-
Borko, H.; Bernick, M.: Automatic document classification : T.2 (1964)
0.39
0.38776773 = product of:
0.5170236 = sum of:
0.02946245 = weight(_text_:for in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02946245 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.33190575 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
0.25572333 = weight(_text_:computing in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25572333 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.9778349 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
0.23183785 = product of:
0.4636757 = sum of:
0.4636757 = weight(_text_:machinery in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.4636757 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35214928 = queryWeight, product of:
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
1.3167021 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery. 11(1964), S.138-151
-
Stiles, H.E.: ¬The association factor in information retrieval (1961)
0.39
0.38776773 = product of:
0.5170236 = sum of:
0.02946245 = weight(_text_:for in 5454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02946245 = score(doc=5454,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.33190575 = fieldWeight in 5454, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5454)
0.25572333 = weight(_text_:computing in 5454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25572333 = score(doc=5454,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.9778349 = fieldWeight in 5454, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5454)
0.23183785 = product of:
0.4636757 = sum of:
0.4636757 = weight(_text_:machinery in 5454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.4636757 = score(doc=5454,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35214928 = queryWeight, product of:
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
1.3167021 = fieldWeight in 5454, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5454)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery. 8(1961), S.271-275
-
Maron, M.E.: Automatic indexing : an experimental inquiry (1961)
0.39
0.38776773 = product of:
0.5170236 = sum of:
0.02946245 = weight(_text_:for in 5465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02946245 = score(doc=5465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.33190575 = fieldWeight in 5465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5465)
0.25572333 = weight(_text_:computing in 5465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25572333 = score(doc=5465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.9778349 = fieldWeight in 5465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5465)
0.23183785 = product of:
0.4636757 = sum of:
0.4636757 = weight(_text_:machinery in 5465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.4636757 = score(doc=5465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35214928 = queryWeight, product of:
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
1.3167021 = fieldWeight in 5465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5465)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery. 8(1961), S.404-417
-
Edmundson, H.P.; Wyllis, R.E.: Automatic abstracting and indexing : survey and recommendations (1961)
0.39
0.38776773 = product of:
0.5170236 = sum of:
0.02946245 = weight(_text_:for in 5480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02946245 = score(doc=5480,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.33190575 = fieldWeight in 5480, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5480)
0.25572333 = weight(_text_:computing in 5480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25572333 = score(doc=5480,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.9778349 = fieldWeight in 5480, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5480)
0.23183785 = product of:
0.4636757 = sum of:
0.4636757 = weight(_text_:machinery in 5480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.4636757 = score(doc=5480,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35214928 = queryWeight, product of:
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
1.3167021 = fieldWeight in 5480, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5480)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Source
- Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery. 4(1961) no.5, S.226-234
-
Borko, H.; Bernick, M.: Automatic document classification : T.1 (1963)
0.39
0.38776773 = product of:
0.5170236 = sum of:
0.02946245 = weight(_text_:for in 5487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02946245 = score(doc=5487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.33190575 = fieldWeight in 5487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5487)
0.25572333 = weight(_text_:computing in 5487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25572333 = score(doc=5487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.9778349 = fieldWeight in 5487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5487)
0.23183785 = product of:
0.4636757 = sum of:
0.4636757 = weight(_text_:machinery in 5487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.4636757 = score(doc=5487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35214928 = queryWeight, product of:
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
1.3167021 = fieldWeight in 5487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery. 10(1963), S.151-162
-
Yu, C.T.; Salton, G.: Precision weighting : an effective automatic indexing method (1976)
0.39
0.38776773 = product of:
0.5170236 = sum of:
0.02946245 = weight(_text_:for in 5490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02946245 = score(doc=5490,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.33190575 = fieldWeight in 5490, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5490)
0.25572333 = weight(_text_:computing in 5490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25572333 = score(doc=5490,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.9778349 = fieldWeight in 5490, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5490)
0.23183785 = product of:
0.4636757 = sum of:
0.4636757 = weight(_text_:machinery in 5490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.4636757 = score(doc=5490,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35214928 = queryWeight, product of:
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
1.3167021 = fieldWeight in 5490, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5490)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery. 23(1976), S.76-88
-
Yu, C.T.; Salton, G.; Siu, M.K.: Effective automatic indexing using term addition and deletion (1978)
0.34
0.33929676 = product of:
0.45239568 = sum of:
0.025779642 = weight(_text_:for in 2859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025779642 = score(doc=2859,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 2859, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2859)
0.22375791 = weight(_text_:computing in 2859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22375791 = score(doc=2859,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.85560554 = fieldWeight in 2859, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2859)
0.20285812 = product of:
0.40571624 = sum of:
0.40571624 = weight(_text_:machinery in 2859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.40571624 = score(doc=2859,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35214928 = queryWeight, product of:
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
1.1521144 = fieldWeight in 2859, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2859)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery. 25(1978), S.210-225
-
Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986)
0.25
0.24807532 = product of:
0.3307671 = sum of:
0.026041372 = weight(_text_:for in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026041372 = score(doc=1356,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.29336601 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
0.15982707 = weight(_text_:computing in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15982707 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.6111468 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
0.14489865 = product of:
0.2897973 = sum of:
0.2897973 = weight(_text_:machinery in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2897973 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35214928 = queryWeight, product of:
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.8229388 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Footnote
- Bezugnahme auf: Blair, D.C.: An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299. - Vgl. auch: Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
- Source
- Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery. 29(1986), S.648-656
-
Salton, G.; Wong, A.; Yang, C.S.: ¬A vector space model for automatic indexing (1975)
0.25
0.24807532 = product of:
0.3307671 = sum of:
0.026041372 = weight(_text_:for in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026041372 = score(doc=1934,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.29336601 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.15982707 = weight(_text_:computing in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15982707 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.6111468 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.14489865 = product of:
0.2897973 = sum of:
0.2897973 = weight(_text_:machinery in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2897973 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35214928 = queryWeight, product of:
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.8229388 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Source
- Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery. 18(1975), S.613-620
-
Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986)
0.04
0.040353596 = product of:
0.08070719 = sum of:
0.02946245 = weight(_text_:for in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02946245 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.33190575 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.051244743 = product of:
0.10248949 = sum of:
0.10248949 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10248949 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
-
Riloff, E.: ¬An empirical study of automated dictionary construction for information extraction in three domains (1996)
0.03
0.025568802 = product of:
0.051137604 = sum of:
0.02551523 = weight(_text_:for in 6752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02551523 = score(doc=6752,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 6752, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6752)
0.025622372 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 6752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051244743 = score(doc=6752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- AutoSlog is a system that addresses the knowledge engineering bottleneck for information extraction. AutoSlog automatically creates domain specific dictionaries for information extraction, given an appropriate training corpus. Describes experiments with AutoSlog in terrorism, joint ventures and microelectronics domains. Compares the performance of AutoSlog across the 3 domains, discusses the lessons learned and presents results from 2 experiments which demonstrate that novice users can generate effective dictionaries using AutoSlog
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Tsareva, P.V.: Algoritmy dlya raspoznavaniya pozitivnykh i negativnykh vkhozdenii deskriptorov v tekst i protsedura avtomaticheskoi klassifikatsii tekstov (1999)
0.03
0.025220998 = product of:
0.050441995 = sum of:
0.01841403 = weight(_text_:for in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01841403 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.20744109 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
0.032027967 = product of:
0.064055935 = sum of:
0.064055935 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064055935 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 1. 4.2002 10:22:41
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Algorithms for selection of positive and negative descriptors from text and automated text indexing
-
Stankovic, R. et al.: Indexing of textual databases based on lexical resources : a case study for Serbian (2016)
0.03
0.025220998 = product of:
0.050441995 = sum of:
0.01841403 = weight(_text_:for in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01841403 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.20744109 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
0.032027967 = product of:
0.064055935 = sum of:
0.064055935 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064055935 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Mongin, L.; Fu, Y.Y.; Mostafa, J.: Open Archives data Service prototype and automated subject indexing using D-Lib archive content as a testbed (2003)
0.02
0.023974061 = product of:
0.095896244 = sum of:
0.095896244 = weight(_text_:computing in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095896244 = score(doc=1167,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.36668807 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The Indiana University School of Library and Information Science opened a new research laboratory in January 2003; The Indiana University School of Library and Information Science Information Processing Laboratory [IU IP Lab]. The purpose of the new laboratory is to facilitate collaboration between scientists in the department in the areas of information retrieval (IR) and information visualization (IV) research. The lab has several areas of focus. These include grid and cluster computing, and a standard Java-based software platform to support plug and play research datasets, a selection of standard IR modules and standard IV algorithms. Future development includes software to enable researchers to contribute datasets, IR algorithms, and visualization algorithms into the standard environment. We decided early on to use OAI-PMH as a resource discovery tool because it is consistent with our mission.
-
Wolfekuhler, M.R.; Punch, W.F.: Finding salient features for personal Web pages categories (1997)
0.02
0.020324267 = product of:
0.040648535 = sum of:
0.01822896 = weight(_text_:for in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01822896 = score(doc=2673,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.20535621 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
0.022419576 = product of:
0.04483915 = sum of:
0.04483915 = weight(_text_:22 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04483915 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Examines techniques that discover features in sets of pre-categorized documents, such that similar documents can be found on the WWW. Examines techniques which will classifiy training examples with high accuracy, then explains why this is not necessarily useful. Describes a method for extracting word clusters from the raw document features. Results show that the clustering technique is successful in discovering word groups in personal Web pages which can be used to find similar information on the WWW
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Newman, D.J.; Block, S.: Probabilistic topic decomposition of an eighteenth-century American newspaper (2006)
0.02
0.020324267 = product of:
0.040648535 = sum of:
0.01822896 = weight(_text_:for in 5291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01822896 = score(doc=5291,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.20535621 = fieldWeight in 5291, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5291)
0.022419576 = product of:
0.04483915 = sum of:
0.04483915 = weight(_text_:22 in 5291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04483915 = score(doc=5291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- We use a probabilistic mixture decomposition method to determine topics in the Pennsylvania Gazette, a major colonial U.S. newspaper from 1728-1800. We assess the value of several topic decomposition techniques for historical research and compare the accuracy and efficacy of various methods. After determining the topics covered by the 80,000 articles and advertisements in the entire 18th century run of the Gazette, we calculate how the prevalence of those topics changed over time, and give historically relevant examples of our findings. This approach reveals important information about the content of this colonial newspaper, and suggests the value of such approaches to a more complete understanding of early American print culture and society.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:32:00
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.753-767
-
Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998)
0.02
0.020186728 = product of:
0.040373456 = sum of:
0.024359472 = weight(_text_:for in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024359472 = score(doc=2337,freq=14.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.27441877 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.016013984 = product of:
0.032027967 = sum of:
0.032027967 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032027967 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Despite early claims to the contemporary, thesauri continue to find use as access tools for information in the full-text environment. Their mode of use is changing, but this change actually represents an expansion rather than a contrdiction of their utility. Thesauri and similar vocabulary tools can complement full-text access by aiding users in focusing their searches, by supplementing the linguistic analysis of the text search engine, and even by serving as one of the tools used by the linguistic engine for its analysis. While human indexing contunues to be used for many databases, the trend is to increase the use of machine aids for this purpose. All machine-aided indexing (MAI) systems rely on thesauri as the basis for term selection. In the 21st century, the balance of effort between human and machine will change at both input and output, but thesauri will continue to play an important role for the foreseeable future
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Source
- Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
-
Tsujii, J.-I.: Automatic acquisition of semantic collocation from corpora (1995)
0.02
0.020176798 = product of:
0.040353596 = sum of:
0.014731225 = weight(_text_:for in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014731225 = score(doc=4709,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
0.025622372 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051244743 = score(doc=4709,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Proposes automatic linguistic knowledge acquisition from sublanguage corpora. The system combines existing linguistic knowledge and human intervention with corpus based techniques. The algorithm involves a gradual approximation which works to converge linguistic knowledge gradually towards desirable results. The 1st experiment revealed the characteristic of this algorithm and the others proved the effectiveness of this algorithm for a real corpus
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:22:19
-
Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996)
0.02
0.0191766 = product of:
0.0383532 = sum of:
0.019136423 = weight(_text_:for in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019136423 = score(doc=7244,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.21557912 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.019216778 = product of:
0.038433556 = sum of:
0.038433556 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038433556 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Considers the principles of indexing and the intellectual skills involved in order to determine what automatic indexing systems would be required in order to supplant or complement the human indexer. Good indexing requires: considerable prior knowledge of the literature; judgement as to what to index and what depth to index; reading skills; abstracting skills; and classification skills, Illustrates these features with a detailed description of abstracting and indexing processes involved in generating entries for the mechanical engineering database POWERLINK. Briefly assesses the possibility of replacing human indexers with specialist indexing software, with particular reference to the Object Analyzer from the InTEXT automatic indexing system and using the criteria described for human indexers. At present, it is unlikely that the automatic indexer will replace the human indexer, but when more primary texts are available in electronic form, it may be a useful productivity tool for dealing with large quantities of low grade texts (should they be wanted in the database)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Martins, A.L.; Souza, R.R.; Ribeiro de Mello, H.: ¬The use of noun phrases in information retrieval : proposing a mechanism for automatic classification (2014)
0.01
0.014640598 = product of:
0.029281195 = sum of:
0.01647001 = weight(_text_:for in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01647001 = score(doc=1441,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.18554096 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
0.012811186 = product of:
0.025622372 = sum of:
0.025622372 = weight(_text_:22 in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025622372 = score(doc=1441,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a research on syntactic structures known as noun phrases (NP) being applied to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the mechanisms for the document's classification. Our hypothesis is the fact that the NP can be used instead of single words as a semantic aggregator to reduce the number of words that will be used for the classification system without losing its semantic coverage, increasing its efficiency. The experiment divided the documents classification process in three phases: a) NP preprocessing b) system training; and c) classification experiments. In the first step, a corpus of digitalized texts was submitted to a natural language processing platform1 in which the part-of-speech tagging was done, and them PERL scripts pertaining to the PALAVRAS package were used to extract the Noun Phrases. The preprocessing also involved the tasks of a) removing NP low meaning pre-modifiers, as quantifiers; b) identification of synonyms and corresponding substitution for common hyperonyms; and c) stemming of the relevant words contained in the NP, for similitude checking with other NPs. The first tests with the resulting documents have demonstrated its effectiveness. We have compared the structural similarity of the documents before and after the whole pre-processing steps of phase one. The texts maintained the consistency with the original and have kept the readability. The second phase involves submitting the modified documents to a SVM algorithm to identify clusters and classify the documents. The classification rules are to be established using a machine learning approach. Finally, tests will be conducted to check the effectiveness of the whole process.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
