-
Robin, J.; McKeown, K.: Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation (1996)
0.03
0.026530482 = product of:
0.10612193 = sum of:
0.10612193 = sum of:
0.055567794 = weight(_text_:services in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055567794 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
0.050554138 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050554138 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Presents a system for summarizing quantitative data in natural language, focusing on the use of a corpus of basketball game summaries, drawn from online news services, to empirically shape the system design and to evaluate the approach. Initial corpus analysis revealed characteristics of textual summaries that challenge the capabilities of current language generation systems. A revision based corpus analysis was used to identify and encode the revision rules of the system. Presents a quantitative evaluation, using several test corpora, to measure the robustness of the new revision based model
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Steinberger, J.; Poesio, M.; Kabadjov, M.A.; Jezek, K.: Two uses of anaphora resolution in summarization (2007)
0.01
0.012794068 = product of:
0.051176272 = sum of:
0.051176272 = weight(_text_:reference in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051176272 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.2696973 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- We propose a new method for using anaphoric information in Latent Semantic Analysis (lsa), and discuss its application to develop an lsa-based summarizer which achieves a significantly better performance than a system not using anaphoric information, and a better performance by the rouge measure than all but one of the single-document summarizers participating in DUC-2002. Anaphoric information is automatically extracted using a new release of our own anaphora resolution system, guitar, which incorporates proper noun resolution. Our summarizer also includes a new approach for automatically identifying the dimensionality reduction of a document on the basis of the desired summarization percentage. Anaphoric information is also used to check the coherence of the summary produced by our summarizer, by a reference checker module which identifies anaphoric resolution errors caused by sentence extraction.
-
Díaz, A.; Gervás, P.: User-model based personalized summarization (2007)
0.01
0.012794068 = product of:
0.051176272 = sum of:
0.051176272 = weight(_text_:reference in 952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051176272 = score(doc=952,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.2696973 = fieldWeight in 952, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=952)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The potential of summary personalization is high, because a summary that would be useless to decide the relevance of a document if summarized in a generic manner, may be useful if the right sentences are selected that match the user interest. In this paper we defend the use of a personalized summarization facility to maximize the density of relevance of selections sent by a personalized information system to a given user. The personalization is applied to the digital newspaper domain and it used a user-model that stores long and short term interests using four reference systems: sections, categories, keywords and feedback terms. On the other side, it is crucial to measure how much information is lost during the summarization process, and how this information loss may affect the ability of the user to judge the relevance of a given document. The results obtained in two personalization systems show that personalized summaries perform better than generic and generic-personalized summaries in terms of identifying documents that satisfy user preferences. We also considered a user-centred direct evaluation that showed a high level of user satisfaction with the summaries.
-
Gomez, J.; Allen, K.; Matney, M.; Awopetu, T.; Shafer, S.: Experimenting with a machine generated annotations pipeline (2020)
0.01
0.006945974 = product of:
0.027783897 = sum of:
0.027783897 = product of:
0.055567794 = sum of:
0.055567794 = weight(_text_:services in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055567794 = score(doc=657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The UCLA Library reorganized its software developers into focused subteams with one, the Labs Team, dedicated to conducting experiments. In this article we describe our first attempt at conducting a software development experiment, in which we attempted to improve our digital library's search results with metadata from cloud-based image tagging services. We explore the findings and discuss the lessons learned from our first attempt at running an experiment.
-
Goh, A.; Hui, S.C.: TES: a text extraction system (1996)
0.01
0.006319267 = product of:
0.025277069 = sum of:
0.025277069 = product of:
0.050554138 = sum of:
0.050554138 = weight(_text_:22 in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050554138 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 26. 2.1997 10:22:43
-
Jones, P.A.; Bradbeer, P.V.G.: Discovery of optimal weights in a concept selection system (1996)
0.01
0.006319267 = product of:
0.025277069 = sum of:
0.025277069 = product of:
0.050554138 = sum of:
0.050554138 = weight(_text_:22 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050554138 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Haag, M.: Automatic text summarization : Evaluation des Copernic Summarizer und mögliche Einsatzfelder in der Fachinformation der DaimlerCrysler AG (2002)
0.01
0.005209481 = product of:
0.020837924 = sum of:
0.020837924 = product of:
0.041675847 = sum of:
0.041675847 = weight(_text_:services in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041675847 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- An evaluation of the Copernic Summarizer, a software for automatically summarizing text in various data formats, is being presented. It shall be assessed if and how the Copernic Summarizer can reasonably be used in the DaimlerChrysler Information Division in order to enhance the quality of its information services. First, an introduction into Automatic Text Summarization is given and the Copernic Summarizer is being presented. Various methods for evaluating Automatic Text Summarization systems and software ergonomics are presented. Two evaluation forms are developed with which the employees of the Information Division shall evaluate the quality and relevance of the extracted keywords and summaries as well as the software's usability. The quality and relevance assessment is done by comparing the original text to the summaries. Finally, a recommendation is given concerning the use of the Copernic Summarizer.
-
Wang, W.; Hwang, D.: Abstraction Assistant : an automatic text abstraction system (2010)
0.01
0.005209481 = product of:
0.020837924 = sum of:
0.020837924 = product of:
0.041675847 = sum of:
0.041675847 = weight(_text_:services in 3981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041675847 = score(doc=3981,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 3981, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3981)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In the interest of standardization and quality assurance, it is desirable for authors and staff of access services to follow the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) guidelines in preparing abstracts. Using the statistical approach an extraction system (the Abstraction Assistant) was developed to generate informative abstracts to meet the ANSI guidelines for structural content elements. The system performance is evaluated by comparing the system-generated abstracts with the author's original abstracts and the manually enhanced system abstracts on three criteria: balance (satisfaction of the ANSI standards), fluency (text coherence), and understandability (clarity). The results suggest that it is possible to use the system output directly without manual modification, but there are issues that need to be addressed in further studies to make the system a better tool.
-
Vanderwende, L.; Suzuki, H.; Brockett, J.M.; Nenkova, A.: Beyond SumBasic : task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion (2007)
0.00
0.0047394503 = product of:
0.018957801 = sum of:
0.018957801 = product of:
0.037915602 = sum of:
0.037915602 = weight(_text_:22 in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037915602 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In recent years, there has been increased interest in topic-focused multi-document summarization. In this task, automatic summaries are produced in response to a specific information request, or topic, stated by the user. The system we have designed to accomplish this task comprises four main components: a generic extractive summarization system, a topic-focusing component, sentence simplification, and lexical expansion of topic words. This paper details each of these components, together with experiments designed to quantify their individual contributions. We include an analysis of our results on two large datasets commonly used to evaluate task-focused summarization, the DUC2005 and DUC2006 datasets, using automatic metrics. Additionally, we include an analysis of our results on the DUC2006 task according to human evaluation metrics. In the human evaluation of system summaries compared to human summaries, i.e., the Pyramid method, our system ranked first out of 22 systems in terms of overall mean Pyramid score; and in the human evaluation of summary responsiveness to the topic, our system ranked third out of 35 systems.
-
Wu, Y.-f.B.; Li, Q.; Bot, R.S.; Chen, X.: Finding nuggets in documents : a machine learning approach (2006)
0.00
0.003949542 = product of:
0.015798168 = sum of:
0.015798168 = product of:
0.031596337 = sum of:
0.031596337 = weight(_text_:22 in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031596337 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:25:48
-
Kim, H.H.; Kim, Y.H.: Generic speech summarization of transcribed lecture videos : using tags and their semantic relations (2016)
0.00
0.003949542 = product of:
0.015798168 = sum of:
0.015798168 = product of:
0.031596337 = sum of:
0.031596337 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031596337 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 12:29:41
-
Oh, H.; Nam, S.; Zhu, Y.: Structured abstract summarization of scientific articles : summarization using full-text section information (2023)
0.00
0.003949542 = product of:
0.015798168 = sum of:
0.015798168 = product of:
0.031596337 = sum of:
0.031596337 = weight(_text_:22 in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031596337 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:57:12
-
Jiang, Y.; Meng, R.; Huang, Y.; Lu, W.; Liu, J.: Generating keyphrases for readers : a controllable keyphrase generation framework (2023)
0.00
0.003949542 = product of:
0.015798168 = sum of:
0.015798168 = product of:
0.031596337 = sum of:
0.031596337 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031596337 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 14:55:20
