-
Hayman, S.; Lothian, N.: Taxonomy directed folksonomies : integrating user tagging and controlled vocabularies for Australian education networks (2007)
0.03
0.025645949 = product of:
0.051291898 = sum of:
0.039516103 = weight(_text_:services in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039516103 = score(doc=705,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.22946067 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
0.011775794 = product of:
0.023551589 = sum of:
0.023551589 = weight(_text_:management in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023551589 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- What is the role of controlled vocabulary in a Web 2.0 world? Can we have the best of both worlds: balancing folksonomies and controlled vocabularies to help communities of users find and share information and resources most relevant to them? education.au develops and manages Australian online services for education and training. Its goal is to bring people, learning and technology together. education.au projects are increasingly involved in exploring the use of Web 2.0 developments building on user ideas, knowledge and experience, and how these might be integrated with existing information management systems. This paper presents work being undertaken in this area, particularly in relation to controlled vocabularies, and discusses the challenges faced. Education Network Australia (edna) is a leading online resource collection and collaborative network for education, with an extensive repository of selected educational resources with metadata created by educators and information specialists. It uses controlled vocabularies for metadata creation and searching, where users receive suggested related terms from an education thesaurus, with their results. We recognise that no formal thesaurus can keep pace with user needs so are interested in exploiting the power of folksonomies. We describe a proof of concept project to develop community contributions to managing information and resources, using Taxonomy-Directed Folksonomy. An established taxonomy from the Australian education sector suggests terms for tagging and users can suggest terms. Importantly, the folksonomy will feed back into the taxonomy showing gaps in coverage and helping us to monitor new terms and usage to improve and develop our formal taxonomies. This model would initially sit alongside the current edna repositories, tools and services but will give us valuable user contributed resources as well as information about how users manage resources. Observing terms suggested, chosen and used in folksonomies is a rich source of information for developing our formal systems so that we can indeed get the best of both worlds.
-
Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008)
0.02
0.01836472 = product of:
0.07345888 = sum of:
0.07345888 = sum of:
0.035327382 = weight(_text_:management in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035327382 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
0.038131498 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038131498 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 1. 8.2008 12:39:22
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.4, S.1562-1579
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies, social tagging and information retrieval (2011)
0.02
0.01814893 = product of:
0.07259572 = sum of:
0.07259572 = weight(_text_:services in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07259572 = score(doc=4907,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.42154622 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Services in Web 2.0 generate a large quantity of information, distributed over a range of resources (e.g. photos, URLs, videos) and integrated into different platforms (e.g. social bookmarking systems, sharing platforms (Peters, 2009). To adequately use this mass of information and to extract it from the platforms, users must be equipped with suitable tools and knowledge. After all, the best information is useless if users cannot find it: 'The model of information consumption relies on the information being found' (Vander Wal, 2004). In Web 2.0, the retrieval component has been established through so-called folksonomies (Vander Wal, 2005a), which are considered as several combinations of an information resource, one or more freely chosen keywords ('tags') and a user. Web 2.0 services that use folksonomies as an indexing and retrieval tool are defined as 'collaborative information services' because they allow for the collaborative creation of a public database that is accessible to all users (registered, where necessary) via the tags of the folksonomy (Ding et al., 2009; Heymann, Paepcke and Garcia-Molina, 2010).
-
Furner, J.: Folksonomies (2009)
0.01
0.013971052 = product of:
0.05588421 = sum of:
0.05588421 = weight(_text_:services in 3857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05588421 = score(doc=3857,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 3857, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3857)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Folksonomies are indexing languages that emerge from the distributed resource-description activity of multiple agents who make use of online tagging services to assign tags (i.e., category labels) to the resources in collections. Although individuals' motivations for engaging in tagging activity vary widely, folksonomy-based retrieval systems can be evaluated by measuring the degree to which taggers and searchers agree on tag-resource pairings.
-
Schwartz, C.: Thesauri and facets and tags, Oh my! : a look at three decades in subject analysis (2008)
0.01
0.012224671 = product of:
0.048898686 = sum of:
0.048898686 = weight(_text_:services in 5566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048898686 = score(doc=5566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 5566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5566)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The field of subject analysis enjoyed a flurry of interest in the 1970s, and has recently become a focus of attention again. The scholarly community doing work in this area has become more diffuse, and has grown to include new groups, such as information architects. Changes in information services and information seeking have led to reexamination of the nature and role of subject analysis tools and practices. This selective review looks at thesauri, guided navigation, and folksonomy as three activity areas in which subject analysis researchers have been attempting to address rapidly changing new environments.
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.01
0.009532874 = product of:
0.038131498 = sum of:
0.038131498 = product of:
0.076262996 = sum of:
0.076262996 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076262996 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Power tags in information retrieval (2010)
0.01
0.008731907 = product of:
0.03492763 = sum of:
0.03492763 = weight(_text_:services in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03492763 = score(doc=865,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Many Web 2.0 services (including Library 2.0 catalogs) make use of folksonomies. The purpose of this paper is to cut off all tags in the long tail of a document-specific tag distribution. The remaining tags at the beginning of a tag distribution are considered power tags and form a new, additional search option in information retrieval systems. Design/methodology/approach - In a theoretical approach the paper discusses document-specific tag distributions (power law and inverse-logistic shape), the development of such distributions (Yule-Simon process and shuffling theory) and introduces search tags (besides the well-known index tags) as a possibility for generating tag distributions. Findings - Search tags are compatible with broad and narrow folksonomies and with all knowledge organization systems (e.g. classification systems and thesauri), while index tags are only applicable in broad folksonomies. Based on these findings, the paper presents a sketch of an algorithm for mining and processing power tags in information retrieval systems. Research limitations/implications - This conceptual approach is in need of empirical evaluation in a concrete retrieval system. Practical implications - Power tags are a new search option for retrieval systems to limit the amount of hits. Originality/value - The paper introduces power tags as a means for enhancing the precision of search results in information retrieval systems that apply folksonomies, e.g. catalogs in Library 2.0environments.
-
Trant, J.: Exploring the potential for social tagging and folksonomy in art museums : proof of concept (2006)
0.01
0.006985526 = product of:
0.027942104 = sum of:
0.027942104 = weight(_text_:services in 5900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027942104 = score(doc=5900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.1622532 = fieldWeight in 5900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5900)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Knowledge organization systems and services"
-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.01
0.0056173005 = product of:
0.022469202 = sum of:
0.022469202 = product of:
0.044938404 = sum of:
0.044938404 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044938404 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006)
0.01
0.0055608437 = product of:
0.022243375 = sum of:
0.022243375 = product of:
0.04448675 = sum of:
0.04448675 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04448675 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 5. 1.2008 19:22:48
-
Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008)
0.00
0.003972031 = product of:
0.015888125 = sum of:
0.015888125 = product of:
0.03177625 = sum of:
0.03177625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03177625 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Macgregor, G.; McCulloch, E.: Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool (2006)
0.00
0.0036799356 = product of:
0.014719742 = sum of:
0.014719742 = product of:
0.029439485 = sum of:
0.029439485 = weight(_text_:management in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029439485 = score(doc=764,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to provide an overview of the collaborative tagging phenomenon and explore some of the reasons for its emergence. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the related literature and discusses some of the problems associated with, and the potential of, collaborative tagging approaches for knowledge organisation and general resource discovery. A definition of controlled vocabularies is proposed and used to assess the efficacy of collaborative tagging. An exposition of the collaborative tagging model is provided and a review of the major contributions to the tagging literature is presented. Findings - There are numerous difficulties with collaborative tagging systems (e.g. low precision, lack of collocation, etc.) that originate from the absence of properties that characterise controlled vocabularies. However, such systems can not be dismissed. Librarians and information professionals have lessons to learn from the interactive and social aspects exemplified by collaborative tagging systems, as well as their success in engaging users with information management. The future co-existence of controlled vocabularies and collaborative tagging is predicted, with each appropriate for use within distinct information contexts: formal and informal. Research limitations/implications - Librarians and information professional researchers should be playing a leading role in research aimed at assessing the efficacy of collaborative tagging in relation to information storage, organisation, and retrieval, and to influence the future development of collaborative tagging systems. Practical implications - The paper indicates clear areas where digital libraries and repositories could innovate in order to better engage users with information. Originality/value - At time of writing there were no literature reviews summarising the main contributions to the collaborative tagging research or debate.
-
Solskinnsbakk, G.; Gulla, J.A.; Haderlein, V.; Myrseth, P.; Cerrato, O.: Quality of hierarchies in ontologies and folksonomies (2012)
0.00
0.0036799356 = product of:
0.014719742 = sum of:
0.014719742 = product of:
0.029439485 = sum of:
0.029439485 = weight(_text_:management in 1034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029439485 = score(doc=1034,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 1034, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1034)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Ontologies have been a hot research topic for the recent decade and have been used for many applications such as information integration, semantic search, knowledge management, etc. Manual engineering of ontologies is a costly process and automatic ontology engineering lacks in precision. Folksonomies have recently emerged as another hot research topic and several research efforts have been made to extract lightweight ontologies automatically from folksonomy data. Due to the high cost of manual ontology engineering and the lack of precision in automatic ontology engineering it is important that we are able to evaluate the structure of the ontology. Detection of problems with the suggested ontology at an early stage can, especially for manually engineered ontologies, be cost saving. In this paper we present an approach to evaluate the quality of hierarchical relations in ontologies and folksonomy based structures. The approach is based on constructing shallow semantic representations of the ontology concepts and folksonomy tags. We specify four hypotheses regarding the semantic representations and different quality aspects of the hierarchical relations and perform an evaluation on two different data sets. The results of the evaluation confirm our hypotheses.
-
Braun, M.: Lesezeichen zum Stöbern : "Social bookmark"-Seiten setzen auf die Empfehlungen ihrer Nutzer (2007)
0.00
0.0031776251 = product of:
0.0127105005 = sum of:
0.0127105005 = product of:
0.025421001 = sum of:
0.025421001 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025421001 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
-
Xie, H.; Li, X.; Wang, T.; Lau, R.Y.K.; Wong, T.-L.; Chen, L.; Wang, F.L.; Li, Q.: Incorporating sentiment into tag-based user profiles and resource profiles for personalized search in folksonomy (2016)
0.00
0.0029439486 = product of:
0.011775794 = sum of:
0.011775794 = product of:
0.023551589 = sum of:
0.023551589 = weight(_text_:management in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023551589 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 52(2016) no.1, S.61-72
