Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Garfield, E."
  1. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.02 
    0.017654698 = product of:
  0.035309397 = sum of:
    0.012889821 = weight(_text_:for in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012889821 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.14520876 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
    0.022419576 = product of:
      0.04483915 = sum of:
        0.04483915 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04483915 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.14, S.1197-1202
  2. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.01 
    0.008006992 = product of:
  0.032027967 = sum of:
    0.032027967 = product of:
      0.064055935 = sum of:
        0.064055935 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064055935 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  3. Garfield, E.: How will new technology change the characteristics of libraries and their users? (1978) 0.01 
    0.0078124115 = product of:
  0.031249646 = sum of:
    0.031249646 = weight(_text_:for in 901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031249646 = score(doc=901,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.35203922 = fieldWeight in 901, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=901)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Knowledge and development. Reshaping library and information services for the world of tommorrow. Festschrift for Björn Tell. Ed. by S. Schwarz u. U. Willers
  4. Garfield, E.: ¬The Permuterm Subject Index : an autobiographic review (1976) 0.01 
    0.0073656123 = product of:
  0.02946245 = sum of:
    0.02946245 = weight(_text_:for in 3299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02946245 = score(doc=3299,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.33190575 = fieldWeight in 3299, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3299)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 27(1976), S.88-291
  5. Garfield, E.; Sher, I.H.: KeyWords Plus: algorithmic derivative indexing (1993) 0.01 
    0.0073656123 = product of:
  0.02946245 = sum of:
    0.02946245 = weight(_text_:for in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02946245 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.33190575 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 44(1993) no.5, S.298-299
  6. Garfield, E.: Citation indexes for science : a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas (1955) 0.01 
    0.0073656123 = product of:
  0.02946245 = sum of:
    0.02946245 = weight(_text_:for in 4342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02946245 = score(doc=4342,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.33190575 = fieldWeight in 4342, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4342)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  7. Garfield, E.: How ISI selects journals for coverage : quantitative and qualitative considerations (1990) 0.01 
    0.0073656123 = product of:
  0.02946245 = sum of:
    0.02946245 = weight(_text_:for in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02946245 = score(doc=1153,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.33190575 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  8. Garfield, E.: ¬An algorithm for translating chemical names to molecular formulas (1961) 0.01 
    0.006510343 = product of:
  0.026041372 = sum of:
    0.026041372 = weight(_text_:for in 3465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026041372 = score(doc=3465,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.29336601 = fieldWeight in 3465, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3465)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This dissertation discusses, explains, and demonstrates a new algorithm for translating chemica l nomenclature into molecular formulas. In order to place the study in its proper context and perspective the historical development of nomenclature is first discussed, aa well as other related aspects of the chemical information problem. The relationship of nomenclature to modern linguistic studies is then introduced. Tire relevance of structural linguistic procedures to the study of chemical nomenclature is shown. The methods of the linguist are illustrated by examples from chemical discourse. The algorithm is then explained, first for the human translator and then for use by a computer. Flow diagrams for the computer syntactic analysis, dictionary Iook-up routine, and furmula calculation routine are included. The sampling procedure for testing the algorithm is explained and finalIy, conclusions are drawn with respect to the general validity of the method and the dirsction that might be taken for future research. A summary of modern chemical nomenclature practice is appened primarily for use by the reader who is not familiar with chemical nomenclature.
