Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Ellis, D."
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996) 0.02
    0.018370286 = product of:
      0.027555428 = sum of:
        0.0045722527 = product of:
          0.022861263 = sum of:
            0.022861263 = weight(_text_:2 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022861263 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042408705 = queryNorm
                0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.022983177 = product of:
          0.045966353 = sum of:
            0.045966353 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045966353 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14850806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042408705 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    26. 7.2002 20:22:46
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Managing information 3(1996) no.10, S.49 (D. Bawden); Program 32(1998) no.2, S.190-192 (C. Revie)
  2. Ellis, D.; Wilson, T.; Allen, D.: Information science and information systems : conjunct subjects - disjunct disciplines (1999) 0.00
    0.0019051053 = product of:
      0.0057153157 = sum of:
        0.0057153157 = product of:
          0.028576579 = sum of:
            0.028576579 = weight(_text_:2 in 4345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028576579 = score(doc=4345,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042408705 = queryNorm
                0.27285388 = fieldWeight in 4345, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4345)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: The 50th Anniversary of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Pt.2: Paradigms, models, and models of information science
  3. Ellis, D.; Ford, N.; Furner, J.: In search of the unknown user : indexing, hypertext and the World Wide Web (1998) 0.00
    0.0013335737 = product of:
      0.004000721 = sum of:
        0.004000721 = product of:
          0.020003606 = sum of:
            0.020003606 = weight(_text_:2 in 4714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020003606 = score(doc=4714,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042408705 = queryNorm
                0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 4714, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4714)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    For the purposes of this article, the indexing of information is interpreted as the pre-processing of information in order to enable its retrieval. The definition thus spans a dimension extending from classification-based approaches (pre-co-ordinate) to keyword searching (post-co-ordinate). In the first section we clarify our use of terminology, by briefly describing a framework for modelling IR systems in terms of sets of objects, relationships and functions. In the following 3 sections, we discuss the application of indexing functions to document collections of 3 specific types: (1) 'conventional' text databases; (2) hypertext databases; and (3) the World Wide Web, globally distributed across the Internet
  4. Ellis, D.; Furner-Hines, J.; Willett, P.: Measuring the degree of similarity between objects in text retrieval systems (1993) 0.00
    0.0011430632 = product of:
      0.0034291893 = sum of:
        0.0034291893 = product of:
          0.017145947 = sum of:
            0.017145947 = weight(_text_:2 in 6716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017145947 = score(doc=6716,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042408705 = queryNorm
                0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 6716, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6716)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Perspectives in information management. 3(1993) no.2, S.128-149
  5. Ellis, D.; Vasconcelos, A.: Ranganathan and the Net : using facet analysis to search and organise the World Wide Web (1999) 0.00
    0.0011430632 = product of:
      0.0034291893 = sum of:
        0.0034291893 = product of:
          0.017145947 = sum of:
            0.017145947 = weight(_text_:2 in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017145947 = score(doc=726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042408705 = queryNorm
                0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper documents the continuing relevance of facet analysis as a technique for searching and organising WWW based materials. The 2 approaches underlying WWW searching and indexing - word and concept based indexing - are outlined. It is argued that facet analysis as an a posteriori approach to classification using words from the subject field as the concept terms in the classification derived represents an excellent approach to searching and organising the results of WWW searches using either search engines or search directories. Finally it is argued that the underlying philosophy of facet analysis is better suited to the disparate nature of WWW resources and searchers than the assumptions of contemporaray IR research.
  6. Ellis, D.; Furner-Hines, J.; Willett, P.: On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents : measurement of inter-linker consistency (1994) 0.00
    9.5255265E-4 = product of:
      0.0028576578 = sum of:
        0.0028576578 = product of:
          0.0142882895 = sum of:
            0.0142882895 = weight(_text_:2 in 7493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0142882895 = score(doc=7493,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042408705 = queryNorm
                0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 7493, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7493)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 50(1994) no.2, S.67-98
  7. Ellis, D.: ¬The dilemma of measurement in information retrieval research (1996) 0.00
    9.5255265E-4 = product of:
      0.0028576578 = sum of:
        0.0028576578 = product of:
          0.0142882895 = sum of:
            0.0142882895 = weight(_text_:2 in 3003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0142882895 = score(doc=3003,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042408705 = queryNorm
                0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 3003, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3003)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The problem of measurement in information retrieval research is traced to its source in the first retrieval tests. The problem is seen as presenting a chronic dilemma for the field. This dilemma has taken 3 forms as the discipline has evloved: (1) the dilemma of measurement in the archetypal approach: stated relevance versus user relevance; (2) the dilemma of measurement in the probabilistic approach: realism versus formalism; and (3) the dilemma of measurement in the Information Retrieval-Expert System (IR-ES) approach: linear measures of relevance versus logarithmic measures of knowledge. It is argued that the dilemma of measurement has remained intractable even given the different assumptions of the different approaches for 3 connecte reasons - the nature of the subject matter of the field; the nature of relevance jidgement; and the nature of cognition and knowledge. Finally, it is concluded that the original vision of information retrieval research as a discipline founded on quantification proved restricting for its theoretical and methodological development and that increasing recognition of this is reflected in growing interest in qualitative methods in information retrieval research in relation to cognitive, behavioral, and affective aspects of the information retrieval interaction