Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Vaughan, L."
  1. Vaughan, L.; Chen, Y.: Data mining from web search queries : a comparison of Google trends and Baidu index (2015) 0.04
    0.035786085 = product of:
      0.07157217 = sum of:
        0.07157217 = sum of:
          0.036193423 = weight(_text_:technology in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036193423 = score(doc=1605,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
          0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035378743 = score(doc=1605,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052224867 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Numerous studies have explored the possibility of uncovering information from web search queries but few have examined the factors that affect web query data sources. We conducted a study that investigated this issue by comparing Google Trends and Baidu Index. Data from these two services are based on queries entered by users into Google and Baidu, two of the largest search engines in the world. We first compared the features and functions of the two services based on documents and extensive testing. We then carried out an empirical study that collected query volume data from the two sources. We found that data from both sources could be used to predict the quality of Chinese universities and companies. Despite the differences between the two services in terms of technology, such as differing methods of language processing, the search volume data from the two were highly correlated and combining the two data sources did not improve the predictive power of the data. However, there was a major difference between the two in terms of data availability. Baidu Index was able to provide more search volume data than Google Trends did. Our analysis showed that the disadvantage of Google Trends in this regard was due to Google's smaller user base in China. The implication of this finding goes beyond China. Google's user bases in many countries are smaller than that in China, so the search volume data related to those countries could result in the same issue as that related to China.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.1, S.13-22
  2. Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.: Webometrics : an introduction to the special issue (2004) 0.01
    0.010237046 = product of:
      0.020474091 = sum of:
        0.020474091 = product of:
          0.040948182 = sum of:
            0.040948182 = weight(_text_:technology in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040948182 = score(doc=2908,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.14, S.1213-1215
  3. Vaughan, L.; Hahn, T.B.: Profile, needs, and expectations of information professionals : what we learned from the 2003 ASIST membership survey (2005) 0.01
    0.009048356 = product of:
      0.018096711 = sum of:
        0.018096711 = product of:
          0.036193423 = sum of:
            0.036193423 = weight(_text_:technology in 3305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036193423 = score(doc=3305,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 3305, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3305)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A survey of American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST) members was administered via the Web in May 2003. The survey gathered demographic data about members and their preferences and expectations in regard to conferences and other ASIST products and services. With about a 32% return rate, findings were compared with an earlier survey conducted in 1979, which provides a glimpse of how the Society has changed and what needs to be done to ensure a healthy future development. The gender split has remained the same but members are about 5 years older an average than they were in 1979. A significant shift has occurred in members' institutional affiliations, from the largest group being in the industrial sector to the largest group being in educational institutions. Members an average reported slightly higher incomes (after adjusting for inflation) in 2003 than in 1979. Since 1979, a larger percentage of members have earned a doctoral degree. The most common field of study is library and information science. About half of the respondents reported that ASIST is their primary professional society. Their primary reason for maintaining ASIST membership is "learning about new developments/issues in the field." The most common responses to the question about what factors would make ASIST conferences more appealing related to lowering costs. Other responses related to attitudes about the ASIST Bulletin and the value of other proposed products and services are summarized and reported. Detailed analyses of relationships among different variables made possible a deeper understanding of members' needs and expectations, which provides directions for design of programs and services.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.1, S.95-105
  4. Vaughan, L.: Visualizing linguistic and cultural differences using Web co-link data (2006) 0.01
    0.007677784 = product of:
      0.015355568 = sum of:
        0.015355568 = product of:
          0.030711137 = sum of:
            0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030711137 = score(doc=184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=184)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1178-1193
  5. Romero-Frías, E.; Vaughan, L.: Exploring the relationships between media and political parties through web hyperlink analysis : the case of Spain (2012) 0.01
    0.007677784 = product of:
      0.015355568 = sum of:
        0.015355568 = product of:
          0.030711137 = sum of:
            0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030711137 = score(doc=239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.967-976
  6. Vaughan, L.; Romero-Frías, E.: Web search volume as a predictor of academic fame : an exploration of Google trends (2014) 0.01
    0.007677784 = product of:
      0.015355568 = sum of:
        0.015355568 = product of:
          0.030711137 = sum of:
            0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 1233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030711137 = score(doc=1233,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 1233, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1233)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.707-720
  7. Vaughan, L.; Thelwall, M.: Scholarly use of the Web : what are the key inducers of links to journal Web sites? (2003) 0.01
    0.0063981535 = product of:
      0.012796307 = sum of:
        0.012796307 = product of:
          0.025592614 = sum of:
            0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025592614 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.1, S.29-38
  8. Vaughan, L.; Shaw, D.: Web citation data for impact assessment : a comparison of four science disciplines (2005) 0.01
    0.0063981535 = product of:
      0.012796307 = sum of:
        0.012796307 = product of:
          0.025592614 = sum of:
            0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025592614 = score(doc=3880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.10, S.1075-1087
  9. Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.; Björneborn, L.: Webometrics (2004) 0.01
    0.0063981535 = product of:
      0.012796307 = sum of:
        0.012796307 = product of:
          0.025592614 = sum of:
            0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 4279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025592614 = score(doc=4279,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4279, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4279)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 39(2005), S.81-138
  10. Vaughan, L.; Shaw , D.: Bibliographic and Web citations : what Is the difference? (2003) 0.01
    0.0063981535 = product of:
      0.012796307 = sum of:
        0.012796307 = product of:
          0.025592614 = sum of:
            0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025592614 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.14, S.1313-1324
  11. Leydesdorff, L.; Vaughan, L.: Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science : extending ACA to the Web environment (2006) 0.01
    0.0063981535 = product of:
      0.012796307 = sum of:
        0.012796307 = product of:
          0.025592614 = sum of:
            0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 6113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025592614 = score(doc=6113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 6113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.12, S.1616-1628
  12. Romero-Frías, E.; Vaughan, L.: European political trends viewed through patterns of Web linking (2010) 0.01
    0.0063981535 = product of:
      0.012796307 = sum of:
        0.012796307 = product of:
          0.025592614 = sum of:
            0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025592614 = score(doc=4002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.10, S.2109-2121
  13. Vaughan, L.; Yang, R.: Web data as academic and business quality estimates : a comparison of three data sources (2012) 0.01
    0.0063981535 = product of:
      0.012796307 = sum of:
        0.012796307 = product of:
          0.025592614 = sum of:
            0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025592614 = score(doc=452,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 452, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=452)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.10, S.1960-1972
  14. Vaughan, L.: Uncovering information from social media hyperlinks (2016) 0.01
    0.0063981535 = product of:
      0.012796307 = sum of:
        0.012796307 = product of:
          0.025592614 = sum of:
            0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 2892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025592614 = score(doc=2892,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 2892, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2892)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.5, S.1105-1120
  15. Ninkov, A.; Vaughan, L.: ¬A webometric analysis of the online vaccination debate (2017) 0.01
    0.0063981535 = product of:
      0.012796307 = sum of:
        0.012796307 = product of:
          0.025592614 = sum of:
            0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025592614 = score(doc=3605,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.5, S.1285-1294
  16. Vaughan, L.; Ninkov, A.: ¬A new approach to web co-link analysis (2018) 0.01
    0.0063981535 = product of:
      0.012796307 = sum of:
        0.012796307 = product of:
          0.025592614 = sum of:
            0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 4256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025592614 = score(doc=4256,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 4256, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4256)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.6, S.820-831