Search (104 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Shaw, D.: Automating access to bibliographic information (1996) 0.05 
    0.051291898 = product of:
  0.102583796 = sum of:
    0.079032205 = weight(_text_:services in 4351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.079032205 = score(doc=4351,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.45892134 = fieldWeight in 4351, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4351)
    0.023551589 = product of:
      0.047103178 = sum of:
        0.047103178 = weight(_text_:management in 4351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047103178 = score(doc=4351,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 4351, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4351)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Contrasts early in house automation efforts, such as the development of the MARC format and bibliographic utilities, with the creation of databases by abstracting and indexing services. Concludes that today's attempts to provide unified bibliographic access to the library's entire collection must find ways to integrate this plethora of independently developed access tools
    Source
    Technical services management: 1965-1990. A quarter of a century of change and a look into the future. Festschrift for Kathryn Luther Henderson. Ed.: L.C. Smith et al
  2. Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004) 0.04 
    0.040652603 = product of:
  0.081305206 = sum of:
    0.05588421 = weight(_text_:services in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05588421 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
    0.025421001 = product of:
      0.050842002 = sum of:
        0.050842002 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050842002 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 48(2004) no.3, S.165-178
  3. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.04 
    0.040652603 = product of:
  0.081305206 = sum of:
    0.05588421 = weight(_text_:services in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05588421 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
    0.025421001 = product of:
      0.050842002 = sum of:
        0.050842002 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050842002 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 52(2008) no.3, S.148-163
  4. Riva, P.: Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2004) 0.03 
    0.030489452 = product of:
  0.060978904 = sum of:
    0.041913155 = weight(_text_:services in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041913155 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
    0.019065749 = product of:
      0.038131498 = sum of:
        0.038131498 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038131498 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 48(2004) no.2, S.130-143
  5. Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011) 0.03 
    0.030489452 = product of:
  0.060978904 = sum of:
    0.041913155 = weight(_text_:services in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041913155 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
    0.019065749 = product of:
      0.038131498 = sum of:
        0.038131498 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038131498 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 55(2011) no.1, S.17-32
  6. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.03 
    0.029281482 = product of:
  0.11712593 = sum of:
    0.11712593 = sum of:
      0.07899443 = weight(_text_:management in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07899443 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046906993 = queryNorm
          0.49963182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
      0.038131498 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038131498 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046906993 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
  7. UK MARC manual (1980-) 0.03 
    0.027942104 = product of:
  0.11176842 = sum of:
    0.11176842 = weight(_text_:services in 7877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11176842 = score(doc=7877,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.6490128 = fieldWeight in 7877, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7877)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Editor
    British Library Bibliographic Services Division
  8. Concise UNIMARC Classification Format : Draft 5 (20000125) (2000) 0.03 
    0.027942104 = product of:
  0.11176842 = sum of:
    0.11176842 = weight(_text_:services in 4421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11176842 = score(doc=4421,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.6490128 = fieldWeight in 4421, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4421)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    http://www.bl.uk/services/bsds/marc/unimarc.html
  9. Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003) 0.03 
    0.025407877 = product of:
  0.050815754 = sum of:
    0.03492763 = weight(_text_:services in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03492763 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
    0.015888125 = product of:
      0.03177625 = sum of:
        0.03177625 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03177625 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 47(2003) no.2, S.71-76
  10. MacCallum, S.H.: Harmonization of USMARC, CANMARC, and UKMARC (2000) 0.03 
    0.025407877 = product of:
  0.050815754 = sum of:
    0.03492763 = weight(_text_:services in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03492763 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
    0.015888125 = product of:
      0.03177625 = sum of:
        0.03177625 = weight(_text_:22 in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03177625 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 44(2000) no.3, S.135-140
  11. Hagler, R.: ¬The bibliographic record and information technology (1997) 0.02 
    0.024697563 = product of:
  0.09879025 = sum of:
    0.09879025 = weight(_text_:services in 6175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09879025 = score(doc=6175,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.5736517 = fieldWeight in 6175, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6175)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Rez.: Library resources and technical services 42(1998) no.1, S.71-73 (D. CannCasciato); Reference and user services quarterly 37(1997) no.2, S.235-236 (E. McGrath)
  12. Leazer, G.H.: ¬An examination of data elements for bibliographic description : toward a conceptual schema for the USMARC formats (1992) 0.02 
    0.024449343 = product of:
  0.09779737 = sum of:
    0.09779737 = weight(_text_:services in 4822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09779737 = score(doc=4822,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.56788623 = fieldWeight in 4822, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4822)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 36(1992), S.189-208
  13. Snow, M.: Visual depictions and the use of MARC : a view from the trenches of slide librarianship (1989) 0.02 
    0.021425508 = product of:
  0.08570203 = sum of:
    0.08570203 = sum of:
      0.04121528 = weight(_text_:management in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04121528 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046906993 = queryNorm
          0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
      0.04448675 = weight(_text_:22 in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04448675 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046906993 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. The only way to get bibliographic records on to campus on-line library catalogues, and slide records on the national bibliographic utilities, is through the use of MARC. Discusses the importance of having individual slide and photograph records on the national bibliographic utilities, and considers the obstacles which currently make this difficult. Discusses mapping to MARC from data base management systems.
