-
Chakrabarti, S.; Dom, B.; Kumar, S.R.; Raghavan, P.; Rajagopalan, S.; Tomkins, A.; Kleinberg, J.M.; Gibson, D.: Neue Pfade durch den Internet-Dschungel : Die zweite Generation von Web-Suchmaschinen (1999)
0.02
0.019411642 = product of:
0.038823284 = sum of:
0.019697428 = product of:
0.039394855 = sum of:
0.039394855 = weight(_text_:p in 3) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039394855 = score(doc=3,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 3, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.019125855 = product of:
0.03825171 = sum of:
0.03825171 = weight(_text_:b in 3) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03825171 = score(doc=3,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 3, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Jacucci, G.; Barral, O.; Daee, P.; Wenzel, M.; Serim, B.; Ruotsalo, T.; Pluchino, P.; Freeman, J.; Gamberini, L.; Kaski, S.; Blankertz, B.: Integrating neurophysiologic relevance feedback in intent modeling for information retrieval (2019)
0.02
0.01715763 = product of:
0.03431526 = sum of:
0.017410232 = product of:
0.034820464 = sum of:
0.034820464 = weight(_text_:p in 5356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034820464 = score(doc=5356,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.28089944 = fieldWeight in 5356, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5356)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.016905027 = product of:
0.033810053 = sum of:
0.033810053 = weight(_text_:b in 5356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033810053 = score(doc=5356,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 5356, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5356)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Shah, B.; Raghavan, V.; Dhatric, P.; Zhao, X.: ¬A cluster-based approach for efficient content-based image retrieval using a similarity-preserving space transformation method (2006)
0.01
0.014607959 = product of:
0.029215919 = sum of:
0.012310892 = product of:
0.024621785 = sum of:
0.024621785 = weight(_text_:p in 6118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024621785 = score(doc=6118,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 6118, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6118)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.016905027 = product of:
0.033810053 = sum of:
0.033810053 = weight(_text_:b in 6118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033810053 = score(doc=6118,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 6118, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6118)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The techniques of clustering and space transformation have been successfully used in the past to solve a number of pattern recognition problems. In this article, the authors propose a new approach to content-based image retrieval (CBIR) that uses (a) a newly proposed similarity-preserving space transformation method to transform the original low-level image space into a highlevel vector space that enables efficient query processing, and (b) a clustering scheme that further improves the efficiency of our retrieval system. This combination is unique and the resulting system provides synergistic advantages of using both clustering and space transformation. The proposed space transformation method is shown to preserve the order of the distances in the transformed feature space. This strategy makes this approach to retrieval generic as it can be applied to object types, other than images, and feature spaces more general than metric spaces. The CBIR approach uses the inexpensive "estimated" distance in the transformed space, as opposed to the computationally inefficient "real" distance in the original space, to retrieve the desired results for a given query image. The authors also provide a theoretical analysis of the complexity of their CBIR approach when used for color-based retrieval, which shows that it is computationally more efficient than other comparable approaches. An extensive set of experiments to test the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed approach has been performed. The results show that the approach offers superior response time (improvement of 1-2 orders of magnitude compared to retrieval approaches that either use pruning techniques like indexing, clustering, etc., or space transformation, but not both) with sufficiently high retrieval accuracy.
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Fleet, C. van: Opening the black box of "relevance work" : a domain analysis (2012)
0.01
0.014558731 = product of:
0.029117461 = sum of:
0.01477307 = product of:
0.02954614 = sum of:
0.02954614 = weight(_text_:p in 247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02954614 = score(doc=247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014344391 = product of:
0.028688783 = sum of:
0.028688783 = weight(_text_:b in 247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028688783 = score(doc=247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In response to Hjørland's recent call for a reconceptualization of the foundations of relevance, we suggest that the sociocognitive aspects of intermediation by information agencies, such as archives and libraries, are a necessary and unexplored part of the infrastructure of the subject knowledge domains central to his recommended "view of relevance informed by a social paradigm" (2010, p. 217). From a comparative analysis of documents from 39 graduate-level introductory courses in archives, reference, and strategic/competitive intelligence taught in 13 American Library Association-accredited library and information science (LIS) programs, we identify four defining sociocognitive dimensions of "relevance work" in information agencies within Hjørland's proposed framework for relevance: tasks, time, systems, and assessors. This study is intended to supply sociocognitive content from within the relevance work domain to support further domain analytic research, and to emphasize the importance of intermediary relevance work for all subject knowledge domains.
-
Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015)
0.01
0.014412838 = product of:
0.028825676 = sum of:
0.012310892 = product of:
0.024621785 = sum of:
0.024621785 = weight(_text_:p in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024621785 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.016514784 = product of:
0.033029567 = sum of:
0.033029567 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033029567 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 18:22:56
-
Fan, W.; Fox, E.A.; Pathak, P.; Wu, H.: ¬The effects of fitness functions an genetic programming-based ranking discovery for Web search (2004)
0.01
0.014393164 = product of:
0.028786328 = sum of:
0.01477307 = product of:
0.02954614 = sum of:
0.02954614 = weight(_text_:p in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02954614 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014013258 = product of:
0.028026516 = sum of:
0.028026516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028026516 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 31. 5.2004 19:22:06
-
Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004)
0.01
0.014393164 = product of:
0.028786328 = sum of:
0.01477307 = product of:
0.02954614 = sum of:
0.02954614 = weight(_text_:p in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02954614 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014013258 = product of:
0.028026516 = sum of:
0.028026516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028026516 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 16.11.2008 16:22:48
-
Symonds, M.; Bruza, P.; Zuccon, G.; Koopman, B.; Sitbon, L.; Turner, I.: Automatic query expansion : a structural linguistic perspective (2014)
0.01
0.012132276 = product of:
0.024264552 = sum of:
0.012310892 = product of:
0.024621785 = sum of:
0.024621785 = weight(_text_:p in 1338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024621785 = score(doc=1338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1338)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.011953659 = product of:
0.023907319 = sum of:
0.023907319 = weight(_text_:b in 1338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023907319 = score(doc=1338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1338)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Baloh, P.; Desouza, K.C.; Hackney, R.: Contextualizing organizational interventions of knowledge management systems : a design science perspectiveA domain analysis (2012)
0.01
0.011994304 = product of:
0.023988608 = sum of:
0.012310892 = product of:
0.024621785 = sum of:
0.024621785 = weight(_text_:p in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024621785 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.011677716 = product of:
0.023355432 = sum of:
0.023355432 = weight(_text_:22 in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023355432 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 11. 6.2012 14:22:34
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment : a user-centered evaluation (2006)
0.01
0.011815688 = product of:
0.04726275 = sum of:
0.04726275 = sum of:
0.023907319 = weight(_text_:b in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023907319 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.023355432 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023355432 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The study reported here investigated the query expansion behavior of end-users interacting with a thesaurus-enhanced search system on the Web. Two groups, namely academic staff and postgraduate students, were recruited into this study. Data were collected from 90 searches performed by 30 users using the OVID interface to the CAB abstracts database. Data-gathering techniques included questionnaires, screen capturing software, and interviews. The results presented here relate to issues of search-topic and search-term characteristics, number and types of expanded queries, usefulness of thesaurus terms, and behavioral differences between academic staff and postgraduate students in their interaction. The key conclusions drawn were that (a) academic staff chose more narrow and synonymous terms than did postgraduate students, who generally selected broader and related terms; (b) topic complexity affected users' interaction with the thesaurus in that complex topics required more query expansion and search term selection; (c) users' prior topic-search experience appeared to have a significant effect on their selection and evaluation of thesaurus terms; (d) in 50% of the searches where additional terms were suggested from the thesaurus, users stated that they had not been aware of the terms at the beginning of the search; this observation was particularly noticeable in the case of postgraduate students.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:32:43
-
Wechsler, M.; Schäuble, P.: ¬The probability ranking principle revisited (2000)
0.01
0.009848714 = product of:
0.039394855 = sum of:
0.039394855 = product of:
0.07878971 = sum of:
0.07878971 = weight(_text_:p in 3827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07878971 = score(doc=3827,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 3827, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3827)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986)
0.01
0.009342172 = product of:
0.03736869 = sum of:
0.03736869 = product of:
0.07473738 = sum of:
0.07473738 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07473738 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
-
Yan, E.; Ding, Y.; Sugimoto, C.R.: P-Rank: an indicator measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks (2011)
0.01
0.009046621 = product of:
0.036186483 = sum of:
0.036186483 = product of:
0.072372966 = sum of:
0.072372966 = weight(_text_:p in 4349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072372966 = score(doc=4349,freq=12.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.58383846 = fieldWeight in 4349, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4349)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Ranking scientific productivity and prestige are often limited to homogeneous networks. These networks are unable to account for the multiple factors that constitute the scholarly communication and reward system. This study proposes a new informetric indicator, P-Rank, for measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks containing articles, authors, and journals. P-Rank differentiates the weight of each citation based on its citing papers, citing journals, and citing authors. Articles from 16 representative library and information science journals are selected as the dataset. Principle Component Analysis is conducted to examine the relationship between P-Rank and other bibliometric indicators. We also compare the correlation and rank variances between citation counts and P-Rank scores. This work provides a new approach to examining prestige in scholarly communication networks in a more comprehensive and nuanced way.
- Object
- P-Rank
-
Perry, R.; Willett, P.: ¬A revies of the use of inverted files for best match searching in information retrieval systems (1983)
0.01
0.008617624 = product of:
0.034470495 = sum of:
0.034470495 = product of:
0.06894099 = sum of:
0.06894099 = weight(_text_:p in 2701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06894099 = score(doc=2701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 2701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2701)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Ziegler, B.: ESS: ein schneller Algorithmus zur Mustersuche in Zeichenfolgen (1996)
0.01
0.008367561 = product of:
0.033470243 = sum of:
0.033470243 = product of:
0.06694049 = sum of:
0.06694049 = weight(_text_:b in 7543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06694049 = score(doc=7543,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12214884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 7543, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7543)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.01
0.008174401 = product of:
0.032697603 = sum of:
0.032697603 = product of:
0.065395206 = sum of:
0.065395206 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065395206 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.01
0.008174401 = product of:
0.032697603 = sum of:
0.032697603 = product of:
0.065395206 = sum of:
0.065395206 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065395206 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120730735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
-
Jascó, P.: Mapping algorithms to translate natural language questions into search queries for Web databases (1997)
0.01
0.007386535 = product of:
0.02954614 = sum of:
0.02954614 = product of:
0.05909228 = sum of:
0.05909228 = weight(_text_:p in 314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05909228 = score(doc=314,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 314, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=314)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Robertson, S.E.: ¬The probability ranking principle in IR (1977)
0.01
0.007386535 = product of:
0.02954614 = sum of:
0.02954614 = product of:
0.05909228 = sum of:
0.05909228 = weight(_text_:p in 1935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05909228 = score(doc=1935,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 1935, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1935)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willet. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.281-286.
-
Salton, G.; Buckley, C.: Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval (1988)
0.01
0.007386535 = product of:
0.02954614 = sum of:
0.02954614 = product of:
0.05909228 = sum of:
0.05909228 = weight(_text_:p in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05909228 = score(doc=1938,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1239606 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.034476474 = queryNorm
0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.323-328.
