Search (162 results, page 2 of 9)

0.017288294 = product of:
  0.069153175 = sum of:
    0.069153175 = weight(_text_:services in 5915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069153175 = score(doc=5915,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 5915, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5915)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Academic libraries today are faced with the prospect of numerous alternatives to traditional printed indexes to the primary literature. Not only are many indexes made available by publishers on CD-ROM products, but most of these products can be acquired on computer tape for local mounting. This happy situation is further augmented by the availability of these products through mediated search services such as Dialog and end user services such as OCLC FirstSearch. Choosing the best alternative becomes a matter of estimating demand and comparing costs for each type of access. These estimates are complicated by lack of information on how often patrons will use a given alternative and by lack of qualitative data. Results of comparisons made at Trinity and Clemson Universities provide some revealing benchmarks that can help to place a quantitative framework around the decision process

0.017288294 = product of:
  0.069153175 = sum of:
    0.069153175 = weight(_text_:services in 8638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069153175 = score(doc=8638,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 8638, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8638)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reviews the situation of newspapers in the US in the context of the current transition to home interactive information services. There is no doubt that the coming braodband interactive channels to the home will offer full electronic counterparts of a newspaper - services that embody the printed word as well as graphics, art, sound, and photographs, and that are personalized, intreractive, multimedia, with a full range of content, adevertiser and reader features. Examines whether the familiar daily printed newspaper roles can survive in the emerging environment; and what will be the roles, if any, of today's newspaper companies in the production or delivery of a fully electronic newspaper

0.015888125 = product of:
  0.0635525 = sum of:
    0.0635525 = product of:
      0.127105 = sum of:
        0.127105 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.127105 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22

0.015303934 = product of:
  0.061215736 = sum of:
    0.061215736 = sum of:
      0.029439485 = weight(_text_:management in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029439485 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046906993 = queryNorm
          0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
      0.03177625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03177625 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046906993 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Source

Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.6, S.614-635

0.015303934 = product of:
  0.061215736 = sum of:
    0.061215736 = sum of:
      0.029439485 = weight(_text_:management in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029439485 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046906993 = queryNorm
          0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
      0.03177625 = weight(_text_:22 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03177625 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046906993 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Source

Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.6, S.674-687

0.014818538 = product of:
  0.059274152 = sum of:
    0.059274152 = weight(_text_:services in 805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059274152 = score(doc=805,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.344191 = fieldWeight in 805, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=805)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Mailtext: "Im Rahmen der Schwerpunktinitiative "Digitale Information" der Allianz der Wissenschaftsorganisationen wurden jetzt "Empfehlungen für transformative Zeitschriftenverträge mit Publikationsdienstleistern" veröffentlicht. Die formulierten Kriterien dienen als gemeinsamer und handlungsleitender Rahmen der Akteur:innen aus allen Wissenschaftsorganisationen, d.h. Hochschulen ebenso wie außeruniversitäre Forschungseinrichtungen, für Verhandlungen mit Publikationsdienstleistern. Dabei bildet die Forderung nach größtmöglicher Kostentransparenz und Kosteneffizienz im Gesamtsystem den Kern des Handelns der Wissenschaftsorganisationen im Kontext ihrer Open-Access-Strategie für die Jahre 2021-2025. Diese Kriterien gliedern sich in die Aspekte Transformation von Zeitschriften, Preisgestaltung, Transparenz, Workflow, Preprints, Qualitätssicherung, Metadaten und Schnittstellen, Statistiken, Tracking und Waiver. Deutsche Version: https://doi.org/10.48440/allianzoa.045 Englische Version: https://doi.org/10.48440/allianzoa.046 Siehe auch: Empfehlungen für transformative Zeitschriftenverträge mit Publikationsdienstleistern veröffentlicht https://www.allianzinitiative.de/2022/11/24/empfehlungen-fuer-transformative-zeitschriftenvertraege-mit-publikationsdienstleistern-veroeffentlicht/ Recommendations for Transformative Journal Agreements with Providers of Publishing Services published https://www.allianzinitiative.de/2022/11/24/recommendations-for-transformative-journal-agreements-with-providers-of-publishing-services-published/?lang=en"

0.013971052 = product of:
  0.05588421 = sum of:
    0.05588421 = weight(_text_:services in 5944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05588421 = score(doc=5944,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 5944, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5944)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Provides information for people who want (or need) to know what the SGML is and want to make use of it. Gives a fairly detailed description of what SGML is, why it exists, and provides a list of SGML players who are actively involved in either developing tools, providing services, offering consultancy or enganging in research for SGML. Describes the SGML work undertaken at Hatfield Polytechnic as part of Project Quartet funded by the British Library Research and Development Dept. The results and findings conclude that SGML forms a strong backbone for present and future document handling systems

0.013971052 = product of:
  0.05588421 = sum of:
    0.05588421 = weight(_text_:services in 5947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05588421 = score(doc=5947,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 5947, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5947)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Reference services review. 18(1990) no.3, S.37-40

0.013971052 = product of:
  0.05588421 = sum of:
    0.05588421 = weight(_text_:services in 6613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05588421 = score(doc=6613,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 6613, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6613)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Information services and use. 13(1993) no.2, S.121-130

0.013971052 = product of:
  0.05588421 = sum of:
    0.05588421 = weight(_text_:services in 6614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05588421 = score(doc=6614,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 6614, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6614)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Information services and use. 13(1993) no.2, S.131-139

