Search (103 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.05
    0.04897259 = product of:
      0.19589037 = sum of:
        0.19589037 = sum of:
          0.094206356 = weight(_text_:management in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.094206356 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.101684004 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.101684004 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  2. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.04
    0.03672944 = product of:
      0.14691776 = sum of:
        0.14691776 = sum of:
          0.070654765 = weight(_text_:management in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070654765 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
          0.076262996 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.076262996 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1985, Nürnberg, 1.-4.10.1985: Fachinformation: Methodik - Management - Markt; neue Entwicklungen, Berufe, Produkte. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  3. Joss, M.W.; Wszola, S.: ¬The engines that can : text search and retrieval software, their strategies, and vendors (1996) 0.03
    0.030489452 = product of:
      0.060978904 = sum of:
        0.041913155 = weight(_text_:services in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041913155 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
        0.019065749 = product of:
          0.038131498 = sum of:
            0.038131498 = weight(_text_:22 in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038131498 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Traces the development of text searching and retrieval software designed to cope with the increasing demands made by the storage and handling of large amounts of data, recorded on high data storage media, from CD-ROM to multi gigabyte storage media and online information services, with particular reference to the need to cope with graphics as well as conventional ASCII text. Includes details of: Boolean searching, fuzzy searching and matching; relevance ranking; proximity searching and improved strategies for dealing with text searching in very large databases. Concludes that the best searching tools for CD-ROM publishers are those optimized for searching and retrieval on CD-ROM. CD-ROM drives have relatively lower random seek times than hard discs and so the software most appropriate to the medium is that which can effectively arrange the indexes and text on the CD-ROM to avoid continuous random access searching. Lists and reviews a selection of software packages designed to achieve the sort of results required for rapid CD-ROM searching
    Date
    12. 9.1996 13:56:22
  4. Baloh, P.; Desouza, K.C.; Hackney, R.: Contextualizing organizational interventions of knowledge management systems : a design science perspectiveA domain analysis (2012) 0.02
    0.020691734 = product of:
      0.082766935 = sum of:
        0.082766935 = sum of:
          0.050990686 = weight(_text_:management in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050990686 = score(doc=241,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
          0.03177625 = weight(_text_:22 in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03177625 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    We address how individuals' (workers) knowledge needs influence the design of knowledge management systems (KMS), enabling knowledge creation and utilization. It is evident that KMS technologies and activities are indiscriminately deployed in most organizations with little regard to the actual context of their adoption. Moreover, it is apparent that the extant literature pertaining to knowledge management projects is frequently deficient in identifying the variety of factors indicative for successful KMS. This presents an obvious business practice and research gap that requires a critical analysis of the necessary intervention that will actually improve how workers can leverage and form organization-wide knowledge. This research involved an extensive review of the literature, a grounded theory methodological approach and rigorous data collection and synthesis through an empirical case analysis (Parsons Brinckerhoff and Samsung). The contribution of this study is the formulation of a model for designing KMS based upon the design science paradigm, which aspires to create artifacts that are interdependent of people and organizations. The essential proposition is that KMS design and implementation must be contextualized in relation to knowledge needs and that these will differ for various organizational settings. The findings present valuable insights and further understanding of the way in which KMS design efforts should be focused.
    Date
    11. 6.2012 14:22:34
  5. Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015) 0.02
    0.018594472 = product of:
      0.07437789 = sum of:
        0.07437789 = sum of:
          0.029439485 = weight(_text_:management in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029439485 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
          0.044938404 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044938404 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    18. 9.2018 18:22:56
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.6, S.700-714
  6. Witschel, H.F.: Global term weights in distributed environments (2008) 0.02
    0.01836472 = product of:
      0.07345888 = sum of:
        0.07345888 = sum of:
          0.035327382 = weight(_text_:management in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035327382 = score(doc=2096,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
          0.038131498 = weight(_text_:22 in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038131498 = score(doc=2096,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2008 9:44:22
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.3, S.1049-1061
  7. Efthimiadis, E.N.: User choices : a new yardstick for the evaluation of ranking algorithms for interactive query expansion (1995) 0.02
    0.015303934 = product of:
      0.061215736 = sum of:
        0.061215736 = sum of:
          0.029439485 = weight(_text_:management in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029439485 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
          0.03177625 = weight(_text_:22 in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03177625 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1996 13:14:10
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.4, S.605-620
  8. Chang, R.: Keyword searching and indexing (1993) 0.01
    0.013971052 = product of:
      0.05588421 = sum of:
        0.05588421 = weight(_text_:services in 7223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05588421 = score(doc=7223,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 7223, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7223)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Technical services quarterly. 10(1993) no.4, S.75-86
  9. Rajashekar, T.B.; Croft, W.B.: Combining automatic and manual index representations in probabilistic retrieval (1995) 0.01
    0.012224671 = product of:
      0.048898686 = sum of:
        0.048898686 = weight(_text_:services in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048898686 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Results from research in information retrieval have suggested that significant improvements in retrieval effectiveness can be obtained by combining results from multiple index representioms, query formulations, and search strategies. The inference net model of retrieval, which was designed from this point of view, treats information retrieval as an evidental reasoning process where multiple sources of evidence about document and query content are combined to estimate relevance probabilities. Uses a system based on this model to study the retrieval effectiveness benefits of combining these types of document and query information that are found in typical commercial databases and information services. The results indicate that substantial real benefits are possible
