Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Choemprayong, S."
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Choemprayong, S.; Siridhara, C.: Work centered classification as communication : representing a central bank's mission with the library classification (2021) 0.02
    0.016784726 = product of:
      0.0671389 = sum of:
        0.0671389 = weight(_text_:communication in 233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0671389 = score(doc=233,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19902779 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046093877 = queryNorm
            0.3373343 = fieldWeight in 233, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=233)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    For a special library serving its parent organization, the design and use of classification schemes primarily need to support work activities. However, when the Prince Vivadhanajaya Library at the Bank of Thailand decided to open its doors to the public in 2018, the redesign of classification that serves both internal staff work and the public interest became a challenging task. We designed a classification scheme by integrating work centered classification design approach, classification as communication framework and the service design approach. The design process included developing empathy, ideation and implementation and evaluation. As a result, the new classification scheme, including seven main classes and thirty-seven level-one subclasses and twenty-two level-two subclasses, was primarily based on the organization's strategic plans, mapping with JEL Classification Codes, Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). The classification scheme also includes geographical code, author cutter number, publication year, volume number and copy number. Follow up interviews with twenty-three participants were conducted two years later to evaluate user experience as well as the staff's opinion of the new classification scheme. The feedback addressed favorable outcomes and challenges to be used for the next iteration of the library service design process.