-
Khurshid, Z.: ¬The impact of information technology an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers (2003)
0.06
0.055794522 = product of:
0.111589044 = sum of:
0.111589044 = sum of:
0.0620588 = weight(_text_:technology in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0620588 = score(doc=2323,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.39897424 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
0.04953024 = weight(_text_:22 in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04953024 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Information technology (IT) encompassing an integrated library system, computer hardware and software, CDROM, Internet, and other domains, including MARC 21 formats, CORC, and metadata standards (Dublin Core, TEI, XML, RDF) has produced far-reaching changes in the job functions of catalogers. Libraries are now coming up with a new set of recruiting requirements for these positions. This paper aims to review job advertisements published in American Libraries (AL) and College and Research Libraries News (C&RL NEWS) to assess the impact of the use of IT in libraries an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers.
- Source
- Information technology and libraries. 22(2003) no. March, S.18-21
-
Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014)
0.05
0.050100517 = product of:
0.10020103 = sum of:
0.10020103 = sum of:
0.05067079 = weight(_text_:technology in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05067079 = score(doc=2606,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.32576108 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.04953024 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04953024 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Catalogers have become fluent in information technology such as web design skills, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Cascading Stylesheets (CSS), eXensible Markup Language (XML), and programming languages. The knowledge gained from learning information technology can be used to experiment with methods of transforming one metadata schema into another using various software solutions. This paper will discuss the use of eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) for repurposing, editing, and reformatting metadata. Catalogers have the requisite skills for working with any metadata schema, and if they are excluded from metadata work, libraries are wasting a valuable human resource.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Lee, E.: Cataloguing (and reference) at the crossroads (1996)
0.05
0.04877709 = product of:
0.09755418 = sum of:
0.09755418 = sum of:
0.040948182 = weight(_text_:technology in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040948182 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
0.05660599 = weight(_text_:22 in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05660599 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Alerts librarians to directions in research in artificial intelligence relevant to information retrieval which will change current technology and user expectations and consequently the requirements for data provision and access at the base level. Predicts a reevaluation of priorities for using the expertise of cataloguers (and reference librarians) and of cataloguing methodologies. Debates the future of cataloguing, arguing for the need to monitor developments in adjacent research areas and to plan with these in mind
- Source
- Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.68-75
-
Roughton, K.G.: Educating the dinosaur : the evolution of catalog management at the Iowa State University Library (1985)
0.05
0.04877709 = product of:
0.09755418 = sum of:
0.09755418 = sum of:
0.040948182 = weight(_text_:technology in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040948182 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
0.05660599 = weight(_text_:22 in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05660599 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Traditional cataloging support services such as typing and filing are gradually being eliminated in favor of more sophisticated skills. Library staff members who are specialized in imminently obsolete skills must be re-educated to become productive participants in the "Golden Age" of technology. The Catalog Management section at the Iowa State University Library is attempting to make this process painless and exciting for all of its employees.
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:11
-
Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004)
0.05
0.04877709 = product of:
0.09755418 = sum of:
0.09755418 = sum of:
0.040948182 = weight(_text_:technology in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040948182 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.05660599 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05660599 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
-
Lee-Smeltzer, K.-H. (Janet): Cataloging in three academic libraries: operations, trends, and perspectives (2000)
0.04
0.0429433 = product of:
0.0858866 = sum of:
0.0858866 = sum of:
0.04343211 = weight(_text_:technology in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04343211 = score(doc=5386,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2792238 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article describes the cataloging operations and management in three medium-sized academic libraries - Oregon State University, University of Houston, and Colorado State University. It provides an overview of the staffing and organizational structure of the cataloging department in each library. Faced with similar challenges from constantly changing environments brought about by technology and institutional pressure to achieve more with less, library technical services in these three libraries, cataloging in particular, are developing some common strategies for coping. These trends include: (1) changing the roles and responsibilities of both professional and support staff (2) designing workflow around library systems and limited personnel resources, (3) mainstreaming government documents cataloging and processing into technical services, (4) using technology to increase cataloging efficiency, and (5) dealing with bibliographic control of current electronic resources and moving into digitization and metadata arenas.
- Date
- 27. 7.2006 18:22:11
-
Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006)
0.04
0.04267995 = product of:
0.0853599 = sum of:
0.0853599 = sum of:
0.03582966 = weight(_text_:technology in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03582966 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
0.04953024 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04953024 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012)
0.04
0.04267995 = product of:
0.0853599 = sum of:
0.0853599 = sum of:
0.03582966 = weight(_text_:technology in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03582966 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.04953024 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04953024 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000)
0.04
0.04002648 = product of:
0.08005296 = sum of:
0.08005296 = product of:
0.16010591 = sum of:
0.16010591 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16010591 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2000 19:22:27
-
Coyle, K.: FRBR, before and after : a look at our bibliographic models (2016)
0.04
0.03985323 = product of:
0.07970646 = sum of:
0.07970646 = sum of:
0.044327714 = weight(_text_:technology in 2786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044327714 = score(doc=2786,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.2849816 = fieldWeight in 2786, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2786)
0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 2786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035378743 = score(doc=2786,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2786, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2786)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This book looks at the ways that we define the things of the bibliographic world, and in particular how our bibliographic models reflect our technology and the assumed goals of libraries. There is, of course, a history behind this, as well as a present and a future. The first part of the book begins by looking at the concept of the 'work' in library cataloging theory, and how that concept has evolved since the mid-nineteenth century to date. Next it talks about models and technology, two areas that need to be understood before taking a long look at where we are today. It then examines the new bibliographic model called Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and the technical and social goals that the FRBR Study Group was tasked to address. The FRBR entities are analyzed in some detail. Finally, FRBR as an entity-relation model is compared to a small set of Semantic Web vocabularies that can be seen as variants of the multi-entity bibliographic model that FRBR introduced.
- Content
- Part I. Work, model, technologyThe work -- The model -- The technology -- Part II. FRBR and other solutions -- Introduction -- FRBR : standard for international sharing -- The entity-relation model -- What is modeled in FRBR -- Does FRBR meet FRBR's objectives? -- Some issues that arise -- Bibliographic description and the Semantic Web.
- Date
- 12. 2.2016 16:22:58
-
Parent, I.: IFLA Section on Cataloguing: "Why in the World?" (2000)
0.04
0.036582813 = product of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Bibliographic Control Division of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) consists of three sections: bibliography, cataloguing, and classification. The cataloguing section, which focuses on descriptive cataloguing, is one of the oldest within IFLA, having been founded in 1935 as the IFLA Committee on Uniform Cataloguing Rules. It became the Committee on Cataloguing in 1970. The committee played a key role in planning and convening the International Conference on Cataloguing Principles held in Paris in 1961 and the International Meeting of Cataloguing Experts held in Copenhagen in 1969. The Copenhagen conference provided the impetus to develop the International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions (ISBD). The Committee on Cataloguing established a systematic process for the revision of the ISBDs. The cataloguing section focuses on traditional cataloguing standards and on the impact of electronic resources and technology on these standards. The section has initiated several projects at the international level to facilitate access to information.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009)
0.04
0.036582813 = product of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:20:24
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.844-857
-
D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011)
0.04
0.036582813 = product of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:06:52
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.257-269
-
Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011)
0.04
0.036582813 = product of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:25:32
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.395-405
-
Das, S.; Paik, J.H.: Gender tagging of named entities using retrieval-assisted multi-context aggregation : an unsupervised approach (2023)
0.04
0.036582813 = product of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.073165625 = sum of:
0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030711137 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042454492 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2023 12:00:14
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.461-475
-
Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003)
0.04
0.035786085 = product of:
0.07157217 = sum of:
0.07157217 = sum of:
0.036193423 = weight(_text_:technology in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036193423 = score(doc=154,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035378743 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Encoded Archival Description (EAD) has provided a new way to approach manuscript and archival collection representation. A review of previous representational practices and problems highlights the benefits of using EAD. This new approach should be considered a partner rather than an adversary in the access providing process. Technological capabilities now allow for multiple metadata schemas to be employed in the creation of the finding aid. Crosswalks allow for MARC records to be generated from the detailed encoding of an EAD finding aid. In the process of creating these crosswalks and detailed encoding, EAD has generated more changes in traditional processes and procedures than originally imagined. The North Carolina State University (NCSU) Libraries sought to test the process of crosswalking EAD to MARC, investigating how this process used technology as well as changed physical procedures. By creating a complex and indepth EAD template for finding aids, with accompanying related encoding analogs embedded within the element structure, MARC records were generated that required minor editing and revision for inclusion in the NCSU Libraries OPAC. The creation of this bridge between EAD and MARC has stimulated theoretical discussions about the role of collaboration, technology, and expertise in the ongoing struggle to maximize access to our collections. While this study is a only a first attempt at harnessing this potential, a presentation of the tensions, struggles, and successes provides illumination to some of the larger issues facing special collections today.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003)
0.03
0.030485678 = product of:
0.060971357 = sum of:
0.060971357 = sum of:
0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025592614 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035378743 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
-
Savoy, J.: Estimating the probability of an authorship attribution (2016)
0.03
0.030485678 = product of:
0.060971357 = sum of:
0.060971357 = sum of:
0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025592614 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035378743 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 5.2016 21:22:27
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.6, S.1462-1472
-
Kim, J.(im); Kim, J.(enna): Effect of forename string on author name disambiguation (2020)
0.03
0.030485678 = product of:
0.060971357 = sum of:
0.060971357 = sum of:
0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025592614 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035378743 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 7.2020 13:22:58
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.7, S.839-855
-
Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023)
0.03
0.030485678 = product of:
0.060971357 = sum of:
0.060971357 = sum of:
0.025592614 = weight(_text_:technology in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025592614 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.035378743 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035378743 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052224867 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:40:36
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.168-185
