-
Dumais, S.T.: Latent semantic analysis (2003)
0.08
0.08099276 = product of:
0.10799034 = sum of:
0.016572626 = weight(_text_:for in 2462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016572626 = score(doc=2462,freq=18.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.18669698 = fieldWeight in 2462, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2462)
0.047948122 = weight(_text_:computing in 2462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047948122 = score(doc=2462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.18334404 = fieldWeight in 2462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2462)
0.043469597 = product of:
0.08693919 = sum of:
0.08693919 = weight(_text_:machinery in 2462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08693919 = score(doc=2462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35214928 = queryWeight, product of:
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.24688165 = fieldWeight in 2462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.448392 = idf(docFreq=69, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2462)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) was first introduced in Dumais, Furnas, Landauer, and Deerwester (1988) and Deerwester, Dumais, Furnas, Landauer, and Harshman (1990) as a technique for improving information retrieval. The key insight in LSA was to reduce the dimensionality of the information retrieval problem. Most approaches to retrieving information depend an a lexical match between words in the user's query and those in documents. Indeed, this lexical matching is the way that the popular Web and enterprise search engines work. Such systems are, however, far from ideal. We are all aware of the tremendous amount of irrelevant information that is retrieved when searching. We also fail to find much of the existing relevant material. LSA was designed to address these retrieval problems, using dimension reduction techniques. Fundamental characteristics of human word usage underlie these retrieval failures. People use a wide variety of words to describe the same object or concept (synonymy). Furnas, Landauer, Gomez, and Dumais (1987) showed that people generate the same keyword to describe well-known objects only 20 percent of the time. Poor agreement was also observed in studies of inter-indexer consistency (e.g., Chan, 1989; Tarr & Borko, 1974) in the generation of search terms (e.g., Fidel, 1985; Bates, 1986), and in the generation of hypertext links (Furner, Ellis, & Willett, 1999). Because searchers and authors often use different words, relevant materials are missed. Someone looking for documents an "human-computer interaction" will not find articles that use only the phrase "man-machine studies" or "human factors." People also use the same word to refer to different things (polysemy). Words like "saturn," "jaguar," or "chip" have several different meanings. A short query like "saturn" will thus return many irrelevant documents. The query "Saturn Gar" will return fewer irrelevant items, but it will miss some documents that use only the terms "Saturn automobile." In searching, there is a constant tension between being overly specific and missing relevant information, and being more general and returning irrelevant information.
A number of approaches have been developed in information retrieval to address the problems caused by the variability in word usage. Stemming is a popular technique used to normalize some kinds of surface-level variability by converting words to their morphological root. For example, the words "retrieve," "retrieval," "retrieved," and "retrieving" would all be converted to their root form, "retrieve." The root form is used for both document and query processing. Stemming sometimes helps retrieval, although not much (Harman, 1991; Hull, 1996). And, it does not address Gases where related words are not morphologically related (e.g., physician and doctor). Controlled vocabularies have also been used to limit variability by requiring that query and index terms belong to a pre-defined set of terms. Documents are indexed by a specified or authorized list of subject headings or index terms, called the controlled vocabulary. Library of Congress Subject Headings, Medical Subject Headings, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) keywords, and Yellow Pages headings are examples of controlled vocabularies. If searchers can find the right controlled vocabulary terms, they do not have to think of all the morphologically related or synonymous terms that authors might have used. However, assigning controlled vocabulary terms in a consistent and thorough manner is a time-consuming and usually manual process. A good deal of research has been published about the effectiveness of controlled vocabulary indexing compared to full text indexing (e.g., Bates, 1998; Lancaster, 1986; Svenonius, 1986). The combination of both full text and controlled vocabularies is often better than either alone, although the size of the advantage is variable (Lancaster, 1986; Markey, Atherton, & Newton, 1982; Srinivasan, 1996). Richer thesauri have also been used to provide synonyms, generalizations, and specializations of users' search terms (see Srinivasan, 1992, for a review). Controlled vocabularies and thesaurus entries can be generated either manually or by the automatic analysis of large collections of texts.
With the advent of large-scale collections of full text, statistical approaches are being used more and more to analyze the relationships among terms and documents. LSA takes this approach. LSA induces knowledge about the meanings of documents and words by analyzing large collections of texts. The approach simultaneously models the relationships among documents based an their constituent words, and the relationships between words based an their occurrence in documents. By using fewer dimensions for representation than there are unique words, LSA induces similarities among terms that are useful in solving the information retrieval problems described earlier. LSA is a fully automatic statistical approach to extracting relations among words by means of their contexts of use in documents, passages, or sentences. It makes no use of natural language processing techniques for analyzing morphological, syntactic, or semantic relations. Nor does it use humanly constructed resources like dictionaries, thesauri, lexical reference systems (e.g., WordNet), semantic networks, or other knowledge representations. Its only input is large amounts of texts. LSA is an unsupervised learning technique. It starts with a large collection of texts, builds a term-document matrix, and tries to uncover some similarity structures that are useful for information retrieval and related text-analysis problems. Several recent ARIST chapters have focused an text mining and discovery (Benoit, 2002; Solomon, 2002; Trybula, 2000). These chapters provide complementary coverage of the field of text analysis.
-
Smeaton, A.F.: Indexing, browsing, and searching of digital video (2003)
0.06
0.061110914 = product of:
0.12222183 = sum of:
0.009207015 = weight(_text_:for in 4274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009207015 = score(doc=4274,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.103720546 = fieldWeight in 4274, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4274)
0.11301481 = weight(_text_:computing in 4274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11301481 = score(doc=4274,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.43214604 = fieldWeight in 4274, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4274)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Video is a communications medium that normally brings together moving pictures with a synchronized audio track into a discrete piece or pieces of information. A "piece" of video is variously referred to as a frame, a shot, a scene, a Clip, a program, or an episode; these pieces are distinguished by their length and by their composition. We shall return to the definition of each of these in the section an automatically structuring and indexing digital video. In modern society, Video is commonplace and is usually equated with television, movies, or home Video produced by a Video camera or camcorder. We also accept Video recorded from closed circuit TVs for security and surveillance as part of our daily lives. In short, Video is ubiquitous. Digital Video is, as the name suggests, the creation or capture of Video information in digital format. Most Video produced today, commercial, surveillance, or domestic, is produced in digital form, although the medium of Video predates the development of digital computing by several decades. The essential nature of Video has not changed with the advent of digital computing. It is still moving pictures and synchronized audio. However, the production methods and the end product have gone through significant evolution, in the last decade especially.
-
Buckland, M.K.; Liu, Z.: History of information science (1995)
0.02
0.023227734 = product of:
0.04645547 = sum of:
0.020833097 = weight(_text_:for in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020833097 = score(doc=4226,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
0.025622372 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051244743 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- State of the art review of the historical development of information science as deemed to be covered by the particular interests of memebers of the American Society for Information Science, as defined as the representation, storage, transmission, selection, retrieval, filtering, and use of documents and messages. Arranges the references cited roughly according to the classification scheme used by Information Science Abstracts, and so uses the headings: background; information science; techniques and technology; information related behaviour; application areas; social aspects; education for information science; institutions; individuals; geographical areas; and conclusions
- Date
- 13. 6.1996 19:22:20
-
Haas, S.W.: Natural language processing : toward large-scale, robust systems (1996)
0.02
0.023227734 = product of:
0.04645547 = sum of:
0.020833097 = weight(_text_:for in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020833097 = score(doc=7415,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
0.025622372 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051244743 = score(doc=7415,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- State of the art review of natural language processing updating an earlier review published in ARIST 22(1987). Discusses important developments that have allowed for significant advances in the field of natural language processing: materials and resources; knowledge based systems and statistical approaches; and a strong emphasis on evaluation. Reviews some natural language processing applications and common problems still awaiting solution. Considers closely related applications such as language generation and th egeneration phase of machine translation which face the same problems as natural language processing. Covers natural language methodologies for information retrieval only briefly
-
Gabbard, R.: Recent literature shows accelerated growth in hypermedia tools : an annotated bibliography (1994)
0.02
0.020176798 = product of:
0.040353596 = sum of:
0.014731225 = weight(_text_:for in 8460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014731225 = score(doc=8460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 8460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8460)
0.025622372 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 8460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051244743 = score(doc=8460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8460)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- An annotated bibliography on hypermedia divided into 3 sections: material on hypertext/hypermedia that is not tied to any hardware platforms or operating systems; materials detailing those hypertext/hypermedia applications for DOS and Windows, HyperCard Macintosh hypertext/hypermedia applications. Includes journal articles, monographs, conference proceedings, and specific product announcements, evaluations, and reviews from 1990 until the summer of 1993
- Source
- Reference services review. 22(1994) no.2, S.31-40
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.02
0.020176798 = product of:
0.040353596 = sum of:
0.014731225 = weight(_text_:for in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014731225 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.025622372 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051244743 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007)
0.02
0.020176798 = product of:
0.040353596 = sum of:
0.014731225 = weight(_text_:for in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014731225 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.025622372 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051244743 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction : key issues and selected readings (2004)
0.02
0.017654698 = product of:
0.035309397 = sum of:
0.012889821 = weight(_text_:for in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012889821 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.14520876 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
0.022419576 = product of:
0.04483915 = sum of:
0.04483915 = weight(_text_:22 in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04483915 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this selected bibliography is to introduce issues and problems in relation to thesaurus construction and to present a set of readings that may be used in practical thesaurus design. The concept of thesaurus is discussed, the purpose of the thesaurus and how the concept has evolved over the years according to new IR technologies. Different approaches to thesaurus construction are introduced, and readings dealing with specific problems and developments in the collection, formation and organisation of thesaurus concepts and terms are presented. Primarily manual construction methods are discussed, but the bibliography also refers to research about techniques for automatic thesaurus construction.
- Date
- 18. 5.2006 20:06:22
-
Weiss, A.K.; Carstens, T.V.: ¬The year's work in cataloging, 1999 (2001)
0.02
0.017654698 = product of:
0.035309397 = sum of:
0.012889821 = weight(_text_:for in 6084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012889821 = score(doc=6084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.14520876 = fieldWeight in 6084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6084)
0.022419576 = product of:
0.04483915 = sum of:
0.04483915 = weight(_text_:22 in 6084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04483915 = score(doc=6084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6084)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The challenge of cataloging Web sites and electronic resources was the most important issue facing the cataloging world in the last year. This article reviews attempts to analyze and revise the cataloging code in view of the new electronic environment. The difficulties of applying traditional library cataloging standards to Web resources has led some to favor metadata as the best means of providing access to these materials. The appropriate education and training for library cataloging personnel remains crucial during this transitional period. Articles on user understanding of Library of Congress subject headings and on cataloging practice are also reviewed.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010)
0.02
0.017654698 = product of:
0.035309397 = sum of:
0.012889821 = weight(_text_:for in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012889821 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.14520876 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.022419576 = product of:
0.04483915 = sum of:
0.04483915 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04483915 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014)
0.02
0.0174208 = product of:
0.0348416 = sum of:
0.015624823 = weight(_text_:for in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015624823 = score(doc=2608,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.17601961 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.019216778 = product of:
0.038433556 = sum of:
0.038433556 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038433556 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval (2008)
0.01
0.012811186 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = product of:
0.10248949 = sum of:
0.10248949 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10248949 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:01:26
-
Morris, S.A.: Mapping research specialties (2008)
0.01
0.012811186 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = product of:
0.10248949 = sum of:
0.10248949 = weight(_text_:22 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10248949 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 9:30:22
-
Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006)
0.01
0.012811186 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = product of:
0.10248949 = sum of:
0.10248949 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10248949 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:22:28
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.01
0.012811186 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = product of:
0.10248949 = sum of:
0.10248949 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10248949 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Metz, A.: Community service : a bibliography (1996)
0.01
0.012811186 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = product of:
0.10248949 = sum of:
0.10248949 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10248949 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 17.10.1996 14:22:33
-
Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Retrieval techniques (1987)
0.01
0.012811186 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = product of:
0.10248949 = sum of:
0.10248949 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10248949 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145
-
Smith, L.C.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987)
0.01
0.012811186 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = product of:
0.10248949 = sum of:
0.10248949 = weight(_text_:22 in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10248949 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.41-77
-
Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987)
0.01
0.012811186 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = product of:
0.10248949 = sum of:
0.10248949 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10248949 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
-
Corbett, L.E.: Serials: review of the literature 2000-2003 (2006)
0.01
0.012610499 = product of:
0.025220998 = sum of:
0.009207015 = weight(_text_:for in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009207015 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.103720546 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
0.016013984 = product of:
0.032027967 = sum of:
0.032027967 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032027967 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The topic of electronic journals (e-journals) dominated the serials literature from 2000 to 2003. This review is limited to the events and issues within the broad topics of cost, management, and archiving. Coverage of cost includes such initiatives as PEAK, JACC, BioMed Central, SPARC, open access, the "Big Deal," and "going e-only." Librarians combated the continued price increase trend for journals, fueled in part by publisher mergers, with the economies found with bundled packages and consortial subscriptions. Serials management topics include usage statistics; core title lists; staffing needs; the "A-Z list" and other services from such companies as Serials Solutions; "deep linking"; link resolvers such as SFX; development of standards or guidelines, such as COUNTER and ERMI; tracking of license terms; vendor mergers; and the demise of integrated library systems and a subscription agent's bankruptcy. Librarians archived print volumes in storage facilities due to space shortages. Librarians and publishers struggled with electronic archiving concepts, discussing questions of who, where, and how. Projects such as LOCKSS tested potential solutions, but missing online content due to the Tasini court case and retractions posed more archiving difficulties. The serials literature captured much of the upheaval resulting from the rapid pace of changes, many linked to the advent of e-journals.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
