-
Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009)
0.04
0.036582813 = product of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:07:20
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.778-788
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.04
0.036582813 = product of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.2, S.198-201
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.03
0.030485678 = product of:
0.060971357 = sum of:
0.060971357 = sum of:
0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025592614 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035378743 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.217-229
-
Hellsten, I.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The construction of interdisciplinarity : the development of the knowledge base and programmatic focus of the journal Climatic Change, 1977-2013 (2016)
0.03
0.030485678 = product of:
0.060971357 = sum of:
0.060971357 = sum of:
0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025592614 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035378743 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 24. 8.2016 17:53:22
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.9, S.2181-2193
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Johnson, M.W.; Ivanova, I.: Toward a calculus of redundancy : signification, codification, and anticipation in cultural evolution (2018)
0.03
0.030485678 = product of:
0.060971357 = sum of:
0.060971357 = sum of:
0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025592614 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035378743 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 9.2018 11:22:09
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.10, S.1181-1192
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Should co-occurrence data be normalized : a rejoinder (2007)
0.02
0.015355568 = product of:
0.030711137 = sum of:
0.030711137 = product of:
0.061422274 = sum of:
0.061422274 = weight(_text_:technology in 627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061422274 = score(doc=627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=627)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.14, S.2411-2413
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Accounting for the uncertainty in the evaluation of percentile ranks (2012)
0.02
0.015355568 = product of:
0.030711137 = sum of:
0.030711137 = product of:
0.061422274 = sum of:
0.061422274 = weight(_text_:technology in 447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061422274 = score(doc=447,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 447, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=447)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.11, S.2349-2350
-
Bornmann, L.; Leydesdorff, L.: Statistical tests and research assessments : a comment on Schneider (2012) (2013)
0.02
0.015355568 = product of:
0.030711137 = sum of:
0.030711137 = product of:
0.061422274 = sum of:
0.061422274 = weight(_text_:technology in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061422274 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.6, S.1306-1308
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Wagner, C,; Bornmann, L.: Replicability and the public/private divide (2016)
0.02
0.015355568 = product of:
0.030711137 = sum of:
0.030711137 = product of:
0.061422274 = sum of:
0.061422274 = weight(_text_:technology in 3023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061422274 = score(doc=3023,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 3023, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3023)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.7, S.1777-1778
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: ¬The operationalization of "fields" as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics : the cases of "library and information science" and "science & technology studies" (2016)
0.01
0.013298314 = product of:
0.026596628 = sum of:
0.026596628 = product of:
0.053193256 = sum of:
0.053193256 = weight(_text_:technology in 2779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053193256 = score(doc=2779,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.34197792 = fieldWeight in 2779, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2779)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Normalization of citation scores using reference sets based on Web of Science subject categories (WCs) has become an established ("best") practice in evaluative bibliometrics. For example, the Times Higher Education World University Rankings are, among other things, based on this operationalization. However, WCs were developed decades ago for the purpose of information retrieval and evolved incrementally with the database; the classification is machine-based and partially manually corrected. Using the WC "information science & library science" and the WCs attributed to journals in the field of "science and technology studies," we show that WCs do not provide sufficient analytical clarity to carry bibliometric normalization in evaluation practices because of "indexer effects." Can the compliance with "best practices" be replaced with an ambition to develop "best possible practices"? New research questions can then be envisaged.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.3, S.707-714
-
Rafols, I.; Porter, A.L.; Leydesdorff, L.: Science overlay maps : a new tool for research policy and library management (2010)
0.01
0.010858027 = product of:
0.021716055 = sum of:
0.021716055 = product of:
0.04343211 = sum of:
0.04343211 = weight(_text_:technology in 3987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04343211 = score(doc=3987,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 3987, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3987)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We present a novel approach to visually locate bodies of research within the sciences, both at each moment of time and dynamically. This article describes how this approach fits with other efforts to locally and globally map scientific outputs. We then show how these science overlay maps help benchmarking, explore collaborations, and track temporal changes, using examples of universities, corporations, funding agencies, and research topics. We address their conditions of application and discuss advantages, downsides, and limitations. Overlay maps especially help investigate the increasing number of scientific developments and organizations that do not fit within traditional disciplinary categories. We make these tools available online to enable researchers to explore the ongoing sociocognitive transformations of science and technology systems.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.9, S.1871-1887
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Mapping (USPTO) patent data using overlays to Google Maps (2012)
0.01
0.010858027 = product of:
0.021716055 = sum of:
0.021716055 = product of:
0.04343211 = sum of:
0.04343211 = weight(_text_:technology in 288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04343211 = score(doc=288,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 288, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=288)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A technique is developed using patent information available online (at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office) for the generation of Google Maps. The overlays indicate both the quantity and the quality of patents at the city level. This information is relevant for research questions in technology analysis, innovation studies, and evolutionary economics, as well as economic geography. The resulting maps can also be relevant for technological innovation policies and research and development management, because the U.S. market can be considered the leading market for patenting and patent competition. In addition to the maps, the routines provide quantitative data about the patents for statistical analysis. The cities on the map are colored according to the results of significance tests. The overlays are explored for the Netherlands as a "national system of innovations" and further elaborated in two cases of emerging technologies: ribonucleic acid interference (RNAi) and nanotechnology.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.7, S.1442-1458
-
Rotolo, D.; Leydesdorff, L.: Matching Medline/PubMed data with Web of Science: A routine in R language (2015)
0.01
0.010858027 = product of:
0.021716055 = sum of:
0.021716055 = product of:
0.04343211 = sum of:
0.04343211 = weight(_text_:technology in 2224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04343211 = score(doc=2224,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 2224, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2224)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We present a novel routine, namely medlineR, based on the R language, that allows the user to match data from Medline/PubMed with records indexed in the ISI Web of Science (WoS) database. The matching allows exploiting the rich and controlled vocabulary of medical subject headings (MeSH) of Medline/PubMed with additional fields of WoS. The integration provides data (e.g., citation data, list of cited reference, list of the addresses of authors' host organizations, WoS subject categories) to perform a variety of scientometric analyses. This brief communication describes medlineR, the method on which it relies, and the steps the user should follow to perform the matching across the two databases. To demonstrate the differences from Leydesdorff and Opthof (Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 1076-1080), we conclude this artcle by testing the routine on the MeSH category "Burgada syndrome."
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.10, S.2155-2159
-
Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The construction and globalization of the knowledge base in inter-human communication systems (2003)
0.01
0.010613623 = product of:
0.021227246 = sum of:
0.021227246 = product of:
0.042454492 = sum of:
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 1621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=1621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1621)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.2003 19:48:04
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003)
0.01
0.010613623 = product of:
0.021227246 = sum of:
0.021227246 = product of:
0.042454492 = sum of:
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6.11.2005 19:02:22
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors : an alternative research design with policy implications (2011)
0.01
0.009048356 = product of:
0.018096711 = sum of:
0.018096711 = product of:
0.036193423 = sum of:
0.036193423 = weight(_text_:technology in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036193423 = score(doc=4919,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In bibliometrics, the association of "impact" with central-tendency statistics is mistaken. Impacts add up, and citation curves therefore should be integrated instead of averaged. For example, the journals MIS Quarterly and Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology differ by a factor of 2 in terms of their respective impact factors (IF), but the journal with the lower IF has the higher impact. Using percentile ranks (e.g., top-1%, top-10%, etc.), an Integrated Impact Indicator (I3) can be based on integration of the citation curves, but after normalization of the citation curves to the same scale. The results across document sets can be compared as percentages of the total impact of a reference set. Total number of citations, however, should not be used instead because the shape of the citation curves is then not appreciated. I3 can be applied to any document set and any citation window. The results of the integration (summation) are fully decomposable in terms of journals or institutional units such as nations, universities, and so on because percentile ranks are determined at the paper level. In this study, we first compare I3 with IFs for the journals in two Institute for Scientific Information subject categories ("Information Science & Library Science" and "Multidisciplinary Sciences"). The library and information science set is additionally decomposed in terms of nations. Policy implications of this possible paradigm shift in citation impact analysis are specified.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.11, S.2133-2146
-
Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.; Leydesdorff, L.: BRICS countries and scientific excellence : a bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers (2015)
0.01
0.009048356 = product of:
0.018096711 = sum of:
0.018096711 = product of:
0.036193423 = sum of:
0.036193423 = weight(_text_:technology in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036193423 = score(doc=2047,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) are notable for their increasing participation in science and technology. The governments of these countries have been boosting their investments in research and development to become part of the group of nations doing research at a world-class level. This study investigates the development of the BRICS countries in the domain of top-cited papers (top 10% and 1% most frequently cited papers) between 1990 and 2010. To assess the extent to which these countries have become important players at the top level, we compare the BRICS countries with the top-performing countries worldwide. As the analyses of the (annual) growth rates show, with the exception of Russia, the BRICS countries have increased their output in terms of most frequently cited papers at a higher rate than the top-cited countries worldwide. By way of additional analysis, we generate coauthorship networks among authors of highly cited papers for 4 time points to view changes in BRICS participation (1995, 2000, 2005, and 2010). Here, the results show that all BRICS countries succeeded in becoming part of this network, whereby the Chinese collaboration activities focus on the US.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.7, S.1507-1513
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Dynamic and evolutionary updates of classificatory schemes in scientific journal structures (2002)
0.01
0.008957415 = product of:
0.01791483 = sum of:
0.01791483 = product of:
0.03582966 = sum of:
0.03582966 = weight(_text_:technology in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03582966 = score(doc=1249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.12, S.987-994
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Similarity measures, author cocitation Analysis, and information theory (2005)
0.01
0.008957415 = product of:
0.01791483 = sum of:
0.01791483 = product of:
0.03582966 = sum of:
0.03582966 = weight(_text_:technology in 3471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03582966 = score(doc=3471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 3471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3471)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.7, S.769-772
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Zhou, P.: Co-word analysis using the Chinese character set (2008)
0.01
0.008957415 = product of:
0.01791483 = sum of:
0.01791483 = product of:
0.03582966 = sum of:
0.03582966 = weight(_text_:technology in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03582966 = score(doc=1970,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1528-1530
