-
Morgan, E.L.: Possible solutions for incorporating digital information mediums into traditional library cataloging services (1996)
0.04
0.03557103 = product of:
0.07114206 = sum of:
0.048898686 = weight(_text_:services in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048898686 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
0.022243375 = product of:
0.04448675 = sum of:
0.04448675 = weight(_text_:22 in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04448675 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.143-170
-
Enhancing access to information : designing catalogs for the 21st century (1992)
0.02
0.024823686 = product of:
0.049647372 = sum of:
0.03492763 = weight(_text_:services in 1009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03492763 = score(doc=1009,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 1009, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1009)
0.014719742 = product of:
0.029439485 = sum of:
0.029439485 = weight(_text_:management in 1009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029439485 = score(doc=1009,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 1009, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1009)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Canadian journal of information and library science 1993, no. April, S.81-82 (D. Mattison); Library review 42(1993) S.48-49 (D. Anderson); Australian academic and research libraries 1993, no. March, S.55-56 (J.S. Goodell); Library resources and technical services 1993, no.1, S.102 (R.P. Holley); Knowledge organization 20(1993) no.4, S.231-232 (P.A. Cochrane); Information processing and management 33(1997) no.4, S.573-575 (C.R. Hildreth)
-
Jansen, H.: Discovery-Services : Einführung, Marktübersicht und Trends (2014)
0.02
0.024697563 = product of:
0.09879025 = sum of:
0.09879025 = weight(_text_:services in 2577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09879025 = score(doc=2577,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.5736517 = fieldWeight in 2577, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2577)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Der Beitrag liefert eine kurze Übersicht zur Entstehung und zu den wesentlichen Eigenschaften von Discovery-Services. Die im deutschen Markt vertretenen Anbieter werden vorgestellt und hinsichtlich einiger wichtiger Unterscheidungsmerkmale verglichen. Abschließend werden zwei Trends für die mittelfristige Entwicklung beleuchtet.
-
Williamson, N.J.: Is there a catalog in your future? : Access to information in the year 2006 (1982)
0.02
0.017463814 = product of:
0.06985526 = sum of:
0.06985526 = weight(_text_:services in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06985526 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.405633 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 26(1982), S.122-135
-
Whitney , C.; Schiff, L.: ¬The Melvyl Recommender Project : developing library recommendation services (2006)
0.01
0.014818538 = product of:
0.059274152 = sum of:
0.059274152 = weight(_text_:services in 1173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059274152 = score(doc=1173,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.344191 = fieldWeight in 1173, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1173)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Popular commercial on-line services such as Google, e-Bay, Amazon, and Netflix have evolved quickly over the last decade to help people find what they want, developing information retrieval strategies such as usefully ranked results, spelling correction, and recommender systems. Online library catalogs (OPACs), in contrast, have changed little and are notoriously difficult for patrons to use (University of California Libraries, 2005). Over the past year (June 2005 to the present), the Melvyl Recommender Project (California Digital Library, 2005) has been exploring methods and feasibility of closing the gap between features that library patrons want and have come to expect from information retrieval systems and what libraries are currently equipped to deliver. The project team conducted exploratory work in five topic areas: relevance ranking, auto-correction, use of a text-based discovery system, user interface strategies, and recommending. This article focuses specifically on the recommending portion of the project and potential extensions to that work.
-
Xu, H.; Lancaster, F.W.: Redundancy and uniqueness of subject access points in online catalogs (1998)
0.01
0.010478289 = product of:
0.041913155 = sum of:
0.041913155 = weight(_text_:services in 1788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041913155 = score(doc=1788,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 1788, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1788)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 42(1998) no.1, S.61-66
-
Drabenstott, K.M.; Weller, M.S.: Handling spelling errors in online catalog searches (1996)
0.01
0.008731907 = product of:
0.03492763 = sum of:
0.03492763 = weight(_text_:services in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03492763 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 40(1996) no.2, S.113-132
-
Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Have we made any progress? : catalogues of the future revisited (2009)
0.01
0.008731907 = product of:
0.03492763 = sum of:
0.03492763 = weight(_text_:services in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03492763 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Library online public access catalogues (OPACs) are considered to be unattractive in comparison with popular internet sites. In 2000, the authors presented some suggestions on how library catalogues should change. Have librarians actually made their OPACs more user-friendly by adopting techniques and technologies already present in other information resources? This paper aims to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The characteristics of four OPACs, one online bookstore and two internet search engines are analyzed. The paper reviews some of the changes and directions suggested by researchers and adds some of authors own. All this is in the hope that library catalogues will survive "Google attack." Findings - Changes are identified in the information services studied over a seven-year period. Least development is found in library catalogues. Suggestions are made for library catalogues of the future. Research limitations/implications - A library catalogue, a web search engine and an internet bookstore cannot be compared directly because of differences in scope. But features from each could be fruitfully used in others. Practical implications - OPACs must be both attractive and useful. They should be at least as easy to use as their competitors. With the results of research as well as the knowledge librarians have many years, the profession should be able to develop better OPACs than we have today and regain lost ground in the "competition" for those with information needs. Originality/value - A comparison of OPAC features in 2000 and 2007, even if subjective, can provide a panoramic view of the development of the field.
-
Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996)
0.01
0.0063552503 = product of:
0.025421001 = sum of:
0.025421001 = product of:
0.050842002 = sum of:
0.050842002 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050842002 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
-
Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009)
0.01
0.0063552503 = product of:
0.025421001 = sum of:
0.025421001 = product of:
0.050842002 = sum of:
0.050842002 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050842002 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 2.2009 18:50:43
-
Markey, K.: ¬The online library catalog : paradise lost and paradise regained? (2007)
0.01
0.0061123357 = product of:
0.024449343 = sum of:
0.024449343 = weight(_text_:services in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024449343 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.14197156 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The impetus for this essay is the library community's uncertainty regarding the present and future direction of the library catalog in the era of Google and mass digitization projects. The uncertainty is evident at the highest levels. Deanna Marcum, Associate Librarian for Library Services at the Library of Congress (LC), is struck by undergraduate students who favor digital resources over the online library catalog because such resources are available at anytime and from anywhere (Marcum, 2006). She suggests that "the detailed attention that we have been paying to descriptive cataloging may no longer be justified ... retooled catalogers could give more time to authority control, subject analysis, [and] resource identification and evaluation" (Marcum, 2006, 8). In an abrupt about-face, LC terminated series added entries in cataloging records, one of the few subject-rich fields in such records (Cataloging Policy and Support Office, 2006). Mann (2006b) and Schniderman (2006) cite evidence of LC's prevailing viewpoint in favor of simplifying cataloging at the expense of subject cataloging. LC commissioned Karen Calhoun (2006) to prepare a report on "revitalizing" the online library catalog. Calhoun's directive is clear: divert resources from cataloging mass-produced formats (e.g., books) to cataloging the unique primary sources (e.g., archives, special collections, teaching objects, research by-products). She sums up her rationale for such a directive, "The existing local catalog's market position has eroded to the point where there is real concern for its ability to weather the competition for information seekers' attention" (p. 10). At the University of California Libraries (2005), a task force's recommendations parallel those in Calhoun report especially regarding the elimination of subject headings in favor of automatically generated metadata. Contemplating these events prompted me to revisit the glorious past of the online library catalog. For a decade and a half beginning in the early 1980s, the online library catalog was the jewel in the crown when people eagerly queued at its terminals to find information written by the world's experts. I despair how eagerly people now embrace Google because of the suspect provenance of the information Google retrieves. Long ago, we could have added more value to the online library catalog but the only thing we changed was the catalog's medium. Our failure to act back then cost the online catalog the crown. Now that the era of mass digitization has begun, we have a second chance at redesigning the online library catalog, getting it right, coaxing back old users, and attracting new ones. Let's revisit the past, reconsidering missed opportunities, reassessing their merits, combining them with new directions, making bold decisions and acting decisively on them.
-
Hillmann, D.I.: 'Parallel universes' or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996)
0.01
0.0055608437 = product of:
0.022243375 = sum of:
0.022243375 = product of:
0.04448675 = sum of:
0.04448675 = weight(_text_:22 in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04448675 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Mönnich, M.; Spiering, M.: Einsatz von BibTip als Recommendersystem m Bibliothekskatalog (2008)
0.00
0.0036799356 = product of:
0.014719742 = sum of:
0.014719742 = product of:
0.029439485 = sum of:
0.029439485 = weight(_text_:management in 2475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029439485 = score(doc=2475,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2475, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2475)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Das Karlsruher Recommendersystem BibTip An der Universität Karlsruhe wurden im Zeitraum von 2002 bis 2007 mehrere DFG-Projekte durchgeführt, welche die Entwicklung von Recommendersystemen für den Einsatz in Bibliotheken zum Gegenstand hatten. Daraus ist BibTip hervorgegangen. Projektpartner waren dabei die Universitätsbibliothek Karlsruhe und das Institut für Informationswirtschaft und -management von Prof. Dr. Andreas Geyer-Schulz an der Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften (http://www.em.unikarlsruhe.de/research/projects/reckvk/). Im Institut wurden die Algorithmen und die technischen Grundlagen von BibTip entwickelt. Die Bibliothek war für die Einbindung in den Katalog, die Erfassung des statistischen Datenmaterials und die Entwicklung der Dienstleistung BibTip verantwortlich. Das Projekt war so erfolgreich, dass es im Auftrag der DFG von den Projektnehmern im Dezember beim Fall 2007 Task Force Meeting der Coalition for Networked Information in Washington DC präsentiert wurde. Bei BibTip handelt es sich um einen verhaltensbasierten Recommender. Dieser Typus von Recommenderdiensten basiert auf der - im Fall von BibTip anonymisierten - Beobachtung von Nutzerverhalten und der statistischen Auswertung dieser Daten. Im Internet-Handel ergeben sich die Nutzungsdaten aus Kaufvorgängen oder aus den Klicks auf Links in Webseiten. Im Falle von BibTip sind es die Aufrufe von Volltitelanzeigen im Online-Katalog.
-
Hahn, U.; Schulze, M.: Katalogerweiterungen, Mashups und Elemente der Bibliothek 2.0" in der Praxis : der Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek der Helmut-Schmidt-Universität (IHSU) Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg (2009)
0.00
0.0031776251 = product of:
0.0127105005 = sum of:
0.0127105005 = product of:
0.025421001 = sum of:
0.025421001 = weight(_text_:22 in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025421001 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 2.2009 19:40:38
