Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Zhang, P."
  1. Zhang, P.; Sun, H.: ¬The complexity of different types of attitudes in initial and continued ICT use (2009) 0.01
    0.012132276 = product of:
      0.024264552 = sum of:
        0.012310892 = product of:
          0.024621785 = sum of:
            0.024621785 = weight(_text_:p in 3119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024621785 = score(doc=3119,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 3119, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3119)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011953659 = product of:
          0.023907319 = sum of:
            0.023907319 = weight(_text_:b in 3119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023907319 = score(doc=3119,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 3119, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3119)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In the information systems (IS) field, research interest in attitude has fluctuated over the past decades given the inconsistent and inconclusive findings on attitude's effects on behavioral intention (BI) to use information and communication technology (ICT). This study addresses the conceptual, operational, and temporal dynamics of attitude that may have caused the inconsistent and inconclusive results. A longitudinal study was conducted to validate our hypotheses. The results show that: (a) The attitude that significantly influences BI needs to be at a particular specificity with BI on two aspects, the same evaluation target and the same evaluation time, where the time specificity can supersede the target specificity; (b) the relationships among attitudes and intention remain the same if they are measured at the same time, regardless of use stages; (c) the two types of attitudes show different long-lasting effects over time; (d) omitting important mediating factors in a research model may generate misleading messages; and (e) attitudes alone can explain a large amount of variances in BI. The results can help explain the reasons behind inconsistent findings in the literature, inspire additional research efforts, and suggest bringing attitudes back to information systems research due to their theoretical and practical importance.
  2. Zhang, P.; Yan, J.L.S.; DeVries Hassman, K.: ¬The intellectual characteristics of the information field : heritage and substance (2013) 0.01
    0.012132276 = product of:
      0.024264552 = sum of:
        0.012310892 = product of:
          0.024621785 = sum of:
            0.024621785 = weight(_text_:p in 1132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024621785 = score(doc=1132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1132)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011953659 = product of:
          0.023907319 = sum of:
            0.023907319 = weight(_text_:b in 1132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023907319 = score(doc=1132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1132)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    As the information field (IField) becomes more recognized by different constituencies for education and research, the need to better understand its intellectual characteristics becomes more compelling. Although there are various conceptualizations of the IField, to date, in-depth studies based on empirical evidence are scarce. This article reports a study that fills this gap. We focus on the first five ISchools in the ICaucus as a proxy to represent the IField. The intellectual characteristics are depicted by two independent sets of data on tenure track faculty as knowledge contributors: their intellectual heritages and the intellectual substance in their journal publications. We use a critical analysis method to examine doctoral training areas and 3 years of journal publications. Our results indicate that (a) the IField can be better conceptualized with empirical support by a four-component model that includes People, Information, Technology, and Management, as predicted by the I-Model (Zhang & Benjamin, 2007); (b) the ISchools' faculty members are diverse, interdisciplinary, and multidisciplinary as shown by their intellectual heritages, by their research foci, by journals in which they publish, by the contexts within which they conduct research, and by the levels of analysis in research investigations; (c) the five ISchools share similarities while evincing differences in both faculty heritages and intellectual substances; (d) ISchool tenure track faculty members do not collaborate much with each other within or across schools although there is great potential; and (e) intellectual heritages are not good predictors of scholars' intellectual substance. We conclude by discussing the implications of the findings on IField identity, IField development, new ISchool formation and existing ISchool evolution, faculty career development, and collaboration within the IField.
  3. Zhang, P.; Soergel, D.: Towards a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking (2014) 0.01
    0.011994304 = product of:
      0.023988608 = sum of:
        0.012310892 = product of:
          0.024621785 = sum of:
            0.024621785 = weight(_text_:p in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024621785 = score(doc=1344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011677716 = product of:
          0.023355432 = sum of:
            0.023355432 = weight(_text_:22 in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023355432 = score(doc=1344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:55:39
  4. Li, J.; Zhang, P.; Cao, J.: External concept support for group support systems through Web mining (2009) 0.00
    0.0036932675 = product of:
      0.01477307 = sum of:
        0.01477307 = product of:
          0.02954614 = sum of:
            0.02954614 = weight(_text_:p in 2806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02954614 = score(doc=2806,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 2806, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2806)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  5. Li, J.; Zhang, P.; Song, D.; Wu, Y.: Understanding an enriched multidimensional user relevance model by analyzing query logs (2017) 0.00
    0.0036932675 = product of:
      0.01477307 = sum of:
        0.01477307 = product of:
          0.02954614 = sum of:
            0.02954614 = weight(_text_:p in 3961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02954614 = score(doc=3961,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 3961, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3961)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  6. Zhang, P.; Benjamin, R.I.: Understanding information related fields : a conceptual framework (2007) 0.00
    0.003077723 = product of:
      0.012310892 = sum of:
        0.012310892 = product of:
          0.024621785 = sum of:
            0.024621785 = weight(_text_:p in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024621785 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  7. Sun, H.; Zhang, P.: ¬An exploration of affect factors and their role in user technology acceptance : mediation and causality (2008) 0.00
    0.003077723 = product of:
      0.012310892 = sum of:
        0.012310892 = product of:
          0.024621785 = sum of:
            0.024621785 = weight(_text_:p in 1876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024621785 = score(doc=1876,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1876, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1876)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  8. Liu, X.; Kaza, S.; Zhang, P.; Chen, H.: Determining inventor status and its effect on knowledge diffusion : a study on nanotechnology literature from China, Russia, and India (2011) 0.00
    0.003077723 = product of:
      0.012310892 = sum of:
        0.012310892 = product of:
          0.024621785 = sum of:
            0.024621785 = weight(_text_:p in 4468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024621785 = score(doc=4468,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4468, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4468)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  9. Zhang, P.; Wang, OP.; Wu, Q.: How are the best JASIST papers cited? (2018) 0.00
    0.003077723 = product of:
      0.012310892 = sum of:
        0.012310892 = product of:
          0.024621785 = sum of:
            0.024621785 = weight(_text_:p in 4259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024621785 = score(doc=4259,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4259, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4259)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  10. Zhang, P.; Soergel, D.: Cognitive mechanisms in sensemaking : a qualitative user study (2020) 0.00
    0.003077723 = product of:
      0.012310892 = sum of:
        0.012310892 = product of:
          0.024621785 = sum of:
            0.024621785 = weight(_text_:p in 5614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024621785 = score(doc=5614,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034476474 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 5614, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5614)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)