  10. Salton, G.: ¬A simple blueprint for automatic Boolean query processing (1988) 0.01
    0.011775794 = product of:
      0.047103178 = sum of:
        0.047103178 = product of:
          0.094206356 = sum of:
            0.094206356 = weight(_text_:management in 6774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094206356 = score(doc=6774,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 6774, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6774)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 24(1988) no.3, S.269-280
  11. Reddaway, S.: High speed text retrieval from large databases on a massively parallel processor (1991) 0.01
    0.011775794 = product of:
      0.047103178 = sum of:
        0.047103178 = product of:
          0.094206356 = sum of:
            0.094206356 = weight(_text_:management in 7745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094206356 = score(doc=7745,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 7745, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7745)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 27(1991), S.311-316
  12. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.01
    0.0111216875 = product of:
      0.04448675 = sum of:
        0.04448675 = product of:
          0.0889735 = sum of:
            0.0889735 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0889735 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  13. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.01
    0.0111216875 = product of:
      0.04448675 = sum of:
        0.04448675 = product of:
          0.0889735 = sum of:
            0.0889735 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0889735 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  14. Evans, R.: Beyond Boolean : relevance ranking, natural language and the new search paradigm (1994) 0.01
    0.010478289 = product of:
      0.041913155 = sum of:
        0.041913155 = weight(_text_:services in 8578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041913155 = score(doc=8578,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 8578, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8578)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    New full-text search engines that employ relevance ranking have become available online services. These software tools provide increased ease of use by making natural language queries possible, and deliver superior recall. Even inexperienced end users can execute searchers with good results. For experienced database searchers, the ranked search engines offer a technology that is complementary to structured Boolean strategy, not necessarily a replacement. Even traditional Boolean queries become useful when the results are ranked by probable relevance, such ranking can free users from overwhelming output. Relevance ranking also permits the use of statistical inference methods to find related terms. using such tools to their best advantage requires rethinking some basic techniques, such as progressively narrowing queries until the retrieved set is small enough. users should broaden their search to maximize recall, then browse retrieved documents or pare the set down from the top
  15. MacFarlane, A.; McCann, J.A.; Robertson, S.E.: Parallel methods for the generation of partitioned inverted files (2005) 0.01
    0.010478289 = product of:
      0.041913155 = sum of:
        0.041913155 = weight(_text_:services in 651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041913155 = score(doc=651,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 651, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=651)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The generation of inverted indexes is one of the most computationally intensive activities for information retrieval systems: indexing large multi-gigabyte text databases can take many hours or even days to complete. We examine the generation of partitioned inverted files in order to speed up the process of indexing. Two types of index partitions are investigated: TermId and DocId. Design/methodology/approach - We use standard measures used in parallel computing such as speedup and efficiency to examine the computing results and also the space costs of our trial indexing experiments. Findings - The results from runs on both partitioning methods are compared and contrasted, concluding that DocId is the more efficient method. Practical implications - The practical implications are that the DocId partitioning method would in most circumstances be used for distributing inverted file data in a parallel computer, particularly if indexing speed is the primary consideration. Originality/value - The paper is of value to database administrators who manage large-scale text collections, and who need to use parallel computing to implement their text retrieval services.
  16. Daniowicz, C.; Baliski, J.: Document ranking based upon Markov chains (2001) 0.01
    0.01030382 = product of:
      0.04121528 = sum of:
        0.04121528 = product of:
          0.08243056 = sum of:
            0.08243056 = weight(_text_:management in 5388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08243056 = score(doc=5388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 5388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5388)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.4, S.623-637
  17. Horng, J.T.; Yeh, C.C.: Applying genetic algorithms to query optimization in document retrieval (2000) 0.01
    0.01030382 = product of:
      0.04121528 = sum of:
        0.04121528 = product of:
          0.08243056 = sum of:
            0.08243056 = weight(_text_:management in 3045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08243056 = score(doc=3045,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 3045, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3045)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.5, S.737-759
  18. Ciocca, G.; Schettini, R.: ¬A relevance feedback mechanism for content-based image retrieval (1999) 0.01
    0.01030382 = product of:
      0.04121528 = sum of:
        0.04121528 = product of:
          0.08243056 = sum of:
            0.08243056 = weight(_text_:management in 6498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08243056 = score(doc=6498,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6498, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6498)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 35(1999) no.5, S.605-632
  19. Niemi, T.; Junkkari, M.; Järvelin, K.; Viita, S.: Advanced query language for manipulating complex entities (2004) 0.01
    0.01030382 = product of:
      0.04121528 = sum of:
        0.04121528 = product of:
          0.08243056 = sum of:
            0.08243056 = weight(_text_:management in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08243056 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.6, S.869-
  20. Koyama, M.: ¬A fast retrieving algorithm of hierarchical relationships using tree structures (1998) 0.01
    0.01030382 = product of:
      0.04121528 = sum of:
        0.04121528 = product of:
          0.08243056 = sum of:
            0.08243056 = weight(_text_:management in 6403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08243056 = score(doc=6403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6403)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 34(1998) no.6, S.761-763

Years

Languages

  • e 98
  • d 5
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 99
  • m 3
  • r 1
  • More… Less…