Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × subject_ss:"Information society"
  1. ¬The global flow of information : legal, social, and cultural perspectives (2011) 0.02
    0.022607733 = product of:
      0.052751377 = sum of:
        0.010196409 = product of:
          0.020392818 = sum of:
            0.020392818 = weight(_text_:c in 61) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020392818 = score(doc=61,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13377286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03878143 = queryNorm
                0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 61, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=61)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.018376553 = weight(_text_:u in 61) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018376553 = score(doc=61,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12698764 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03878143 = queryNorm
            0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 61, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=61)
        0.024178416 = weight(_text_:g in 61) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024178416 = score(doc=61,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14566101 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03878143 = queryNorm
            0.165991 = fieldWeight in 61, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=61)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Perspectives on the global flow of information / Ramesh Subramanian and Eddan Katz -- Mcdonalds, Wienerwald, and the corner deli / Victoria Reyes and Miguel Angel Centeno -- Internet TV and the global flow of filmed entertainment / Eli Noam -- Piracy, creativity and infrastructure : rethinking access to culture / Lawrence Liang -- Prospects for a global networked cultural heritage : law versus technology? / Stanley N. Katz -- The cultural exception to trade laws / C. Edwin Baker -- Weighing the scales : the Internet's effect on state-society relations / Daniel W. Drezner -- Local nets on a global network : filtering and the internet governance problem / John G. Palfrey, Jr. -- Law as a network standard / Dan L. Burk -- Emerging market pharmaceutical supply : a prescription for sharing the benefits of global information flow / Frederick M. Abbott -- The flow of information in modern warfare / Jeremy M. Kaplan -- Information flow in war and peace / James Der Derian -- Power over the information flow / Dorothy E. Denning -- Information power : the information society from an antihumanist perspective / Jack M. Balkin
    Editor
    Subramanian, R. u. E. Katz
  2. Kleinwächter, W.: Macht und Geld im Cyberspace : wie der Weltgipfel zur Informationsgesellschaft (WSIS) die Weichen für die Zukunft stellt (2004) 0.01
    0.011870748 = product of:
      0.04154762 = sum of:
        0.022970693 = weight(_text_:u in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022970693 = score(doc=145,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12698764 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03878143 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
        0.018576927 = product of:
          0.037153855 = sum of:
            0.037153855 = weight(_text_:22 in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037153855 = score(doc=145,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13580596 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03878143 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Im Dezember 2003 fand in Genf die erste Phase des UN-Weltgipfels zur Informationsgesellschaft (WSIS) statt. Die Gipfelkonferenz, an der mehr als 11.000 Vertreter von Regierungen, der privaten Wirtschaft und der Zivilgesellschaft teilnahmen, verhandelte u. a. Themen wie die Überwindung der digitalen Spaltung, Menschenrechte im Informationszeitalter, geistige Eigentumsrechte, Cyberkriminalität und Internet Governance. Das vorliegende Buch stellt den WSIS-Gipfel in den historischen Kontext 200-jähriger internationaler Verhandlungen zur Regulierung grenzüberschreitender Kommunikation -- von den Karlsbader Verträgen 1819 bis zur Entstehung des Internets. Es beschreibt die spannenden und kontroversen Auseinandersetzungen darüber, wie das Internet reguliert, Menschenrechte im Informationszeitalter garantiert, Sicherheit im Cyberspace gewährleistet, geistiges Eigentum geschützt und die digitale Spaltung überbrückt werden soll. Kleinwächter lässt keinen Zweifel daran, dass der WSIS-Kompromiss von Genf nicht mehr ist als der Beginn eines langen Prozesses zur Gestaltung der globalen Informationsgesellschaft der Zukunft. Die zweite Phase des Gipfeltreffens findet im November 2005 in Tunis statt. Das Buch enthält im Anhang die vom Gipfel verabschiedete Deklaration und den Aktionsplan sowie die von der Zivilgesellschaft angenommene Erklärung zur Zukunft der Informationsgesellschaft.
    Date
    20.12.2006 18:22:32
    Isbn
    3-936931-22-4
  3. Keen, A.: ¬The cult of the amateur : how today's internet is killing our culture (2007) 0.01
    0.008588872 = product of:
      0.030061051 = sum of:
        0.018575706 = weight(_text_:only in 797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018575706 = score(doc=797,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1614961 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1642637 = idf(docFreq=1867, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03878143 = queryNorm
            0.11502262 = fieldWeight in 797, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1642637 = idf(docFreq=1867, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=797)
        0.011485347 = weight(_text_:u in 797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011485347 = score(doc=797,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12698764 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03878143 = queryNorm
            0.0904446 = fieldWeight in 797, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=797)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Keen's relentless "polemic" is on target about how a sea of amateur content threatens to swamp the most vital information and how blogs often reinforce one's own views rather than expand horizons. But his jeremiad about the death of "our cultural standards and moral values" heads swiftly downhill. Keen became somewhat notorious for a 2006 Weekly Standard essay equating Web 2.0 with Marxism; like Karl Marx, he offers a convincing overall critique but runs into trouble with the details. Readers will nod in recognition at Keen's general arguments - sure, the Web is full of "user-generated nonsense"! - but many will frown at his specific examples, which pretty uniformly miss the point. It's simply not a given, as Keen assumes, that Britannica is superior to Wikipedia, or that record-store clerks offer sounder advice than online friends with similar musical tastes, or that YouTube contains only "one or two blogs or songs or videos with real value." And Keen's fears that genuine talent will go unnourished are overstated: writers penned novels before there were publishers and copyright law; bands recorded songs before they had major-label deals. In its last third, the book runs off the rails completely, blaming Web 2.0 for online poker, child pornography, identity theft and betraying "Judeo-Christian ethics."
    Footnote
    Wenn Wikipedia und blogs nur Ergänzungen zur Kultur und zur Information wären, wäre dies nicht gravierend. Das Problem ist, dass sie Ihren Ersatz geworden sind. Darüber hinaus neben der Unerfahrenheit der Autoren steht auch die Anonymität, die ermöglicht, dass sich zwischen den Amateurs Dessinformanten, getarnten Publizisten (vor allem die Spezialisten in Enten und Desinformation, welche jetzt die ganze Welt direkt und glaubhafter erreichen können) zwischen schieben. Fügen wir diesem apokalyptischen Panorama die intellektuelle Piraterie hinzu, werden wir eine Welt haben, in der die Schöpfer von den Nachahmern verdrängt werden. Dies annulliert die Motivation für die Schöpfung des Neuen. Der Autor gibt uns einige Beispiele, wie die Entlassungen bei Disney Productions. Eine große nordamerikanische Fernsehkette hat teuere Serien in Prime Time aus dem Programm entfernt, weil diese nicht mehr rentabel sind. Andere Beispiele u.a. sind die Verluste der traditionellen Presse und das Verschwinden von spezialisierten Platten- und Bücherläden egal wie gut sie waren. Andere Themen: Invasion der Privatsphäre durch das Internet, E-Mail Betrug, wachsende Kinderpornografie, das Plagiat bei Schülern sind auch in dem Buch enthalten. So sollten wir uns ein furchtbares Bild der von den neuen Technologien verursachten Probleme machen. Aber der Kern des Buches besteht in die Verteidigung des individuellen Schöpfertums und des Fachwissens. Beide sind nach Meinung des Autors die Hauptopfer des Web 2.0. Das Buch ist ein Pamphlet, was im Prinzip nicht Schlechtes bedeutet. Marx, Nietzsche, u..v.a. haben auch Pamphlete geschrieben und einige dieser Schriften haben bei der Gestaltung der modernen Welt beigetragen. Das Buch hat alle Merkmale des Pamphlets: ist kurz, kontrovers, aggressiv und einseitig. Daran liegen seine Kräfte und seine Schwäche. Der Text kann in einigen wenigen Stunden gelesen werden und schärft die Wahrnehmung des Leser vor scheinbar unschädlichen Praktiken: runterladen eines Liedes oder die Zusammenstellung einer Schulaufgabe. Weil er einseitig ist, der Autor absichtlich ignoriert, dass viele dieser Probleme unabhängig des Internets existieren, wie das Plagiat. Er unterdrückt auch Tatsachen, wie die Kontrollmechanismen von Wikipedia, die sie genau so vertrauensvoll wie die Encyclopaedia Britannica machen. Aber gerade weil das Buch einseitig ist, hilft der Autor dem Dialog zwischen den unterschiedlichen Formen, um das Internet zu sehen und zu nutzen. (Aus der Originalrezension in Spanisch von Juan Carlos Castillon, Barcelona, en el Blog Penultimos Dias)
  4. Information ethics : privacy, property, and power (2005) 0.01
    0.007961191 = product of:
      0.02786417 = sum of:
        0.018575706 = weight(_text_:only in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018575706 = score(doc=2392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1614961 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1642637 = idf(docFreq=1867, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03878143 = queryNorm
            0.11502262 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1642637 = idf(docFreq=1867, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
        0.009288464 = product of:
          0.018576927 = sum of:
            0.018576927 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018576927 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13580596 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03878143 = queryNorm
                0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Classification
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    DDC
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    Footnote
    The book also includes an index, a selected bibliography, and endnotes for each article. More information on the authors of the articles would have been useful, however. One of the best features of Information Ethics is the discussion cases at the end of each chapter. For instance, in the discussion cases, Moore asks questions like: Would you allow one person to die to save nine? Should a scientist be allowed to experiment on people without their knowledge if there is no harm? Should marriages between people carrying a certain gene be outlawed? These discussion cases really add to the value of the readings. The only suggestion would be to have put them at the beginning of each section so the reader could have the questions floating in their heads as they read the material. Information Ethics is a well thought out and organized collection of articles. Moore has done an excellent job of finding articles to provide a fair and balanced look at a variety of complicated and far-reaching topics. Further, the work has breadth and depth. Moore is careful to include enough historical articles, like the 1890 Warren article, to give balance and perspective to new and modern topics like E-mail surveillance, biopiracy, and genetics. This provides a reader with just enough philosophy and history theory to work with the material. The articles are written by a variety of authors from differing fields so they range in length, tone, and style, creating a rich tapestry of ideas and arguments. However, this is not a quick or easy read. The subject matter is complex and one should plan to spend time with the book. The book is well worth the effort though. Overall, this is a highly recommended work for all libraries especially academic ones."
  5. Warner, J.: Humanizing information technology (2004) 0.00
    0.0026536724 = product of:
      0.018575706 = sum of:
        0.018575706 = weight(_text_:only in 438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018575706 = score(doc=438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1614961 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1642637 = idf(docFreq=1867, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03878143 = queryNorm
            0.11502262 = fieldWeight in 438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1642637 = idf(docFreq=1867, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=438)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Footnote
    Like Daniel Bell, the author of The Coming of Post-Industrial Society (1973), who used aspects of Marx's thinking as the basis for his social forecasting models, Warner uses Marxist thought as a tool for social and historical analysis. Unlike Bell, Warner's approach to Marx tends to be doctrinaire. As a result, "An Information View of History" and "Origins of the Human Brain," two of the essays in which Warner sets out to establish the connections between information science and information technology, are less successful. Warner argues, "the classic source for an understanding of technology as a human construction is Marx," and that "a Marxian perspective an information technology could be of high marginal Utility," noting additionally that with the exception of Norbert Wiener and John Desmond Bernal, "there has only been a limited penetration of Marxism into information science" (p. 9). But Warner's efforts to persuade the reader that these views are cogent never go beyond academic protocol. Nor does his support for the assertion that the second half of the 19th century was the critical period for innovation and diffusion of modern information technologies. The closing essay, "Whither Information Science?" is particularly disappointing, in part, because the preface and opening chapters of the book promised more than was delivered at the end. Warner asserts that the theoretical framework supporting information science is negligible, and that the discipline is limited even further by the fact that many of its members do not recognize or understand the effects of such a limitation. However cogent the charges may be, none of this is news. But the essay fails most notably because Warner does not have any new directions to offer, save that information scientists should pay closer artention to what is going an in allied disciplines. Moreover, he does not seem to understand that at its heart the "information revolution" is not about the machines, but about the growing legions of men and women who can and do write programming code to exert control over and find new uses for these devices. Nor does he seem to understand that information science, in the grip of what he terms a "quasi-global crisis," suffers grievously because it is a community situated not at the center but rather an the periphery of this revolution."
  6. Breidbach, O.: Neue Wissensordnungen : wie aus Informationen und Nachrichten kulturelles Wissen entsteht (2008) 0.00
    0.0011259317 = product of:
      0.007881522 = sum of:
        0.007881522 = product of:
          0.015763044 = sum of:
            0.015763044 = weight(_text_:22 in 3037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015763044 = score(doc=3037,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13580596 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03878143 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3037, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3037)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2009 13:43:50

Languages

Types