Search (35 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.06 
    0.060355097 = product of:
  0.120710194 = sum of:
    0.120710194 = sum of:
      0.07839915 = weight(_text_:management in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07839915 = score(doc=994,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.042311046 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042311046 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed.
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1451-1464
  2. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.04 
    0.04075531 = product of:
  0.08151062 = sum of:
    0.08151062 = sum of:
      0.039199576 = weight(_text_:management in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039199576 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
      0.042311046 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042311046 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.800-810
  3. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.03 
    0.028207365 = product of:
  0.05641473 = sum of:
    0.05641473 = product of:
      0.11282946 = sum of:
        0.11282946 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11282946 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  4. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.03 
    0.028207365 = product of:
  0.05641473 = sum of:
    0.05641473 = product of:
      0.11282946 = sum of:
        0.11282946 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11282946 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  5. Trivison, D.: Term co-occurrence in cited/citing journal articles as a measure of document similarity (1987) 0.03 
    0.026133051 = product of:
  0.052266102 = sum of:
    0.052266102 = product of:
      0.104532205 = sum of:
        0.104532205 = weight(_text_:management in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.104532205 = score(doc=5656,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 23(1987), S.183-194
  6. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02 
    0.024932023 = product of:
  0.049864046 = sum of:
    0.049864046 = product of:
      0.09972809 = sum of:
        0.09972809 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09972809 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  7. Kwok, K.L.: ¬The use of titles and cited titles as document representations for automatic classification (1975) 0.02 
    0.022866419 = product of:
  0.045732837 = sum of:
    0.045732837 = product of:
      0.091465674 = sum of:
        0.091465674 = weight(_text_:management in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.091465674 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.521365 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 11(1975), S.201-206
  8. He, Y.; Hui, S.C.: Mining a web database for author cocitation analysis (2002) 0.02 
    0.022866419 = product of:
  0.045732837 = sum of:
    0.045732837 = product of:
      0.091465674 = sum of:
        0.091465674 = weight(_text_:management in 2584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.091465674 = score(doc=2584,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.521365 = fieldWeight in 2584, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2584)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 38(2002) no.4, S.491-508
  9. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.02 
    0.017629603 = product of:
  0.035259206 = sum of:
    0.035259206 = product of:
      0.07051841 = sum of:
        0.07051841 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07051841 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  10. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01 
    0.014959215 = product of:
  0.02991843 = sum of:
    0.02991843 = product of:
      0.05983686 = sum of:
        0.05983686 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05983686 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  11. Marion, L.S.; McCain, K.W.: Contrasting views of software engineering journals : author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments (2001) 0.01 
    0.014144929 = product of:
  0.028289858 = sum of:
    0.028289858 = product of:
      0.056579717 = sum of:
        0.056579717 = weight(_text_:management in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056579717 = score(doc=5767,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    We explore the intellectual subject structure and research themes in software engineering through the identification and analysis of a core journal literature. We examine this literature via two expert perspectives: that of the author, who identified significant work by citing it (journal cocitation analysis), and that of the professional indexer, who tags published work with subject terms to facilitate retrieval from a bibliographic database (subject profile analysis). The data sources are SCISEARCH (the on-line version of Science Citation Index), and INSPEC (a database covering software engineering, computer science, and information systems). We use data visualization tools (cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling, and PFNets) to show the "intellectual maps" of software engineering. Cocitation and subject profile analyses demonstrate that software engineering is a distinct interdisciplinary field, valuing practical and applied aspects, and spanning a subject continuum from "programming-in-the-smalI" to "programming-in-the-large." This continuum mirrors the software development life cycle by taking the operating system or major application from initial programming through project management, implementation, and maintenance. Object orientation is an integral but distinct subject area in software engineering. Key differences are the importance of management and programming: (1) cocitation analysis emphasizes project management and systems development; (2) programming techniques/languages are more influential in subject profiles; (3) cocitation profiles place object-oriented journals separately and centrally while the subject profile analysis locates these journals with the programming/languages group
  12. Lai, K.-K.; Wu, S.-J.: Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system (2005) 0.01 
    0.014144929 = product of:
  0.028289858 = sum of:
    0.028289858 = product of:
      0.056579717 = sum of:
        0.056579717 = weight(_text_:management in 1013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056579717 = score(doc=1013,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 1013, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1013)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The paper proposes a new approach to create a patent classification system to replace the IPC or UPC system for conducting patent analysis and management. The new approach is based on co-citation analysis of bibliometrics. The traditional approach for management of patents, which is based on either the IPC or UPC, is too general to meet the needs of specific industries. In addition, some patents are placed in incorrect categories, making it difficult for enterprises to carry out R&D planning, technology positioning, patent strategy-making and technology forecasting. Therefore, it is essential to develop a patent classification system that is adaptive to the characteristics of a specific industry. The analysis of this approach is divided into three phases. Phase I selects appropriate databases to conduct patent searches according to the subject and objective of this study and then select basic patents. Phase II uses the co-cited frequency of the basic patent pairs to assess their similarity. Phase III uses factor analysis to establish a classification system and assess the efficiency of the proposed approach. The main contribution of this approach is to develop a patent classification system based on patent similarities to assist patent manager in understanding the basic patents for a specific industry, the relationships among categories of technologies and the evolution of a technology category.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.2, S.313-330
  13. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01 
    0.014103683 = product of:
  0.028207365 = sum of:
    0.028207365 = product of:
      0.05641473 = sum of:
        0.05641473 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05641473 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  14. Pao, M.L.: Term and citation retrieval : a field study (1993) 0.01 
    0.013066526 = product of:
  0.026133051 = sum of:
    0.026133051 = product of:
      0.052266102 = sum of:
        0.052266102 = weight(_text_:management in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052266102 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.1, S.95-112
  15. Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005) 0.01 
    0.013066526 = product of:
  0.026133051 = sum of:
    0.026133051 = product of:
      0.052266102 = sum of:
        0.052266102 = weight(_text_:management in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052266102 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1395-1402
  16. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.01 
    0.012340722 = product of:
  0.024681443 = sum of:
    0.024681443 = product of:
      0.049362887 = sum of:
        0.049362887 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049362887 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  17. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.01 
    0.012340722 = product of:
  0.024681443 = sum of:
    0.024681443 = product of:
      0.049362887 = sum of:
        0.049362887 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049362887 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  18. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.01 
    0.012340722 = product of:
  0.024681443 = sum of:
    0.024681443 = product of:
      0.049362887 = sum of:
        0.049362887 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049362887 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  19. Zhao, D.: Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science : a comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals (2005) 0.01 
    0.011433209 = product of:
  0.022866419 = sum of:
    0.022866419 = product of:
      0.045732837 = sum of:
        0.045732837 = weight(_text_:management in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045732837 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1403-1418
  20. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.01 
    0.010577762 = product of:
  0.021155523 = sum of:
    0.021155523 = product of:
      0.042311046 = sum of:
        0.042311046 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042311046 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 30
  • d 5

Types

  • a 34
  • el 3
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications