Search (38 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.06
    0.06270731 = product of:
      0.12541462 = sum of:
        0.078029044 = weight(_text_:j in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078029044 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
        0.047385577 = product of:
          0.094771154 = sum of:
            0.094771154 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094771154 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1530933 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  2. Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000) 0.05
    0.047118533 = product of:
      0.09423707 = sum of:
        0.06380201 = weight(_text_:et in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06380201 = score(doc=4593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
        0.030435055 = product of:
          0.06087011 = sum of:
            0.06087011 = weight(_text_:al in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06087011 = score(doc=4593,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)
  3. Garfield, E.: Citation indexes for science (1985) 0.03
    0.031412356 = product of:
      0.06282471 = sum of:
        0.042534675 = weight(_text_:et in 3632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042534675 = score(doc=3632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2051255 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3632)
        0.020290038 = product of:
          0.040580075 = sum of:
            0.040580075 = weight(_text_:al in 3632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040580075 = score(doc=3632,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20035699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 3632, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3632)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
  4. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.02
    0.023515243 = product of:
      0.047030486 = sum of:
        0.029260892 = weight(_text_:j in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029260892 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
        0.017769592 = product of:
          0.035539184 = sum of:
            0.035539184 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035539184 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1530933 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  5. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.02
    0.023515243 = product of:
      0.047030486 = sum of:
        0.029260892 = weight(_text_:j in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029260892 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
        0.017769592 = product of:
          0.035539184 = sum of:
            0.035539184 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035539184 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1530933 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05
  6. Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002) 0.02
    0.016893784 = product of:
      0.067575134 = sum of:
        0.067575134 = weight(_text_:j in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067575134 = score(doc=3765,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.48645282 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A new approach for investigating the correlation between research quality and citation counts is presented and applied to a case study of the relationship between peer evaluations reflected in scholarly book reviews and the citation frequencies of reviewed books. Results of the study designate a J-shaped distribution between the considered variables, presumably caused by a skewed allocation of negative citations. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.
  7. Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.: Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities : the flow of ides within and among disciplines (1998) 0.01
    0.012192038 = product of:
      0.04876815 = sum of:
        0.04876815 = weight(_text_:j in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04876815 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 50(1999) no.13, S.1259-1261 (J. Andersen)
  8. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.01
    0.011846394 = product of:
      0.047385577 = sum of:
        0.047385577 = product of:
          0.094771154 = sum of:
            0.094771154 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094771154 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1530933 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  9. Pudovkin, A.I.; Garfield, E.: Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals (2002) 0.01
    0.010558615 = product of:
      0.04223446 = sum of:
        0.04223446 = weight(_text_:j in 5220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04223446 = score(doc=5220,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.304033 = fieldWeight in 5220, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5220)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Journal Citation Reports provides a classification of journals most heavily cited by a given journal and which most heavily cite that journal, but size variation is not taken into account. Pudovkin and Garfield suggest a procedure for meeting this difficulty. The relatedness of journal i to journal j is determined by the number of citations from journal i to journal j in a given year normalized by the product of the papers published in the j journal in that year times the number of references cited in the i journal in that year. A multiplier of ten to the sixth is suggested to bring the values into an easily perceptible range. While citations received depend upon the overall cumulative number of papers published by a journal, the current year is utilized since that data is available in JCR. Citations to current year papers would be quite low in most fields and thus not included. To produce the final index, the maximum of the A citing B value, and the B citing A value is chosen and used to indicate the closeness of the journals. The procedure is illustrated for the journal Genetics.
  10. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01
    0.010470833 = product of:
      0.04188333 = sum of:
        0.04188333 = product of:
          0.08376666 = sum of:
            0.08376666 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08376666 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1530933 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  11. Howard, D.L.: What the eye sees while predicitng a document's pertinence from its citation (1991) 0.01
    0.0097536305 = product of:
      0.039014522 = sum of:
        0.039014522 = weight(_text_:j in 3675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039014522 = score(doc=3675,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 3675, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3675)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    ASIS '91: systems understanding people. proc. of the 54th Annual Meeting of the ASIS, vol.28, Washington, DC, 27.-31.10.1991. Ed.: J.-M. Griffiths
  12. Huang, S.; Qian, J.; Huang, Y.; Lu, W.; Bu, Y.; Yang, J.; Cheng, Q.: Disclosing the relationship between citation structure and future impact of a publication (2022) 0.01
    0.008621072 = product of:
      0.03448429 = sum of:
        0.03448429 = weight(_text_:j in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03448429 = score(doc=621,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  13. Wainer, J.; Valle, E.: What happens to computer science research after it is published? : Tracking CS research lines (2013) 0.01
    0.008534427 = product of:
      0.034137707 = sum of:
        0.034137707 = weight(_text_:j in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034137707 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  14. Jacobs, N.; Woodfield, J.; Morris, A.: Using local citation data to relate the use of journal articles by academic researchers to the coverage of full-text document access systems (2000) 0.01
    0.007315223 = product of:
      0.029260892 = sum of:
        0.029260892 = weight(_text_:j in 4541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029260892 = score(doc=4541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4541)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  15. Leydesdorff, L.; Bihui, J.: Mapping the Chinese Science Citation Database in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations (2005) 0.01
    0.007315223 = product of:
      0.029260892 = sum of:
        0.029260892 = weight(_text_:j in 4813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029260892 = score(doc=4813,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4813, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4813)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  16. Lin, X.; White, H.D.; Buzydlowski, J.: Real-time author co-citation mapping for online searching (2003) 0.01
    0.007315223 = product of:
      0.029260892 = sum of:
        0.029260892 = weight(_text_:j in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029260892 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  17. Ardanuy, J.: Sixty years of citation analysis studies in the humanities (1951-2010) (2013) 0.01
    0.007315223 = product of:
      0.029260892 = sum of:
        0.029260892 = weight(_text_:j in 1015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029260892 = score(doc=1015,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 1015, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1015)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  18. Xie, J.; Lu, H.; Kang, L.; Cheng, Y.: Citing criteria and its effects on researcher's intention to cite : a mixed-method study (2022) 0.01
    0.007315223 = product of:
      0.029260892 = sum of:
        0.029260892 = weight(_text_:j in 634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029260892 = score(doc=634,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 634, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=634)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  19. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.0062825 = product of:
      0.02513 = sum of:
        0.02513 = product of:
          0.05026 = sum of:
            0.05026 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05026 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1530933 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04371809 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  20. Gabel, J.: Improving information retrieval of subjects through citation-analysis (2006) 0.01
    0.006096019 = product of:
      0.024384076 = sum of:
        0.024384076 = weight(_text_:j in 61) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024384076 = score(doc=61,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13891406 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04371809 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 61, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=61)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    

Years

Types

  • a 36
  • el 3
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Classifications