Search (36 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Dahlberg, I."
  1. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.05
    0.050441995 = product of:
      0.10088399 = sum of:
        0.03682806 = weight(_text_:for in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03682806 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.41488218 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
        0.064055935 = product of:
          0.12811187 = sum of:
            0.12811187 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12811187 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  2. De Luca, E.W.; Dahlberg, I.: Including knowledge domains from the ICC into the multilingual lexical linked data cloud (2014) 0.02
    0.019297104 = product of:
      0.03859421 = sum of:
        0.01594702 = weight(_text_:for in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01594702 = score(doc=1493,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.17964928 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
        0.02264719 = product of:
          0.04529438 = sum of:
            0.04529438 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04529438 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    A lot of information that is already available on the Web, or retrieved from local information systems and social networks is structured in data silos that are not semantically related. Semantic technologies make it emerge that the use of typed links that directly express their relations are an advantage for every application that can reuse the incorporated knowledge about the data. For this reason, data integration, through reengineering (e.g. triplify), or querying (e.g. D2R) is an important task in order to make information available for everyone. Thus, in order to build a semantic map of the data, we need knowledge about data items itself and the relation between heterogeneous data items. In this paper, we present our work of providing Lexical Linked Data (LLD) through a meta-model that contains all the resources and gives the possibility to retrieve and navigate them from different perspectives. We combine the existing work done on knowledge domains (based on the Information Coding Classification) within the Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud (based on the RDF/OWL EurowordNet and the related integrated lexical resources (MultiWordNet, EuroWordNet, MEMODATA Lexicon, Hamburg Methaphor DB).
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:01:18
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  3. Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978) 0.02
    0.016013984 = product of:
      0.064055935 = sum of:
        0.064055935 = product of:
          0.12811187 = sum of:
            0.12811187 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12811187 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975) 0.02
    0.016013984 = product of:
      0.064055935 = sum of:
        0.064055935 = product of:
          0.12811187 = sum of:
            0.12811187 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12811187 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
  5. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.01
    0.011209788 = product of:
      0.04483915 = sum of:
        0.04483915 = product of:
          0.0896783 = sum of:
            0.0896783 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0896783 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    S.9-22
  6. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.01
    0.008006992 = product of:
      0.032027967 = sum of:
        0.032027967 = product of:
          0.064055935 = sum of:
            0.064055935 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064055935 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
  7. Dahlberg, I.: Ontical structure and universal classification (1977) 0.01
    0.0073656123 = product of:
      0.02946245 = sum of:
        0.02946245 = weight(_text_:for in 3342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02946245 = score(doc=3342,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.33190575 = fieldWeight in 3342, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3342)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Imprint
    Bangalore : Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science
  8. Dahlberg, I.: Principles for the construction of a universal classification system : a proposal (1978) 0.01
    0.0064449105 = product of:
      0.025779642 = sum of:
        0.025779642 = weight(_text_:for in 67) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025779642 = score(doc=67,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 67, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=67)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  9. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.01
    0.006405593 = product of:
      0.025622372 = sum of:
        0.025622372 = product of:
          0.051244743 = sum of:
            0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051244743 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  10. Dahlberg, I.: Knowledge organization : its scope and possibilities (1993) 0.01
    0.0063788076 = product of:
      0.02551523 = sum of:
        0.02551523 = weight(_text_:for in 6315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02551523 = score(doc=6315,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 6315, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6315)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Sketch of historical development of knowledge organization and presentation of its scope as shown by the contents of the literature service, now called 'Knowledge Organization Literature'. The scheme is explained and shown on its three levels as well as its correlation to a universal classification system of knowledge fields, the 'Information Coding Classification'. The possibilities of Knowledge Organization as a help for everybody, especially also students and above all students of education, and a help for political, industrial and social leaders are discussed. 10 measures for consideration and activation are listed
  11. Dahlberg, I.: Towards a future for knowledge organization (2006) 0.01
    0.0063788076 = product of:
      0.02551523 = sum of:
        0.02551523 = weight(_text_:for in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02551523 = score(doc=1476,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the origin and evolution of the Information Coding Classification (ICC); its theoretical basis, and structure and advantageous attributes for organizing knowledge. Pleads that the considerable work already done on the system should be taken up and developed by interested research groups through collaborative effort. Concludes with some thoughts on the future of knowledge organization for information retrieval and other applications
  12. Dahlberg, I.: Library catalogs in the Internet : switching for future subject access (1996) 0.01
    0.0061762533 = product of:
      0.024705013 = sum of:
        0.024705013 = weight(_text_:for in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024705013 = score(doc=5171,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.27831143 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A multitude of library catalogs are now being entered into the Internet. Their differing classification and subject headings systems used for subject access call for a switching system, a black box to facilitate the location of subject fields and their subjects in these systems. The principles on which such a switching system must be built in order to provide the necessary insight, surveyability, reproducebility and ease of concept combinability (e.g. in cases of interdisciplinary subjects) are outlined and compared with the BSO which hance once been established by the FID in order to serve a switching purpose. The advantages of using the Information Coding Classification (ICC) as a switching system in the Internet are demonstrated, likewise the methodology needed to establish the necessary correlation between library classification systems (and if possible also subject heading systems and thesauri) and the ICC. Finally some organizational implications for creating a switching for 6 universal systems in use are described
  13. Dahlberg, I.: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO) (2009) 0.01
    0.005638122 = product of:
      0.022552488 = sum of:
        0.022552488 = weight(_text_:for in 4693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022552488 = score(doc=4693,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.2540624 = fieldWeight in 4693, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4693)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The aims, tasks, activities, and achievements of the International Society for Knowledge Organization (1989-) are presented. ISKO is that group of scholars and practitioners who feel responsible for questions pertaining to the conceptual organization and processing of knowledge, the scientific bases of which lie in knowledge drawn from the fields of logic, organization science, psychology, science theory, informatics, semiotics, linguistics, and philosophy. It aims at giving advice in the construction, perfection, and application of such organizational tools as classification systems, taxonomies, thesauri, terminologies, as well as their use for indexing purposes and thereby for the retrieval of information. Events leading up to the founding of ISKO in 1989 are described. The aims and objectives of ISKO according to its statutes are mentioned, as well as its organization, its biennial international conferences with their proceedings volumes, and the establishment of a further conference series and a textbook series. The drive and success of coordinators in establishing chapters in many countries is reviewed as well. The activities of the chapters (mainly by their own meetings and conferences) and subsequently their publications during the past years are also included. The idea and structure of ISKO's official journal-Knowledge Organization-is explained, and ISKO's Web site is given. Finally, the need for the Society is discussed, and its possible future is considered.
