Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"el"
  1. Wesch, M.: Web 2.0 ... The Machine is Us/ing Us (2006) 0.02
    0.023227734 = product of:
      0.04645547 = sum of:
        0.020833097 = weight(_text_:for in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020833097 = score(doc=3478,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
        0.025622372 = product of:
          0.051244743 = sum of:
            0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051244743 = score(doc=3478,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Final version now available! http://youtube.com/watch?v=NLlGopyXT_g http://mediatedcultures.net A higher quality version is available for download here: http://www.mediafire.com/?6duzg3zioyd. Please note that this is the second draft and the final version will not be available until late February after I review all comments and revise the video. Please return for a new download link at that time.
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  2. Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006) 0.01
    0.005604894 = product of:
      0.022419576 = sum of:
        0.022419576 = product of:
          0.04483915 = sum of:
            0.04483915 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04483915 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  3. Bedathur, S.; Narang, A.: Mind your language : effects of spoken query formulation on retrieval effectiveness (2013) 0.01
    0.0055814567 = product of:
      0.022325827 = sum of:
        0.022325827 = weight(_text_:for in 1150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022325827 = score(doc=1150,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.25150898 = fieldWeight in 1150, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1150)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Voice search is becoming a popular mode for interacting with search engines. As a result, research has gone into building better voice transcription engines, interfaces, and search engines that better handle inherent verbosity of queries. However, when one considers its use by non- native speakers of English, another aspect that becomes important is the formulation of the query by users. In this paper, we present the results of a preliminary study that we conducted with non-native English speakers who formulate queries for given retrieval tasks. Our results show that the current search engines are sensitive in their rankings to the query formulation, and thus highlights the need for developing more robust ranking methods.