Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"Z695"
  1. Aitchison, J.; Gilchrist, A.: Thesaurus construction : a practical manual (1987) 0.01
    0.014821622 = product of:
      0.044464864 = sum of:
        0.044464864 = weight(_text_:j in 6869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044464864 = score(doc=6869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12665632 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039860412 = queryNorm
            0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 6869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6869)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  2. ¬The thesaurus: review, renaissance and revision (2004) 0.01
    0.008892974 = product of:
      0.02667892 = sum of:
        0.02667892 = weight(_text_:j in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02667892 = score(doc=3243,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12665632 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039860412 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. folgende Aussage von J. Aitchison u. S. Dextre Clarke: "We face a paradox. Ostensibly, the need and the opportunity to apply thesauri to information retrieval are greater than ever before. On the other hand, users resist most efforts to persuade them to apply one. The drive for interoperability of systems means we must design our vocabularies for easy integration into downstream applications such as content management systems, indexing/metatagging interfaces, search engines, and portals. Summarizing the search for vocabularies that work more intuitively, we see that there are trends working in opposite directions. In the hugely popular taxonomies an the one hand, relationships between terms are more loosely defined than in thesauri. In the ontologies that will support computer-to-computer communications in AI applications such as the Semantic Web, we see the need for much more precisely defined term relationships."
    Enthält die Beiträge: Spiteri, L.F.: Word association testing and thesaurus construction: a pilot study. Aitchison, J., S.G. Dextre-Clarke: The Thesaurus: a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future. Thomas, A.R.: Teach yourself thesaurus: exercises, reading, resources. Shearer, J.R.: A practical exercise in building a thesaurus. Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction: key issues and selected readings. Riesland, M.A.: Tools of the trade: vocabulary management software. Will, L.: Thesaurus consultancy. Owens, L.A., P.A. Cochrane: Thesaurus evaluation. Greenberg, J.: User comprehension and application of information retrieval thesauri. Johnson, E.H.: Distributed thesaurus Web services. Thomas, A.R., S.K. Roe: An interview with Dr. Amy J. Warner. Landry, P.: Multilingual subject access: the linking approach of MACS.
  3. Tait, J.A.: Authors and titles : an analytical study of the author concept in codes of cataloguing rules in the English language, from that of the British Museum in 1841 to the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules 1967 (1969) 0.00
    0.004844052 = product of:
      0.014532155 = sum of:
        0.014532155 = product of:
          0.043596465 = sum of:
            0.043596465 = weight(_text_:29 in 2161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043596465 = score(doc=2161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14021647 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039860412 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2161)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2008 19:29:39
  4. Subject access : preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future" (2011) 0.00
    0.002422026 = product of:
      0.0072660777 = sum of:
        0.0072660777 = product of:
          0.021798233 = sum of:
            0.021798233 = weight(_text_:29 in 1799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021798233 = score(doc=1799,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14021647 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039860412 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 1799, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1799)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    11. 4.2015 18:29:01