-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.09
0.086108625 = product of:
0.17221725 = sum of:
0.13647008 = weight(_text_:reference in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13647008 = score(doc=6940,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.71919286 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.035747174 = product of:
0.07149435 = sum of:
0.07149435 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07149435 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Wordmanship is a humorous dictionary cum index. Analyzing its structure, considers general aspects of the design of a reference work in relation to its index. Indexers should be consulted at the design stage of reference books, as they may suggest reversal of the primary entries, and the index entries; refine the cross-reference-structure; revise locator notation; and select appropriate typography
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The indexes to AACR2 and its 1988 revision : an evaluation (1990)
0.03
0.026530482 = product of:
0.10612193 = sum of:
0.10612193 = sum of:
0.055567794 = weight(_text_:services in 3592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055567794 = score(doc=3592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 3592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3592)
0.050554138 = weight(_text_:22 in 3592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050554138 = score(doc=3592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3592)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 14. 1.1996 5:56:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 34(1990) no.3, S.393-398
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The earliest Hebrew citation indexes (1997)
0.02
0.018093549 = product of:
0.072374195 = sum of:
0.072374195 = weight(_text_:reference in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072374195 = score(doc=86,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.38140965 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The invention of the citation index was credited to Shepard (1873) and Shapiro described a legal citation index published in 1743. A similar index was embedded in the Talmud 2 centuries earlier (1546). The 1st Hebrew citation index to a printed book is dated 1511. The earliest Hebrew manuscript citation index, ascribed to Maimonides, dates from the 12th century. Considerable knowledge was assumed for users of these tools. The substantial knowledge of their compilers contrats with the semi-automatic production of modern citation indexes. The terms citation, quotation, reference, cross-reference, locator, and concordance are employed inconsistently in publications about Hebrew indexes. There is a lack of citation links between the secondary literature on Hebrew indexes and that of citation analysis
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.01
0.011058717 = product of:
0.04423487 = sum of:
0.04423487 = product of:
0.08846974 = sum of:
0.08846974 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08846974 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.01
0.011058717 = product of:
0.04423487 = sum of:
0.04423487 = product of:
0.08846974 = sum of:
0.08846974 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08846974 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.01
0.011058717 = product of:
0.04423487 = sum of:
0.04423487 = product of:
0.08846974 = sum of:
0.08846974 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08846974 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
-
Weinberg, B.H.; Dombeck, L.: Education and training in indexing and abstracting : a directory of courses and workshops offered in the United States and Canada, with a bibliography of textbooks used in indexing and abstracting services (1985)
0.01
0.008682468 = product of:
0.034729872 = sum of:
0.034729872 = product of:
0.069459744 = sum of:
0.069459744 = weight(_text_:services in 1454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069459744 = score(doc=1454,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.405633 = fieldWeight in 1454, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1454)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Why indexing fails the researcher (1988)
0.01
0.0061394316 = product of:
0.024557726 = sum of:
0.024557726 = product of:
0.049115453 = sum of:
0.049115453 = weight(_text_:services in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049115453 = score(doc=703,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.28682584 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- It is a truism in information science that indexing is associated with 'aboutness', and that index terms that accurately represent what a document is about will serve the needs of the user/searcher well. It is contended in this paper that indexing which is limited to the representation of aboutness serves the novice in a discipline adequately, but does not serve the scholar or researcher, who is concerned with highly specific aspects of or points-of-view on a subject. The linguistic analogs of 'aboutness' and 'aspects' are 'topic' and 'comment' respectively. Serial indexing services deal with topics at varyng levels of specificity, but neglect comment almost entirely. This may explain the underutilization of secondary information services by scholars, as has been repeatedly demonstrated in user studies. It may also account for the incomplete lists of bibliographic references in many research papers. Natural language searching of fulltext databases does not solve this problem, because the aspect of a topic of interest to researchers is often inexpressible in concrete terms. The thesis is illustrated with examples of indexing failures in research projects the author has conducted on a range of linguistic and library-information science topics. Finally, the question of whether indexing can be improved to meet the needs of researchers is examined
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The hidden classification in Library of Congress Subject Headings for Judaica (1993)
0.01
0.005209481 = product of:
0.020837924 = sum of:
0.020837924 = product of:
0.041675847 = sum of:
0.041675847 = weight(_text_:services in 6162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041675847 = score(doc=6162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 6162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 37(1993) no.4, S.369379
