Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Li, J."
  1. Li, J.; Shi, D.: Sleeping beauties in genius work : when were they awakened? (2016) 0.02
    0.019429237 = product of:
      0.07771695 = sum of:
        0.07771695 = sum of:
          0.049690433 = weight(_text_:b in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049690433 = score(doc=2647,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                0.034476474 = queryNorm
              0.40680233 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
          0.028026516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028026516 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.034476474 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    "Genius work," proposed by Avramescu, refers to scientific articles whose citations grow exponentially in an extended period, for example, over 50 years. Such articles were defined as "sleeping beauties" by van Raan, who quantitatively studied the phenomenon of delayed recognition. However, the criteria adopted by van Raan at times are not applicable and may confer recognition prematurely. To revise such deficiencies, this paper proposes two new criteria, which are applicable (but not limited) to exponential citation curves. We searched for genius work among articles of Nobel Prize laureates during the period of 1901-2012 on the Web of Science, finding 25 articles of genius work out of 21,438 papers including 10 (by van Raan's criteria) sleeping beauties and 15 nonsleeping-beauties. By our new criteria, two findings were obtained through empirical analysis: (a) the awakening periods for genius work depend on the increase rate b in the exponential function, and (b) lower b leads to a longer sleeping period.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:13:32
  2. Lin, N.; Li, D.; Ding, Y.; He, B.; Qin, Z.; Tang, J.; Li, J.; Dong, T.: ¬The dynamic features of Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube (2012) 0.00
    0.0042262566 = product of:
      0.016905027 = sum of:
        0.016905027 = product of:
          0.033810053 = sum of:
            0.033810053 = weight(_text_:b in 4970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033810053 = score(doc=4970,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 4970, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4970)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article investigates the dynamic features of social tagging vocabularies in Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube from 2003 to 2008. Three algorithms are designed to study the macro- and micro-tag growth as well as the dynamics of taggers' activities, respectively. Moreover, we propose a Tagger Tag Resource Latent Dirichlet Allocation (TTR-LDA) model to explore the evolution of topics emerging from those social vocabularies. Our results show that (a) at the macro level, tag growth in all the three tagging systems obeys power law distribution with exponents lower than 1; at the micro level, the tag growth of popular resources in all three tagging systems follows a similar power law distribution; (b) the exponents of tag growth vary in different evolving stages of resources; (c) the growth of number of taggers associated with different popular resources presents a feature of convergence over time; (d) the active level of taggers has a positive correlation with the macro-tag growth of different tagging systems; and (e) some topics evolve into several subtopics over time while others experience relatively stable stages in which their contents do not change much, and certain groups of taggers continue their interests in them.
  3. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.00
    0.004128696 = product of:
      0.016514784 = sum of:
        0.016514784 = product of:
          0.033029567 = sum of:
            0.033029567 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033029567 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
  4. Lin, X.; Li, J.; Zhou, X.: Theme creation for digital collections (2008) 0.00
    0.0040872004 = product of:
      0.016348802 = sum of:
        0.016348802 = product of:
          0.032697603 = sum of:
            0.032697603 = weight(_text_:22 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032697603 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  5. Li, J.; Zhang, P.; Cao, J.: External concept support for group support systems through Web mining (2009) 0.00
    0.0036932675 = product of:
      0.01477307 = sum of:
        0.01477307 = product of:
          0.02954614 = sum of:
            0.02954614 = weight(_text_:p in 2806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02954614 = score(doc=2806,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 2806, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2806)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  6. Li, J.; Zhang, P.; Song, D.; Wu, Y.: Understanding an enriched multidimensional user relevance model by analyzing query logs (2017) 0.00
    0.0036932675 = product of:
      0.01477307 = sum of:
        0.01477307 = product of:
          0.02954614 = sum of:
            0.02954614 = weight(_text_:p in 3961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02954614 = score(doc=3961,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 3961, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3961)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  7. Li, J.; Willett, P.: ArticleRank : a PageRank-based alternative to numbers of citations for analysing citation networks (2009) 0.00
    0.003077723 = product of:
      0.012310892 = sum of:
        0.012310892 = product of:
          0.024621785 = sum of:
            0.024621785 = weight(_text_:p in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024621785 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  8. Min, C.; Ding, Y.; Li, J.; Bu, Y.; Pei, L.; Sun, J.: Innovation or imitation : the diffusion of citations (2018) 0.00
    0.003077723 = product of:
      0.012310892 = sum of:
        0.012310892 = product of:
          0.024621785 = sum of:
            0.024621785 = weight(_text_:p in 4445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024621785 = score(doc=4445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Citations in scientific literature are important both for tracking the historical development of scientific ideas and for forecasting research trends. However, the diffusion mechanisms underlying the citation process remain poorly understood, despite the frequent and longstanding use of citation counts for assessment purposes within the scientific community. Here, we extend the study of citation dynamics to a more general diffusion process to understand how citation growth associates with different diffusion patterns. Using a classic diffusion model, we quantify and illustrate specific diffusion mechanisms which have been proven to exert a significant impact on the growth and decay of citation counts. Experiments reveal a positive relation between the "low p and low q" pattern and high scientific impact. A sharp citation peak produced by rapid change of citation counts, however, has a negative effect on future impact. In addition, we have suggested a simple indicator, saturation level, to roughly estimate an individual article's current stage in the life cycle and its potential to attract future attention. The proposed approach can also be extended to higher levels of aggregation (e.g., individual scientists, journals, institutions), providing further insights into the practice of scientific evaluation.
  9. Zheng, R.; Li, J.; Chen, H.; Huang, Z.: ¬A framework for authorship identification of online messages : writing-style features and classification techniques (2006) 0.00
    0.002919429 = product of:
      0.011677716 = sum of:
        0.011677716 = product of:
          0.023355432 = sum of:
            0.023355432 = weight(_text_:22 in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023355432 = score(doc=5276,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:14:37