Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × language_ss:"d"
  1. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.01
    0.014618957 = product of:
      0.04385687 = sum of:
        0.04385687 = product of:
          0.08771374 = sum of:
            0.08771374 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08771374 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16193457 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046242844 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  2. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.01
    0.00835369 = product of:
      0.025061069 = sum of:
        0.025061069 = product of:
          0.050122138 = sum of:
            0.050122138 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050122138 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16193457 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046242844 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
  3. Reichert, S.; Mayr, P.: Untersuchung von Relevanzeigenschaften in einem kontrollierten Eyetracking-Experiment (2012) 0.01
    0.0062652673 = product of:
      0.018795801 = sum of:
        0.018795801 = product of:
          0.037591603 = sum of:
            0.037591603 = weight(_text_:22 in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037591603 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16193457 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046242844 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:25:54