Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

0.057257734 = product of:
  0.11451547 = sum of:
    0.11451547 = sum of:
      0.057909478 = weight(_text_:technology in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.057909478 = score(doc=4226,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052224867 = queryNorm
          0.3722984 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
      0.05660599 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05660599 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052224867 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

State of the art review of the historical development of information science as deemed to be covered by the particular interests of memebers of the American Society for Information Science, as defined as the representation, storage, transmission, selection, retrieval, filtering, and use of documents and messages. Arranges the references cited roughly according to the classification scheme used by Information Science Abstracts, and so uses the headings: background; information science; techniques and technology; information related behaviour; application areas; social aspects; education for information science; institutions; individuals; geographical areas; and conclusions

Date

13. 6.1996 19:22:20

Source

Annual review of information science and technology. 30(1995), S.385-416

0.043281987 = product of:
  0.086563975 = sum of:
    0.086563975 = sum of:
      0.051185228 = weight(_text_:technology in 1399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051185228 = score(doc=1399,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052224867 = queryNorm
          0.32906836 = fieldWeight in 1399, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1399)
      0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 1399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035378743 = score(doc=1399,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052224867 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1399, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1399)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Since ancient times intellectual work has required tools for writing, documents for reading, and bibliographies for finding, not to mention more specialized techniques and technologies. Direct personal discussion is often impractical and we depend on documents instead. Document technology evolved through writing, printing, telecommunications, copying, and computing and facilitated an 'information flood' which motivated important knowledge organization initiatives, especially in the nineteenth century (library science, bibliography, documentation). Electronics and the Internet amplified these trends. As an example we consider an initiative to provide shared access to the working notes of editors preparing scholarly editions of historically important texts. For the future, we can project trends leading to ubiquitous recording, pervasive representations, simultaneous interaction regardless of geography, and powerful analysis and visualization of the records resulting from that ubiquitous recording. This evolving situation has implications for publishing, archival practice, and knowledge organization. The passing of time is of special interest in knowledge organization because knowing is cultural, living, and always changing. Technique and technology are also cultural ("material culture") but fixed and inanimate, as can be seen in the obsolescence of subject headings, which remain inscribed while culture moves on. The tension between the benefits of technology and the limitations imposed by fixity in a changing world provide a central tension in knowledge organization over time.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.028302995 = product of:
  0.05660599 = sum of:
    0.05660599 = product of:
      0.11321198 = sum of:
        0.11321198 = weight(_text_:22 in 5405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11321198 = score(doc=5405,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052224867 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5405, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5405)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Library hi tech. 10(1992) no.4, S.7-22

0.020474091 = product of:
  0.040948182 = sum of:
    0.040948182 = product of:
      0.081896365 = sum of:
        0.081896365 = weight(_text_:technology in 4079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081896365 = score(doc=4079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052224867 = queryNorm
            0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 4079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4079)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information technology and libraries. 6(1987) no.4, S.266

0.01791483 = product of:
  0.03582966 = sum of:
    0.03582966 = product of:
      0.07165932 = sum of:
        0.07165932 = weight(_text_:technology in 7710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07165932 = score(doc=7710,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052224867 = queryNorm
            0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 7710, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7710)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information technology and libraries. 6(1987) no.2, S.83-88

0.015355568 = product of:
  0.030711137 = sum of:
    0.030711137 = product of:
      0.061422274 = sum of:
        0.061422274 = weight(_text_:technology in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061422274 = score(doc=1493,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052224867 = queryNorm
            0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information technology and libraries. 11(1992), S.157-163

0.014477369 = product of:
  0.028954739 = sum of:
    0.028954739 = product of:
      0.057909478 = sum of:
        0.057909478 = weight(_text_:technology in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057909478 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052224867 = queryNorm
            0.3722984 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Bezugnahme auf: Buschman, J.: Democratic theory in library information science: toward an emendation. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.10, S.1483-1496.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1534

0.014306708 = product of:
  0.028613416 = sum of:
    0.028613416 = product of:
      0.057226833 = sum of:
        0.057226833 = weight(_text_:technology in 1991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057226833 = score(doc=1991,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052224867 = queryNorm
            0.36790967 = fieldWeight in 1991, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1991)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This book tells the story of Emanuel Goldberg, a chemist, inventor, and industrialist who contributed to almost every aspect of imaging technology in the first half of the 20th century. An incredible story emerges as Buckland unearths forgotten documents and rogue citations to show that Goldberg created the first desktop search engine, developed microdot technology, and designed the famous Contax 35 mm camera. It is a fascinating tribute to a great mind and a crucial period in the history of information science and technology.

LCSH

Information technology / History

Subject

Information technology / History

0.01238256 = product of:
  0.02476512 = sum of:
    0.02476512 = product of:
      0.04953024 = sum of:
        0.04953024 = weight(_text_:22 in 4546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04953024 = score(doc=4546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052224867 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4546)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Library hi tech. 10(1992) no.4, S.7-22

0.008957415 = product of:
  0.01791483 = sum of:
    0.01791483 = product of:
      0.03582966 = sum of:
        0.03582966 = weight(_text_:technology in 1002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03582966 = score(doc=1002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052224867 = queryNorm
            0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 1002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1002)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Ordinarily the word document denotes a textual record. Increasingliy sophisticated attempts to provide access to the rapidly growing quantity of available documents raised questions about what should be considered a document. Paul Otlet and other developed a functional view of document and discussed whether sculpture, museum objects, and live animals, could be considered documents. Suzanne Briet equates document with organized physical evidence. These ideas appear to resemble notions of 'material culture' in cultural anthropology and 'object as signs' in semiotics. Others, especially in the USA took a narrower view. New digital technology renews old questions and also old confusions between medium, message and meaning

0.007677784 = product of:
  0.015355568 = sum of:
    0.015355568 = product of:
      0.030711137 = sum of:
        0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030711137 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052224867 = queryNorm
            0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Librarians have many and varied difficulties. For some library problems research is not the best remedy. Improved coordination, clarification of values, or drawing on existing research results may suffice. When research is indicated, it pays to be selective. Investing in research, like any other kind of investment, should be judged in terms of the probability of success, the likely delay before results are achieved, and the impact on the population of competent researchers, as well as the perceived importance of the problem. New technology permits new forms of service, generates new data for analysis, and supports new tools for researchers. Normal research is repetitious and progresses incrementally. A bolder strategy is to seek significant advances in library service by challenging researchers to achieve a deeper understanding of important, but inadequately understood, library phenomena. Five Grand Challenges are proposed: 1. Library service: Could library services be made more meaningful? 2. Library theory: Who knew what when? 3. Library design: Have digital libraries been designed backwards? 4. Library values: How neutral can libraries be? and 5. Library communities: How do communities differ?

0.007677784 = product of:
  0.015355568 = sum of:
    0.015355568 = product of:
      0.030711137 = sum of:
        0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 4240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030711137 = score(doc=4240,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052224867 = queryNorm
            0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4240, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4240)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.9, S.1268-1278

0.007677784 = product of:
  0.015355568 = sum of:
    0.015355568 = product of:
      0.030711137 = sum of:
        0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030711137 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052224867 = queryNorm
            0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.3, S.407-418