Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Folksonomies"
  1. Peterson, E.: Parallel systems : the coexistence of subject cataloging and folksonomy (2008) 0.02
    0.016616032 = product of:
      0.066464126 = sum of:
        0.066464126 = weight(_text_:communication in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066464126 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19902779 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046093877 = queryNorm
            0.33394393 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have always had to balance adherence to cataloging rules and authority files with creating cataloging that is current and relevant to users. That dilemma has been complicated in new ways because of user demands in the world of Web 2.0. Standardized cataloging is crucial for communication between computer systems, but patrons now have an expectation of social interaction on the Internet, as evidenced by the popularity of folksonomy. After a description of traditional subject cataloging and folksonomy, this article discusses several institutions where subject cataloging is still used, but where patron interaction is also encouraged. User-generated tags can coexist with controlled vocabulary such as subject headings.
  2. Park, H.: ¬A conceptual framework to study folksonomic interaction (2011) 0.01
    0.011868593 = product of:
      0.047474373 = sum of:
        0.047474373 = weight(_text_:communication in 4852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047474373 = score(doc=4852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19902779 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046093877 = queryNorm
            0.23853138 = fieldWeight in 4852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4852)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper proposes a conceptual framework to recast a folksonomy as a Web classification and to use this to explore the ways in which people work with it in assessing, sharing, and navigating Web resources. The author uses information scent and foraging theory as a context to discuss how folksonomy is constructed through interactions among users, a folksonomic system, and a given domain that consists of a group of users who share the same interest or goals. The discussion centers on two dimensions of folksonomies: (1) folksonomy as a Web classification which puts like information together in a Web context; and (2) folksonomy as information scent which helps users to find related resources and users, and obtain desired information. This paper aims to integrate these two dimensions with a conceptual framework that addresses the structure of a folksonomy shaped by users' interactions. A proposed framework consists of three components of users' interactions with a folksonomy: (a) tagging - cognitive categorization of Web accessible resources by an individual user; (b) navigation - exploration and discovery of Web accessible resources in the folksonomic system; and (c) knowledge sharing - representation and communication of knowledge within a domain. This understanding will help us motivate possible future directions of research in folksonomy. This initial framework will frame a number of research questions and help lay the groundwork for future empirical research which focuses on qualitative analysis of a folksonomy and users' tagging behaviors.
  3. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.01
    0.009367626 = product of:
      0.037470505 = sum of:
        0.037470505 = product of:
          0.07494101 = sum of:
            0.07494101 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07494101 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16141291 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046093877 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  4. Moreiro-González, J.-A.; Bolaños-Mejías, C.: Folksonomy indexing from the assignment of free tags to setup subject : a search analysis into the domain of legal history (2018) 0.01
    0.0071209157 = product of:
      0.028483663 = sum of:
        0.028483663 = product of:
          0.056967326 = sum of:
            0.056967326 = weight(_text_:networks in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056967326 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21802035 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046093877 = queryNorm
                0.26129362 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The behaviour and lexical quality of the folksonomies is examined by comparing two online social networks: Library-Thing (for books) and Flickr (for photos). We presented a case study that combines quantitative and qualitative elements, singularized by the lexical and functional framework. Our query was made by "Legal History" and by the synonyms "Law History" and "History of Law." We then examined the relevance, consistency and precision of the tags attached to the retrieved documents, in addition to their lexical composition. We identified the difficulties caused by free tagging and some of the folksonomy solutions that have been found to solve them. The results are presented in comparative tables, giving special attention to related tags within each retrieved document. Although the number of ambiguous or inconsistent tags is not very large, these do nevertheless represent the most obvious problem to search and retrieval in folksonomies. Relevance is high when the terms are assigned by especially competent taggers. Even with less expert taggers, ambiguity is often successfully corrected by contextualizing the concepts within related tags. A propinquity to associative and taxonomic lexical semantic knowledge is reached via contextual relationships.
  5. Hayman, S.; Lothian, N.: Taxonomy directed folksonomies : integrating user tagging and controlled vocabularies for Australian education networks (2007) 0.01
    0.005696733 = product of:
      0.022786932 = sum of:
        0.022786932 = product of:
          0.045573864 = sum of:
            0.045573864 = weight(_text_:networks in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045573864 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21802035 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046093877 = queryNorm
                0.2090349 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  6. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.01
    0.0055199265 = product of:
      0.022079706 = sum of:
        0.022079706 = product of:
          0.044159412 = sum of:
            0.044159412 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044159412 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16141291 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046093877 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  7. Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006) 0.01
    0.0054644486 = product of:
      0.021857794 = sum of:
        0.021857794 = product of:
          0.04371559 = sum of:
            0.04371559 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04371559 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16141291 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046093877 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  8. Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008) 0.00
    0.004683813 = product of:
      0.018735252 = sum of:
        0.018735252 = product of:
          0.037470505 = sum of:
            0.037470505 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037470505 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16141291 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046093877 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2008 12:39:22
  9. Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008) 0.00
    0.0039031778 = product of:
      0.015612711 = sum of:
        0.015612711 = product of:
          0.031225422 = sum of:
            0.031225422 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031225422 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16141291 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046093877 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  10. Braun, M.: Lesezeichen zum Stöbern : "Social bookmark"-Seiten setzen auf die Empfehlungen ihrer Nutzer (2007) 0.00
    0.003122542 = product of:
      0.012490168 = sum of:
        0.012490168 = product of:
          0.024980336 = sum of:
            0.024980336 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024980336 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16141291 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046093877 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22