-
Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany (2008)
0.08
0.08377162 = product of:
0.1116955 = sum of:
0.02137535 = weight(_text_:for in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02137535 = score(doc=2668,freq=22.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.2408015 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
0.07911036 = weight(_text_:computing in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07911036 = score(doc=2668,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.30250221 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
0.011209788 = product of:
0.022419576 = sum of:
0.022419576 = weight(_text_:22 in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022419576 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Metadata is a key aspect of our evolving infrastructure for information management, social computing, and scientific collaboration. DC-2008 will focus on metadata challenges, solutions, and innovation in initiatives and activities underlying semantic and social applications. Metadata is part of the fabric of social computing, which includes the use of wikis, blogs, and tagging for collaboration and participation. Metadata also underlies the development of semantic applications, and the Semantic Web - the representation and integration of multimedia knowledge structures on the basis of semantic models. These two trends flow together in applications such as Wikipedia, where authors collectively create structured information that can be extracted and used to enhance access to and use of information sources. Recent discussion has focused on how existing bibliographic standards can be expressed as Semantic Web vocabularies to facilitate the ingration of library and cultural heritage data with other types of data. Harnessing the efforts of content providers and end-users to link, tag, edit, and describe their information in interoperable ways ("participatory metadata") is a key step towards providing knowledge environments that are scalable, self-correcting, and evolvable. DC-2008 will explore conceptual and practical issues in the development and deployment of semantic and social applications to meet the needs of specific communities of practice.
- Content
- Carol Jean Godby, Devon Smith, Eric Childress: Encoding Application Profiles in a Computational Model of the Crosswalk. - Maria Elisabete Catarino, Ana Alice Baptista: Relating Folksonomies with Dublin Core. - Ed Summers, Antoine Isaac, Clay Redding, Dan Krech: LCSH, SKOS and Linked Data. - Xia Lin, Jiexun Li, Xiaohua Zhou: Theme Creation for Digital Collections. - Boris Lauser, Gudrun Johannsen, Caterina Caracciolo, Willem Robert van Hage, Johannes Keizer, Philipp Mayr: Comparing Human and Automatic Thesaurus Mapping Approaches in the Agricultural Domain. - P. Bryan Heidorn, Qin Wei: Automatic Metadata Extraction From Museum Specimen Labels. - Stuart Allen Sutton, Diny Golder: Achievement Standards Network (ASN): An Application Profile for Mapping K-12 Educational Resources to Achievement Standards. - Allen H. Renear, Karen M. Wickett, Richard J. Urban, David Dubin, Sarah L. Shreeves: Collection/Item Metadata Relationships. - Seth van Hooland, Yves Bontemps, Seth Kaufman: Answering the Call for more Accountability: Applying Data Profiling to Museum Metadata. - Thomas Margaritopoulos, Merkourios Margaritopoulos, Ioannis Mavridis, Athanasios Manitsaris: A Conceptual Framework for Metadata Quality Assessment. - Miao Chen, Xiaozhong Liu, Jian Qin: Semantic Relation Extraction from Socially-Generated Tags: A Methodology for Metadata Generation. - Hak Lae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G. Breslin, Stefan Decker, Hong Gee Kim: The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies. - Martin Malmsten: Making a Library Catalogue Part of the Semantic Web. - Philipp Mayr, Vivien Petras: Building a Terminology Network for Search: The KoMoHe Project. - Michael Panzer: Cool URIs for the DDC: Towards Web-scale Accessibility of a Large Classification System. - Barbara Levergood, Stefan Farrenkopf, Elisabeth Frasnelli: The Specification of the Language of the Field and Interoperability: Cross-language Access to Catalogues and Online Libraries (CACAO)
-
El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001)
0.08
0.076742016 = product of:
0.15348403 = sum of:
0.12786166 = weight(_text_:computing in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12786166 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.48891744 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.025622372 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051244743 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 23. 1.2007 11:22:30
- Footnote
- Auch in: Library computing 19(2000) nos.3/4, S.180-191
-
Pitti, D.V.: Encoded Archival Description (EAD) (2009)
0.05
0.050250523 = product of:
0.100501046 = sum of:
0.020587513 = weight(_text_:for in 3777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020587513 = score(doc=3777,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.2319262 = fieldWeight in 3777, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3777)
0.079913534 = weight(_text_:computing in 3777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079913534 = score(doc=3777,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.3055734 = fieldWeight in 3777, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3777)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Encoded Archival Description (EAD) is an international digital standard based on Extensible Markup Language (XML) for encoding descriptions of archival records. People living their lives as individuals, as members of families, and as members of corporate bodies create and assemble records that serve as instruments for carrying out or documenting the performance of activities. Based on the archival principles of respect des fonds (or provenance) and original order, archivists traditionally have treated all of the records created and assembled by one individual, family, or corporate body as a collection or fonds. Archivists describe records as an essential part of their responsibility for preserving and facilitating access to and use of archives. Archival description provides information essential for establishing the authenticity and completeness of fonds, and serves effective administration, discovery, access, and understanding of records. Traditionally archivists have described each fonds hierarchically in a single apparatus commonly called a finding aid. Until the advent of computing, finding aids were typically in printed form. In the 1990s, archivists created EAD, an encoding standard for archival description. EAD is based technologically on XML and intellectually on General International Standard Archival Description (ISAD(G)), a descriptive framework developed by the International Council of Archives (ICA). As with all standards, EAD will continue to develop in the future. Future changes to EAD will be influenced by ICA descriptive standards that complement ISAD(G) and encoding standards based on them that will complement EAD. This entry is organized into six sections: introduction, archival records, archival description, EAD, history, and future.
