Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0019798437 = product of:
  0.0059395307 = sum of:
    0.0059395307 = product of:
      0.029697653 = sum of:
        0.029697653 = weight(_text_:2 in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029697653 = score(doc=2638,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.28355807 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Hirsch-type indices are studied with special attention to the AR**2-index introduced by Jin. The article consists of two parts: a theoretical part and a practical illustration. In the theoretical part, we recall the definition of the AR**2-index and show that an alternative definition, the so-called AR**2,1, does not have the properties expected for this type of index. A practical example shows the existence of some of these mathematical properties and illustrates the difference between different h-type indices. Clearly the h-index itself is the most robust of all. It is shown that excluding so-called non-WoS source articles may have a significant influence on the R-and, especially, the g-index.