Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

Oppenheim, C.: Intellectual property : legal and other issues (1997) 0.03
```
0.026457824 = product of:
  0.105831295 = sum of:
    0.105831295 = sum of:
      0.06836079 = weight(_text_:networks in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06836079 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21802035 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046093877 = queryNorm
          0.31355235 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
      0.037470505 = weight(_text_:22 in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037470505 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16141291 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046093877 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

The rapidly increasing volume and variety of electronic or digitized information sources and their accessibility worldwide, have brought to the surface new issues concerning intellectual property, the complexity of the related legal questions and application of legislative measures in real world situations. Attemps to define 'intellectual property' from different points of view; considers the different types with different 'strengths' of protection, and the underlying objectives of such protection. Discusses copyright and international treaties on intellectual property, what is protected and for how long, the concept of fair use and the role of organizations concerned with reproduction rights. Presents a brief overview of the intellectual property questions relating to electronic media: machine readable databases, the information resources on the Internet, and images; electrocopying and downloading of texts and images from networks; and the special nature and copyright problems of multimedia. Also considers moral rights and the need for and feasibility of establishing Electronic Copyright Management System (ECMS)

Source

Information studies. 3(1997) no.1, S.5-22
Oppenheim, C.: National information policies and the need for a coalition for public information (1996) 0.02
```
0.016616032 = product of:
  0.066464126 = sum of:
    0.066464126 = weight(_text_:communication in 4859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066464126 = score(doc=4859,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19902779 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046093877 = queryNorm
        0.33394393 = fieldWeight in 4859, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4859)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Defines a national information policy, identifying 6 component areas. Describes some specific aspects of government action that can be used as a test of commitment to an national information policy. Suggests support for electronic information industries is one of the key methods by which a government can influence information policy, citing the case of the USA as an example. More specifically, considers freedom of information, and policy towards public and national libraries. Argues for the creation of a Coalition for Public Information in each major country, to provide a forum where members of the information community can participate in public policy discussions about technical, economic and social questions arising from the use of information derived from the new electronic communication and information delivery technologies

Oppenheim, C.: Using the h-Index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship (2007) 0.01

0.014242312 = product of:
  0.056969248 = sum of:
    0.056969248 = weight(_text_:communication in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056969248 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19902779 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046093877 = queryNorm
        0.28623766 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series: Brief communication

Johnson, B.; Oppenheim, C.: How socially connected are citers to those that they cite? (2007) 0.01
```
0.010070496 = product of:
  0.040281985 = sum of:
    0.040281985 = product of:
      0.08056397 = sum of:
        0.08056397 = weight(_text_:networks in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08056397 = score(doc=839,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21802035 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046093877 = queryNorm
            0.369525 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to report an investigation into the social and citation networks of three information scientists: David Nicholas, Peter Williams and Paul Huntington. Design/methodology/approach - Similarities between citation patterns and social closeness were identified and discussed. A total of 16 individuals in the citation network were identified and investigated using citation analysis, and a matrix formed of citations made between those in the network. Social connections between the 16 in the citation network were then investigated by means of a questionnaire, the results of which were merged into a separate matrix. These matrices were converted into visual social networks, using multidimensional scaling. A new deviance measure was devised for drawing comparisons between social and citation closeness in individual cases. Findings - Nicholas, Williams and Huntington were found to have cited 527 authors in the period 2000-2003, the 16 most cited becoming the subjects of further citation and social investigation. This comparison, along with the examination of visual representations indicates a positive correlation between social closeness and citation counts. Possible explanations for this correlation are discussed, and implications considered. Despite this correlation, the information scientists were found to cite widely outside their immediate social connections. Originality/value - Social network analysis has not been often used in combination with citation analysis to explore inter-relationships in research teams.

Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994) 0.01

0.006245084 = product of:
  0.024980336 = sum of:
    0.024980336 = product of:
      0.049960673 = sum of:
        0.049960673 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049960673 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16141291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046093877 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22

Oppenheim, C.: ¬An agenda for action to achieve the information society in the UK (1996) 0.01

0.006245084 = product of:
  0.024980336 = sum of:
    0.024980336 = product of:
      0.049960673 = sum of:
        0.049960673 = weight(_text_:22 in 7670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049960673 = score(doc=7670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16141291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046093877 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.6, S.407-421

Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009) 0.00

0.004683813 = product of:
  0.018735252 = sum of:
    0.018735252 = product of:
      0.037470505 = sum of:
        0.037470505 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037470505 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16141291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046093877 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 8. 7.2010 19:22:45

Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010) 0.00

0.0039031778 = product of:
  0.015612711 = sum of:
    0.015612711 = product of:
      0.031225422 = sum of:
        0.031225422 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031225422 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16141291 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046093877 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 8. 1.2011 19:22:13

Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Themes