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:51:36
  14. Format integration and its effect on cataloging, training, and systems (1993) 0.02 
    0.020956578 = product of:
  0.08382631 = sum of:
    0.08382631 = weight(_text_:services in 67) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08382631 = score(doc=67,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.4867596 = fieldWeight in 67, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=67)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Series
    ALCTS papers on library technical services and collections; no.4
  15. Salgáné, M.M.: Our electronic era and bibliographic informations computer-related bibliographic data formats, metadata formats and BDML (2005) 0.02 
    0.019858949 = product of:
  0.039717898 = sum of:
    0.027942104 = weight(_text_:services in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027942104 = score(doc=3005,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.1622532 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
    0.011775794 = product of:
      0.023551589 = sum of:
        0.023551589 = weight(_text_:management in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023551589 = score(doc=3005,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Using new communication technologies libraries must face continuously new questions, possibilities and expectations. This study discusses library-related aspects of our electronic era and how computer-related data formats affect bibliographic dataprocessing to give a summary of the most important results. First bibliographic formats for the exchange of bibliographic and related information in the machine-readable form between different types of computer systems were created more than 30 years ago. The evolution of information technologies leads to the improvement of computer systems. In addition to the development of computers and media types Internet has a great influence on data structure as well. Since the introduction of MARC bibliographic format, technology of data exchange between computers and between different computer systems has reached a very sophisticated stage and has contributed to the creation of new standards in this field. Today libraries work with this new infrastructure that induces many challenges. One of the most significant challenges is moving from a relatively homogenous bibliographic environment to a diverse one. Despite these challenges such changes are achievable and necessary to exploit possibilities of new metadata and technologies like the Internet and XML (Extensible Markup Language). XML is an open standard, a universal language for data on the Web. XML is nearly six-years-old standard designed for the description and computer-based management of (semi)-structured data and structured texts. XML gives developers the power to deliver structured data from a wide variety of applications and it is also an ideal format from server-to-server transfer of structured data. XML also isn't limited for Internet use and is an especially valuable tool in the field of library. In fact, XML's main strength - organizing information - makes it perfect for exchanging data between different systems. Tools that work with the XML can be used to process XML records without incurring additional costs associated with one's own software development. In addition, XML is also a suitable format for library web services. The Department of Computer-related Graphic Design and Library and Information Sciences of Debrecen University launched the BDML (Bibliographic Description Markup Language) development project in order to standardize bibliogrphic description with the help of XML.
  16. Kokabi, M.: ¬The internationalization of MARC : Pt.2: some MARC formats based on USMARC (1996) 0.02 
    0.017463814 = product of:
  0.06985526 = sum of:
    0.06985526 = weight(_text_:services in 6723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06985526 = score(doc=6723,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.405633 = fieldWeight in 6723, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6723)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 12(1996) no.2, S.21-26
  17. Kokabi, M.: ¬The internationalization of MARC : Pt.3: some MARC formats based on UKMARC (1996) 0.02 
    0.017463814 = product of:
  0.06985526 = sum of:
    0.06985526 = weight(_text_:services in 6725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06985526 = score(doc=6725,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.405633 = fieldWeight in 6725, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6725)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 12(1996) no.3, S.8-11
  18. Bourne, R.: Common MARC, or 'vivent les differences'? (1996) 0.02 
    0.017463814 = product of:
  0.06985526 = sum of:
    0.06985526 = weight(_text_:services in 6727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06985526 = score(doc=6727,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.405633 = fieldWeight in 6727, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6727)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 12(1996) no.2, S.35-39
  19. Oehlschläger, S.: Aus der 49. Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme am 23. und 24. November 2005 in Köln (2006) 0.01 
    0.014349207 = product of:
  0.028698415 = sum of:
    0.017463814 = weight(_text_:services in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017463814 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.10140825 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
    0.011234601 = product of:
      0.022469202 = sum of:
        0.022469202 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022469202 = score(doc=632,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    MARC21 als Austauschformat Die Expertengruppe Datenformate hat in ihrer 5. Sitzung am 22. November 2005 die Frage der Hierarchienabbildung bei der Übernahme von MARC 21 weiter diskutiert und einer Lösung zugeführt. Für einen geringen Prozentsatz der Daten werden trotz Vorarbeiten der Expertengruppe Probleme bei der Überführung von MARC-21-Daten in MAB2-Strukturen gesehen. Es wurde darauf hingewiesen, dass es im Zusammenhang mit dem Umstieg auf MARC 21 ebenso wie bei der kooperativen Katalogisierung notwendig ist, gemeinsame Regeln festzulegen und Absprachen zwischen den Verbünden zu treffen. Eine unterschiedliche Handhabung des Formats sollte sich von vornherein verbieten. Projekt Kooperative Neukatalogisierung Die Projektgruppe hat zweimal getagt, zuletzt am 3. November 2005. Es liegen erste Ergebnisse vor, und spätestens Anfang Januar 2006 soll das Verfahren erprobt werden. Alle Verbünde signalisieren ihr Interesse an dem geplanten Verfahren, da die Eigenkatalogisierungsrate nach wie vor zu hoch ist. Für die Akzeptanz des Dienstes, der auch zum Synchronisieren der vorhandenen Aufnahmen und zum Austausch von Sacherschließungsdaten genutzt werden soll, ist die Aktualität des geplanten Neukatalogisierungspools essentiell. Ein weiteres Ziel ist auch die Optimierung der Arbeitsabläufe zwischen Verbundzentrale und Bibliotheken. Catalogue Enrichment Zur Anreicherung der Katalogdaten gibt es verschiedene Aktivitäten innerhalb der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme, die koordiniert werden müssen, damit eine Mehrfachdigitalisierung von Inhaltsverzeichnissen, Abstracts und anderen Objekten vermieden werden kann. Die Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme beschließt, eine kleine Arbeitsgruppe einzusetzen, die bis spätestens Anfang Februar 2006 einen Vorschlag mit unterschiedlichen Szenarien für unterschiedliche Umgebungen vorlegen soll. Aufgabe der AG Datenanreicherung ist die Konzeption eines schnellen Dienstes für die Digitalisierung von Abstracts und Inhaltsverzeichnissen sofern sie lizenzrechtlich frei verfügbar sind, die allen Verbünden zur Verfügung gestellt werden sollen. Dazu gehören eine Übersicht über die vorhandenen Daten und eine ausgearbeitete Verfahrensvorschrift für das künftige Vorgehen.
    Gesamtnachweis aller Bibliotheksbestände in deutschsprachigen Raum Das HBZ hat seinen am 15. November frei geschalteten Dreiländer-Katalog (Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz) vorgestellt, dessen Ziel der Gesamtnachweis aller Bibliotheksbestände in deutschsprachigen Raum ist. Der Katalog entstand in Kooperation des HBZ mit dem Bibliotheksverbund Bayern (BVB) und dem Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbund (OBV); die Integration weiterer Bibliotheksbestände aus anderen Regionen ist in Arbeit. Realisiert wurde das Projekt mittels der Suchmaschinentechnologie des HBZ, die Antwortzeiten in Bruchteilen von Sekunden, Ranking und Kategorisierung der Treffermengen ermöglicht. Die Mitglieder der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme haben beschlossen, sich die für die Literaturversorgung relevanten Verbunddaten (Titeldaten mit Nachweisen) für den Aufbau verbundbezogener, nicht kommerzieller Dienste auf Gegenseitigkeit kostenfrei zur Verfügung zu stellen. Normdateien Online-Schnittstelle Ziel der Online-Kommunikation mit Normdateien ist es, die Arbeit mit den zentralen Normdateien dadurch zu vereinfachen, dass Änderungen an Normdaten in den zentral bei Der Deutschen Bibliothek gehaltenen Dateien mit dem eigenen Client erfolgen können. Ferner sollen alle Änderungen an den Normdateien zeitnah in die Normdaten-Spiegel der Verbundsysteme transportiert werden (Replikation). Das Verfahren soll sich auf alle bei Der Deutschen Bibliothek geführten Normdaten erstrecken. Als standardisiertes Kommunikationsprotokoll soll Z39.50 SR Extended Services Update genutzt werden. Für die Replikation ist OAI vorgesehen, als Austauschformat zunächst MAB2 bzw. MABXML. Die existierenden Implementierungen erfüllen an mehreren wichtigen Stellen nicht die Anforderungen. Eine Konversion in und aus einem neutralen Transportformat, wie für die Online-Kommunikation mit Normdateien benötigt, ist an der gegenwärtigen Pica-Schnittstelle nicht vorgesehen und lässt sich nur realisieren, wenn wesentliche Veränderungen vorgenommen werden. OCLC PICA plant, diese Veränderungen im 1. Quartal 2006 vorzunehmen. Nach der aktuellen Projektplanung soll die Online-Kommunikation zu Beginn des Jahres 2007 starten.
    DDC/Melvil-Nutzungs- und Lizenzsituation Die Deutsche Bibliothek hat den Dienst Melvil vorgestellt, der auf der im Rahmen des Projektes DDC Deutsch erstellten deutschen Übersetzung der 22. Ausgabe der DDC basiert, und die Such- und Sprachgewohnheiten deutschsprachiger Benutzerinnen und Benutzer berücksichtigt. Mit Melvil wurde ein Online-Dienst entwickelt, der Bibliotheken und Informationseinrichtungen außer einem an WebDewey orientierten Klassifikationstool MelvilClass auch ein Retrievaltool MelvilSearch für die verbale Suche nach DDC-erschlossenen Dokumenten und das Browsing in der DDC-Hierarchie zur Verfügung stellt. Über die Schnittstelle MelvilSoap können Bibliotheken und Verbundzentralen, die den Dienst Melvil lizenziert haben, auch DDC-Daten zur weiteren Nutzung herunterladen. Gegenwärtig vergibt Die Deutsche Bibliothek Testlizenzen, ab 2006 kann der Dienst nach einem gestaffelten Modell kostenpflichtig genutzt werden Ergebnisse der Adhoc-Arbeitsgruppe ISBD(CR) Der Standardisierungsausschuss hatte in seiner 9. Sitzung am 15. Dezember 2004 die Anpassung der Splitregeln bei fortlaufenden Sammelwerken an die ISBD(CR) mit dem Ziel der Übernahme beschlossen. Im Januar 2005 richtete die Arbeitsstelle für Standardisierung eine Ad-hoc-AG ISBD(CR) ein, in der Vertreter der ZDB, der Expertengruppe Formalerschließung und der AGDBT (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Datenbankteilnehmer der ZDB) unter der Federführung der Arbeitsstelle für Standardisierung zusammenarbeiteten. Auftragsgemäß konnte dem Standardisierungsausschuss am 2. August 2005 ein entscheidungsreifer Entwurf zur Anwendung der ISBD(CR)-Splitregeln für fortlaufende Sammelwerke vorgelegt werden. Die Unterlage, die dem Standardisierungsausschuss zu seiner 11. Sitzung am 1. Dezember 2005 zugeleitet wurde, wurde den Mitgliedern der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme im Vorfeld der Sitzung zur Kenntnis gegeben. Die zeitnahe Anwendung der ISBD(CR)-Splitregeln würde nicht nur in einem kleinen abgeschlossenen Bereich eine Angleichung an internationale Gepflogenheiten bedeuten, sondern sie hätte auch einige positive Auswirkungen auf die von Zeitschriftentiteln abhängigen ergänzenden Dienstleistungen. So würde z.B. die Verlinkung mit SFX-Diensten erheblich erleichtert."
  20. USMARC format for community information : including guidelines for content designation (1993) 0.01 
    0.013971052 = product of:
  0.05588421 = sum of:
    0.05588421 = weight(_text_:services in 8044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05588421 = score(doc=8044,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 8044, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8044)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The latest format. Features specifications for inputting and communicating community information - i.e., information about non-bibliographic resources (programs, services, organizations, individuals, one-time and ongoing events) that fulfill a community's information needs. Defines the codes and conventions (tags, indicators, subfield codes and codes values) that identify the data elements in the records. Includes full record examples showing how records are coded

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 75
  • d 16
  • f 4
  • nl 1
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 86
  • m 6
  • s 6
  • el 5
  • b 2
  • ? 1
  • l 1
  • n 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes