-
Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978)
0.06
0.055695087 = product of:
0.08354263 = sum of:
0.023869323 = product of:
0.11934661 = sum of:
0.11934661 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11934661 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.059673306 = product of:
0.11934661 = sum of:
0.11934661 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11934661 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
-
Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975)
0.06
0.055695087 = product of:
0.08354263 = sum of:
0.023869323 = product of:
0.11934661 = sum of:
0.11934661 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11934661 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.059673306 = product of:
0.11934661 = sum of:
0.11934661 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11934661 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
-
Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981)
0.06
0.055695087 = product of:
0.08354263 = sum of:
0.023869323 = product of:
0.11934661 = sum of:
0.11934661 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11934661 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.059673306 = product of:
0.11934661 = sum of:
0.11934661 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11934661 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987)
0.04
0.03898656 = product of:
0.058479838 = sum of:
0.016708525 = product of:
0.08354262 = sum of:
0.08354262 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08354262 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.04177131 = product of:
0.08354262 = sum of:
0.08354262 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08354262 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Pages
- S.9-22
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die "doppelt notierte Einheitsklassifikation" : die Lösung? (1975)
0.03
0.028939158 = product of:
0.08681747 = sum of:
0.08681747 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 1620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08681747 = score(doc=1620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20799294 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.41740587 = fieldWeight in 1620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1620)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Im Oktober 1974 haben maßgebliche deutsche Bibliothekare der Erarbeitung einer Einheitsklassifikation für die Bibliotheken der BRD entsprechend den Vorschlägen einer AfB-Projektgruppe zugestimmt. Danach kann nun eine "doppelt notierte" Klassifikation in Angriff genommen werden, die auf den Klassaten des systematischen Kataloges der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek (BSB) aufbaut und für vorliegende Titelmengen pro Klassat neue Klassen in einer dreigliedrigen Notation für Aufstellungszwecke festlegt. Die BSB-Systematik wird erläutert und kritisch zur Sachproblematik der vorgeschlagenen Lösung Stellung genommen. Auf organisatorische Schwierigkeiten wird hingewiesen; abschließend werden andere Lösungsmöglichkeiten diskutiert
-
Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974)
0.03
0.027847543 = product of:
0.041771315 = sum of:
0.011934661 = product of:
0.059673306 = sum of:
0.059673306 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059673306 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.029836653 = product of:
0.059673306 = sum of:
0.059673306 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059673306 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
-
Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010)
0.02
0.022278037 = product of:
0.033417054 = sum of:
0.009547729 = product of:
0.047738645 = sum of:
0.047738645 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047738645 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.023869323 = product of:
0.047738645 = sum of:
0.047738645 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047738645 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
De Luca, E.W.; Dahlberg, I.: Including knowledge domains from the ICC into the multilingual lexical linked data cloud (2014)
0.02
0.019691188 = product of:
0.02953678 = sum of:
0.00843908 = product of:
0.0421954 = sum of:
0.0421954 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0421954 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0210977 = product of:
0.0421954 = sum of:
0.0421954 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0421954 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 9.2014 19:01:18
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Luca, E.W. de; Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud : eine mögliche Zugangsoptimierung? (2014)
0.02
0.016708525 = product of:
0.025062786 = sum of:
0.0071607963 = product of:
0.03580398 = sum of:
0.03580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03580398 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.01790199 = product of:
0.03580398 = sum of:
0.03580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03580398 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 9.2014 19:00:13
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Pilotstudie "DB-Thesaurus" : Allgemeiner Thesaurus für Bibliotheken (1982)
0.01
0.009569195 = product of:
0.028707584 = sum of:
0.028707584 = product of:
0.05741517 = sum of:
0.05741517 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 1527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05741517 = score(doc=1527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18082327 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.31752092 = fieldWeight in 1527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1527)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Im Jahre 1978/79 wurde bei der Deutschen Bibliothek eine Pilotstudie durchgeführt, in der die zur Indexierung der in der Reihe A der Deutschen Bibliographie ("Wöchentliches Verzeichnis") verwendeten Schlagwörter auf ihre Brauchbarkeit als Deskriptoren eines Allgemeinen Thesaurus für Bibliotheken untersucht werden. Es sollten die Grundprinzipien eines solchen Thesaurus darsgestellt, und seine Struktur (Fachgebiete, Anzahl der Hauptgruppen, Erschließungstiefe), die Möglichkeiten der Wortschatzbegrenzung, die Behandlung der Eigennamen und die Möglichkeiten der Terminologiekontrolle untersucht werden. Es zeigte sich, daß sich die Schlagwörter der DB sehr wohl als Thesauruselemente eignen, daß sie aber um viele Begriffe ergänzt werden müssen, um den Zusammenhang der Hierarchieebenen herzustellen
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Pilotstudie DB-Thesaurus (1980)
0.01
0.008202167 = product of:
0.0246065 = sum of:
0.0246065 = product of:
0.049213 = sum of:
0.049213 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049213 = score(doc=3155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18082327 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.27216077 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Bei der Pilotstudie DB-Thesaurus ging es um die Untersuchung der Art und Form der von der Deutschen Bibliothek für ihre Inhaltserschließung verwendeten Schlagwörter und ihre Eignung als Elemente eines allgemeinen Thesaurus für Bibliotheken. Der Abschlußbericht (Arbeits- und Ergebnisbericht) beantwortet die in der Ausschreibung ausgesprochenen Fragen bezgl. der Möglichkeiten und Grundprinzipien eines solchen Thesaurus der DB-Schlagwörter, insbesondere auch seiner Struktur (Umfassung der Fachgebeiete, Anzahl der Hauptgruppen, Erschließungstiefe), seiner Relationsarten (begriffliche und terminologische), der Möglichkeiten der Wortschatzbegrenzung, der Behandlung von Eigennamen und der Möglichkeiten der Terminologiekontrolle. Die Untersuchung ergab, daß sich die SW der DB als Thesauruselemente eignen, daß diese aber um viele Begriffe ergänzt werden müssen, die teilweise aus dem Schatz der DB-Verweisungen gewonnen werden könnten, wenn man einen systematisch angelegten, allgemeinen Thesaurus auf dieser Basis erstellen will. Unter den Anlagen befindet sich als Beispiel dafür, daß DB-Schlag- und Verweisungswörter zur Thesauruserstellung herangezogen werden können, ein sog. Sportthesaurus, der nur durch einige fehlende Oberbegriffe ergänzt wurde. Der gesamte systematische Teil ist im alphabetischen Teil enthalten. Auf die Unterscheidung der Abstraktionsrelation von der Bestandsrelation wurde auch im alphabetischen Teil besonderer Wert gelegt
