-
Deegan, M.: Electronic publishing (1996)
0.13
0.12849905 = product of:
0.17133206 = sum of:
0.04589845 = weight(_text_:c in 6666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04589845 = score(doc=6666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 6666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6666)
0.084923245 = weight(_text_:et in 6666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084923245 = score(doc=6666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 6666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6666)
0.040510375 = product of:
0.08102075 = sum of:
0.08102075 = weight(_text_:al in 6666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08102075 = score(doc=6666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 6666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Source
- New technologies for the humanities. Ed.: C. Mullins et al
-
Popham, M.: Text encoding, analysis, and retrieval (1996)
0.11
0.11243666 = product of:
0.14991555 = sum of:
0.04016114 = weight(_text_:c in 6604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04016114 = score(doc=6604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 6604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6604)
0.07430784 = weight(_text_:et in 6604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07430784 = score(doc=6604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 6604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6604)
0.035446577 = product of:
0.07089315 = sum of:
0.07089315 = weight(_text_:al in 6604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07089315 = score(doc=6604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 6604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Source
- New technologies for the humanities. Ed.: C. Mullins et al
-
Hickey, T.B.: Using SGML and TeX for an interactive chemical encyclopedia (1989)
0.11
0.11243666 = product of:
0.14991555 = sum of:
0.04016114 = weight(_text_:c in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04016114 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
0.07430784 = weight(_text_:et in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07430784 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
0.035446577 = product of:
0.07089315 = sum of:
0.07089315 = weight(_text_:al in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07089315 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Source
- National online meeting. Proc. 1989, New York, 9-11 May 1989. Ed.: C. Nixon et al
-
Project ELVYN : an experiment in electronic jornal delivery, facts, figures and findings (1995)
0.11
0.1066241 = product of:
0.2132482 = sum of:
0.084923245 = weight(_text_:et in 6685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084923245 = score(doc=6685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 6685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6685)
0.12832494 = sum of:
0.08102075 = weight(_text_:al in 6685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08102075 = score(doc=6685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 6685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6685)
0.047304194 = weight(_text_:22 in 6685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047304194 = score(doc=6685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6685)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 1. 3.1997 18:22:00
- Editor
- Rowland, F. et al.
-
Coombs, J.H.; Renear, A.H.; DeRose, S.J.: Markup systems and the future of scholarly text processing (1987)
0.08
0.07839601 = product of:
0.15679201 = sum of:
0.106154054 = weight(_text_:et in 593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106154054 = score(doc=593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.5183982 = fieldWeight in 593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=593)
0.050637968 = product of:
0.101275936 = sum of:
0.101275936 = weight(_text_:al in 593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101275936 = score(doc=593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.5063471 = fieldWeight in 593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Reprinted in: The digital world: text-based computing in the humanities. Ed.: G. Landow et al. Cambridge: MIT Pr. 1993, S.85-118
-
Björklund, L.: Document description in the future (1992)
0.06
0.06271681 = product of:
0.12543362 = sum of:
0.084923245 = weight(_text_:et in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084923245 = score(doc=5939,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
0.040510375 = product of:
0.08102075 = sum of:
0.08102075 = weight(_text_:al in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08102075 = score(doc=5939,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Technology and competence. Proc. of the 8th Nordic Conference on Information and Documentation, Helsingborg, 19-21 May 1992. Ed.: K. Adler et al
-
Butler, H.J.: ¬The electronic journal : a viable channel for formal scholarly communication? (1994)
0.06
0.06271681 = product of:
0.12543362 = sum of:
0.084923245 = weight(_text_:et in 3518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084923245 = score(doc=3518,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 3518, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3518)
0.040510375 = product of:
0.08102075 = sum of:
0.08102075 = weight(_text_:al in 3518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08102075 = score(doc=3518,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 3518, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3518)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Navigating the networks: Proceedings of the 1994 Mid-year Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Portland, Oregon, May 21-25, 1994. Ed.: D.L. Andersen et al
-
Leskien, H.: ¬The impact of electronic publishing on library services (1996)
0.06
0.06271681 = product of:
0.12543362 = sum of:
0.084923245 = weight(_text_:et in 4841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084923245 = score(doc=4841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 4841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4841)
0.040510375 = product of:
0.08102075 = sum of:
0.08102075 = weight(_text_:al in 4841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08102075 = score(doc=4841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 4841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Electronic documents and information: from preservation to access; Festschrift in honor of Patricia Battin. 18th International Symposium, 23.-26.10.1995. Ed.: A.H. Helal et al
-
Lancaster, F.W.: Networked electronic publishing of the results of scholarly research (1995)
0.05
0.054877207 = product of:
0.10975441 = sum of:
0.07430784 = weight(_text_:et in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07430784 = score(doc=1675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
0.035446577 = product of:
0.07089315 = sum of:
0.07089315 = weight(_text_:al in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07089315 = score(doc=1675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Information superhighway: the role of librarians, information scientists, and intermediaries. Festschrift in honor of Frederick Wilfred Lancaster. 17th International Essen Symposium, 24.-27.10.1994. Ed. A.H. Helal et al
-
Zeng, M.L.; Sula, C.A.; Gracy, K.F.; Hyvönen, E.; Alves Lima, V.M.: JASIST special issue on digital humanities (DH) : guest editorial (2022)
0.05
0.054314356 = product of:
0.10862871 = sum of:
0.073545694 = weight(_text_:et in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073545694 = score(doc=462,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.35915685 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
0.03508302 = product of:
0.07016604 = sum of:
0.07016604 = weight(_text_:al in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07016604 = score(doc=462,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.3508076 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- More than 15 years ago, A Companion to Digital Humanities marked out the area of digital humanities (DH) "as a discipline in its own right" (Schreibman et al., 2004, p. xxiii). In the years that followed, there is ample evidence that the DH domain, formed by the intersection of humanities disciplines and digital information technology, has undergone remarkable expansion. This growth is reflected in A New Companion to Digital Humanities (Schreibman et al., 2016). The extensively revised contents of the second edition were contributed by a global team of authors who are pioneers of innovative research in the field. Over this formative period, DH has become a widely recognized, impactful mode of scholarship and an institutional unit for collaborative, transdisciplinary, and computationally engaged research, teaching, and publication (Burdick et al., 2012; Svensson, 2010; Van Ruyskensvelde, 2014). The field of DH has advanced tremendously over the last decade and continues to expand. Meanwhile, competing definitions and approaches of DH scholars continue to spark debate. "Complexity" was a theme of the DH2019 international conference, as it demonstrates the multifaceted connections within DH scholarship today (Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations, 2019). Yet, while it is often assumed that the DH is in flux and not particularly fixed as an institutional or intellectual construct, there are also obviously touchstones within the DH field, most visibly in the relationship between traditional humanities disciplines and technological infrastructures. Thus, it is still meaningful to "bring together the humanistic and the digital through embracing a non-territorial and liminal zone" (Svensson, 2016, p. 477). This is the focus of this JASIST special issue, which mirrors the increasing attention on DH worldwide.
-
Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017)
0.05
0.05331205 = product of:
0.1066241 = sum of:
0.042461623 = weight(_text_:et in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042461623 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.06416247 = sum of:
0.040510375 = weight(_text_:al in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040510375 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.023652097 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023652097 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose The introduction of "altmetrics" as new tools to analyze scientific impact within the reward system of science has challenged the hegemony of citations as the predominant source for measuring scientific impact. Mendeley readership has been identified as one of the most important altmetric sources, with several features that are similar to citations. The purpose of this paper is to perform an in-depth analysis of the differences and similarities between the distributions of Mendeley readership and citations across fields. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze two issues by using in each case a common analytical framework for both metrics: the shape of the distributions of readership and citations, and the field normalization problem generated by differences in citation and readership practices across fields. In the first issue the authors use the characteristic scores and scales method, and in the second the measurement framework introduced in Crespo et al. (2013). Findings There are three main results. First, the citations and Mendeley readership distributions exhibit a strikingly similar degree of skewness in all fields. Second, the results on "exchange rates (ERs)" for Mendeley readership empirically supports the possibility of comparing readership counts across fields, as well as the field normalization of readership distributions using ERs as normalization factors. Third, field normalization using field mean readerships as normalization factors leads to comparably good results. Originality/value These findings open up challenging new questions, particularly regarding the possibility of obtaining conflicting results from field normalized citation and Mendeley readership indicators; this suggests the need for better determining the role of the two metrics in capturing scientific recognition.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Barker, P.; Richards, S.; Benest, I.: Human-computer interface design for electronic books (1994)
0.05
0.047037605 = product of:
0.09407521 = sum of:
0.06369243 = weight(_text_:et in 1993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06369243 = score(doc=1993,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 1993, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1993)
0.03038278 = product of:
0.06076556 = sum of:
0.06076556 = weight(_text_:al in 1993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06076556 = score(doc=1993,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 1993, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1993)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Online information 94. Proceedings of the 18th International Online Meeting, London, 6-8 Dec 1994. Ed. by D.I. Raitt et al
-
Luhmann, J.; Burghardt, M.: Digital humanities - A discipline in its own right? : an analysis of the role and position of digital humanities in the academic landscape (2022)
0.04
0.039198004 = product of:
0.07839601 = sum of:
0.053077027 = weight(_text_:et in 460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053077027 = score(doc=460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=460)
0.025318984 = product of:
0.050637968 = sum of:
0.050637968 = weight(_text_:al in 460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050637968 = score(doc=460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=460)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Although digital humanities (DH) has received a lot of attention in recent years, its status as "a discipline in its own right" (Schreibman et al., A companion to digital humanities (pp. xxiii-xxvii). Blackwell; 2004) and its position in the overall academic landscape are still being negotiated. While there are countless essays and opinion pieces that debate the status of DH, little research has been dedicated to exploring the field in a systematic and empirical way (Poole, Journal of Documentation; 2017:73). This study aims to contribute to the existing research gap by comparing articles published over the past three decades in three established English-language DH journals (Computers and the Humanities, Literary and Linguistic Computing, Digital Humanities Quarterly) with research articles from journals in 15 other academic disciplines (corpus size: 34,041 articles; 299 million tokens). As a method of analysis, we use latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling, combined with recent approaches that aggregate topic models by means of hierarchical agglomerative clustering. Our findings indicate that DH is simultaneously a discipline in its own right and a highly interdisciplinary field, with many connecting factors to neighboring disciplines-first and foremost, computational linguistics, and information science. Detailed descriptive analyses shed some light on the diachronic development of DH and also highlight topics that are characteristic for DH.
-
Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994)
0.03
0.034775272 = product of:
0.069550544 = sum of:
0.04589845 = weight(_text_:c in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04589845 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.023652097 = product of:
0.047304194 = sum of:
0.047304194 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047304194 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
-
Speier, C.; Palmer, J.; Wren, D.; Hahn, S.: Faculty perceptions of electronic journals as scholarly communication : a question of prestige and legitimacy (1999)
0.03
0.034775272 = product of:
0.069550544 = sum of:
0.04589845 = weight(_text_:c in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04589845 = score(doc=3674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
0.023652097 = product of:
0.047304194 = sum of:
0.047304194 = weight(_text_:22 in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047304194 = score(doc=3674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 14:43:47
-
Seer, V.: Von der Schattenbibliothek zum Forschungskorpus : ein Gespräch über Sci-Hub und die Folgen für die Wissenschaft (2017)
0.03
0.031358406 = product of:
0.06271681 = sum of:
0.042461623 = weight(_text_:et in 5606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042461623 = score(doc=5606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 5606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5606)
0.020255188 = product of:
0.040510375 = sum of:
0.040510375 = weight(_text_:al in 5606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040510375 = score(doc=5606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 5606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5606)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Die so genannten Schattenbibliotheken sind vermutlich die radikalste Form, um Beschränkungen des Zugangs zu wissenschaftlicher Literatur zu umgehen. Sie nutzen die Möglichkeiten digitaler Medien und Netze und vermitteln konsequent, niedrigschwellig und umfangreich den Zugang zu digitalen Kopien von Monographien und Aufsätzen. Obschon offensichtlich in vielen Fällen urheberrechtswidrig, erfreuen sich diese Plattformen einer regen Nachfrage und zwar naturgemäß vor allem aus dem Bereich der Wissenschaft. Es scheint, als würden die Schattenbibliotheken Versorgungslücken schließen, die auch vergleichsweise gut ausgestattete Hochschulbibliotheken haben. Einer weiterer Aspekt könnte sein, dass die sehr einfache Benutzbarkeit verbunden mit der Aussicht, ein Paper garantiert herunterladen zu können, den Umweg über VPN-Einwahl und Bibliotheks-Login unattraktiv macht. Werden Schattenbibliotheken somit zur Konkurrenz für Hochschulbibliotheken? Und mit welcher Motivation setzen sich die Betreiber dieser Plattformen einer möglichen Strafverfolgung, die im Kontext der jüngsten Urteile nun wahrscheinlicher wird, aus? Im Juni diesen Jahres bekam der Wissenschaftsverlag Elsevier, der Gewinnmargen von 37% erzielt (siehe Holcombe 2015), von einem US-Gericht knapp 13 Millionen Euro Schadensersatz für die nicht genehmigte Verbreitung von 100 wissenschaftlichen Artikeln (siehe Scherschel 2017 und Strecker 2017) zugesprochen. Die Fachgesellschaft American Chemical Society (ACS) erhielt in einem zweiten Urteil den Anspruch auf knapp 4,1 Millionen Euro Schadenersatz für 32 zu Unrecht kopierte und verbreitete Werke (Siehe Ernesto 2017). Neben der zunehmenden Kriminalisierung erfährt Sci-Hub jedoch auch großen Zuspruch, der sich neben der starken Nutzung auch in Solidaritätsbekundungen manifestiert (siehe Barok, D. et al 2015).
-
Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009)
0.03
0.026081456 = product of:
0.05216291 = sum of:
0.03442384 = weight(_text_:c in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03442384 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.017739072 = product of:
0.035478145 = sum of:
0.035478145 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035478145 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 8. 7.2010 19:22:45
-
Canty, C.: Document query languages : why is it so hard to ask a simple question? (1993)
0.02
0.02008057 = product of:
0.08032228 = sum of:
0.08032228 = weight(_text_:c in 6204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08032228 = score(doc=6204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 6204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6204)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Gulbins, J.; Kahrmann, C.: Mut zur Typographie : ein Kurs für DTP und Textverarbeitung (1996)
0.02
0.02008057 = product of:
0.08032228 = sum of:
0.08032228 = weight(_text_:c in 5638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08032228 = score(doc=5638,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 5638, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5638)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Bläsi, C.: Literary studies, business studies - and information science? : Yes, it's a key discipline for the empowerment of publishing studies for the digital age (2015)
0.02
0.019874614 = product of:
0.079498455 = sum of:
0.079498455 = weight(_text_:c in 2986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079498455 = score(doc=2986,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.52808017 = fieldWeight in 2986, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2986)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