  14. Dahlberg, I.: Why a new universal classification system is needed (2017) 0.01
    0.0055814567 = product of:
      0.022325827 = sum of:
        0.022325827 = weight(_text_:for in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022325827 = score(doc=3614,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.25150898 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Research history of the last 70 years highlights various systems for contents assessment and retrieval of scientific literature, such as universal classifications, thesauri, ontologies etc., which have followed developments of their own, notwithstanding a general trend towards interoperability, i.e. either to become instruments for cooperation or to widen their scope to encompass neighbouring fields within their framework. In the case of thesauri and ontologies, the endeavour to upgrade them into a universal system was bound to miscarry. This paper purports to indicate ways to gain from past experience and possibly rally material achievements while updating and promoting the ontologically-based faceted Information Coding Classification as a progressive universal system fit for meeting whatever requirements in the fields of information and science at large.
  15. Dahlberg, I.: On the theory of the concept (1979) 0.01
    0.0055242092 = product of:
      0.022096837 = sum of:
        0.022096837 = weight(_text_:for in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022096837 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.24892932 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Ordering systems for global information networks. Proc. of the 3rd Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Bombay 1975
  16. Luca, E.W. de; Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud : eine mögliche Zugangsoptimierung? (2014) 0.00
    0.0048041944 = product of:
      0.019216778 = sum of:
        0.019216778 = product of:
          0.038433556 = sum of:
            0.038433556 = weight(_text_:22 in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038433556 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:00:13
  17. Dahlberg, I.: Classification structure principles : Investigations, experiences, conclusions (1998) 0.00
    0.004784106 = product of:
      0.019136423 = sum of:
        0.019136423 = weight(_text_:for in 47) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019136423 = score(doc=47,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.21557912 = fieldWeight in 47, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=47)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    For the purpose of establishing compatibility between the major universal classification systems in use, their structure principles were investigated and crucial points of difficulty for this undertaking were looked for, in order to relate the guiding classes, e.g. of the DDC, UDC, LCC, BC, and CC, to the subject groups of the ICC. With the help of a matrix into whose fields all subject groups of the ICC were inserted, it was not difficult at all to enter the notations of the universal classification systems mentioned. However, differences in terms of level of subdivision were found, as well as differences of occurrences. Most, though not all, of the fields of the ICC matrix could be completely filled with the corresponding notations of the other systems. Through this matrix, a first table of some 81 equivalences was established on which further work regarding the next levels of subject fields can be based
  18. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (1975) 0.00
    0.004784106 = product of:
      0.019136423 = sum of:
        0.019136423 = weight(_text_:for in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019136423 = score(doc=2103,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.21557912 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields
  19. Dahlberg, I.: Tendencias actuales en organizacion del conocimiento (1995) 0.00
    0.00455724 = product of:
      0.01822896 = sum of:
        0.01822896 = weight(_text_:for in 5549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01822896 = score(doc=5549,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.20535621 = fieldWeight in 5549, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5549)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the latest trends in knowledge organization research. Provides a historical background covering the thesaurs period; the impact of Ranganathan's ideas and the foundation of the ISKO. Defines knowledge organization and explains its conceptual framework. Analyses current research from the Knowledge Literature supplement to Knowledge Organization covering automation and universal classification schemes; a universal thesaurus; new conceptual structures for knowledge organization; and the quality of indexing and cataloguing procedures. Recommends close cooperation between terminologies and knowledge organization researchers for facet analysis to progress
  20. Dahlberg, I.: Knowledge organization : a new science? (2006) 0.00
    0.00455724 = product of:
      0.01822896 = sum of:
        0.01822896 = weight(_text_:for in 3375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01822896 = score(doc=3375,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.20535621 = fieldWeight in 3375, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3375)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In ISKO's name, the term "Knowledge Organization" (KO) denotes already the object and the activity area significant for the existence of any science. Both areas are outlined and their specific contents shown. Also a survey of its special subfields is given. The sciencetheoretical foundation of Knowledge Organization as a new scientific discipline is based on the propositional concept of science. Within a universal system of the sciences, KO has been regarded as a subfield of Science of Science. Concludingly it is proposed to find the necessary institution for work in concerted effort of scientists, knowledge organizers and terminologists on the collection, definition, and systematization of concepts of all subject fields, utilizing the Information Coding Classification (ICC) as the necessary categorizing structure.