Search (498 results, page 1 of 25)

  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  1. Berghel, H.: Cyberspace 2000 : dealing with information overload (1997) 0.34
    0.33929676 = product of:
      0.45239568 = sum of:
        0.025779642 = weight(_text_:for in 3666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025779642 = score(doc=3666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 3666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3666)
        0.22375791 = weight(_text_:computing in 3666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22375791 = score(doc=3666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.85560554 = fieldWeight in 3666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3666)
        0.20285812 = product of:
          0.40571624 = sum of:
            0.40571624 = weight(_text_:machinery in 3666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.40571624 = score(doc=3666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35214928 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                1.1521144 = fieldWeight in 3666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Source
    Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery. 40(1997) no.2, S.19-24
  2. Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023) 0.21
    0.20644064 = product of:
      0.2752542 = sum of:
        0.01841403 = weight(_text_:for in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01841403 = score(doc=950,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.20744109 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
        0.079913534 = weight(_text_:computing in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079913534 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.3055734 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
        0.17692661 = sum of:
          0.14489865 = weight(_text_:machinery in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14489865 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.35214928 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047278564 = queryNorm
              0.4114694 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
          0.032027967 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032027967 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047278564 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose With the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of "information overload". In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed. Design/methodology/approach A concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for "information overload", which is "cognitive overload" was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Findings The themes identified from the authors' concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload. Originality/value Through the authors' concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.
    Date
    22. 4.2023 19:27:56
  3. Hartel, J.: ¬The red thread of information (2020) 0.09
    0.09306681 = product of:
      0.18613362 = sum of:
        0.009207015 = weight(_text_:for in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009207015 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.103720546 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
        0.17692661 = sum of:
          0.14489865 = weight(_text_:machinery in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14489865 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.35214928 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047278564 = queryNorm
              0.4114694 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
          0.032027967 = weight(_text_:22 in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032027967 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047278564 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose In The Invisible Substrate of Information Science, a landmark article about the discipline of information science, Marcia J. Bates wrote that ".we are always looking for the red thread of information in the social texture of people's lives" (1999a, p. 1048). To sharpen our understanding of information science and to elaborate Bates' idea, the work at hand answers the question: Just what does the red thread of information entail? Design/methodology/approach Through a close reading of Bates' oeuvre and by applying concepts from the reference literature of information science, nine composite entities that qualify as the red thread of information are identified, elaborated, and related to existing concepts in the information science literature. In the spirit of a scientist-poet (White, 1999), several playful metaphors related to the color red are employed. Findings Bates' red thread of information entails: terms, genres, literatures, classification systems, scholarly communication, information retrieval, information experience, information institutions, and information policy. This same constellation of phenomena can be found in resonant visions of information science, namely, domain analysis (Hjørland, 2002), ethnography of infrastructure (Star, 1999), and social epistemology (Shera, 1968). Research limitations/implications With the vital vermilion filament in clear view, newcomers can more easily engage the material, conceptual, and social machinery of information science, and specialists are reminded of what constitutes information science as a whole. Future researchers and scientist-poets may wish to supplement the nine composite entities with additional, emergent information phenomena. Originality/value Though the explication of information science that follows is relatively orthodox and time-bound, the paper offers an imaginative, accessible, yet technically precise way of understanding the field.
    Date
    30. 4.2020 21:03:22
  4. Wolff, J.G.: Computing, cognition and information compression (1993) 0.09
    0.08912055 = product of:
      0.1782411 = sum of:
        0.01841403 = weight(_text_:for in 6712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01841403 = score(doc=6712,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.20744109 = fieldWeight in 6712, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6712)
        0.15982707 = weight(_text_:computing in 6712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15982707 = score(doc=6712,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.6111468 = fieldWeight in 6712, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6712)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The storage and processing of information in computers and in brains may often be understood information compression. Reviews what is meant by information and, in particular, what is meant by redundancy, a concept fundamental in all methods for information compression. Describes principles of information compression
  5. Philosophy, computing and information science (2014) 0.08
    0.07515965 = product of:
      0.1503193 = sum of:
        0.0073656123 = weight(_text_:for in 3407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0073656123 = score(doc=3407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.08297644 = fieldWeight in 3407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3407)
        0.14295368 = weight(_text_:computing in 3407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14295368 = score(doc=3407,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.5466263 = fieldWeight in 3407, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3407)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Introduction: Philosophy's Relevance in Computing and Information Science - Ruth Hagengruber and Uwe V.Riss Part I: Philosophy of Computing and Information 1 The Fourth Revolution in our Self-Understanding - Luciano Floridi -- 2 Information Transfer as a Metaphor - Jakob Krebs -- 3 With Aristotle towards a Differentiated Concept of Information? - Uwe Voigt -- 4 The Influence of Philosophy on the Understanding of Computing and Information - Klaus Fuchs-Kittowski -- Part II: Complexity and System Theory 5 The Emergence of Self-Conscious Systems: From Symbolic AI to Embodied Robotics - Klaus Mainzer -- 6 Artificial Intelligence as a New Metaphysical Project - Aziz F. Zambak Part III: Ontology 7 The Relevance of Philosophical Ontology to Information and Computer Science - Barry Smith -- 8 Ontology, its Origins and its Meaning in Information Science - Jens Kohne -- 9 Smart Questions: Steps towards an Ontology of Questions and Answers - Ludwig Jaskolla and Matthias Rugel Part IV: Knowledge Representation 10 Sophisticated Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Requires Philosophy - Selmer Bringsjord, Micah Clark and Joshua Taylor -- 11 On Frames and Theory-Elements of Structuralism Holger Andreas -- 12 Ontological Complexity and Human Culture David J. Saab and Frederico Fonseca Part V: Action Theory 13 Knowledge and Action between Abstraction and Concretion - Uwe V.Riss -- 14 Action-Directing Construction of Reality in Product Creation Using Social Software: Employing Philosophy to Solve Real-World Problems - Kai Holzweifiig and Jens Krüger -- 15 An Action-Theory-Based Treatment ofTemporal Individuals - Tillmann Pross -- 16 Four Rules for Classifying Social Entities - Ludger Jansen Part VI: Info-Computationalism 17 Info-Computationalism and Philosophical Aspects of Research in Information Sciences - Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic -- 18 Pancomputationalism: Theory or Metaphor ? - Vincent C. Mutter Part VII: Ethics 19 The Importance of the Sources of Professional Obligations - Francis C. Dane
    Footnote
    Vgl.: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/philosophy-computing-and-information-science/EFE440F6D9884BD733C19D1BF535045B.
  6. Green, A.-M.; Higgins, M.: "Making out" with new media : young people and new information and communication technology (1997) 0.07
    0.07333309 = product of:
      0.14666618 = sum of:
        0.0110484185 = weight(_text_:for in 1558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0110484185 = score(doc=1558,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.12446466 = fieldWeight in 1558, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1558)
        0.13561776 = weight(_text_:computing in 1558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13561776 = score(doc=1558,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.51857525 = fieldWeight in 1558, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1558)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a survey of teenagers at a school in Edinburgh, Scotland, conducted as part of the Household Information System (HIS) project at Queen Margaret College. HIS has attempted to apply organizational models of information management to non organizational contexts such as households. Information management concepts have also been complemented by reference to research from sociology and media and cultural studies into the domestic consumption of technologies. Previous HIS research has suggested that notions of technological convergence proposed by producers and suppliers of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) are not shared by consumers who prefer to keep their television and computing devioces separate. Television is most often associated with relaxation and entertainment, computing with work and education. However, there is some evidence that expertise with regard to new ICTs is the province of children rather than adults in many homes, a trend which may indicate as inversion of traditional patterns of knowledge dispersal in adult child relationships
    Source
    Proceedings of the 2nd British-Nordic Conference on Library and Information Studies, Edinburgh, 1997. Organized by the British Association for Information and Library Education (BAILER). Ed.: Micheline Beaulieu et al
  7. Rodriguez-Alamo, E.: ¬The conflict between conceptual and visual thought and the future of science (1995) 0.07
    0.06710239 = product of:
      0.13420478 = sum of:
        0.022325827 = weight(_text_:for in 2449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022325827 = score(doc=2449,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.25150898 = fieldWeight in 2449, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2449)
        0.111878954 = weight(_text_:computing in 2449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.111878954 = score(doc=2449,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.42780277 = fieldWeight in 2449, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2449)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The language and contents of the mass communications industry, and the products produced through and for commerical computerized information systems and networks, may appeal to relatively undeveloped aspects of our intellectual and spiritual faculties and could degrade rationalism and thus jeopardize the production of scientific knowledge. In particular, recent decades have seen a shift away from conceptual linguistic symbolism, historically used for scientific research and communication, to iconic symbolism and visual language, which may be poorly suited to scientific thought. Discusses the relationship between complex computing and telecommunications and both the content and the vehicles of learning and scientific research for the 21st century
  8. Denbigh, K.: How subjective is entropy? (1990) 0.06
    0.06393083 = product of:
      0.25572333 = sum of:
        0.25572333 = weight(_text_:computing in 4105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25572333 = score(doc=4105,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.9778349 = fieldWeight in 4105, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4105)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Maxwell's demon: entropy, information, computing. Ed.: H.S. Leff u. A.F. Rex
  9. Aspray, W.: ¬The scientific conceptualization of information : a survey (1985) 0.06
    0.06393083 = product of:
      0.25572333 = sum of:
        0.25572333 = weight(_text_:computing in 1327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25572333 = score(doc=1327,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.9778349 = fieldWeight in 1327, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1327)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Annals of the history of computing. 7(1985), S.117-140
  10. Fuchs-Kittowski, K.: The influence of philosophy on the understanding of computing and information (2014) 0.06
    0.06301775 = product of:
      0.1260355 = sum of:
        0.013020686 = weight(_text_:for in 3397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013020686 = score(doc=3397,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.14668301 = fieldWeight in 3397, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3397)
        0.11301481 = weight(_text_:computing in 3397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11301481 = score(doc=3397,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.43214604 = fieldWeight in 3397, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3397)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    What we consider to be the influence of philosophy on scientific thinking largely depends on how science perceives itself. The understanding and conscious human-oriented design of the relationship between the computer and the creatively active person - i.e. the design of a formal model and the non-formal, natural and social environment - is always more readily recognized as the fundamental philosophical, theoretical and methodological problem of informatics (computer science and information systems). Informatics/computer science results from the necessity to overcome the tension between technology-based automation, which is based on a purely syntactic interpretation and transformation of information, and creative and active people who carry out semantic information processing based on their knowledge. It is this tension that requires the development and use of user-oriented software and the formal operations to be integrated into complex human work processes. Conceptual strategies that foster the development and integration of modern information technologies into social organization are currently the topic of vivid philosophical and methodological discussions, reflecting the influence of different philosophical schools. The utilization of information technologies has significantly changed both employee working conditions and the relationship between organizations and their environment. The development of humanity-oriented computer science is a necessary condition for integrating computational systems into social contexts and for largely adapting these systems to the users' needs.
