Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

0.03629786 = product of:
  0.14519145 = sum of:
    0.14519145 = weight(_text_:services in 2310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14519145 = score(doc=2310,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.84309244 = fieldWeight in 2310, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2310)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

COMPASS

Libraries / Reference services

Subject

Libraries / Reference services

0.016457174 = product of:
  0.065828696 = sum of:
    0.065828696 = product of:
      0.13165739 = sum of:
        0.13165739 = weight(_text_:management in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13165739 = score(doc=2270,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.83271974 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Examines the nature of records management theory, including information retrieval, record life cycle, and information policy. Concludes that records management theory should not be seen in isolation and need not be unique to records management. Outlines functional, professional, and educational contexts of records management theory, with examples

0.012348781 = product of:
  0.049395125 = sum of:
    0.049395125 = weight(_text_:services in 4958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049395125 = score(doc=4958,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.28682584 = fieldWeight in 4958, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4958)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

During the 20th century there was a strong desire to develop an information science from librarianship, bibliography, and documentation and in 1968 the American Documentation Institute changed its name to the American Society for Information Science. By the beginning of the 21st century, however, departments of (library and) information science had turned instead towards the social sciences. These programs address a variety of important topics, but they have been less successful in providing a coherent explanation of the nature and scope of the field. Progress can be made towards a coherent, unified view of the roles of archives, libraries, museums, online information services, and related organizations if they are treated as information-providing services. However, such an approach seems significantly incomplete on ordinary understandings of the providing of information. Instead of asking what information science is or what we might wish it to become, we ask instead what kind of field it can be given our assumptions about it. We approach the question by examining some keywords: science, information, knowledge, and interdisciplinary. We conclude that if information science is concerned with what people know, then it is a form of cultural engagement, and at most, a science of the artificial.

0.010478289 = product of:
  0.041913155 = sum of:
    0.041913155 = weight(_text_:services in 2258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041913155 = score(doc=2258,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2258, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2258)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

This paper examines three themes in the design of search support services: linking different genres of reference resources (e.g. bibliographies, biographical dictionaries, catalogs, encyclopedias, place name gazetteers); the division of vocabularies by facet (e.g. What, Where, When, and Who); and mapping between both similar and dissimilar vocabularies. Different vocabularies within a facet can be used in conjunction, e.g. a place name combined with spatial coordinates for Where. In practice, vocabularies of different facets are used in combination in the representation or description of complex topics. Rich opportunities arise from mapping across vocabularies of dissimilar reference genres to recreate the amenities of a reference library. In a network environment, in which vocabulary control cannot be imposed, semantic correspondence across diverse vocabularies is a challenge and an opportunity.

0.009532874 = product of:
  0.038131498 = sum of:
    0.038131498 = product of:
      0.076262996 = sum of:
        0.076262996 = weight(_text_:22 in 2555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076262996 = score(doc=2555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2555)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

15. 1.2016 19:22:28

0.005887897 = product of:
  0.023551589 = sum of:
    0.023551589 = product of:
      0.047103178 = sum of:
        0.047103178 = weight(_text_:management in 3973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047103178 = score(doc=3973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 3973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.1, S.63-76

0.00515191 = product of:
  0.02060764 = sum of:
    0.02060764 = product of:
      0.04121528 = sum of:
        0.04121528 = weight(_text_:management in 4344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04121528 = score(doc=4344,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 4344, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4344)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Founded in 1937 as the American Documentation Institution, the ASIS is 62 years old. Information science includes 2 fundamental different traditions: a 'document' traditiion concerned with signifying objects and their use; and a 'computational' tradition of applying algorithmic, logical, mathematical, and mechanical techniques to information management. Both traditions have been deeply influenced by technological modernism: Technology, standards, systems, and efficiency enable progress. Both traditions are needed. Information Science is rooted in part in humanities and qualitative social sciences. The landscape of Information Science is complex. An ecumenical view is needed

0.0027804219 = product of:
  0.0111216875 = sum of:
    0.0111216875 = product of:
      0.022243375 = sum of:
        0.022243375 = weight(_text_:22 in 2665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022243375 = score(doc=2665,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2665, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2665)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas