Search (1158 results, page 1 of 58)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. (2013 ff.) 0.11 
    0.10868083 = product of:
  0.21736166 = sum of:
    0.21736166 = sum of:
      0.104532205 = weight(_text_:management in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.104532205 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
      0.11282946 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11282946 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 65(2013) ff. Früher u.d.T.: Aslib proceedings, (bis 2012)
  2. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.08 
    0.08266668 = product of:
  0.16533336 = sum of:
    0.16533336 = product of:
      0.49600005 = sum of:
        0.49600005 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49600005 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.441267 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  3. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.07 
    0.0688889 = product of:
  0.1377778 = sum of:
    0.1377778 = product of:
      0.4133334 = sum of:
        0.4133334 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4133334 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.441267 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  4. Paul-Hus, A.; Desrochers, N.; Rijcke, S.de; Rushforth, A.D.: ¬The reward system of science (2017) 0.07 
    0.06792552 = product of:
  0.13585104 = sum of:
    0.13585104 = sum of:
      0.06533263 = weight(_text_:management in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06533263 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
      0.07051841 = weight(_text_:22 in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07051841 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.5, S.478-485
  5. Ermert, A.: Terminologie - Bedeutung, Erarbeitung, professionelle Strukturierung und Management : Der 13. Deutsche Terminologietag vom 19. bis 21. April 2012 in Heidelberg (2012) 0.07 
    0.06792552 = product of:
  0.13585104 = sum of:
    0.13585104 = sum of:
      0.06533263 = weight(_text_:management in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06533263 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
      0.07051841 = weight(_text_:22 in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07051841 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:37:29
  6. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.06 
    0.064287245 = product of:
  0.12857449 = sum of:
    0.12857449 = sum of:
      0.07921161 = weight(_text_:management in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07921161 = score(doc=4198,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
      0.049362887 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049362887 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
    Theme
    Content Management System
  7. Jervis, M.; Masoodian, M.: How do people attempt to integrate the management of their paper and electronic documents? (2014) 0.06 
    0.06084308 = product of:
  0.12168616 = sum of:
    0.12168616 = sum of:
      0.08642695 = weight(_text_:management in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08642695 = score(doc=1632,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.49264365 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.035259206 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035259206 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to describe how people manage to integrate their use of paper and electronic documents in modern office work environments. Design/methodology/approach - An observational interview type study of 14 participants from 11 offices in eight organizations was conducted. Recorded data were analysed using a thematic analysis method. This involved reading and annotation of interview transcripts, categorizing, linking and connecting, corroborating, and producing an account of the study. Findings - The findings of the study can be categorized into four groups: the roles paper and electronic documents serve in today's offices, the ways in which these documents are managed, the problems associated with their management, and the types of fragmentation that exist in terms of their management and how these are dealt with. Practical implications - The study has identified the need for better integrated management of paper and electronic documents in present-day offices. The findings of the study have then been used to propose a set of guidelines for the development of integrated paper and electronic document management systems. Originality/value - Although similar studies of offices have been conducted in the past, almost all of these studies are prior to the widespread use of mobile and network-based shared technologies in office environments. Furthermore, previous studies have generally failed to identify and propose guidelines for integration of paper and electronic document management systems.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 66(2014) no.2, S.134-155
  8. Mizrachi, D.; Bates, M.J.: Undergraduates' personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency (2013) 0.06 
    0.057637505 = product of:
  0.11527501 = sum of:
    0.11527501 = sum of:
      0.0800158 = weight(_text_:management in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0800158 = score(doc=1003,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.45609936 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
      0.035259206 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035259206 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.
