in approach.
The Renardus project has brought together gateways that are 'large-scale national initiatives'. Within the European context this immediately introduces a diversity of organisations, as responsibility for national gateway initiatives is located differently, for example, in national libraries, national agencies with responsibility for educational technology infrastructure, and within universities or consortia of universities. Within the project, gateways are in some cases represented directly by their own personnel, in some cases by other departments or research centres, but not always by the people responsible for providing the gateway service. For example, the UK Resource Discovery Network (RDN) is represented in the project by UKOLN (formerly part of the Resource Discovery Network Centre) and the Institute of Learning and Research Technology (ILRT), University of Bristol -- an RDN 'hub' service provider -- who are primarily responsible for dissemination. Since the start of the project there have been changes within the organisational structures providing gateways and within the service ambitions of gateways themselves. Such lack of stability is inherent within the Internet service environment, and this presents challenges to Renardus activity that has to be planned for a three-year period. For example, within the gateway's funding environment there is now an exploration of 'subject portals' offering more extended services than gateways. There is also potential commercial interest for including gateways as a value-added component to existing commercial services, and new offerings from possible competitors such as Google's Web Directory and country based services. This short update on the Renardus project intends to inform the reader of progress within the project and to give some wider context to its main themes by locating the project within the broader arena of digital library activity. There are twelve partners in the project from Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden, as well as the UK. In particular we will focus on the specific activity in which UKOLN is involved: the architectural design, the specification of functional requirements, reaching consensus on a collaborative business model, etc. We will also consider issues of metadata management where all partners have interests. We will highlight implementation issues that connect to areas of debate elsewhere. In particular we see connections with activity related to establishing architectural models for digital library services, connections to the services that may emerge from metadata sharing using the Open Archives Initiative metadata sharing protocol, and links with work elsewhere on navigation of digital information spaces by means of controlled vocabularies.

0.017282704 = product of:
  0.034565408 = sum of:
    0.034565408 = product of:
      0.069130816 = sum of:
        0.069130816 = weight(_text_:services in 2812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069130816 = score(doc=2812,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051899735 = queryNorm
            0.36280918 = fieldWeight in 2812, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2812)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

From a quantitative and qualitative point of view the ETH Library is offering its users an extensive choice of information services. In this respect all researchers, all scientists and also all students have access to nearly all relevant information. This is one side of the coin. On the other hand, this broad, but also heterogeneous bundle of information sources has disadvantages, which should not be underestimated: The more information services and information channels you have, the more complex is it to find what you want to get for your scientific work. A portal-like integration of all the different information resources is still missing. The vision, the main goal of the project "Knowledge Portal" is, to develop a central access system in terms of a "single-point-of-access" for all electronic information services. This means, that all these sources - from the library's catalogue and the fulltext inhouse applications to external, licensed sources - should be accessible via one central Web service. Although the primary target group for this vision is the science community of the ETH Zurich, the interested public should also be taken into account, for the library has also a nation-wide responsibility.The general idea to launch a complex project like that comes from a survey the library did one and a half years ago. We asked a defined sample of scientists what they expected to get from their library and one constant answer was, that they wanted to have one point of access to all the electronic library services and besides this, the search processes should be as simple as possible. We accepted this demand as an order to develop a "single-point-of-access" to all electronic services the library provides. The presentation gives an overview about the general idea of the project and describes the current status.

0.016395813 = product of:
  0.032791626 = sum of:
    0.032791626 = product of:
      0.06558325 = sum of:
        0.06558325 = weight(_text_:services in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06558325 = score(doc=3383,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051899735 = queryNorm
            0.344191 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The initial research on semantic digital libraries resulted in the design and implementation of JeromeDL; current research on online social networking and information discovery delivered new sets of features that were implemented in JeromeDL. Eventually, this digital library has been redesigned to follow the architecture of a social semantic digital library. JeromeDL describes each resource using three types of metadata: structure, bibliographic and community. It delivers services leveraging each of these information types. Annotations based on the structure and legacy metadata, and bibliographic ontology are rendered to the users in one, mixed, representation of library resources. Community annotations are managed by separate services, such as social semantic collaborative filtering or blogging component

0.01545812 = product of:
  0.03091624 = sum of:
    0.03091624 = product of:
      0.06183248 = sum of:
        0.06183248 = weight(_text_:services in 4571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06183248 = score(doc=4571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19054317 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051899735 = queryNorm
            0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 4571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4571)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Die Virtuelle Fachbibliothek GEO-LEO bietet Geo- und Montanwissenschaftlern eine integrierte Suche über Bibliothekskataloge, Literatur-Datenbanken und Volltextserver. Die Sondersammelgebietsbibliotheken in Freiberg und Göttingen machen damit ihre - im Auftrag der DFG erworbenen - Ressourcen für alle Wissenschaftler im deutschsprachigen Raum sichtbar und zugänglich. Viele weitere Services, wie die Publikationsplattform, erhöhen den Nutzwert für die Wissenschaftler und tragen zur Attraktivität des Portals bei. Die im Projekt erworbenen Erfahrungen und die dort entwickelte Software stehen anderen Suchportalen zur Verfügung.