0.013971052 = product of:
  0.05588421 = sum of:
    0.05588421 = weight(_text_:services in 6616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05588421 = score(doc=6616,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 6616, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6616)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Information services and use. 13(1993) no.2, S.103-109

0.013971052 = product of:
  0.05588421 = sum of:
    0.05588421 = weight(_text_:services in 8026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05588421 = score(doc=8026,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 8026, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8026)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Discusses the role of journals in knowledge dissemination and in the processes and value systems of scholarship. There are many different ways of attempting to improve scholarly communication using information technology, examines the dimensions of digital journals and presents a statement of objectives for the development of digital journals. Describes a number of simple initiatives oopen to the scholarly community that could develop digital publication services by mobilizing existing resources at a minimum cost with a high chance of success

0.013971052 = product of:
  0.05588421 = sum of:
    0.05588421 = weight(_text_:services in 2521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05588421 = score(doc=2521,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 2521, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2521)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The proliferation of periodical titles and increasing costs of centralised document delivery systems, coupled with declining library budgets, has led to efforts aimed at automating the document delivery process. Reviews some of the research projects undertaken in this area inclu-ding: APOLLO (satellites), HERMES (high speed telex) and ADONIS (CD-ROMs). The emergence of ISDN (Integrated Services Digital Ntework) and its UK version IDA (Integrated Digital Access), as a document delivery medium is discussed in relation to the Quartet Project undertaken at University College London.

0.013971052 = product of:
  0.05588421 = sum of:
    0.05588421 = weight(_text_:services in 4778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05588421 = score(doc=4778,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 4778, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4778)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.013971052 = product of:
  0.05588421 = sum of:
    0.05588421 = weight(_text_:services in 1063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05588421 = score(doc=1063,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 1063, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1063)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

The volume of scientific literature typically far exceeds the ability of scientists to identify and utilize all relevant information in their research. Improvements to the accessibility of scientific literature, allowing scientists to locate more relevant research within a given time, have the potential to dramatically improve communication and progress in science. With the web, scientists now have very convenient access to an increasing amount of literature that previously required trips to the library, inter-library loan delays, or substantial effort in locating the source. Evidence shows that usage increases when access is more convenient, and maximizing the usage of the scientific record benefits all of society. Although availability varies greatly by discipline, over a million research articles are freely available on the web. Some journals and conferences provide free access online, others allow authors to post articles on the web, and others allow authors to purchase the right to post their articles on the web. In this article we investigate the impact of free online availability by analyzing citation rates. We do not discuss methods of creating free online availability, such as time-delayed release or publication/membership/conference charges. Online availability of an article may not be expected to greatly improve access and impact by itself. For example, efficient means of locating articles via web search engines or specialized search services is required, and a substantial percentage of the literature needs to be indexed by these search services before it is worthwhile for many scientists to use them. Computer science is a forerunner in web availability -- a substantial percentage of the literature is online and available through search engines such as Google (google.com), or specialized services such as ResearchIndex (researchindex.org). Even so, the greatest impact of the online availability of computer science literature is likely yet to come, because comprehensive search services and more powerful search methods have only become available recently. We analyzed 119,924 conference articles in computer science and related disciplines, obtained from DBLP (dblp.uni-trier.de). In computer science, conference articles are typically formal publications and are often more prestigious than journal articles, with acceptance rates at some conferences below 10%. Citation counts and online availability were estimated using ResearchIndex. The analysis excludes self-citations, where a citation is considered to be a self-citation if one or more of the citing and cited authors match.

0.013481522 = product of:
  0.053926088 = sum of:
    0.053926088 = product of:
      0.107852176 = sum of:
        0.107852176 = weight(_text_:22 in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.107852176 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

3. 5.1997 8:44:22
18. 6.2000 9:11:22

0.0127105005 = product of:
  0.050842002 = sum of:
    0.050842002 = product of:
      0.101684004 = sum of:
        0.101684004 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101684004 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22

0.0127105005 = product of:
  0.050842002 = sum of:
    0.050842002 = product of:
      0.101684004 = sum of:
        0.101684004 = weight(_text_:22 in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101684004 = score(doc=6381,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Zeit. Nr.xx vom ???, S.22

0.0127105005 = product of:
  0.050842002 = sum of:
    0.050842002 = product of:
      0.101684004 = sum of:
        0.101684004 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101684004 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75

0.012348781 = product of:
  0.049395125 = sum of:
    0.049395125 = weight(_text_:services in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049395125 = score(doc=1507,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.28682584 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Discusses the factors, especially developments in information and communication technologies (ICTs) that influence the access and use of information by a person - as student at various levels. researcher, on the job, and for general purpose. Concludes that- books and libraries will continue to be with us and are in no danger of being replaced by the products and services that are ITC-based. There will be changes in the nature and size of library holdings and library services. Books of recreation and books of inspiration will continue to appear in the conventional form. Acquisition of books of information will he confined to the essentially required for continuous reading. For the other books and journals in each field, full text databases accessed online will have to be depended on. Reference hooks and costly books and journals required can he acquired in CD-ROM at a fraction of the cost of the printed versions. So the future library will be a combination of the conventional books and IT products in varying degrees or a hybrid library, depending on the types of library. The Impact of ICTs will be highest on research libraries.