  9. Garfield, E.: Introducing the ISI Atlas of Science : Biotechnology and molecular genetics, 1981/82 and bibliographic update for 1983/84 (1984) 0.01 
    0.0064449105 = product of:
  0.025779642 = sum of:
    0.025779642 = weight(_text_:for in 1076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025779642 = score(doc=1076,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 1076, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1076)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  10. Garfield, E.: KeyWords Plus takes you beyond title words (1990) 0.01 
    0.0064449105 = product of:
  0.025779642 = sum of:
    0.025779642 = weight(_text_:for in 4344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025779642 = score(doc=4344,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 4344, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4344)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Issue
    Pt.2: Expanded journal coverage for Current Contents on Diskette, includes social and behavioral sciences
  11. Garfield, E.: When to cite (1996) 0.01 
    0.0052082743 = product of:
  0.020833097 = sum of:
    0.020833097 = weight(_text_:for in 7080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020833097 = score(doc=7080,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 7080, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7080)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In spite of numerous studies of citation behaviour and the wide recognition by journal editors of the need to acknowledge intellectual debts, authors and referees need explicit reminders as to when formal refrences or acknowledgements are appropriate. Notes a 3 year experiment involving graduate students which demonstrated the varying perceptions of the need for documentation off terminology, ideas and methods. Suggests a tentative tutorial for journal editors that should be modified in each scholarly context
  12. Garfield, E.: Random thoughts on citationology : Its theory and practice (1998) 0.01 
    0.0052082743 = product of:
  0.020833097 = sum of:
    0.020833097 = weight(_text_:for in 5128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020833097 = score(doc=5128,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 5128, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5128)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Theories of citation are as elusive as theories of information science, which have been debated for decade. Gives an overview of some of these theories, and as a basis for discussion offers the term citationology as the theory and practice of citation, including its derivative disciplines citation analysis and bibliometrics
  13. Garfield, E.; Pudovkin, A.I.; Istomin, V.S.: Why do we need algorithmic historiography? (2003) 0.01 
    0.0052082743 = product of:
  0.020833097 = sum of:
    0.020833097 = weight(_text_:for in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020833097 = score(doc=1606,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This article discusses the rationale for creating historiographs of scholarly topics using a new program called HistCite(TM), which produces a variety of analyses to aid the historian identify key events (papers), people (authors), and journals in a field. By creating a genealogic profile of the evolution, the program aids the scholar in evaluating the paradigm involved.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.5, S.400-412
  14. Garfield, E.: Citation indexes for science (1985) 0.00 
    0.0048718946 = product of:
  0.019487578 = sum of:
    0.019487578 = weight(_text_:for in 3632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019487578 = score(doc=3632,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.21953502 = fieldWeight in 3632, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3632)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Indexes in general seek to provide a "key" to a body of literature intending to help the user in identifying, verifying, and/or locating individual or related items. The most common devices for collocation in indexes are authors' names and subjects. A different approach to collocating related items in an index is provided by a method called "citation indexing." Citation indexes attempt to link items through citations or references, in other works, by bringing together items cited in a particular work and the works citing a particular item. Citation indexing is based an the concept that there is a significant intellectual link between a document and each bibliographic item cited in it and that this link is useful to the scholar because an author's references to earlier writings identify relevant information to the subject of his current work. One of the major differences between the citation index and the traditional subject index is that the former, while listing current literature, also provides a retrospec tive view of past literature. While each issue of a traditional index is normally concerned only with the current literature, the citation index brings back retrospective literature in the form of cited references, thereby linking current scholarly works with earlier works. The advantages of the citation index have been considered to be its value as a tool for tracing the history of ideas or discoveries, for associating ideas between current and past work, and for evaluating works of individual authors or library collections. The concept of citation indexing is not new. It has been applied to legal literature since 1873 in a legal reference tool called Shepard's Citations. In the 1950s Eugene Garfield, a documentation consultant and founder and President of the Institute for Scientific Information (Philadelphia), developed the technique of citation indexing for scientific literature. This new application was facilitated by the availability of computer technology, resulting in a series of services: Science Citation Index (1955- ), Social Sciences Citation Index (1966- ), and the Arts & Humanities Index (1976- ). All three appear in printed versions and as machine-readable databases. In the following essay, the first in a series of articles and books elucidating the citation indexing system, Garfield traces the origin and beginning of this idea, its advantages, and the methods of preparing such indexes.
  15. Abt, H.A.; Garfield, E.: Is the relationship between numbers of references and paper lengths the same for all sciences? (2002) 0.00 
    0.004784106 = product of:
  0.019136423 = sum of:
    0.019136423 = weight(_text_:for in 5223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019136423 = score(doc=5223,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.21557912 = fieldWeight in 5223, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5223)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    It has been shown in the physical sciences that a paper's length is related to its number of references in a linear manner. Abt and Garfield here look at the life and social sciences with the thought that if the relation holds the citation counts will provide a measure of relative importance across these disciplines. In the life sciences 200 research papers from 1999-2000 were scanned in each of 10 journals to produce counts of 1000 word normalized pages. In the social sciences an average of 70 research papers in nine journals were scanned for the two-year period. Papers of average length in the various sciences have the same average number of references within plus or minus 17%. A look at the 30 to 60 papers over the two years in 18 review journals indicates twice the references of research papers of the same length.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.13, S.1106-1112
  16. Pudovkin, A.I.; Garfield, E.: Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals (2002) 0.00 
    0.0046035075 = product of:
  0.01841403 = sum of:
    0.01841403 = weight(_text_:for in 5220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01841403 = score(doc=5220,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.20744109 = fieldWeight in 5220, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5220)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Journal Citation Reports provides a classification of journals most heavily cited by a given journal and which most heavily cite that journal, but size variation is not taken into account. Pudovkin and Garfield suggest a procedure for meeting this difficulty. The relatedness of journal i to journal j is determined by the number of citations from journal i to journal j in a given year normalized by the product of the papers published in the j journal in that year times the number of references cited in the i journal in that year. A multiplier of ten to the sixth is suggested to bring the values into an easily perceptible range. While citations received depend upon the overall cumulative number of papers published by a journal, the current year is utilized since that data is available in JCR. Citations to current year papers would be quite low in most fields and thus not included. To produce the final index, the maximum of the A citing B value, and the B citing A value is chosen and used to indicate the closeness of the journals. The procedure is illustrated for the journal Genetics.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.13, S.1113-1119
  17. Garfield, E.: Chemico-linguistics : computer translation of chemical nomenclature (1961) 0.00 
    0.0046035075 = product of:
  0.01841403 = sum of:
    0.01841403 = weight(_text_:for in 3458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01841403 = score(doc=3458,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.20744109 = fieldWeight in 3458, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3458)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Zusammenfassung der Dissertation Vgl. auch: Garfield, E.: An algorithm for translating chemical names to molecular formulas. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1961. In: Essays of an information scientist. Vol. 7. Philadelphia, PA: ISI Press, 1985. S.441-513.
  18. Garfield, E.; Paris, S.W.; Stock, W.G.: HistCite(TM) : a software tool for informetric analysis of citation linkage (2006) 0.00 
    0.00455724 = product of:
  0.01822896 = sum of:
    0.01822896 = weight(_text_:for in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01822896 = score(doc=79,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.20535621 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    HistCite(TM) is a software tool for analyzing and visualizing direct citation linkages between scientific papers. Its inputs are bibliographic records (with cited references) from "Web of Knowledge" or other sources. Its outputs are various tables and graphs with informetric indicators about the knowledge domain under study. As an example we analyze informetrically the literature about Alexius Meinong, an Austrian philosopher and psychologist. The article shortly discusses the informetric functionality of "Web of Knowledge" and shows broadly the possibilities that HistCite offers to its users (e.g. scientists, scientometricans and science journalists).
  19. Garfield, E.: ¬A retrospective and prospective view of information retrieval and artificial intelligence in the 21st century (2001) 0.00 
    0.0036828062 = product of:
  0.014731225 = sum of:
    0.014731225 = weight(_text_:for in 5194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014731225 = score(doc=5194,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 5194, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5194)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.1, S.18-21
  20. Garfield, E.: From citation indexes to informetrics : is the tail now wagging the dog? (1998) 0.00 
    0.0032224553 = product of:
  0.012889821 = sum of:
    0.012889821 = weight(_text_:for in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012889821 = score(doc=2809,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047278564 = queryNorm
        0.14520876 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Provides a synoptic review and history of citation indexes and their evolution into research evaluation tools including a discussion of the use of bibliometric data for evaluating US institutions (academic departments) by the National Research Council (NRC). Covers the origin and uses of periodical impact factors, validation studies of citation analysis, information retrieval and dissemination (current awareness), citation consciousness, historiography and science mapping, Citation Classics, and the history of contemporary science. Illustrates the retrieval of information by cited reference searching, especially as it applies to avoiding duplicated research. Discusses the 15 year cumulative impacts of periodicals and the percentage of uncitedness, the emergence of scientometrics, old boy networks, and citation frequency distributions. Concludes with observations about the future of citation indexing

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 21
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 20
  • m 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications