-
Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008)
0.03
0.030485678 = product of:
0.060971357 = sum of:
0.060971357 = sum of:
0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025592614 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035378743 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.11, S.1711-1726
-
Meho, L.I.: E-Mail interviewing in qualitative research : a methodological discussion (2006)
0.01
0.010237046 = product of:
0.020474091 = sum of:
0.020474091 = product of:
0.040948182 = sum of:
0.040948182 = weight(_text_:technology in 5701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040948182 = score(doc=5701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 5701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5701)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.10, S.1284-1295
-
Cronin, B.; Meho, L.I.: Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists (2006)
0.01
0.010237046 = product of:
0.020474091 = sum of:
0.020474091 = product of:
0.040948182 = sum of:
0.040948182 = weight(_text_:technology in 196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040948182 = score(doc=196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1275-1278
-
Cronin, B.; Meho, L.I.: Applying the author affiliation index to library and information science journals (2008)
0.01
0.010237046 = product of:
0.020474091 = sum of:
0.020474091 = product of:
0.040948182 = sum of:
0.040948182 = weight(_text_:technology in 2361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040948182 = score(doc=2361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 2361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2361)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.11, S.1861-1865
-
Cronin, B.; Meho, L.I.: Timelines of creativity : A study of intellectual innovators in information science (2007)
0.01
0.008957415 = product of:
0.01791483 = sum of:
0.01791483 = product of:
0.03582966 = sum of:
0.03582966 = weight(_text_:technology in 480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03582966 = score(doc=480,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 480, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=480)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.13, S.1948-1959
-
Cronin, B.; Meho, L.I.: ¬The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies (2008)
0.01
0.008957415 = product of:
0.01791483 = sum of:
0.01791483 = product of:
0.03582966 = sum of:
0.03582966 = weight(_text_:technology in 1377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03582966 = score(doc=1377,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 1377, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1377)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.4, S.551-564
-
Meho, L.I.; Sugimoto, C.R.: Assessing the scholarly impact of information studies : a tale of two citation databases - Scopus and Web of Science (2009)
0.01
0.007677784 = product of:
0.015355568 = sum of:
0.015355568 = product of:
0.030711137 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 3298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=3298,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3298, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3298)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.12, S.2499-2508
-
Meho, L.I.; Tibbo, H.R.: Modeling the information-seeking behavior of social scientists Ellis's study revisited (2003)
0.01
0.0063981535 = product of:
0.012796307 = sum of:
0.012796307 = product of:
0.025592614 = sum of:
0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025592614 = score(doc=5170,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.6, S.569-586
-
Meho, L.I.; Yang, K.: Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty : Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)
0.01
0.0063981535 = product of:
0.012796307 = sum of:
0.012796307 = product of:
0.025592614 = sum of:
0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025592614 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.13, S.2105-2125
-
Meho, L.I.; Spurgin, K.M.: Ranking the research productivity of library and information science faculty and schools : an evaluation of data sources and research methods (2005)
0.01
0.005118523 = product of:
0.010237046 = sum of:
0.010237046 = product of:
0.020474091 = sum of:
0.020474091 = weight(_text_:technology in 4343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020474091 = score(doc=4343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.13162735 = fieldWeight in 4343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4343)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.12, S.1314-1331
