Search (86 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval"
  1. Bayer, O.; Höhfeld, S.; Josbächer, F.; Kimm, N.; Kradepohl, I.; Kwiatkowski, M.; Puschmann, C.; Sabbagh, M.; Werner, N.; Vollmer, U.: Evaluation of an ontology-based knowledge-management-system : a case study of Convera RetrievalWare 8.0 (2005) 0.03
    0.027872246 = product of:
      0.05574449 = sum of:
        0.03492763 = weight(_text_:services in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03492763 = score(doc=624,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
        0.02081686 = product of:
          0.04163372 = sum of:
            0.04163372 = weight(_text_:management in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04163372 = score(doc=624,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    With RetrievalWare 8.0(TM) the American company Convera offers an elaborated software in the range of Information Retrieval, Information Indexing and Knowledge Management. Convera promises the possibility of handling different file formats in many different languages. Regarding comparable products one innovation is to be stressed particularly: the possibility of the preparation as well as integration of an ontology. One tool of the software package is useful in order to produce ontologies manually, to process existing ontologies and to import the very. The processing of search results is also to be mentioned. By means of categorization strategies search results can be classified dynamically and presented in personalized representations. This study presents an evaluation of the functions and components of the system. Technological aspects and modes of operation under the surface of Convera RetrievalWare will be analysed, with a focus on the creation of libraries and thesauri, and the problems posed by the integration of an existing thesaurus. Broader aspects such as usability and system ergonomics are integrated in the examination as well.
    Source
    Information services and use. 25(2005), S.181-195
  2. Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006) 0.03
    0.026032262 = product of:
      0.104129046 = sum of:
        0.104129046 = sum of:
          0.04121528 = weight(_text_:management in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04121528 = score(doc=5295,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
          0.06291377 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06291377 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A new search paradigm, in which the primary user activity is the guided exploration of a complex information space rather than the retrieval of items based on precise specifications, is proposed. The author claims that this paradigm is the norm in most practical applications, and that solutions based on traditional search methods are not effective in this context. He then presents a solution based on dynamic taxonomies, a knowledge management model that effectively guides users to reach their goal while giving them total freedom in exploring the information base. Applications, benefits, and current research are discussed.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:56:22
  3. Efthimiadis, E.N.: End-users' understanding of thesaural knowledge structures in interactive query expansion (1994) 0.02
    0.024486296 = product of:
      0.09794518 = sum of:
        0.09794518 = sum of:
          0.047103178 = weight(_text_:management in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047103178 = score(doc=5693,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
          0.050842002 = weight(_text_:22 in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050842002 = score(doc=5693,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:35:22
    Source
    Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
  4. Mayr, P.; Schaer, P.; Mutschke, P.: ¬A science model driven retrieval prototype (2011) 0.02
    0.023430167 = product of:
      0.09372067 = sum of:
        0.09372067 = weight(_text_:services in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09372067 = score(doc=649,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.5442138 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper is about a better understanding of the structure and dynamics of science and the usage of these insights for compensating the typical problems that arises in metadata-driven Digital Libraries. Three science model driven retrieval services are presented: co-word analysis based query expansion, re-ranking via Bradfordizing and author centrality. The services are evaluated with relevance assessments from which two important implications emerge: (1) precision values of the retrieval services are the same or better than the tf-idf retrieval baseline and (2) each service retrieved a disjoint set of documents. The different services each favor quite other - but still relevant - documents than pure term-frequency based rankings. The proposed models and derived retrieval services therefore open up new viewpoints on the scientific knowledge space and provide an alternative framework to structure scholarly information systems.
  5. Semantic search over the Web (2012) 0.02
    0.019858949 = product of:
      0.039717898 = sum of:
        0.027942104 = weight(_text_:services in 411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027942104 = score(doc=411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.1622532 = fieldWeight in 411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=411)
        0.011775794 = product of:
          0.023551589 = sum of:
            0.023551589 = weight(_text_:management in 411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023551589 = score(doc=411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Web has become the world's largest database, with search being the main tool that allows organizations and individuals to exploit its huge amount of information. Search on the Web has been traditionally based on textual and structural similarities, ignoring to a large degree the semantic dimension, i.e., understanding the meaning of the query and of the document content. Combining search and semantics gives birth to the idea of semantic search. Traditional search engines have already advertised some semantic dimensions. Some of them, for instance, can enhance their generated result sets with documents that are semantically related to the query terms even though they may not include these terms. Nevertheless, the exploitation of the semantic search has not yet reached its full potential. In this book, Roberto De Virgilio, Francesco Guerra and Yannis Velegrakis present an extensive overview of the work done in Semantic Search and other related areas. They explore different technologies and solutions in depth, making their collection a valuable and stimulating reading for both academic and industrial researchers. The book is divided into three parts. The first introduces the readers to the basic notions of the Web of Data. It describes the different kinds of data that exist, their topology, and their storing and indexing techniques. The second part is dedicated to Web Search. It presents different types of search, like the exploratory or the path-oriented, alongside methods for their efficient and effective implementation. Other related topics included in this part are the use of uncertainty in query answering, the exploitation of ontologies, and the use of semantics in mashup design and operation. The focus of the third part is on linked data, and more specifically, on applying ideas originating in recommender systems on linked data management, and on techniques for the efficiently querying answering on linked data.