  9. Vlaeminck, S.; Wagner, G.G.: Ergebnisse einer Befragung von wissenschaftlichen Infrastrukturdienstleistern im Bereich der Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften : Zur Rolle von Forschungsdatenzentren beim Management von publikationsbezogenen Forschungsdaten (2014) 0.06 
    0.057019442 = product of:
  0.114038885 = sum of:
    0.114038885 = sum of:
      0.064676 = weight(_text_:management in 2543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.064676 = score(doc=2543,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 2543, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2543)
      0.049362887 = weight(_text_:22 in 2543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049362887 = score(doc=2543,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2543, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2543)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden die Ergebnisse einer Analyse zusammengefasst, in der untersucht wurde, ob, und wenn ja welche Services für das Management von publikationsbezogenen Forschungsdaten gegenwärtig bei wissenschaftlichen Infrastrukturdienstleistern in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften bestehen. Die Analyse wurde Mithilfe von Desktop-Research sowie einer Online-Befragung, an der sich 22 von 46 angeschriebenen Institutionen beteiligten, durchgeführt. Untersucht wurden vor allem deutsche und europäische Forschungsdatenzentren, Bibliotheken und Archive. Insbesondere wurde untersucht, ob diese Organisationen extern erzeugte Forschungsdaten, den dazugehörigen Berechnungscode (Syntax) und ggf. genutzte (selbstgeschriebene) Software grundsätzlich speichern und hosten. Weitere Themenfelder waren Metadatenstandards, Persistente Identifikatoren, Verfügbarkeit von Schnittstellen (APIs) und Unterstützung von semantischen Technologien.
  10. Leitfaden zum Forschungsdaten-Management : Handreichungen aus dem WissGrid-Projekt (2013) 0.06 
    0.055103354 = product of:
  0.11020671 = sum of:
    0.11020671 = sum of:
      0.067895666 = weight(_text_:management in 1029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.067895666 = score(doc=1029,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.38701317 = fieldWeight in 1029, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1029)
      0.042311046 = weight(_text_:22 in 1029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042311046 = score(doc=1029,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1029, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1029)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Digitale Forschungsdaten sind eine unverzichtbare Grundlage moderner Wissenschaft. Mit ihnen sind aber eine Reihe von notwendigen Datenmanagement-Aufgaben verbunden, damit sie in der aktiven Forschung bestmöglich eingesetzt werden können und die gute wissenschaftliche Praxis eingehalten wird. Wie lange sollen die Daten aufbewahrt werden? Welche Kontextinformtionen müssen erfasst werden, um die Daten zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt noch sinnvol benutzen zu können? Wie viel kostet die Aufbewahrung? Dieses Buch kann diese Fragen nur aufwerfen, nicht beantworten. Denn ohne auf Details der jeweiligen Disziplin, Forschungsdaten und Projekte einzugehen, lassen sich diese Fragen nicht allegemeinverbindlich klären. Was dieses Buch jedoch mit einem Leitfaden und einer Checkliste bereitstellt, ist ein einfaches Instrument für fachwissenschatliche oder Infrastruktur-Einrichtungen, um die wichtigsten Aufgaben und Fragen im Forschungsdaten-Management strukturiert beantworten und effizient planen zu können.
    Date
    19.12.2015 11:57:22
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  11. Alqahtani, F.H.: ¬The acceptance of corporate wiki use for knowledge diffusion purposes (2017) 0.05 
    0.05029592 = product of:
  0.10059184 = sum of:
    0.10059184 = sum of:
      0.06533263 = weight(_text_:management in 4055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06533263 = score(doc=4055,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 4055, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4055)
      0.035259206 = weight(_text_:22 in 4055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035259206 = score(doc=4055,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4055, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4055)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose Scholars and practitioners alike view knowledge as a crucial organisational asset. Over the past decade, several knowledge management (KM) technologies have emerged, such as wikis. A wiki is a web-based hypertext application that supports a collaborative and conversational approach to KM. While wikis are generally simple to use, their adoption for managing organisational knowledge sometimes meets resistance from employees. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the factors affecting the user acceptance of organisational wikis as a means of knowledge creation and diffusion. Design/methodology/approach Building on the existing research on KM and information technology adoption, this study identified the following factors: the relevance of top management support for and complexity of enterprise wikis as well as technical support and knowledge-sharing self-efficacy. A cross-sectional survey was employed to examine the influence of these factors on employees' acceptance of corporate wikis. Overall, 102 employees participated in the online survey, and the data collected were analysed using the partial least squares method. Findings The research model developed demonstrates that top management support, technical support and knowledge-sharing self-efficacy have a positive significant effect on employees' willingness to use wikis for knowledge-creation purposes within organisations. Originality/value The findings of this study contribute to the existing literature on the implementation of wikis as a KM technology by developing a theoretical model explaining employees' acceptance of this technology. Organisations could use this model to guide and facilitate wiki initiatives.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.6, S.642-659
  12. Petric, K.; Petric, T.; Krisper, M.; Rajkovic, V.: User profiling on a pilot digital library with the final result of a new adaptive knowledge management solution (2011) 0.05 
    0.048873812 = product of:
  0.097747624 = sum of:
    0.097747624 = sum of:
      0.055436574 = weight(_text_:management in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055436574 = score(doc=4560,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
      0.042311046 = weight(_text_:22 in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042311046 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this article, several procedures (e.g., measurements, information retrieval analyses, power law, association rules, hierarchical clustering) are introduced which were made on a pilot digital library. Information retrievals of web users from 01/01/2003 to 01/01/2006 on the internal search engine of the pilot digital library have been analyzed. With the power law method of data processing, a constant information retrieval pattern has been established, stable over a longer period of time. After this, the data have been analyzed. On the basis of the accomplished measurements and analyses, a series of mental models of web users for global (educational) purposes have been developed (e.g., the metamodel of thought hierarchy of web users, the segmentation model of web users), and the users were profiled in four different groups (adventurers, observers, applicable, and know-alls). The article concludes with the construction of a new knowledge management solution called multidimensional rank thesaurus.
    Date
    13. 7.2011 14:47:22
  13. Chiaravalloti, M.T.; Pasceri, E.; Taverniti, M.: URT "Indexing and Classification Systems" Projects and biomedical knowledge standards (2012) 0.05 
    0.048873812 = product of:
  0.097747624 = sum of:
    0.097747624 = sum of:
      0.055436574 = weight(_text_:management in 4887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055436574 = score(doc=4887,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 4887, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4887)
      0.042311046 = weight(_text_:22 in 4887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042311046 = score(doc=4887,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4887, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4887)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper presents an overview of the activities of the "Unità di Ricerca presso Terzi" (URT) - "Indexing and classification systems" of the National Research Council (CNR), which deals with research in organization and document management systems, indexing, classification, knowledge, and content management. Particular attention will be focused on the project of the Electronic Health Record Technological Infrastructure (InFSE), in which the URT works on the definition of ontological models, and vocabularies supporting EHR with the aim to build an updated Italian version of a unified medical reporting language. Although current Italian legislation makes mandatory the use of internationally recognized classification systems to help interoperability and exchange of information, the current structure of those systems does not allow their full use in the Italian context. For all these reasons, it is necessary to make some adaptations in the International Classification of Disease 9th Revision terminology, used for diagnosis encoding, and in the Logical Observation Names and Codes, used for encoding laboratory observations.
    Date
    22. 1.2012 12:55:24
  14. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.05 
    0.04822223 = product of:
  0.09644446 = sum of:
    0.09644446 = product of:
      0.28933337 = sum of:
        0.28933337 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28933337 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.441267 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05204841 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  15. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.05 
    0.048030596 = product of:
  0.09606119 = sum of:
    0.09606119 = sum of:
      0.046197146 = weight(_text_:management in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046197146 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
      0.049864046 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049864046 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper centres on the tools for the management of new digital documents, which are not only textual, but also visual-video, audio or multimedia in the full sense. Among the aims is to demonstrate that operating within the terms of generic Information Retrieval through textual language only is limiting, and it is instead necessary to consider ampler criteria, such as those of MultiMedia Information Retrieval, according to which, every type of digital document can be analyzed and searched by the proper elements of language for its proper nature. MMIR is presented as the organic complex of the systems of Text Retrieval, Visual Retrieval, Video Retrieval, and Audio Retrieval, each of which has an approach to information management that handles the concrete textual, visual, audio, or video content of the documents directly, here defined as content-based. In conclusion, the limits of this content-based objective access to documents is underlined. The discrepancy known as the semantic gap is that which occurs between semantic-interpretive access and content-based access. Finally, the integration of these conceptions is explained, gathering and composing the merits and the advantages of each of the approaches and of the systems to access to information.
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
  16. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.05 
    0.048030596 = product of:
  0.09606119 = sum of:
    0.09606119 = sum of:
      0.046197146 = weight(_text_:management in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046197146 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
      0.049864046 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049864046 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyse the global scientific outputs of ontology research, an important emerging discipline that has huge potential to improve information understanding, organization, and management. Design/methodology/approach - This study collected literature published during 1900-2012 from the Web of Science database. The bibliometric analysis was performed from authorial, institutional, national, spatiotemporal, and topical aspects. Basic statistical analysis, visualization of geographic distribution, co-word analysis, and a new index were applied to the selected data. Findings - Characteristics of publication outputs suggested that ontology research has entered into the soaring stage, along with increased participation and collaboration. The authors identified the leading authors, institutions, nations, and articles in ontology research. Authors were more from North America, Europe, and East Asia. The USA took the lead, while China grew fastest. Four major categories of frequently used keywords were identified: applications in Semantic Web, applications in bioinformatics, philosophy theories, and common supporting technology. Semantic Web research played a core role, and gene ontology study was well-developed. The study focus of ontology has shifted from philosophy to information science. Originality/value - This is the first study to quantify global research patterns and trends in ontology, which might provide a potential guide for the future research. The new index provides an alternative way to evaluate the multidisciplinary influence of researchers.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.1, S.27-54
  17. Deokattey, S.; Neelameghan, A.; Kumar, V.: ¬A method for developing a domain ontology : a case study for a multidisciplinary subject (2010) 0.05 
    0.047547862 = product of:
  0.095095724 = sum of:
    0.095095724 = sum of:
      0.045732837 = weight(_text_:management in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045732837 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
      0.049362887 = weight(_text_:22 in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049362887 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A method to develop a prototype domain ontology has been described. The domain selected for the study is Accelerator Driven Systems. This is a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary subject comprising Nuclear Physics, Nuclear and Reactor Engineering, Reactor Fuels and Radioactive Waste Management. Since Accelerator Driven Systems is a vast topic, select areas in it were singled out for the study. Both qualitative and quantitative methods such as Content analysis, Facet analysis and Clustering were used, to develop the web-based model.
    Date
    22. 7.2010 19:41:16
  18. Petras, V.: Heterogenitätsbehandlung und Terminology Mapping durch Crosskonkordanzen : eine Fallstudie (2010) 0.05 
    0.047547862 = product of:
  0.095095724 = sum of:
    0.095095724 = sum of:
      0.045732837 = weight(_text_:management in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045732837 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
      0.049362887 = weight(_text_:22 in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049362887 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Das BMBF hat bis Ende 2007 ein Projekt gefördert, dessen Aufgabe es war, die Erstellung und das Management von Crosskonkordanzen zwischen kontrollierten Vokabularen (Thesauri, Klassifikationen, Deskriptorenlisten) zu organisieren. In drei Jahren wurden 64 Crosskonkordanzen mit mehr als 500.000 Relationen zwischen kontrollierten Vokabularen aus den Sozialwissenschaften und anderen Fachgebieten umgesetzt. In der Schlussphase des Projekts wurde eine umfangreiche Evaluation durchgeführt, die die Effektivität der Crosskonkordanzen in unterschiedlichen Informationssystemen testen sollte. Der Artikel berichtet über die Anwendungsmöglichkeiten der Heterogenitätsbehandlung durch Crosskonkordanzen und die Ergebnisse der umfangreichen Analysen.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  19. Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010) 0.05 
    0.047547862 = product of:
  0.095095724 = sum of:
    0.095095724 = sum of:
      0.045732837 = weight(_text_:management in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045732837 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
      0.049362887 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049362887 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43
  20. Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012) 0.05 
    0.047547862 = product of:
  0.095095724 = sum of:
    0.095095724 = sum of:
      0.045732837 = weight(_text_:management in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045732837 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
      0.049362887 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049362887 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05204841 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Authors

Languages

  • e 909
  • d 238
  • a 1
  • es 1
  • hu 1
  • i 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 990
  • m 101
  • el 96
  • s 39
  • x 21
  • r 9
  • b 6
  • i 2
  • n 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications