Search (1256 results, page 1 of 63)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Intner, S.S.: ¬The re-professionalization of cataloguing (1993) 0.11
    0.106944665 = product of:
      0.21388933 = sum of:
        0.022096837 = weight(_text_:for in 7314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022096837 = score(doc=7314,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.24892932 = fieldWeight in 7314, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7314)
        0.19179249 = weight(_text_:computing in 7314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19179249 = score(doc=7314,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.73337615 = fieldWeight in 7314, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7314)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Traces the de-professionalization of cataloguing in the 80s and show how it is being re-professiionalized in the 90s. Describes how cataloguing has change and their need for knowledge of standards, management, research and computing
  2. Vizine-Goetz, D.: Office of research project develops tools for describing and accessing Internet resources (1995) 0.09
    0.090273276 = product of:
      0.18054655 = sum of:
        0.022325827 = weight(_text_:for in 5534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022325827 = score(doc=5534,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.25150898 = fieldWeight in 5534, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5534)
        0.15822072 = weight(_text_:computing in 5534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15822072 = score(doc=5534,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.60500443 = fieldWeight in 5534, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5534)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Over the past 5 years, librarians, humanities computing researchers and computer scientists have been working to establish standards for encoding and accessing local and networked electronic information resources, and these are now being put into practice by their corresponding user communities. The OCLC Cataloging Internet Resources project is investigating the relationship between 2 of these: the MARC bibliographic format and the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) header, developed by humanities computing researchers. Specifically, the project has designed a WWW based prototype, called Spectrum, that enables those without specialized knowledge of library cataloguing or markup to create records for describing and accessing Internet resources of various types. The system enables the generation of MARC records from TEI headers
  3. Burnard, L.K.: ¬The Text Encoding Initiative : towards an extensible standard for the encoding of texts (1993) 0.07
    0.06710239 = product of:
      0.13420478 = sum of:
        0.022325827 = weight(_text_:for in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022325827 = score(doc=919,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.25150898 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
        0.111878954 = weight(_text_:computing in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.111878954 = score(doc=919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.42780277 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Introduces the scope and development of the Text Encoding Initiative's Recommendations, published in Jul 93. Gives a brief overview of the scheme's modular architecture, with particular attention to the proposals for the encoding of bibliographic and descriptive information, of textual records as typed and structured objects and of derived or analytic information extracted from textual records in an integrated and well defined manner
    Source
    Electronic information resources and historians: European perspectives. Proceedings of the workshop organized by the British Library, Research and Development Department, British Academy, and the International Association for History and Computing, 25-26 June 1993. Ed.: R. Ross et al
  4. Ayres, F.H.; Ridley, J.M.: Twenty-five years of bibliographic control research at the University of Bradford (2007) 0.06
    0.055760533 = product of:
      0.111521065 = sum of:
        0.015624823 = weight(_text_:for in 257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015624823 = score(doc=257,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.17601961 = fieldWeight in 257, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=257)
        0.095896244 = weight(_text_:computing in 257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095896244 = score(doc=257,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.36668807 = fieldWeight in 257, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=257)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes cooperation between Bradford University Library and the Department of Computing that has resulted in nine research projects over a twenty five year period on various aspects of bibliographic control. It recounts the origins of the Universal Standard Bibliographic Code (USBC) and its development for the identification of both books and non book material. It then describes various aspects of the projects including simulating the merging necessary to set up a national database, the cleaning of a database, its use in inter library lending, and its application together with expert systems for the quality control of databases. The final project is BOPAC that has used modern technology to create faster and better access to a number of library catalogues worldwide and has demonstrated that authority control in its present form is not effective.
  5. Pitti, D.V.: Encoded Archival Description (EAD) (2009) 0.05
    0.050250523 = product of:
      0.100501046 = sum of:
        0.020587513 = weight(_text_:for in 3777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020587513 = score(doc=3777,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.2319262 = fieldWeight in 3777, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3777)
        0.079913534 = weight(_text_:computing in 3777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079913534 = score(doc=3777,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.3055734 = fieldWeight in 3777, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3777)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Encoded Archival Description (EAD) is an international digital standard based on Extensible Markup Language (XML) for encoding descriptions of archival records. People living their lives as individuals, as members of families, and as members of corporate bodies create and assemble records that serve as instruments for carrying out or documenting the performance of activities. Based on the archival principles of respect des fonds (or provenance) and original order, archivists traditionally have treated all of the records created and assembled by one individual, family, or corporate body as a collection or fonds. Archivists describe records as an essential part of their responsibility for preserving and facilitating access to and use of archives. Archival description provides information essential for establishing the authenticity and completeness of fonds, and serves effective administration, discovery, access, and understanding of records. Traditionally archivists have described each fonds hierarchically in a single apparatus commonly called a finding aid. Until the advent of computing, finding aids were typically in printed form. In the 1990s, archivists created EAD, an encoding standard for archival description. EAD is based technologically on XML and intellectually on General International Standard Archival Description (ISAD(G)), a descriptive framework developed by the International Council of Archives (ICA). As with all standards, EAD will continue to develop in the future. Future changes to EAD will be influenced by ICA descriptive standards that complement ISAD(G) and encoding standards based on them that will complement EAD. This entry is organized into six sections: introduction, archival records, archival description, EAD, history, and future.
  6. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.04
    0.035309397 = product of:
      0.07061879 = sum of:
        0.025779642 = weight(_text_:for in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025779642 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
        0.04483915 = product of:
          0.0896783 = sum of:
            0.0896783 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0896783 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  7. Seymour, C.: Cataloging Internet resources (1996) 0.03
    0.031961 = product of:
      0.063922 = sum of:
        0.03189404 = weight(_text_:for in 4679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03189404 = score(doc=4679,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.35929856 = fieldWeight in 4679, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4679)
        0.032027967 = product of:
          0.064055935 = sum of:
            0.064055935 = weight(_text_:22 in 4679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064055935 = score(doc=4679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the OCLC project for cataloguing Internet resources, a project aimed at developing rules for electronic material, and as a possible solution for the difficulty of locating materials on the Internet. No attempts is made to catalogue all the resources on the Internet and choice of materials is left to participating libraries
    Source
    Information and librarianship. 22(1996) no.1, S.33-35
  8. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.03
    0.028534302 = product of:
      0.057068605 = sum of:
        0.020833097 = weight(_text_:for in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020833097 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
        0.036235508 = product of:
          0.072471015 = sum of:
            0.072471015 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072471015 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  9. Brisson, R.: ¬The cataloger's workstation and the continuing transformation of cataloging (1995) 0.03
    0.027969738 = product of:
      0.111878954 = sum of:
        0.111878954 = weight(_text_:computing in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.111878954 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.42780277 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    While Part I of this essay focused on the history, development, and conceptual foundations of the cataloger's workstation, Part II will look at the technical details in its configuration. Minimum hardware specifications are given, and the ensemble of software running under Microsoft Windows is described. This includes the LAN, the Internet and the use of Trumpet 'Winsock' compliant software, electronic documentation (including a description of the Library of Congress's Cataloger's Desktop), and the use of e-mail clients. The essay hopes to demonstrate that the highly-integrated nature of this software running under Windows will lead to a significant enhancement of computing resources in cataloging departments.
  10. Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999) 0.03
    0.02754241 = product of:
      0.05508482 = sum of:
        0.02946245 = weight(_text_:for in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02946245 = score(doc=6095,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.33190575 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
        0.025622372 = product of:
          0.051244743 = sum of:
            0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051244743 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
  11. Letarte, K.M.; Turvey, M.R.; Bornemann, D.; Adams, D.L.: Practitioner perspectives on cataloging education for entry-level academic Librarians (2002) 0.03
    0.02699653 = product of:
      0.05399306 = sum of:
        0.031573486 = weight(_text_:for in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031573486 = score(doc=158,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.35568738 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
        0.022419576 = product of:
          0.04483915 = sum of:
            0.04483915 = weight(_text_:22 in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04483915 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The role of cataloging education within the library profession is a topic of considerable interest and debate. Fifty-five heads of reference and sixty-five heads of cataloging in Association of Research Librarians institutions responded to a survey based upon the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Educational Policy Statement, Appendix: Knowledge and Skills, Intellectual Access and Information Organization, concerning the importance of cataloging competencies for all entry-level academic librarians. The survey found that practitioners agreed upon a definite set of core cataloging competencies that all entry-level academic librarians should possess. This finding holds larger implications for library education for academic librarians and for the profession as a whole.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.03
    0.025621045 = product of:
      0.05124209 = sum of:
        0.028822517 = weight(_text_:for in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028822517 = score(doc=6523,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.3246967 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
        0.022419576 = product of:
          0.04483915 = sum of:
            0.04483915 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04483915 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Currently, few resources exist to guide libraries in the cataloguing of community information using the new USMARC Format for Cammunity Information (1993). In developing a community information database, Queens Borough Public Library, New York City, formulated their own cataloguing procedures for applying AACR2, LoC File Interpretations, and USMARC Format for Community Information to community information. Their practices include entering corporate names directly whenever possible and assigning LC subject headings for classes of persons and topics, adding neighbourhood level geographic subdivisions. The guidelines were specially designed to aid non cataloguers in cataloguing community information and have enabled library to maintain consistency in handling corporate names and in assigning subject headings, while creating database that is highly accessible to library staff and users
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
  13. Haynes, K.J.M.; Saye, J.D.; Kaid, L.L.: Cataloging collection-level records for archival video and audio recordings (1993) 0.03
    0.025621045 = product of:
      0.05124209 = sum of:
        0.028822517 = weight(_text_:for in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028822517 = score(doc=584,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.3246967 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
        0.022419576 = product of:
          0.04483915 = sum of:
            0.04483915 = weight(_text_:22 in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04483915 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a project to create a bibliographic control system for archival quality video and audio recordings of political commercials. The project objectives were: to design a local computer searchable database; prepare item level records for the local database; and prepare collection level records for the OCLC Online Union Catalog. The collection level records are intended to alert scholars, researchers, and other potential users to the existence of the archive and to direct them to it for more powerful item level searching in the local database. Some of the cataloguing problems discussed are: choice of cataloguing tools and MARC formats; organization of the collections around the political candidate, and name authority
    Date
    12. 1.2007 14:43:22
  14. Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006) 0.03
    0.025621045 = product of:
      0.05124209 = sum of:
        0.028822517 = weight(_text_:for in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028822517 = score(doc=2425,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.3246967 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
        0.022419576 = product of:
          0.04483915 = sum of:
            0.04483915 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04483915 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The FRBR model is by many considered to be an important contribution to the next generation of bibliographic catalogues, but a major challenge for the library community is how to use this model on already existing MARC-based bibliographic catalogues. This problem requires a solution for the interpretation and conversion of MARC records, and a tool for this kind of conversion is developed as a part of the Norwegian BIBSYS FRBR project. The tool is based on a systematic approach to the interpretation and conversion process and is designed to be adaptable to the rules applied in different catalogues.
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  15. Münnich, M.: Katalogisieren auf dem PC : ein Pflichtenheft für die Formalkatalogisierung (1988) 0.03
    0.025568802 = product of:
      0.051137604 = sum of:
        0.02551523 = weight(_text_:for in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02551523 = score(doc=2502,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
        0.025622372 = product of:
          0.051244743 = sum of:
            0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051244743 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Examines a simpler cataloguing format offered by PCs, without disturbing compatibility, using A-Z cataloguing rules for data input, category codes for tagging and computer-supported data input through windows. Gives numerous examples of catalogue entries, basing techniques on certain category schemes set out by Klaus Haller and Hans Popst. Examines catalogue entries in respect of categories of data bases for authors and corporate names, titles, single volume works, serial issues of collected works, and limited editions of works in several volumes.
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856
  16. Moir, S.; Wells, A.: Descriptive cataloguing and the Internet : recent research (1996) 0.03
    0.025568802 = product of:
      0.051137604 = sum of:
        0.02551523 = weight(_text_:for in 7230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02551523 = score(doc=7230,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 7230, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7230)
        0.025622372 = product of:
          0.051244743 = sum of:
            0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 7230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051244743 = score(doc=7230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines the Coalition for Networked Information's (CNI) analysis of the networked electronic environment where the chief problem for the users appears to be finding resources on the Internet. Presents the CNI's arguments for surrogates and describes one approach to the identification and description of resources on the Internet: the OCLC Internet Cataloguing Project
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.8-16
  17. Martin, G.: Main entry : the argument for a defence of main entry in the OPAC (1996) 0.03
    0.025568802 = product of:
      0.051137604 = sum of:
        0.02551523 = weight(_text_:for in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02551523 = score(doc=7234,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
        0.025622372 = product of:
          0.051244743 = sum of:
            0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051244743 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that the current understanding of main entry is the chief access point for the work in a physical item being described by a bibliographic record. Explains the justification for main entries while drawing attention to the few related problems as they relate to OPACs
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.21-25
  18. Talmacs, K.: Cataloguing at the crossroads : or, rules were made to be broken (1996) 0.03
    0.025568802 = product of:
      0.051137604 = sum of:
        0.02551523 = weight(_text_:for in 498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02551523 = score(doc=498,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 498, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=498)
        0.025622372 = product of:
          0.051244743 = sum of:
            0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051244743 = score(doc=498,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 498, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=498)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloguers have excellent opportunities within the profession to assist in the facilitation of access to electronic resources and make order out of the chaotic Internet. Discusses tasks for cataloguers, outsourcing possibilities for copy cataloguing, structures and alliances, external networks and traditional cataloguing tools. Considers the role of cataloguers in the years 2000 warning of the threats and challenges and listing prerequisites for the cataloguer of the future
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.76-85
  19. Lee, E.: Cataloguing (and reference) at the crossroads (1996) 0.03
    0.025568802 = product of:
      0.051137604 = sum of:
        0.02551523 = weight(_text_:for in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02551523 = score(doc=499,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
        0.025622372 = product of:
          0.051244743 = sum of:
            0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051244743 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Alerts librarians to directions in research in artificial intelligence relevant to information retrieval which will change current technology and user expectations and consequently the requirements for data provision and access at the base level. Predicts a reevaluation of priorities for using the expertise of cataloguers (and reference librarians) and of cataloguing methodologies. Debates the future of cataloguing, arguing for the need to monitor developments in adjacent research areas and to plan with these in mind
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.68-75
  20. Lundy, M.W.: Evidence of application of the DCRB core standard in WorldCat and RLIN (2006) 0.03
    0.025233213 = product of:
      0.050466426 = sum of:
        0.031249646 = weight(_text_:for in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031249646 = score(doc=1087,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.35203922 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
        0.019216778 = product of:
          0.038433556 = sum of:
            0.038433556 = weight(_text_:22 in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038433556 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Core Standard for Rare Books, known as the DCRB Core standard, was approved by the Program for Cooperative Cataloging for use beginning in January 1999. Comparable to the core standards for other types of materials, the DCRB Core standard provides requirements for an intermediate level of bibliographic description for the cataloging of rare books. While the Core Standard for Books seems to have found a place in general cataloging practice, the DCRB Core standard appears to have met with resistance among rare book cataloging practitioners. This study investigates the extent to which such resistance exists by examining all of the DCRB Core records in the OCLC (Online Computer Library Center) Online Union Catalog (WorldCat) and the Research Libraries Croup Union Catalog (RLIN) databases that were created during the standard's first five years. The study analyzes the content of the records for adherence to the standard and investigates the ways in which the flexibility of the standard and cataloger's judgment augmented many records with more than the mandatory elements of description and access.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Languages

Types

  • a 1133
  • el 68
  • m 66
  • b 16
  • s 16
  • r 8
  • n 7
  • x 3
  • ? 2
  • ag 2
  • i 1
  • l 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects