Search (119 results, page 6 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Womser-Hacker, C.: Theorie des Information Retrieval III : Evaluierung (2004) 0.00
    0.0037873362 = product of:
      0.01893668 = sum of:
        0.01893668 = weight(_text_:u in 2919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01893668 = score(doc=2919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085829 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03996351 = queryNorm
            0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 2919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2919)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 5., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. 2 Bde. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, Th. Seeger u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried. Bd.1: Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis
  2. TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval (2005) 0.00
    0.0033475638 = product of:
      0.016737819 = sum of:
        0.016737819 = weight(_text_:u in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016737819 = score(doc=636,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13085829 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03996351 = queryNorm
            0.12790798 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Editor
    Voorhees, E.M. u. D.K. Harman
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.6, S.910-911 (J.L. Vicedo u. J. Gomez): "The Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) is a yearly workshop hosted by the U.S. government's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) that fosters and supports research in information retrieval as well as speeding the transfer of technology between research labs and industry. Since 1992, TREC has provided the infrastructure necessary for large-scale evaluations of different text retrieval methodologies. TREC impact has been very important and its success has been mainly supported by its continuous adaptation to the emerging information retrieval needs. Not in vain, TREC has built evaluation benchmarks for more than 20 different retrieval problems such as Web retrieval, speech retrieval, or question-answering. The large and intense trajectory of annual TREC conferences has resulted in an immense bulk of documents reflecting the different eval uation and research efforts developed. This situation makes it difficult sometimes to observe clearly how research in information retrieval (IR) has evolved over the course of TREC. TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval succeeds in organizing and condensing all this research into a manageable volume that describes TREC history and summarizes the main lessons learned. The book is organized into three parts. The first part is devoted to the description of TREC's origin and history, the test collections, and the evaluation methodology developed. The second part describes a selection of the major evaluation exercises (tracks), and the third part contains contributions from research groups that had a large and remarkable participation in TREC. Finally, Karen Spark Jones, one of the main promoters of research in IR, closes the book with an epilogue that analyzes the impact of TREC on this research field.
  3. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.K.: ¬The Text REtrieval Conference (2005) 0.00
    0.0033139193 = product of:
      0.016569596 = sum of:
        0.016569596 = weight(_text_:u in 5082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016569596 = score(doc=5082,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085829 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03996351 = queryNorm
            0.12662244 = fieldWeight in 5082, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5082)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
  4. Iivonen, M.: Consistency in the selection of search concepts and search terms (1995) 0.00
    0.0032487025 = product of:
      0.016243512 = sum of:
        0.016243512 = product of:
          0.032487024 = sum of:
            0.032487024 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032487024 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1399454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03996351 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Considers intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency in the selection of search terms. Based on an empirical study where 22 searchers from 4 different types of search environments analyzed altogether 12 search requests of 4 different types in 2 separate test situations between which 2 months elapsed. Statistically very significant differences in consistency were found according to the types of search environments and search requests. Consistency was also considered according to the extent of the scope of search concept. At level I search terms were compared character by character. At level II different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a rather simple evaluation of linguistic expressions. At level III, in addition to level II, the hierarchical approach of the search request was also controlled. At level IV different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a broad interpretation of the search concept. Both intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency grew most immediately after a rather simple evaluation of linguistic impressions
  5. Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989) 0.00
    0.0032487025 = product of:
      0.016243512 = sum of:
        0.016243512 = product of:
          0.032487024 = sum of:
            0.032487024 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032487024 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1399454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03996351 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9. 1.1996 10:22:31
  6. Wood, F.; Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Sobczyk, G.; Duffin, R.: Information skills, searching behaviour and cognitive styles for student-centred learning : a computer-assisted learning approach (1996) 0.00
    0.0032487025 = product of:
      0.016243512 = sum of:
        0.016243512 = product of:
          0.032487024 = sum of:
            0.032487024 = weight(_text_:22 in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032487024 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1399454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03996351 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.2, S.79-92
  7. Crestani, F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: Information retrieval by imaging (1996) 0.00
    0.0032487025 = product of:
      0.016243512 = sum of:
        0.016243512 = product of:
          0.032487024 = sum of:
            0.032487024 = weight(_text_:22 in 6967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032487024 = score(doc=6967,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1399454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03996351 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6967, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6967)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  8. Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000) 0.00
    0.0032487025 = product of:
      0.016243512 = sum of:
        0.016243512 = product of:
          0.032487024 = sum of:
            0.032487024 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032487024 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1399454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03996351 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  9. Reichert, S.; Mayr, P.: Untersuchung von Relevanzeigenschaften in einem kontrollierten Eyetracking-Experiment (2012) 0.00
    0.0032487025 = product of:
      0.016243512 = sum of:
        0.016243512 = product of:
          0.032487024 = sum of:
            0.032487024 = weight(_text_:22 in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032487024 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1399454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03996351 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:25:54
  10. Belkin, N.J.: ¬An overview of results from Rutgers' investigations of interactive information retrieval (1998) 0.00
    0.002707252 = product of:
      0.01353626 = sum of:
        0.01353626 = product of:
          0.02707252 = sum of:
            0.02707252 = weight(_text_:22 in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02707252 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1399454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03996351 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  11. King, D.W.: Blazing new trails : in celebration of an audacious career (2000) 0.00
    0.002707252 = product of:
      0.01353626 = sum of:
        0.01353626 = product of:
          0.02707252 = sum of:
            0.02707252 = weight(_text_:22 in 1184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02707252 = score(doc=1184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1399454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03996351 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1184)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  12. Petrelli, D.: On the role of user-centred evaluation in the advancement of interactive information retrieval (2008) 0.00
    0.002707252 = product of:
      0.01353626 = sum of:
        0.01353626 = product of:
          0.02707252 = sum of:
            0.02707252 = weight(_text_:22 in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02707252 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1399454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03996351 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.22-38
  13. Pal, S.; Mitra, M.; Kamps, J.: Evaluation effort, reliability and reusability in XML retrieval (2011) 0.00
    0.002707252 = product of:
      0.01353626 = sum of:
        0.01353626 = product of:
          0.02707252 = sum of:
            0.02707252 = weight(_text_:22 in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02707252 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1399454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03996351 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:20:56
  14. Chu, H.: Factors affecting relevance judgment : a report from TREC Legal track (2011) 0.00
    0.002707252 = product of:
      0.01353626 = sum of:
        0.01353626 = product of:
          0.02707252 = sum of:
            0.02707252 = weight(_text_:22 in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02707252 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1399454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03996351 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    12. 7.2011 18:29:22
  15. Wildemuth, B.; Freund, L.; Toms, E.G.: Untangling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies (2014) 0.00
    0.002707252 = product of:
      0.01353626 = sum of:
        0.01353626 = product of:
          0.02707252 = sum of:
            0.02707252 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02707252 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1399454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03996351 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2015 19:31:22
  16. Ravana, S.D.; Taheri, M.S.; Rajagopal, P.: Document-based approach to improve the accuracy of pairwise comparison in evaluating information retrieval systems (2015) 0.00
    0.002707252 = product of:
      0.01353626 = sum of:
        0.01353626 = product of:
          0.02707252 = sum of:
            0.02707252 = weight(_text_:22 in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02707252 = score(doc=2587,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1399454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03996351 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  17. Rajagopal, P.; Ravana, S.D.; Koh, Y.S.; Balakrishnan, V.: Evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval systems using effort-based relevance judgment (2019) 0.00
    0.002707252 = product of:
      0.01353626 = sum of:
        0.01353626 = product of:
          0.02707252 = sum of:
            0.02707252 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02707252 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1399454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03996351 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  18. Larsen, B.; Ingwersen, P.; Lund, B.: Data fusion according to the principle of polyrepresentation (2009) 0.00
    0.0021658016 = product of:
      0.010829008 = sum of:
        0.010829008 = product of:
          0.021658016 = sum of:
            0.021658016 = weight(_text_:22 in 2752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021658016 = score(doc=2752,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1399454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03996351 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2752, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2752)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:48:28
  19. Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis : ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005 (2006) 0.00
    0.0018936681 = product of:
      0.00946834 = sum of:
        0.00946834 = weight(_text_:u in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00946834 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085829 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03996351 = queryNorm
            0.07235568 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Editor
    Mandl, T. u. C. Womser-Hacker

Years

Languages

  • e 105
  • d 10
  • chi 1
  • f 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 110
  • s 7
  • m 5
  • p 1
  • More… Less…