    Content
    Inhalt: Introduction.- Part I Introduction to Web of Data.- Topology of the Web of Data.- Storing and Indexing Massive RDF Data Sets.- Designing Exploratory Search Applications upon Web Data Sources.- Part II Search over the Web.- Path-oriented Keyword Search query over RDF.- Interactive Query Construction for Keyword Search on the SemanticWeb.- Understanding the Semantics of Keyword Queries on Relational DataWithout Accessing the Instance.- Keyword-Based Search over Semantic Data.- Semantic Link Discovery over Relational Data.- Embracing Uncertainty in Entity Linking.- The Return of the Entity-Relationship Model: Ontological Query Answering.- Linked Data Services and Semantics-enabled Mashup.- Part III Linked Data Search engines.- A Recommender System for Linked Data.- Flint: from Web Pages to Probabilistic Semantic Data.- Searching and Browsing Linked Data with SWSE.
  6. Efthimiadis, E.N.: User choices : a new yardstick for the evaluation of ranking algorithms for interactive query expansion (1995) 0.02
    0.015303934 = product of:
      0.061215736 = sum of:
        0.061215736 = sum of:
          0.029439485 = weight(_text_:management in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029439485 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
          0.03177625 = weight(_text_:22 in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03177625 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1996 13:14:10
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.4, S.605-620
  7. Brunetti, J.M.; Roberto García, R.: User-centered design and evaluation of overview components for semantic data exploration (2014) 0.01
    0.012243148 = product of:
      0.04897259 = sum of:
        0.04897259 = sum of:
          0.023551589 = weight(_text_:management in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023551589 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
          0.025421001 = weight(_text_:22 in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025421001 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 66(2014) no.5, S.519-536
  8. Boyack, K.W.; Wylie,B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology : Domain Visualizations (2002) 0.01
    0.011234601 = product of:
      0.044938404 = sum of:
        0.044938404 = product of:
          0.08987681 = sum of:
            0.08987681 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08987681 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:17:40
  9. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.01
    0.0111216875 = product of:
      0.04448675 = sum of:
        0.04448675 = product of:
          0.0889735 = sum of:
            0.0889735 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0889735 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  10. Thenmalar, S.; Geetha, T.V.: Enhanced ontology-based indexing and searching (2014) 0.01
    0.010712754 = product of:
      0.042851016 = sum of:
        0.042851016 = sum of:
          0.02060764 = weight(_text_:management in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02060764 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.13034125 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
          0.022243375 = weight(_text_:22 in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022243375 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 66(2014) no.6, S.678-696
  11. Scholer, F.; Williams, H.E.; Turpin, A.: Query association surrogates for Web search (2004) 0.01
    0.010478289 = product of:
      0.041913155 = sum of:
        0.041913155 = weight(_text_:services in 2236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041913155 = score(doc=2236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2236)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Collection sizes, query rates, and the number of users of Web search engines are increasing. Therefore, there is continued demand for innovation in providing search services that meet user information needs. In this article, we propose new techniques to add additional terms to documents with the goal of providing more accurate searches. Our techniques are based an query association, where queries are stored with documents that are highly similar statistically. We show that adding query associations to documents improves the accuracy of Web topic finding searches by up to 7%, and provides an excellent complement to existing supplement techniques for site finding. We conclude that using document surrogates derived from query association is a valuable new technique for accurate Web searching.
  12. Pahlevi, S.M.; Kitagawa, H.: Conveying taxonomy context for topic-focused Web search (2005) 0.01
    0.010478289 = product of:
      0.041913155 = sum of:
        0.041913155 = weight(_text_:services in 3310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041913155 = score(doc=3310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 3310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3310)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Introducing context to a user query is effective to improve the search effectiveness. In this article we propose a method employing the taxonomy-based search services such as Web directories to facilitate searches in any Web search interfaces that support Boolean queries. The proposed method enables one to convey current search context an taxonomy of a taxonomy-based search service to the searches conducted with the Web search interfaces. The basic idea is to learn the search context in the form of a Boolean condition that is commonly accepted by many Web search interfaces, and to use the condition to modify the user query before forwarding it to the Web search interfaces. To guarantee that the modified query can always be processed by the Web search interfaces and to make the method adaptive to different user requirements an search result effectiveness, we have developed new fast classification learning algorithms.
  13. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: Interactive query expansion in an OPAC : interface and retrieval issues (1995) 0.01
    0.008831846 = product of:
      0.035327382 = sum of:
        0.035327382 = product of:
          0.070654765 = sum of:
            0.070654765 = weight(_text_:management in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070654765 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of document and text management. 3(1995) no.2, S.172-185
  14. Talja, S.; Keso, H.; Pietilainen, T.: ¬The production of context in information seeking research : a metatheoretical view (1999) 0.01
    0.008831846 = product of:
      0.035327382 = sum of:
        0.035327382 = product of:
          0.070654765 = sum of:
            0.070654765 = weight(_text_:management in 6249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070654765 = score(doc=6249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 6249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 35(1999) no.6, S.751-763
  15. Oakes, M.P.; Taylor, M.J.: Automated assistance in the formulation of search statements for bibliographic databases (1998) 0.01
    0.008831846 = product of:
      0.035327382 = sum of:
        0.035327382 = product of:
          0.070654765 = sum of:
            0.070654765 = weight(_text_:management in 6419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070654765 = score(doc=6419,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 6419, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6419)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 34(1998) no.6, S.645-668
  16. Mandala, R.; Tokunaga, T.; Tanaka, H.: Query expansion using heterogeneous thesauri (2000) 0.01
    0.008831846 = product of:
      0.035327382 = sum of:
        0.035327382 = product of:
          0.070654765 = sum of:
            0.070654765 = weight(_text_:management in 1277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070654765 = score(doc=1277,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 1277, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1277)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.3, S.361-378
  17. Prasad, A.R.D.; Madalli, D.P.: Faceted infrastructure for semantic digital libraries (2008) 0.01
    0.008731907 = product of:
      0.03492763 = sum of:
        0.03492763 = weight(_text_:services in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03492763 = score(doc=1905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The paper aims to argue that digital library retrieval should be based on semantic representations and propose a semantic infrastructure for digital libraries. Design/methodology/approach - The approach taken is formal model based on subject representation for digital libraries. Findings - Search engines and search techniques have fallen short of user expectations as they do not give context based retrieval. Deploying semantic web technologies would lead to efficient and more precise representation of digital library content and hence better retrieval. Though digital libraries often have metadata of information resources which can be accessed through OAI-PMH, much remains to be accomplished in making digital libraries semantic web compliant. This paper presents a semantic infrastructure for digital libraries, that will go a long way in providing them and web based information services with products highly customised to users needs. Research limitations/implications - Here only a model for semantic infrastructure is proposed. This model is proposed after studying current user-centric, top-down models adopted in digital library service architectures. Originality/value - This paper gives a generic model for building semantic infrastructure for digital libraries. Faceted ontologies for digital libraries is just one approach. But the same may be adopted by groups working with different approaches in building ontologies to realise efficient retrieval in digital libraries.
  18. Rekabsaz, N. et al.: Toward optimized multimodal concept indexing (2016) 0.01
    0.007944062 = product of:
      0.03177625 = sum of:
        0.03177625 = product of:
          0.0635525 = sum of:
            0.0635525 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0635525 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  19. Kozikowski, P. et al.: Support of part-whole relations in query answering (2016) 0.01
    0.007944062 = product of:
      0.03177625 = sum of:
        0.03177625 = product of:
          0.0635525 = sum of:
            0.0635525 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0635525 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  20. Marx, E. et al.: Exploring term networks for semantic search over RDF knowledge graphs (2016) 0.01
    0.007944062 = product of:
      0.03177625 = sum of:
        0.03177625 = product of:
          0.0635525 = sum of:
            0.0635525 = weight(_text_:22 in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0635525 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou

Years

Languages

  • e 80
  • d 6
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 81
  • el 4
  • m 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications