-
Hagler, R.: ¬The bibliographic record and information technology (1997)
0.07
0.067204624 = product of:
0.13440925 = sum of:
0.0852938 = weight(_text_:reference in 6175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0852938 = score(doc=6175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.44949555 = fieldWeight in 6175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6175)
0.049115453 = product of:
0.098230906 = sum of:
0.098230906 = weight(_text_:services in 6175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098230906 = score(doc=6175,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.5736517 = fieldWeight in 6175, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6175)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Rez.: Library resources and technical services 42(1998) no.1, S.71-73 (D. CannCasciato); Reference and user services quarterly 37(1997) no.2, S.235-236 (E. McGrath)
-
Mueller, C.J.; Whittaker, M.A.: What is this thing called MARC(S)? (1990)
0.06
0.06214141 = product of:
0.12428282 = sum of:
0.09649892 = weight(_text_:reference in 3588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09649892 = score(doc=3588,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.5085462 = fieldWeight in 3588, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3588)
0.027783897 = product of:
0.055567794 = sum of:
0.055567794 = weight(_text_:services in 3588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055567794 = score(doc=3588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 3588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3588)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Contribution to an issue devoted to serials and reference services. Familiarity with the basic elements of the MARC format and their effect on the display and retrieval of bibliographic data is an essential element of public service in those libraries with MARC-based on-line catalogues. Describes the components of a MARC record. To successfully retrieve the information sought from an on-line catalogue, the catalogue user must know whether it is in an indexed field and, if so, must be familiar with the search strategies required by the system.
- Source
- Reference librarian. 1990, no.27/28, S.161-175
-
Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004)
0.05
0.046756055 = product of:
0.09351211 = sum of:
0.06823504 = weight(_text_:reference in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06823504 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
0.025277069 = product of:
0.050554138 = sum of:
0.050554138 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050554138 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This case study details the evolution of descriptive practices and standards used in the Mount Holyoke College Archives and the Five College Finding Aids Access Project, discusses the relationship of Encoded Archival Description (EAD) and the MARC standard in reference to archival description, and addresses the challenges and opportunities of transferring data from one metadata standard to another. The study demonstrates that greater standardization in archival description allows archivists to respond more effectively to technological change.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
-
Guenther, R.S.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification in the USMARC format (1994)
0.04
0.042008284 = product of:
0.08401657 = sum of:
0.059705656 = weight(_text_:reference in 8864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059705656 = score(doc=8864,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.31464687 = fieldWeight in 8864, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8864)
0.024310911 = product of:
0.048621822 = sum of:
0.048621822 = weight(_text_:services in 8864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048621822 = score(doc=8864,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 8864, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8864)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The paper reviews the development of the USMARC Format for Classification Data, a standard for communication of classification data in machine-readable form. It considers the uses for online classification schedules, both for technical services and reference functions and gives an overview of the format specification details of data elements used and of the structure of the records. The paper describes an experiment conducted at the Library of Congress to test the format as well as the development of the classification database encompassing the LCC schedules. Features of the classification system are given. The LoC will complete its conversion of the LCC in mid-1995
-
Campos, F.M.; Lopes, M.I.; Galvao, R.M.: MARC formats and their use : an overview (1995)
0.04
0.042008284 = product of:
0.08401657 = sum of:
0.059705656 = weight(_text_:reference in 3338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059705656 = score(doc=3338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.31464687 = fieldWeight in 3338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3338)
0.024310911 = product of:
0.048621822 = sum of:
0.048621822 = weight(_text_:services in 3338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048621822 = score(doc=3338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 3338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3338)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Reports on work carried out as part of a feasibility study for UseMARCON (User Controlled Generic MARC Converter); a European Community funded project to develop a toolbox capable of converting bibliographic records from any MARC format into any other MARC format through a central conversion format. Reviews the use of MARC formats as internal or cataloguing formats or an exchange formats available in tape magnetic tape services. Special attention is paid to the actual us and use trends of UNIMARC, with particular reference to the role of UNIMARC as a new stage in the evolution of MARC formats, devised to improve and facilitate the exchange of bibliographic information between different systems
-
Wall, C.E.; Cole, T.W.; Kazmer, M.M.: HyperText MARCup : a conceptualization for encoding, de-constructing, searching, retrieving, and using traditional knowledge tools (1995)
0.04
0.042008284 = product of:
0.08401657 = sum of:
0.059705656 = weight(_text_:reference in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059705656 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.31464687 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.024310911 = product of:
0.048621822 = sum of:
0.048621822 = weight(_text_:services in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048621822 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Reference services review. 23(1995) no.4, S.13-18
-
Dierickx, H. (Bearb.); Hopkinson, A. (Bearb.): UNISIST reference manual for machine-readable bibliographic description (1986)
0.03
0.03411752 = product of:
0.13647008 = sum of:
0.13647008 = weight(_text_:reference in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13647008 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.71919286 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004)
0.03
0.026530482 = product of:
0.10612193 = sum of:
0.10612193 = sum of:
0.055567794 = weight(_text_:services in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055567794 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.050554138 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050554138 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 48(2004) no.3, S.165-178
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.03
0.026530482 = product of:
0.10612193 = sum of:
0.10612193 = sum of:
0.055567794 = weight(_text_:services in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055567794 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.050554138 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050554138 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 52(2008) no.3, S.148-163
-
Lahary, D.: Recommandations pour l'exchange de donnees d'exemplaires en format UNIMARC : un document de reference (1998)
0.02
0.02412473 = product of:
0.09649892 = sum of:
0.09649892 = weight(_text_:reference in 4620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09649892 = score(doc=4620,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.5085462 = fieldWeight in 4620, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4620)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Recommendations for exchange of single copy data in UNIMARC format: a reference document
-
Furrie, B.; Data Base Development Department of The Follett Software Company: Understanding MARC Bibliographic : Machine-readable cataloging (2000)
0.02
0.02412473 = product of:
0.09649892 = sum of:
0.09649892 = weight(_text_:reference in 6772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09649892 = score(doc=6772,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.5085462 = fieldWeight in 6772, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6772)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- What is a MARC Record, and Why is it Important? - MARC 21 Reference Materials -- Parts VII to X - MARC 21 Reference Materials -- Parts XI to XII
-
Information transfer and exchange formats (1991)
0.02
0.02132345 = product of:
0.0852938 = sum of:
0.0852938 = weight(_text_:reference in 7891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0852938 = score(doc=7891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.44949555 = fieldWeight in 7891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7891)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Describes international standard exchange formats for bibliographic information transfer. Outlines their common and differing features. Describes: UNIMARC, UNISIST Reference manual and UNECSO Common Communication Format
-
Riva, P.: Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2004)
0.02
0.019897863 = product of:
0.07959145 = sum of:
0.07959145 = sum of:
0.041675847 = weight(_text_:services in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041675847 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.037915602 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037915602 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 48(2004) no.2, S.130-143
-
Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011)
0.02
0.019897863 = product of:
0.07959145 = sum of:
0.07959145 = sum of:
0.041675847 = weight(_text_:services in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041675847 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.037915602 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037915602 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 55(2011) no.1, S.17-32
-
Hopkinson, A.: International data exchange : a question of formats (1992)
0.02
0.01705876 = product of:
0.06823504 = sum of:
0.06823504 = weight(_text_:reference in 6951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06823504 = score(doc=6951,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 6951, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6951)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Paper presented at the International Symposium on Information Technology; Standards for biliographic control, Bangkok, Thailand, 4-8 Sept 89. Reviews the 3 formats for the international exchange of bibliographic data: UNIMARC, UNISIST Reference Manual, and UNESCO's Common Communication Format (CCF) and describes the origins, technical features and typical users for all 3 formats. Selection of the most appropriate format depends upon whether users participate in a library network, are employed by technical institutes, or need to exchange information with both types of organization
-
International Seminar on the Creation and Use of Authority Files, St. Petersburg, Russia, 4-6 October 1995 (1996)
0.02
0.01705876 = product of:
0.06823504 = sum of:
0.06823504 = weight(_text_:reference in 6068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06823504 = score(doc=6068,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 6068, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6068)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Papers of the following speakers: DANSKIN, A.: The Anglo-American Authority File: an idea whose time has come?; GUY, M.: The Bibliothèque Nationale de France and authority files: advances and perspectives in co-operation; KELM, B.: The Subject Authority File in Germany; McGARRY, D.: Guidelines for subject authority and reference entries; MURTOMAA, E.: Planning and creating name authority control: the Finnish experience
-
Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003)
0.02
0.016581552 = product of:
0.06632621 = sum of:
0.06632621 = sum of:
0.034729872 = weight(_text_:services in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034729872 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.031596337 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031596337 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 47(2003) no.2, S.71-76
-
MacCallum, S.H.: Harmonization of USMARC, CANMARC, and UKMARC (2000)
0.02
0.016581552 = product of:
0.06632621 = sum of:
0.06632621 = sum of:
0.034729872 = weight(_text_:services in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034729872 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
0.031596337 = weight(_text_:22 in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031596337 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16333027 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 44(2000) no.3, S.135-140
-
Passin-Aguirre, N.; Leresche, F.: ¬Le format INTERMARC integre : futur format de travail de la BNF (1997)
0.01
0.014926414 = product of:
0.059705656 = sum of:
0.059705656 = weight(_text_:reference in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059705656 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975449 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.31464687 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The French National Library (NBF) has developed 2 new versions of INTERMARC, (A) and (B), to standardise cataloguing procedures and enrich bibliographic description and access. The bibliographic description format (B) accords with existing ISBD and can be used for all types of documents, allowing inclusion of specific characteristics and addition of new links. The format for editing records (A) eliminates redundancies and enriches links between fields. Both will be used as reference formats in the new Information System
-
UK MARC manual (1980-)
0.01
0.013891948 = product of:
0.055567794 = sum of:
0.055567794 = product of:
0.11113559 = sum of:
0.11113559 = weight(_text_:services in 7877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11113559 = score(doc=7877,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1712379 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.04664141 = queryNorm
0.6490128 = fieldWeight in 7877, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7877)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Editor
- British Library Bibliographic Services Division