-
Patton, M.; Reynolds, D.; Choudhury, G.S.; DiLauro, T.: Toward a metadata generation framework : a case study at Johns Hopkins University (2004)
0.04
0.043013833 = product of:
0.08602767 = sum of:
0.022096835 = weight(_text_:for in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022096835 = score(doc=1192,freq=18.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.2489293 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.06393083 = weight(_text_:computing in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06393083 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.24445872 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In the June 2003 issue of D-Lib Magazine, Kenney et al. (2003) discuss a comparative study between Cornell's email reference staff and Google's Answers service. This interesting study provided insights on the potential impact of "computing and simple algorithms combined with human intelligence" for library reference services. As mentioned in the Kenney et al. article, Bill Arms (2000) had discussed the possibilities of automated digital libraries in an even earlier D-Lib article. Arms discusses not only automating reference services, but also another library function that seems to inspire lively debates about automation-metadata creation. While intended to illuminate, these debates sometimes generate more heat than light. In an effort to explore the potential for automating metadata generation, the Digital Knowledge Center (DKC) of the Sheridan Libraries at The Johns Hopkins University developed and tested an automated name authority control (ANAC) tool. ANAC represents a component of a digital workflow management system developed in connection with the digital Lester S. Levy Collection of Sheet Music. The evaluation of ANAC followed the spirit of the Kenney et al. study that was, as they stated, "more exploratory than scientific." These ANAC evaluation results are shared with the hope of fostering constructive dialogue and discussions about the potential for semi-automated techniques or frameworks for library functions and services such as metadata creation. The DKC's research agenda emphasizes the development of tools that combine automated processes and human intervention, with the overall goal of involving humans at higher levels of analysis and decision-making. Others have looked at issues regarding the automated generation of metadata. A session at the 2003 Joint Conference on Digital Libraries was devoted to automatic metadata creation, and a session at the 2004 conference addressed automated name disambiguation. Commercial vendors such as OCLC, Marcive, and LTI have long used automated techniques for matching names to Library of Congress authority records. We began developing ANAC as a component of a larger suite of open source tools to support workflow management for digital projects. This article describes the goals for the ANAC tool, provides an overview of the metadata records used for testing, describes the architecture for ANAC, and concludes with discussions of the methodology and evaluation of the experiment comparing human cataloging and ANAC-generated results.
-
Pomerantz, J.: Metadata (2015)
0.04
0.039331026 = product of:
0.07866205 = sum of:
0.014731225 = weight(_text_:for in 3800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014731225 = score(doc=3800,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 3800, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3800)
0.06393083 = weight(_text_:computing in 3800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06393083 = score(doc=3800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.24445872 = fieldWeight in 3800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3800)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- When "metadata" became breaking news, appearing in stories about surveillance by the National Security Agency, many members of the public encountered this once-obscure term from information science for the first time. Should people be reassured that the NSA was "only" collecting metadata about phone calls -- information about the caller, the recipient, the time, the duration, the location -- and not recordings of the conversations themselves? Or does phone call metadata reveal more than it seems? In this book, Jeffrey Pomerantz offers an accessible and concise introduction to metadata. In the era of ubiquitous computing, metadata has become infrastructural, like the electrical grid or the highway system. We interact with it or generate it every day. It is not, Pomerantz tell us, just "data about data." It is a means by which the complexity of an object is represented in a simpler form. For example, the title, the author, and the cover art are metadata about a book. When metadata does its job well, it fades into the background; everyone (except perhaps the NSA) takes it for granted. Pomerantz explains what metadata is, and why it exists. He distinguishes among different types of metadata -- descriptive, administrative, structural, preservation, and use -- and examines different users and uses of each type. He discusses the technologies that make modern metadata possible, and he speculates about metadata's future. By the end of the book, readers will see metadata everywhere. Because, Pomerantz warns us, it's metadata's world, and we are just living in it.
- Content
- Introduction -- Definitions -- Descriptive metadata -- Administrative metadata -- Use metadata -- Enabling technologies for metadata -- The Semantic Web -- The future of metadata.
-
Jun, W.: ¬A knowledge network constructed by integrating classification, thesaurus and metadata in a digital library (2003)
0.04
0.038344223 = product of:
0.076688446 = sum of:
0.012757615 = weight(_text_:for in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012757615 = score(doc=1254,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.14371942 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
0.06393083 = weight(_text_:computing in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06393083 = score(doc=1254,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26151994 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.24445872 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5314693 = idf(docFreq=475, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Knowledge management in digital libraries is a universal problem. Keyword-based searching is applied everywhere no matter whether the resources are indexed databases or full-text Web pages. In keyword matching, the valuable content description and indexing of the metadata, such as the subject descriptors and the classification notations, are merely treated as common keywords to be matched with the user query. Without the support of vocabulary control tools, such as classification systems and thesauri, the intelligent labor of content analysis, description and indexing in metadata production are seriously wasted. New retrieval paradigms are needed to exploit the potential of the metadata resources. Could classification and thesauri, which contain the condensed intelligence of generations of librarians, be used in a digital library to organize the networked information, especially metadata, to facilitate their usability and change the digital library into a knowledge management environment? To examine that question, we designed and implemented a new paradigm that incorporates a classification system, a thesaurus and metadata. The classification and the thesaurus are merged into a concept network, and the metadata are distributed into the nodes of the concept network according to their subjects. The abstract concept node instantiated with the related metadata records becomes a knowledge node. A coherent and consistent knowledge network is thus formed. It is not only a framework for resource organization but also a structure for knowledge navigation, retrieval and learning. We have built an experimental system based on the Chinese Classification and Thesaurus, which is the most comprehensive and authoritative in China, and we have incorporated more than 5000 bibliographic records in the computing domain from the Peking University Library. The result is encouraging. In this article, we review the tools, the architecture and the implementation of our experimental system, which is called Vision.
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 29(2003) no.2, S.24-28
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.04
0.03822505 = product of:
0.0764501 = sum of:
0.022096837 = weight(_text_:for in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022096837 = score(doc=5743,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.24892932 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.054353263 = product of:
0.10870653 = sum of:
0.10870653 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10870653 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: New perspectives for cataloguing: metadata versus MARC
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.03
0.030265197 = product of:
0.060530394 = sum of:
0.022096837 = weight(_text_:for in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022096837 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.24892932 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.038433556 = product of:
0.07686711 = sum of:
0.07686711 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07686711 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Beitrag anläßlich des Seminars "Tools for knowledge organization - ISKO UK Seminar", 4. September 2007.
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.03
0.028534302 = product of:
0.057068605 = sum of:
0.020833097 = weight(_text_:for in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020833097 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.036235508 = product of:
0.072471015 = sum of:
0.072471015 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072471015 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999)
0.03
0.02754241 = product of:
0.05508482 = sum of:
0.02946245 = weight(_text_:for in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02946245 = score(doc=6095,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.33190575 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.025622372 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051244743 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
-
Lin, X.; Li, J.; Zhou, X.: Theme creation for digital collections (2008)
0.03
0.025621045 = product of:
0.05124209 = sum of:
0.028822517 = weight(_text_:for in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028822517 = score(doc=2635,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.3246967 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
0.022419576 = product of:
0.04483915 = sum of:
0.04483915 = weight(_text_:22 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04483915 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper presents an approach for integrating multiple sources of semantics for the creating metadata. A new framework is proposed to define topics and themes with both manually and automatically generated terms. The automatically generated terms include: terms from a semantic analysis of the collections and terms from previous user's queries. An interface is developed to facilitate the creation and use of such topics and themes for metadata creation. The framework and the interface promote human-computer collaboration in metadata creation. Several principles underlying such approach are also discussed.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.03
0.025568802 = product of:
0.051137604 = sum of:
0.02551523 = weight(_text_:for in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02551523 = score(doc=767,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.025622372 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051244743 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
Alves dos Santos, E.; Mucheroni, M.L.: VIAF and OpenCitations : cooperative work as a strategy for information organization in the linked data era (2018)
0.03
0.025568802 = product of:
0.051137604 = sum of:
0.02551523 = weight(_text_:for in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02551523 = score(doc=4826,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.28743884 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
0.025622372 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051244743 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 18. 1.2019 19:13:22
- Source
- Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.03
0.025483366 = product of:
0.050966732 = sum of:
0.014731225 = weight(_text_:for in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014731225 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.16595288 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.036235508 = product of:
0.072471015 = sum of:
0.072471015 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072471015 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Lubas, R.L.; Wolfe, R.H.W.; Fleischman, M.: Creating metadata practices for MIT's OpenCourseWare Project (2004)
0.02
0.024099609 = product of:
0.048199218 = sum of:
0.025779642 = weight(_text_:for in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025779642 = score(doc=2843,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.022419576 = product of:
0.04483915 = sum of:
0.04483915 = weight(_text_:22 in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04483915 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The MIT libraries were called upon to recommend a metadata scheme for the resources contained in MIT's OpenCourseWare (OCW) project. The resources in OCW needed descriptive, structural, and technical metadata. The SCORM standard, which uses IEEE Learning Object Metadata for its descriptive standard, was selected for its focus on educational objects. However, it was clear that the Libraries would need to recommend how the standard would be applied and adapted to accommodate needs that were not addressed in the standard's specifications. The newly formed MIT Libraries Metadata Unit adapted established practices from AACR2 and MARC traditions when facing situations in which there were no precedents to follow.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.138-143
-
Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004)
0.02
0.024099609 = product of:
0.048199218 = sum of:
0.025779642 = weight(_text_:for in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025779642 = score(doc=2848,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.29041752 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.022419576 = product of:
0.04483915 = sum of:
0.04483915 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04483915 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article proposes a schema for meta-information about MARC that can express at a fairly comprehensive level the syntactic and semantic aspects of MARC formats in XML, including not only rules but also all texts and examples that are conveyed by MARC documentation. It can be thought of as an XML version of the MARC or UNIMARC manuals, for both machine and human usage. The article explains how such a schema can be the central piece of a more complete framework, to be used in conjunction with "slim" record formats, providing a rich environment for the automated processing of bibliographic data.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.02
0.023503331 = product of:
0.047006663 = sum of:
0.024359472 = weight(_text_:for in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024359472 = score(doc=2652,freq=14.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.27441877 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.02264719 = product of:
0.04529438 = sum of:
0.04529438 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04529438 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Folksonomy is the result of describing Web resources with tags created by Web users. Although it has become a popular application for the description of resources, in general terms Folksonomies are not being conveniently integrated in metadata. However, if the appropriate metadata elements are identified, then further work may be conducted to automatically assign tags to these elements (RDF properties) and use them in Semantic Web applications. This article presents research carried out to continue the project Kinds of Tags, which intends to identify elements required for metadata originating from folksonomies and to propose an application profile for DC Social Tagging. The work provides information that may be used by software applications to assign tags to metadata elements and, therefore, means for tags to be conveniently gathered by metadata interoperability tools. Despite the unquestionably high value of DC and the significance of the already existing properties in DC Terms, the pilot study show revealed a significant number of tags for which no corresponding properties yet existed. A need for new properties, such as Action, Depth, Rate, and Utility was determined. Those potential new properties will have to be validated in a later stage by the DC Social Tagging Community.
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004)
0.02
0.023227734 = product of:
0.04645547 = sum of:
0.020833097 = weight(_text_:for in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020833097 = score(doc=81,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
0.025622372 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051244743 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper provides an introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), a MARC21 compatible XML schema for descriptive metadata. It explains the requirements that the schema targets and the special features that differentiate it from MARC, such as user-oriented tags, regrouped data elements, linking, recursion, and accommodations for electronic resources.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
-
Rogers, D.: Cataloguing Internet resources : the evolution of the Dublin Core metadata set (1997)
0.02
0.023227734 = product of:
0.04645547 = sum of:
0.020833097 = weight(_text_:for in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020833097 = score(doc=903,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
0.025622372 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051244743 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Recently the view has developed that electronic resources require the same level of cataloguing as the physical resources found in libraries, with the effect that a number of guidelines for cataloguing Internet resources have appeared. Describes one such standard for resource description, the Dublin Core metadata set, the ongoing refinement of the metadata elements and the application of the Dublin Core metadata set
- Source
- Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.17-22
-
Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005)
0.02
0.023227734 = product of:
0.04645547 = sum of:
0.020833097 = weight(_text_:for in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020833097 = score(doc=126,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.23469281 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.025622372 = product of:
0.051244743 = sum of:
0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051244743 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047278564 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