    Source
    Philosophy, computing and information science. Eds.: R. Hagengruber u. U.V. Riss
  11. Fremery, W. de; Buckland, M.K.: Copy theory (2022) 0.06
    0.05899654 = product of:
      0.11799308 = sum of:
        0.022096837 = weight(_text_:for in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022096837 = score(doc=487,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.24892932 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
        0.095896244 = weight(_text_:computing in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095896244 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.36668807 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In information science, writing, printing, telecommunication, and digital computing have been central concerns because of their ability to distribute information. Overlooked is the obvious fact that these technologies fashion copies, and the theorizing of copies has been neglected. We may think a copy is the same as what it copies, but no two objects can really be the same. "The same" means similar enough as an acceptable substitute for some purpose. The differences between usefully similar things are also often important, in forensic analysis, for example, or inferential processes. Status as a copy is only one form of relationship between objects, but copies are so integral to information science that they demand a theory. Indeed, theorizing copies provides a basis for a more complete and unified view of information science.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.3, S.407-418
  12. Weinberg, A.M.: On the relation between information and energy systems : a family of Maxwell's demons (1990) 0.06
    0.055939477 = product of:
      0.22375791 = sum of:
        0.22375791 = weight(_text_:computing in 4112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22375791 = score(doc=4112,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.85560554 = fieldWeight in 4112, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4112)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Maxwell's demon: entropy, information, computing
  13. Wiener, N.: Kybernetik : Regelung und Nachrichtenübertragung im Lebewesen und in der Maschine (1963) 0.05
    0.053472333 = product of:
      0.106944665 = sum of:
        0.0110484185 = weight(_text_:for in 4282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0110484185 = score(doc=4282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.12446466 = fieldWeight in 4282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4282)
        0.095896244 = weight(_text_:computing in 4282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095896244 = score(doc=4282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.36668807 = fieldWeight in 4282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4282)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    It is the first public usage of the term "cybernetics" to refer to self-regulating mechanisms. The book laid the theoretical foundation for servomechanisms (whether electrical, mechanical or hydraulic), automatic navigation, analog computing, artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and reliable communications.
  14. Sturges, P.; Gastinger, A.: Information literacy as a human right (2010) 0.05
    0.051233012 = product of:
      0.102466024 = sum of:
        0.022552488 = weight(_text_:for in 5078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022552488 = score(doc=5078,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.2540624 = fieldWeight in 5078, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5078)
        0.079913534 = weight(_text_:computing in 5078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079913534 = score(doc=5078,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.3055734 = fieldWeight in 5078, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5078)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    A clear line of argument can be set out to link the (passive) intellectual freedom rights offered by Article Nineteen of the United Nations' Universal Declaration on Human Rights, to a consequent responsibility on governments, professionals and civil society activists for the (active) creation of suitable conditions for the effective exercise of intellectual freedom. Commentators on media in society and socially responsible computing are also increasingly drawing conclusions of this kind and stressing the importance of Media Literacy and Computer Literacy. This line of argument naturally directs attention towards the rationale currently offered for Information Literacy as a focus of professional activity. Whilst there are many elaborately worked-out programmes for Information Literacy instruction, these have so far been largely derived from practical perceptions of need. However, broad statements such as the Prague Declaration 'Towards an Information Literate Society' of 2003 and the Alexandria Proclamation of 2005 can be seen as beginning to point towards a rationale for Information Literacy activities rooted in human rights, Article Nineteen in particular. The contention is that starting from a human rights perspective leads towards a strong, inclusive interpretation of Information Literacy. This subsumes Media Literacy, Computer Literacy, Web Literacy and, to a considerable extent, Civic Literacy into a model that serves human needs rather than the established priorities of information professionals. The value of this approach for both practice and research is stressed.
  15. Krebs, J.: Information transfer as a metaphor (2014) 0.05
    0.04646711 = product of:
      0.09293422 = sum of:
        0.013020686 = weight(_text_:for in 3395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013020686 = score(doc=3395,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.14668301 = fieldWeight in 3395, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3395)
        0.079913534 = weight(_text_:computing in 3395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079913534 = score(doc=3395,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.3055734 = fieldWeight in 3395, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3395)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    An intuitive understanding of information concerns the means by which knowledge is acquired. This notion corresponds to an instantiation of the complementary properties of 'being informative' and 'being informed'. It is in this intuitive sense that the term 'information' is used in many accounts of verbal communication and explicit learning. But the term is furthermore prominent in accounts of genetics, neurobiology and cognitive science, as well as in communications engineering, and computer sciences. In view of this transdisciplinary use of the word 'information', some theoreticians hope for a unified conception that would serve as a common denominator in interdisciplinary investigations. According to this promise, we would then be equipped with a singular conceptional grasp on physical and genetic structures, on neuronal patterns as well as on cognitive and communicative events. Unfortunately, a unified concept of information is far from being spelled out, since many of the disciplines mentioned above follow quite different approaches. Even in the context of 'information science' itself, extensive differences prevail on the notions of data, information and knowledge and their conceptual interconnections. But if we detect not a single but various conceptions of information, we should not expect a single but various theories of information - a point made by Claude Shannon long before the transdisciplinary implementation of his mathematical theory. When one or the other 'theory of information' gets implemented into theories of communication or learning, for example, these theories thereby inherit one particular conception of information.
    Source
    Philosophy, computing and information science. Eds.: R. Hagengruber u. U.V. Riss
  16. Voigt, U.: With Aristotle towards a differentiated concept of information? (2014) 0.05
    0.04646711 = product of:
      0.09293422 = sum of:
        0.013020686 = weight(_text_:for in 3396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013020686 = score(doc=3396,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.14668301 = fieldWeight in 3396, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3396)
        0.079913534 = weight(_text_:computing in 3396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079913534 = score(doc=3396,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.3055734 = fieldWeight in 3396, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3396)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    We are talking about 'information' in many different contexts: not only in our ordinary language, but also in the highly specialized discourses of the theory of communication, computer science, physics, biology, cultural studies, and so forth. As we do so, are we using the same concept each and every time? Is there one and only one concept of information connecting all these different usages of one word (and its linguistic 'relatives' in languages other than English)? This question has accompanied the 'information talk' for many years and recently has lead to the so-called 'Capurro trilemma'. According to this trilemma, throughout those various contexts the words we use either (A) have the same meaning or (B) completely different meanings or (C) different meanings which nevertheless are somehow connected. As the unity of meaning is a minimal condition for the identity of a concept, in case (A) there is only one concept of information (univocity); in case (B) we deal with several concepts of information (equivocation); in case (C) it is the question of just precisely how the different concepts are interconnected. The authors describing the dilemma suggest Wittgensteinian family resemblance and Aristotelian analogy, but they do not seem to be satisfied by their solutions. Therefore, according to them, we are facing a real trilemma whose single horns are equally unattractive.
    Source
    Philosophy, computing and information science. Eds.: R. Hagengruber u. U.V. Riss
  17. Rocchi, P.; Resca, A.: ¬The creativity of authors in defining the concept of information (2018) 0.04
    0.044560276 = product of:
      0.08912055 = sum of:
        0.009207015 = weight(_text_:for in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009207015 = score(doc=296,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.103720546 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
        0.079913534 = weight(_text_:computing in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079913534 = score(doc=296,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.3055734 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The concept of information is central to several fields of research and professional practice. So many definitions have been put forward that complete inventory is unachievable while authors have failed to reach a consensus. In the face of the present impasse, innovative proposals could rouse information theorists to action, but literature surveys tend to emphasize the common traits of definitions. Reviewers are inclined to iron out originality in information models; thus the purpose of this paper is to discover the creativity of authors attempting to define the concept of information and to stimulate the progress of studies in this field. Design/methodology/approach Because the present inquiry could be influenced and distorted by personal criteria and opinions, the authors have adopted precise criteria and guidelines. It could be said the present approach approximates a statistical methodology. Findings The findings of this paper include (1) The authors found 32 original definitions of information which sometimes current surveys have overlooked. (2) The authors found a relation between information theories and advances in information technology. (3) Overall, the authors found that researchers take account of a wide variety of perspectives yet overlook the notion of information as used by computing practitioners such as electronic engineers and software developers. Research limitations/implications The authors comment on some limitations of the procedure that was followed. Results 1 and 3 open up new possibilities for theoretical research in the information domain. Originality/value This is an attempt to conduct a bibliographical inquiry driven by objective and scientific criteria; its value lies in the fact that final report has not been influenced by personal choice or arbitrary viewpoints.
  18. ¬The philosophy of information (2004) 0.04
    0.041709207 = product of:
      0.083418414 = sum of:
        0.019487578 = weight(_text_:for in 11) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019487578 = score(doc=11,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.21953502 = fieldWeight in 11, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=11)
        0.06393083 = weight(_text_:computing in 11) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06393083 = score(doc=11,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.24445872 = fieldWeight in 11, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=11)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Luciano Floridi's 1999 monograph, Philosophy and Computing: An Introduction, provided the impetus for the theme of this issue, more for what it did not say about librarianship and information studies (LIS) than otherwise. Following the pioneering works of Wilson, Nitecki, Buckland, and Capurro (plus many of the authors of this issue), researchers in LIS have increasingly turned to the efficacy of philosophical discourse in probing the more fundamental aspects of our theories, including those involving the information concept. A foundational approach to the nature of information, however, has not been realized, either in partial or accomplished steps, nor even as an agreed, theoretical research objective. It is puzzling that while librarianship, in the most expansive sense of all LIS-related professions, past and present, at its best sustains a climate of thought, both comprehensive and nonexclusive, information itself as the subject of study has defied our abilities to generalize and synthesize effectively. Perhaps during periods of reassessment and justification for library services, as well as in times of curricular review and continuing scholarly evaluation of perceived information demand, the necessity for every single stated position to be clarified appears to be exaggerated. Despite this, the important question does keep surfacing as to how information relates to who we are and what we do in LIS.
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Information and Its Philosophy (Ian Cornelius) - Documentation Redux: Prolegomenon to (Another) Philosophy of Information (Bernd Frohmann) - Community as Event (Ronald E. Day) - Information Studies Without Information (Jonathan Furner) - Relevance: Language, Semantics, Philosophy (John M. Budd) - On Verifying the Accuracy of Information: Philosophical Perspectives (Don Fallis) - Arguments for Philosophical Realism in Library and Information Science (Birger Hjørland) - Knowledge Profiling: The Basis for Knowledge Organization (Torkild Thellefsen) - Classification and Categorization: A Difference that Makes a Difference (Elin K. Jacob) - Faceted Classification and Logical Division in Information Retrieval (Jack Mills) - The Epistemological Foundations of Knowledge Representations (Elaine Svenonius) - Classification, Rhetoric, and the Classificatory Horizon (Stephen Paling) - The Ubiquitous Hierarchy: An Army to Overcome the Threat of a Mob (Hope A. Olson) - A Human Information Behavior Approach to a Philosophy of Information (Amanda Spink and Charles Cole) - Cybersemiotics and the Problems of the Information-Processing Paradigm as a Candidate for a Unified Science of Information Behind Library Information Science (Søren Brier)
  19. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.04
    0.039261382 = product of:
      0.078522764 = sum of:
        0.06257574 = product of:
          0.18772723 = sum of:
            0.18772723 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18772723 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.40082818 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.01594702 = weight(_text_:for in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01594702 = score(doc=76,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.17964928 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Content
    Originally published July 1981 as Internal Report 81-2, Dept. of Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 3400 Gottingen, W.-Germany.
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  20. Mutch, A.: Information literacy : an exploration (1997) 0.03
    0.031965416 = product of:
      0.12786166 = sum of:
        0.12786166 = weight(_text_:computing in 1020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12786166 = score(doc=1020,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.48891744 = fieldWeight in 1020, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1020)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the term information literacy as it is derived from both computing and library studies. Outlines the areas which such a concept would need to cover, with an emphasis on links with the process of knowledge creation. Such links make a simplistic conception of little value. Emphasises integration with the practice of knowledge formation and makes some suggestions as to how this might be achieved

Languages

Types

  • a 424
  • m 57
  • el 17
  • s 15
  • r 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications