-
¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012)
0.04
0.038803786 = product of:
0.07760757 = sum of:
0.020892277 = product of:
0.041784555 = sum of:
0.041784555 = weight(_text_:p in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041784555 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.33707932 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0567153 = sum of:
0.028688783 = weight(_text_:b in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028688783 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.028026516 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028026516 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:35:26
- Footnote
- Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.03
0.028468443 = product of:
0.11387377 = sum of:
0.11387377 = sum of:
0.047814637 = weight(_text_:b in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047814637 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.066059135 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066059135 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.02
0.023829456 = product of:
0.047658913 = sum of:
0.009848714 = product of:
0.019697428 = sum of:
0.019697428 = weight(_text_:p in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019697428 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0378102 = sum of:
0.019125855 = weight(_text_:b in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019125855 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.018684344 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018684344 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
-
Li, J.; Shi, D.: Sleeping beauties in genius work : when were they awakened? (2016)
0.02
0.019429237 = product of:
0.07771695 = sum of:
0.07771695 = sum of:
0.049690433 = weight(_text_:b in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049690433 = score(doc=2647,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.40680233 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.028026516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028026516 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- "Genius work," proposed by Avramescu, refers to scientific articles whose citations grow exponentially in an extended period, for example, over 50 years. Such articles were defined as "sleeping beauties" by van Raan, who quantitatively studied the phenomenon of delayed recognition. However, the criteria adopted by van Raan at times are not applicable and may confer recognition prematurely. To revise such deficiencies, this paper proposes two new criteria, which are applicable (but not limited) to exponential citation curves. We searched for genius work among articles of Nobel Prize laureates during the period of 1901-2012 on the Web of Science, finding 25 articles of genius work out of 21,438 papers including 10 (by van Raan's criteria) sleeping beauties and 15 nonsleeping-beauties. By our new criteria, two findings were obtained through empirical analysis: (a) the awakening periods for genius work depend on the increase rate b in the exponential function, and (b) lower b leads to a longer sleeping period.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 14:13:32
-
Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996)
0.02
0.019190885 = product of:
0.03838177 = sum of:
0.019697428 = product of:
0.039394855 = sum of:
0.039394855 = weight(_text_:p in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039394855 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.018684344 = product of:
0.03736869 = sum of:
0.03736869 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03736869 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
-
Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016)
0.02
0.019190885 = product of:
0.03838177 = sum of:
0.019697428 = product of:
0.039394855 = sum of:
0.039394855 = weight(_text_:p in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039394855 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.018684344 = product of:
0.03736869 = sum of:
0.03736869 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03736869 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2019 11:22:31
-
Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007)
0.02
0.0189051 = product of:
0.0756204 = sum of:
0.0756204 = sum of:
0.03825171 = weight(_text_:b in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03825171 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.03736869 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03736869 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 30.12.2007 11:22:39
- Source
- ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
-
Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015)
0.02
0.0189051 = product of:
0.0756204 = sum of:
0.0756204 = sum of:
0.03825171 = weight(_text_:b in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03825171 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.03736869 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03736869 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 17:12:50
- Editor
- Cronin, B. u. C.R. Sugimoto
-
Kretschmer, H.; Kretschmer, T.: Well-ordered collaboration structures of co-author pairs in journals (2006)
0.02
0.018287722 = product of:
0.036575444 = sum of:
0.024621785 = product of:
0.04924357 = sum of:
0.04924357 = weight(_text_:p in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04924357 = score(doc=25,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.011953659 = product of:
0.023907319 = sum of:
0.023907319 = weight(_text_:b in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023907319 = score(doc=25,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In single-authored bibliographies only single scientist distribution can be found. But in multi-authored bibliographies single scientists distribution, pairs distribution, triples distribution, etc., can be presented. Whereas regarding Lotka's law single scientists P distribution (both in single-authored and in multi-authored bibliographies) is of interest, in the future pairs P, Q distribution, triples P, Q, R distribution, etc. should be considered Starting with pair distribution, the following question arises in the present paper: Is there also any regularity or well-ordered structure for the distribution of coauthor pairs in journals in analogy to Lotka's law for the distribution of single authors? Usually, in information science "laws " or "regularities " (for example Lotka's law) are mathematical descriptions of observed data inform of functions; however explanations of these phenomena are mostly missing. By contrast, in this paper the derivation of a formula for describing the distribution of the number of co-author pairs will be presented based on wellknown regularities in socio psychology or sociology in conjunction with the Gestalt theory as explanation for well-ordered collaboration structures and production of scientific literature, as well as derivations from Lotka's law. The assumed regularities for the distribution of co-author pairs in journals could be shown in the co-authorship data (1980-1998) of the journals Science, Nature, Proc Nat Acad Sci USA and Phys Rev B Condensed Matter.
- Source
- Vom Wandel der Wissensorganisation im Informationszeitalter: Festschrift für Walther Umstätter zum 65. Geburtstag, hrsg. von P. Hauke u. K. Umlauf
-
Radev, D.R.; Joseph, M.T.; Gibson, B.; Muthukrishnan, P.: ¬A bibliometric and network analysis of the field of computational linguistics (2016)
0.02
0.016985185 = product of:
0.03397037 = sum of:
0.017235247 = product of:
0.034470495 = sum of:
0.034470495 = weight(_text_:p in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034470495 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.016735122 = product of:
0.033470243 = sum of:
0.033470243 = weight(_text_:b in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033470243 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Fassin, Y.: ¬A new qualitative rating system for scientific publications and a fame index for academics (2018)
0.02
0.016985185 = product of:
0.03397037 = sum of:
0.017235247 = product of:
0.034470495 = sum of:
0.034470495 = weight(_text_:p in 4571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034470495 = score(doc=4571,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 4571, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4571)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.016735122 = product of:
0.033470243 = sum of:
0.033470243 = weight(_text_:b in 4571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033470243 = score(doc=4571,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 4571, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4571)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- An innovative approach is proposed for a rating system for academic publications based on a categorization into ratings comparable to financial ratings such as Moody's and S&P ratings (AAA, AA, A, BA, BBB, BB, B, C). The categorization makes use of a variable percentile approach based on recently developed h-related indices. Building on this categorization, a new index is proposed for researchers, the fame-index or f2-index. This new index integrates some qualitative elements related to the influence of a researcher's articles. It better mitigates than the classic h-index.
-
Hammarfelt, B.: Citation analysis on the micro level : the example of Walter Benjamin's Illuminations (2011)
0.01
0.014558731 = product of:
0.029117461 = sum of:
0.01477307 = product of:
0.02954614 = sum of:
0.02954614 = weight(_text_:p in 4441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02954614 = score(doc=4441,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 4441, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4441)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014344391 = product of:
0.028688783 = sum of:
0.028688783 = weight(_text_:b in 4441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028688783 = score(doc=4441,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 4441, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4441)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- "One can go even further and remember that interruption is one of the fundamental devices of all structuring. It goes far beyond the sphere of art. To give only one example, it is the basis of quotation. To quote a text involves the interruption of its context." [Walter Benjamin (1968/2007, p. 151)]
-
Albarrán, P.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: Differences in citation impact across countries (2015)
0.01
0.014558731 = product of:
0.029117461 = sum of:
0.01477307 = product of:
0.02954614 = sum of:
0.02954614 = weight(_text_:p in 1665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02954614 = score(doc=1665,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1665, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1665)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014344391 = product of:
0.028688783 = sum of:
0.028688783 = weight(_text_:b in 1665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028688783 = score(doc=1665,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 1665, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1665)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Using a large data set, indexed by Thomson Reuters, consisting of 4.4 million articles published in 1998-2003 with a 5-year citation window for each year, this article studies country citation distributions for a partitioning of the world into 36 countries and two geographical areas in eight broad scientific fields and the all-sciences case. The two key findings are the following. First, country citation distributions are highly skewed and very similar to each other in all fields. Second, to a large extent, differences in country citation distributions can be accounted for by scale factors. The Empirical situation described in the article helps to understand why international comparisons of citation impact according to (a) mean citations and (b) the percentage of articles in each country belonging to the top 10% of the most cited articles are so similar to each other.
-
Albarrán, P.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: References made and citations received by scientific articles (2011)
0.01
0.014393164 = product of:
0.028786328 = sum of:
0.01477307 = product of:
0.02954614 = sum of:
0.02954614 = weight(_text_:p in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02954614 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014013258 = product of:
0.028026516 = sum of:
0.028026516 = weight(_text_:22 in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028026516 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article studies massive evidence about references made and citations received after a 5-year citation window by 3.7 million articles published in 1998 to 2002 in 22 scientific fields. We find that the distributions of references made and citations received share a number of basic features across sciences. Reference distributions are rather skewed to the right while citation distributions are even more highly skewed: The mean is about 20 percentage points to the right of the median, and articles with a remarkable or an outstanding number of citations represent about 9% of the total. Moreover, the existence of a power law representing the upper tail of citation distributions cannot be rejected in 17 fields whose articles represent 74.7% of the total. Contrary to the evidence in other contexts, the value of the scale parameter is above 3.5 in 13 of the 17 cases. Finally, power laws are typically small, but capture a considerable proportion of the total citations received.
-
Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014)
0.01
0.014393164 = product of:
0.028786328 = sum of:
0.01477307 = product of:
0.02954614 = sum of:
0.02954614 = weight(_text_:p in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02954614 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014013258 = product of:
0.028026516 = sum of:
0.028026516 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028026516 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:11:29
-
Kronegger, L.; Mali, F.; Ferligoj, A.; Doreian, P.: Classifying scientific disciplines in Slovenia : a study of the evolution of collaboration structures (2015)
0.01
0.014393164 = product of:
0.028786328 = sum of:
0.01477307 = product of:
0.02954614 = sum of:
0.02954614 = weight(_text_:p in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02954614 = score(doc=1639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014013258 = product of:
0.028026516 = sum of:
0.028026516 = weight(_text_:22 in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028026516 = score(doc=1639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 21. 1.2015 14:55:22
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016)
0.01
0.014393164 = product of:
0.028786328 = sum of:
0.01477307 = product of:
0.02954614 = sum of:
0.02954614 = weight(_text_:p in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02954614 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014013258 = product of:
0.028026516 = sum of:
0.028026516 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028026516 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 16.11.2016 11:07:22
-
Milard, B.; Pitarch, Y.: Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies (2023)
0.01
0.014178825 = product of:
0.0567153 = sum of:
0.0567153 = sum of:
0.028688783 = weight(_text_:b in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028688783 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.028026516 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028026516 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:14
-
Haustein, S.; Sugimoto, C.; Larivière, V.: Social media in scholarly communication : Guest editorial (2015)
0.01
0.012549935 = product of:
0.02509987 = sum of:
0.018093241 = product of:
0.036186483 = sum of:
0.036186483 = weight(_text_:p in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036186483 = score(doc=3809,freq=12.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.29191923 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.007006629 = product of:
0.014013258 = sum of:
0.014013258 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014013258 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This year marks 350 years since the inaugural publications of both the Journal des Sçavans and the Philosophical Transactions, first published in 1665 and considered the birth of the peer-reviewed journal article. This form of scholarly communication has not only remained the dominant model for disseminating new knowledge (particularly for science and medicine), but has also increased substantially in volume. Derek de Solla Price - the "father of scientometrics" (Merton and Garfield, 1986, p. vii) - was the first to document the exponential increase in scientific journals and showed that "scientists have always felt themselves to be awash in a sea of the scientific literature" (Price, 1963, p. 15), as, for example, expressed at the 1948 Royal Society's Scientific Information Conference: Not for the first time in history, but more acutely than ever before, there was a fear that scientists would be overwhelmed, that they would be no longer able to control the vast amounts of potentially relevant material that were pouring forth from the world's presses, that science itself was under threat (Bawden and Robinson, 2008, p. 183).
One of the solutions to help scientists filter the most relevant publications and, thus, to stay current on developments in their fields during the transition from "little science" to "big science", was the introduction of citation indexing as a Wellsian "World Brain" (Garfield, 1964) of scientific information: It is too much to expect a research worker to spend an inordinate amount of time searching for the bibliographic descendants of antecedent papers. It would not be excessive to demand that the thorough scholar check all papers that have cited or criticized such papers, if they could be located quickly. The citation index makes this check practicable (Garfield, 1955, p. 108). In retrospective, citation indexing can be perceived as a pre-social web version of crowdsourcing, as it is based on the concept that the community of citing authors outperforms indexers in highlighting cognitive links between papers, particularly on the level of specific ideas and concepts (Garfield, 1983). Over the last 50 years, citation analysis and more generally, bibliometric methods, have developed from information retrieval tools to research evaluation metrics, where they are presumed to make scientific funding more efficient and effective (Moed, 2006). However, the dominance of bibliometric indicators in research evaluation has also led to significant goal displacement (Merton, 1957) and the oversimplification of notions of "research productivity" and "scientific quality", creating adverse effects such as salami publishing, honorary authorships, citation cartels, and misuse of indicators (Binswanger, 2015; Cronin and Sugimoto, 2014; Frey and Osterloh, 2006; Haustein and Larivière, 2015; Weingart, 2005).
Furthermore, the rise of the web, and subsequently, the social web, has challenged the quasi-monopolistic status of the journal as the main form of scholarly communication and citation indices as the primary assessment mechanisms. Scientific communication is becoming more open, transparent, and diverse: publications are increasingly open access; manuscripts, presentations, code, and data are shared online; research ideas and results are discussed and criticized openly on blogs; and new peer review experiments, with open post publication assessment by anonymous or non-anonymous referees, are underway. The diversification of scholarly production and assessment, paired with the increasing speed of the communication process, leads to an increased information overload (Bawden and Robinson, 2008), demanding new filters. The concept of altmetrics, short for alternative (to citation) metrics, was created out of an attempt to provide a filter (Priem et al., 2010) and to steer against the oversimplification of the measurement of scientific success solely on the basis of number of journal articles published and citations received, by considering a wider range of research outputs and metrics (Piwowar, 2013). Although the term altmetrics was introduced in a tweet in 2010 (Priem, 2010), the idea of capturing traces - "polymorphous mentioning" (Cronin et al., 1998, p. 1320) - of scholars and their documents on the web to measure "impact" of science in a broader manner than citations was introduced years before, largely in the context of webometrics (Almind and Ingwersen, 1997; Thelwall et al., 2005):
There will soon be a critical mass of web-based digital objects and usage statistics on which to model scholars' communication behaviors - publishing, posting, blogging, scanning, reading, downloading, glossing, linking, citing, recommending, acknowledging - and with which to track their scholarly influence and impact, broadly conceived and broadly felt (Cronin, 2005, p. 196). A decade after Cronin's prediction and five years after the coining of altmetrics, the time seems ripe to reflect upon the role of social media in scholarly communication. This Special Issue does so by providing an overview of current research on the indicators and metrics grouped under the umbrella term of altmetrics, on their relationships with traditional indicators of scientific activity, and on the uses that are made of the various social media platforms - on which these indicators are based - by scientists of various disciplines.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Couto, T.; Cristo, M.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Calado, P.; Ziviani, N.; Moura, E.; Ribeiro-Neto, B.: ¬A comparative study of citations and links in document classification (2006)
0.01
0.012132276 = product of:
0.024264552 = sum of:
0.012310892 = product of:
0.024621785 = sum of:
0.024621785 = weight(_text_:p in 2531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024621785 = score(doc=2531,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 2531, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2531)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.011953659 = product of:
0.023907319 = sum of:
0.023907319 = weight(_text_:b in 2531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023907319 = score(doc=2531,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 2531, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2531)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
