Search (40 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Kataloganreicherung"
  1. DeHart, F.E.; Matthews, K.: Subject enhancements and OPACs : planning ahead (1990) 0.07
    0.07434738 = product of:
      0.14869475 = sum of:
        0.020833097 = weight(_text_:for in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020833097 = score(doc=4654,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
        0.12786166 = weight(_text_:computing in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12786166 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.48891744 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    As librarians plan ahead to make subject enhancements available to online searchers in various possible file locations and formats, they may want to base their decisions on implications for online searching. This paper explores some of these implications with respect to unique and misleading terminology in tables of contents, Choice abstracts, and reviews from Computing reviews for thirty-six books on information and computer science chosen from the 1987 issues of Choice. It also discusses possible interacting functions in the search process served by these subject enhancements, assigned LCSH, and book title terminology
  2. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.04
    0.035309397 = product of:
      0.07061879 = sum of:
        0.025779642 = weight(_text_:for in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025779642 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
        0.04483915 = product of:
          0.0896783 = sum of:
            0.0896783 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0896783 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  3. Lam, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs : table of contents added to bibliographic records (2000) 0.02
    0.015132599 = product of:
      0.030265197 = sum of:
        0.0110484185 = weight(_text_:for in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0110484185 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.12446466 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
        0.019216778 = product of:
          0.038433556 = sum of:
            0.038433556 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038433556 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access to monographs through online public access catalogs (OPACs) has always been a major concern for large research and/or academic libraries. Academic library practice of providing subject access to monographs has proven inadequate, especially in the case of composite works. Many techniques have been proposed to enhance subject treatment of monographs in OPACs. This article briefly reviews these efforts in the past and presents the case of adding Tables of Contents as one of the Most useful and probably also one of the Most costeffective ways of improving subject access to Monographs in an academic environment.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  4. Barnes, S.; McCue, J.: Linking library records to bibliographic databases : an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola, and the OPAC (1991) 0.01
    0.012784401 = product of:
      0.025568802 = sum of:
        0.012757615 = weight(_text_:for in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012757615 = score(doc=520,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.14371942 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
        0.012811186 = product of:
          0.025622372 = sum of:
            0.025622372 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025622372 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Myriad new information resources are available to contemporary library users. While print remains the foundation of most collections, libraries are also beginning to provide access to an array of bibliographic, numeric, and full-text databases. As more and more information is produced in electronic form and presented at computer workstations, the library catalog is being given an expanded role. The expanded catalog will play a crucial part in organizing information in electronic libraries, and in providing navigational assistance to library users. Like the traditional card catalog, the expanded catalog will not only lead to specific items or groups of sources, but also will provide connections to related materials. These connections will uses standard data elements to link the results of a search in one database with related material in another. For example, links will show local library holdings of sources in citation databases. Cornell University's Mann Library serves the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, the College of Human Ecology, and the Division of Biological Sciences. As part of electronic library development, Mann staff have been analyzing issues involved in making it possible for Agricola and BIOSIS users to see, automatically, which of their retrieved citations are from sources available in the Cornell libraries. Samples of citations from Agricola and BIOSIS were drawn, and data elements present in these records were compared with bibliographic records of the library's holdings. In some cases, links would be provided by ISSNs. The study shows, however, that the presence of standard identifiers such as ISSN, USBN, or CODEN cannot be assumed, and other linking algorithms must be developed. This article presents study results, provides an overview of several linking systems, and identifies some of the difficulties caused by lack of standardization between different bibliographic databases. It is clear that the concept of an expanded catalog will require not only links between information resources but agreements among information professionals on standard data elements.
    Date
    8. 1.2007 17:22:25
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Enhancing Access to Information: Designing Catalogs for the 21st Century
  5. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989) 0.01
    0.011209788 = product of:
      0.04483915 = sum of:
        0.04483915 = product of:
          0.0896783 = sum of:
            0.0896783 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0896783 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
  6. Mandel, C.: Enriching the library catalog record for subject access (1985) 0.01
    0.009020995 = product of:
      0.03608398 = sum of:
        0.03608398 = weight(_text_:for in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03608398 = score(doc=1067,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.40649986 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper analyzes proposals for augmenting library bibliographic records for improved subject searching in online catalogs. Possible fields for enrichment are described and their likely value assessed. The assessment determines that the main value of enriched records would be to provide access to parts of books. The paper presents arguments for and against adding book content indexing to the online catalog and analyzes the feasibility of eleven alternatives for providing such information
  7. Brenner, S.: LibraryThing for Libraries in Deutschland : Community-generierte Anreicherung deutschsprachiger Bibliothekskatalog mit LibraryThing for Libraries (2011) 0.01
    0.0078124115 = product of:
      0.031249646 = sum of:
        0.031249646 = weight(_text_:for in 149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031249646 = score(doc=149,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.35203922 = fieldWeight in 149, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=149)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  8. Settel, B.; Cochrane, P.A.: Augmenting subject descriptions for books in online catalogs (1982) 0.01
    0.0073656123 = product of:
      0.02946245 = sum of:
        0.02946245 = weight(_text_:for in 390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02946245 = score(doc=390,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.33190575 = fieldWeight in 390, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=390)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  9. ¬The subject enhancement of OPAC records and the need for multilingual access (1993) 0.01
    0.006510343 = product of:
      0.026041372 = sum of:
        0.026041372 = weight(_text_:for in 4259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026041372 = score(doc=4259,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.29336601 = fieldWeight in 4259, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4259)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the potential of providing enhanced content indexing of document records either by natural language or PRECIS controlled vocabulary in order to provide more effective subject access to OPACs. Considers multilingual access OPACs. Controlled vocabulary is the best option for the latter in the short terms
  10. Atherton, P.: Books are for use : Final report of the Subject Access Project to the Council of Library Resources (1978) 0.01
    0.0064449105 = product of:
      0.025779642 = sum of:
        0.025779642 = weight(_text_:for in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025779642 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  11. Wormell, I.: Subject Access Project : the use of book indexes for subject retrieval systems in libraries (1981) 0.01
    0.0064449105 = product of:
      0.025779642 = sum of:
        0.025779642 = weight(_text_:for in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025779642 = score(doc=3116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  12. Beatty, S.: Table of contents or index data for subject enrichment : sources and developments (1993) 0.01
    0.0063788076 = product of:
      0.02551523 = sum of:
        0.02551523 = weight(_text_:for in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02551523 = score(doc=3939,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines the present manual procedures at the Australian Defence Force Academy Library for subject enrichment with reference to the evaluation with reference to the evaluation study carried out in 1991. Investigates potential sources of contents and index data in machine readable form. Reports of the Monographic Table of Contents Project at OCLC and on the latest developments in USMARC format for contents page data
  13. Ihadjadene, M.: ¬Les tables des matières dans les catalogues en ligne : opportunités, méthodes et couts (1998) 0.01
    0.0063788076 = product of:
      0.02551523 = sum of:
        0.02551523 = weight(_text_:for in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02551523 = score(doc=2234,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Analysis of research to date on improving subject access by including contents tables in bibliographic records. Results indicate the need for clear methodology (criteria for selecting notoces for enrichment, manual and semi automated methods, cost). Evaluations, based on recall, precision and rate of circulation, indicate manifest benefits, especially in virtual libraries where information is superabundant; but enrichment is a complex process
  14. Knutson, G.: Subject enhancement : report on an experiment (1991) 0.01
    0.0063788076 = product of:
      0.02551523 = sum of:
        0.02551523 = weight(_text_:for in 4648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02551523 = score(doc=4648,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 4648, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4648)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This report describes an experiment in subject enhancement conducted at an academic research library. Subjects and contents notes were added to online catalog records for a group of previously uncirculated social science essay collections, and circulation was monitored over one academic year. A control group, plus a third group with added contents notes but no extra subjects, were also monitored. Results showed an improvement in recorded use for the subject-enhanced titles, but not for titles that only had added contents notes. The effects of browsing, keyword searching, and OPAC display are discussed
  15. Brenner, S.; Ehlen, D.: Zusatzinformationen im interaktiven Katalog : LibraryThing - Social Cataloging-Plattform und Kataloganreicherung für Bibliotheken (2012) 0.01
    0.0063788076 = product of:
      0.02551523 = sum of:
        0.02551523 = weight(_text_:for in 574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02551523 = score(doc=574,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 574, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=574)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In zahlreichen Social Cataloging-Plattformen haben Nutzer die Möglichkeit, ihre Buchsammlung zu präsentieren und sich über diese auszutauschen. Bekannte Beispiele sind Lovelybooks, Goodreads oder Shelfari. Die weltweit größte Community trifft sich auf LibraryThing. Neben der öffentlichen Plattform bietet LibraryThing auch entgeltpflichtige Kataloganreicherungen für Bibliotheken - LibraryThing for Libraries. Dirk Ehlen und Simon Brenner berichten im Folgenden über das Produkt.
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Brenner, S.: LibraryThing for Libraries in Deutschland: Community-generierte Anreicherung deutschsprachiger Bibliothekskatalog mit LibraryThing for Libraries [Master-Thesis, 2011].
  16. Tseng, Y.-H.: Automatic cataloguing and searching for retrospective data by use of OCR text (2001) 0.01
    0.0061762533 = product of:
      0.024705013 = sum of:
        0.024705013 = weight(_text_:for in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024705013 = score(doc=5421,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.27831143 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes our efforts in supporting information retrieval from OCR degraded text. In particular, we report our approach to an automatic cataloging and searching contest for books in multiple languages. In this contest, 500 books in English, German, French, and Italian published during the 1770s to 1970s are scanned into images and OCRed to digital text. The goal is to use only automatic ways to extract information for sophisticated searching. We adopted the vector space retrieval model, an n-gram indexing method, and a special weighting scheme to tackle this problem. Although the performance by this approach is slightly inferior to the best approach, which is mainly based on regular expression match, one advantage of our approach is that it is less language dependent and less layout sensitive, thus is readily applicable to other languages and document collections. Problems of OCR text retrieval for some Asian languages are also discussed in this article, and solutions are suggested
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.5, S.378-390
  17. Piascik, J.M.: Enhanced subject access in Ohio public libraries (1993) 0.01
    0.0052082743 = product of:
      0.020833097 = sum of:
        0.020833097 = weight(_text_:for in 6965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020833097 = score(doc=6965,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 6965, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6965)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports the findings of a survey of heads of cataloging in Ohio public libraries. The survey focused on subject enhancements in automated catalogs. Results reveal that additional subject access points and more anaytical entries ranked as the most useful enhancements for patrons. These enhancements were seen as less useful for technical services staff.
  18. Brenner, S.; Ehlen, D.: Kunden entdecken den Bibliothekskatalog neu : Der (inter)aktive Katalog mit LibraryThing for Libraries - ein Pilotprojekt in Nordrhein-Westfalen (2012) 0.01
    0.0052082743 = product of:
      0.020833097 = sum of:
        0.020833097 = weight(_text_:for in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020833097 = score(doc=150,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In einem vom Ministerium für Familie, Kinder, Jugend, Kultur und Sport des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen für zwei Jahre finanzierten Pilotprojekt wurden die Katalogoberflächen von 24 ausgewählten Bibliotheken in Nordrhein-Westfalen (NRW) mit LibraryThing for Libraries-Elementen versehen? Im Folgenden soll das Landesprojekt vorgestellt werden. Neben dem aktuellen Projektstand werden anfängliche Schwierigkeiten und bisherige Erfolge beschrieben. Das Projekt sollte möglichst viele der in Deutschland verbreiteten Bibliothekssysteme beinhalten, sodass die erlangten Erkenntnisse auch von zahlreichen weiteren Bibliotheken nachgenutzt werden können.
  19. Leissing, U.; Rädler, K.; Hauer, M.: Query-Expansion durch Fachthesauri : Erfahrungsbericht zu dandelon.com, Vorarlberger Parlamentsinformationssystem und vorarlberg.at (2010) 0.00
    0.0048041944 = product of:
      0.019216778 = sum of:
        0.019216778 = product of:
          0.038433556 = sum of:
            0.038433556 = weight(_text_:22 in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038433556 = score(doc=3728,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  20. Cataloguing for online access : 9th National Cataloguing Conference, papers presented Nov. 28-30 1991 (1991) 0.00
    0.0046035075 = product of:
      0.01841403 = sum of:
        0.01841403 = weight(_text_:for in 1785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01841403 = score(doc=1785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.20744109 = fieldWeight in 1785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1785)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)