Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sun, Y."
  1. Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009) 0.04
    0.036582813 = product of:
      0.073165625 = sum of:
        0.073165625 = sum of:
          0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030711137 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
          0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042454492 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:07:20
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.778-788
  2. Wacholder, N.; Kelly, D.; Kantor, P.; Rittman, R.; Sun, Y.; Bai, B.; Small, S.; Yamrom, B.; Strzalkowski, T.: ¬A model for quantitative evaluation of an end-to-end question-answering system (2007) 0.01
    0.010858027 = product of:
      0.021716055 = sum of:
        0.021716055 = product of:
          0.04343211 = sum of:
            0.04343211 = weight(_text_:technology in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04343211 = score(doc=435,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We describe a procedure for quantitative evaluation of interactive question-answering systems and illustrate it with application to the High-Quality Interactive QuestionAnswering (HITIQA) system. Our objectives were (a) to design a method to realistically and reliably assess interactive question-answering systems by comparing the quality of reports produced using different systems, (b) to conduct a pilot test of this method, and (c) to perform a formative evaluation of the HITIQA system. Far more important than the specific information gathered from this pilot evaluation is the development of (a) a protocol for evaluating an emerging technology, (b) reusable assessment instruments, and (c) the knowledge gained in conducting the evaluation. We conclude that this method, which uses a surprisingly small number of subjects and does not rely on predetermined relevance judgments, measures the impact of system change on work produced by users. Therefore this method can be used to compare the product of interactive systems that use different underlying technologies.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.8, S.1082-1099
  3. Sun, Y.; Wang, N.; Shen, X.-L.; Zhang, X.: Bias effects, synergistic effects, and information contingency effects : developing and testing an extended information adoption model in social Q&A (2019) 0.01
    0.010858027 = product of:
      0.021716055 = sum of:
        0.021716055 = product of:
          0.04343211 = sum of:
            0.04343211 = weight(_text_:technology in 5439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04343211 = score(doc=5439,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 5439, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5439)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Part of a special issue for research on people's engagement with technology.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.12, S.1368-1382
  4. Xu, S.; Zhai, D.; Wang, F.; An, X.; Pang, H.; Sun, Y.: ¬A novel method for topic linkages between scientific publications and patents (2019) 0.01
    0.009048356 = product of:
      0.018096711 = sum of:
        0.018096711 = product of:
          0.036193423 = sum of:
            0.036193423 = weight(_text_:technology in 5360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036193423 = score(doc=5360,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 5360, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    It is increasingly important to build topic linkages between scientific publications and patents for the purpose of understanding the relationships between science and technology. Previous studies on the linkages mainly focus on the analysis of nonpatent references on the front page of patents, or the resulting citation-link networks, but with unsatisfactory performance. In the meanwhile, abundant mentioned entities in the scholarly articles and patents further complicate topic linkages. To deal with this situation, a novel statistical entity-topic model (named the CCorrLDA2 model), armed with the collapsed Gibbs sampling inference algorithm, is proposed to discover the hidden topics respectively from the academic articles and patents. In order to reduce the negative impact on topic similarity calculation, word tokens and entity mentions are grouped by the Brown clustering method. Then a topic linkages construction problem is transformed into the well-known optimal transportation problem after topic similarity is calculated on the basis of symmetrized Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. Extensive experimental results indicate that our approach is feasible to build topic linkages with more superior performance than the counterparts.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.9, S.1026-1042
  5. Ng, K.B.; Kantor, P.B.; Strzalkowski, T.; Wacholder, N.; Tang, R.; Bai, B.; Rittman,; Song, P.; Sun, Y.: Automated judgment of document qualities (2006) 0.01
    0.007677784 = product of:
      0.015355568 = sum of:
        0.015355568 = product of:
          0.030711137 = sum of:
            0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030711137 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1155-1164
  6. Kelly, D.; Wacholder, N.; Rittman, R.; Sun, Y.; Kantor, P.; Small, S.; Strzalkowski, T.: Using interview data to identify evaluation criteria for interactive, analytical question-answering systems (2007) 0.01
    0.007677784 = product of:
      0.015355568 = sum of:
        0.015355568 = product of:
          0.030711137 = sum of:
            0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030711137 = score(doc=332,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 332, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=332)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.7, S.1032-1043
  7. Sun, Y.; Kantor, P.B.; Morse, E.L.: Using cross-evaluation to evaluate interactive QA systems (2011) 0.01
    0.007677784 = product of:
      0.015355568 = sum of:
        0.015355568 = product of:
          0.030711137 = sum of:
            0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 4744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030711137 = score(doc=4744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4744)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.9, S.1653-1665
  8. Sun, Y.; Kantor, P.B.: Cross-evaluation : a new model for information system evaluation (2006) 0.01
    0.0063981535 = product of:
      0.012796307 = sum of:
        0.012796307 = product of:
          0.025592614 = sum of:
            0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 5048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025592614 = score(doc=5048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 5048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.5, S.614-628
  9. Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Xie, B.: Quality of health information for consumers on the web : a systematic review of indicators, criteria, tools, and evaluation results (2015) 0.01
    0.0063981535 = product of:
      0.012796307 = sum of:
        0.012796307 = product of:
          0.025592614 = sum of:
            0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 2218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025592614 = score(doc=2218,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 2218, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2218)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.10, S.2071-2084
  10. Shen, X.-L.; Li, Y.-J.; Sun, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, F.: Knowledge withholding in online knowledge spaces : social deviance behavior and secondary control perspective (2019) 0.01
    0.0063981535 = product of:
      0.012796307 = sum of:
        0.012796307 = product of:
          0.025592614 = sum of:
            0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 5016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025592614 = score(doc=5016,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 5016, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5016)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.4, S.385-401
  11. Wu, D.; Xu, H.; Sun, Y.; Lv, S.: What should we teach? : A human-centered data science graduate curriculum model design for iField schools (2023) 0.01
    0.0063981535 = product of:
      0.012796307 = sum of:
        0.012796307 = product of:
          0.025592614 = sum of:
            0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025592614 = score(doc=961,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 961, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=961)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.6, S.623-640