Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Notationen / Signaturen"
  1. Starchan, D.: ¬A chance to make UDC notation more computer-friendly (2000) 0.02
    0.02476512 = product of:
      0.04953024 = sum of:
        0.04953024 = product of:
          0.09906048 = sum of:
            0.09906048 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09906048 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.43-44
  2. Savic, D.: CUTT-x: an expert system for automatic assignment of Cutter numbers (1996) 0.01
    0.014151498 = product of:
      0.028302995 = sum of:
        0.028302995 = product of:
          0.05660599 = sum of:
            0.05660599 = weight(_text_:22 in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05660599 = score(doc=6582,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.71-87
  3. Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999) 0.01
    0.010613623 = product of:
      0.021227246 = sum of:
        0.021227246 = product of:
          0.042454492 = sum of:
            0.042454492 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042454492 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 8.2001 13:22:14
  4. Drezek, G.: Call number relabelling project in an amalgamated university library : how and why we relabelled 170.000 items in three weeks and what good did it to us? (1993) 0.01
    0.010237046 = product of:
      0.020474091 = sum of:
        0.020474091 = product of:
          0.040948182 = sum of:
            0.040948182 = weight(_text_:technology in 3075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040948182 = score(doc=3075,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 3075, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3075)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses a major collection relabelling project undertaken by Queensland University of Technology Library in order to provide a consistent classification and accession numbering scheme on all campuses. The project is examined in terms of how it was done, what was achieved, and what went wrong
  5. Chen, K.-n.: Dynamic subject numbers replace traditional classification numbers (2013) 0.01
    0.007677784 = product of:
      0.015355568 = sum of:
        0.015355568 = product of:
          0.030711137 = sum of:
            0.030711137 = weight(_text_:technology in 787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030711137 = score(doc=787,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15554588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 787, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=787)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents a new idea on shelving printed books and finding books in libraries. The author advocates that traditional book classification number (TBCN) systems should be replaced by a better indexing method for books in libraries. The author proposes a new way of seeking books for library users wishing to locate them called a 'dynamic book subject number' (DBSN) system. The new system combines new indexing rules and automated system technology to create settings in which a book's 'subject number' can change rather than having a particular permanent classification number assigned to it. The new way encourages library users to seek books through a user-friendly cataloging system by choosing subjects from the embedded database. The database contains thousands of subjects with their corresponding Arabic codes. For printed books, the DBSN ushers in a new era in the relationship between library users and the books.
  6. Jansen, U.: ¬Die Herren der Striche sitzen in Köln : Seit 1974 vergibt GS 1 Kodes zur Erleichterung des Warenverkehrs (2005) 0.01
    0.007075749 = product of:
      0.014151498 = sum of:
        0.014151498 = product of:
          0.028302995 = sum of:
            0.028302995 = weight(_text_:22 in 3219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028302995 = score(doc=3219,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18288259 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052224867 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3219, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22