-
Priss, U.: Comparing classification systems using facets (2000)
0.13
0.12849905 = product of:
0.17133206 = sum of:
0.04589845 = weight(_text_:c in 6485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04589845 = score(doc=6485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 6485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6485)
0.084923245 = weight(_text_:et in 6485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084923245 = score(doc=6485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 6485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6485)
0.040510375 = product of:
0.08102075 = sum of:
0.08102075 = weight(_text_:al in 6485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08102075 = score(doc=6485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 6485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6485)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Source
- Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
-
Sedelow, S.Y.; Sedelow, W.A.: Thesauri and concept-lattice semantic nets (1994)
0.06
0.06271681 = product of:
0.12543362 = sum of:
0.084923245 = weight(_text_:et in 7733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084923245 = score(doc=7733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 7733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7733)
0.040510375 = product of:
0.08102075 = sum of:
0.08102075 = weight(_text_:al in 7733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08102075 = score(doc=7733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 7733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7733)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
-
Kent, R.E.: Implications and rules in thesauri (1994)
0.06
0.06271681 = product of:
0.12543362 = sum of:
0.084923245 = weight(_text_:et in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084923245 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
0.040510375 = product of:
0.08102075 = sum of:
0.08102075 = weight(_text_:al in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08102075 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
-
Priss, U.: ¬A graphical interface for conceptually navigating faceted thesauri (1998)
0.05
0.054877207 = product of:
0.10975441 = sum of:
0.07430784 = weight(_text_:et in 6658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07430784 = score(doc=6658,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 6658, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6658)
0.035446577 = product of:
0.07089315 = sum of:
0.07089315 = weight(_text_:al in 6658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07089315 = score(doc=6658,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 6658, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6658)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
-
Wille, R.: Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung in der Wirtschaft (2002)
0.05
0.054877207 = product of:
0.10975441 = sum of:
0.07430784 = weight(_text_:et in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07430784 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
0.035446577 = product of:
0.07089315 = sum of:
0.07089315 = weight(_text_:al in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07089315 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung ist einem pragmatischen Wissensverständnis verpflichtet, nach dem menschliches Wissen in einem offenen Prozess menschlichen Denkens, Argumentierens und Kommunizierens entsteht und weiterlebt. Sie gründet sich auf eine mathematische Begriffstheorie, die auf das wechselseitige Zusammenwirken von Formalem und Inhaltlichem ausgerichtet ist. Wie diese theoretische Konzeption in der wirtschaftlichen Praxis zur Wirkung kommt wird erläutert anhand der Kernprozesse des organisationalen Wissensmanagements, d.h. nach G. Probst et al. anhand von Wissensidentifikation, Wissenserwerb, Wissensentwicklung, Wissens(ver)teilung, Wissensnutzung und Wissensbewahrung; jeweils an einem Beispiel wird der Einsatz spezifischer Methoden der Begrifflichen Wissensverarbeitung demonstriert. Abschließend wird auf den prozesshaften Wirkungszusammenhang von Wissenszielen und Wissensbewertungen mit den Kernprozessen aus Sicht der Begrifflichen Wissensverarbeitung eingegangen.
-
Eklund, P.; Groh, B.; Stumme, G.; Wille, R.: ¬A conceptual-logic extension of TOSCANA (2000)
0.05
0.047037605 = product of:
0.09407521 = sum of:
0.06369243 = weight(_text_:et in 5082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06369243 = score(doc=5082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 5082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5082)
0.03038278 = product of:
0.06076556 = sum of:
0.06076556 = weight(_text_:al in 5082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06076556 = score(doc=5082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 5082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5082)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
-
Eklund. P.W.: Logic-based networks : concept graphs and conceptual structures (2000)
0.05
0.047037605 = product of:
0.09407521 = sum of:
0.06369243 = weight(_text_:et in 5084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06369243 = score(doc=5084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 5084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5084)
0.03038278 = product of:
0.06076556 = sum of:
0.06076556 = weight(_text_:al in 5084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06076556 = score(doc=5084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 5084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5084)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
-
Burmeister, P.; Holzer, R.: On the treatment of incomplete knowledge in formal concept analysis (2000)
0.05
0.047037605 = product of:
0.09407521 = sum of:
0.06369243 = weight(_text_:et in 5085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06369243 = score(doc=5085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 5085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5085)
0.03038278 = product of:
0.06076556 = sum of:
0.06076556 = weight(_text_:al in 5085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06076556 = score(doc=5085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 5085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5085)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
-
Ganter, B.: Computing with conceptual structures (2000)
0.05
0.047037605 = product of:
0.09407521 = sum of:
0.06369243 = weight(_text_:et in 5088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06369243 = score(doc=5088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 5088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5088)
0.03038278 = product of:
0.06076556 = sum of:
0.06076556 = weight(_text_:al in 5088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06076556 = score(doc=5088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 5088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5088)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
-
Hereth, J.; Stumme, G.; Wille, R.; Wille, U.: Conceptual knowledge discovery and data analysis (2000)
0.04
0.039198004 = product of:
0.07839601 = sum of:
0.053077027 = weight(_text_:et in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053077027 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.025318984 = product of:
0.050637968 = sum of:
0.050637968 = weight(_text_:al in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050637968 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Conceptual structures: logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000. Ed.: B. Ganter et al
-
Priss, U.; Jacob, E.: Utilizing faceted structures for information systems design (1999)
0.03
0.031358406 = product of:
0.06271681 = sum of:
0.042461623 = weight(_text_:et in 2470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042461623 = score(doc=2470,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 2470, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2470)
0.020255188 = product of:
0.040510375 = sum of:
0.040510375 = weight(_text_:al in 2470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040510375 = score(doc=2470,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 2470, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2470)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The writers show that a faceted navigation structure makes web sites easier to use. They begin by analyzing the web sites of three library and information science faculties, and seeing if the sites easily provide the answers to five specific questions, e.g., how the school ranks in national evaluations. (It is worth noting that the web site of the Faculty of Information Studies and the University of Toronto, where this bibliography is being written, would fail on four of the five questions.) Using examples from LIS web site content, they show how facets can be related and constructed, and use concept diagrams for illustration. They briefly discuss constraints necessary when joining facets: for example, enrolled students can be full- or part-time, but prospective and alumni students cannot. It should not be possible to construct terms such as "part-time alumni" (see Yannis Tzitzikas et al, below in Background). They conclude that a faceted approach is best for web site navigation, because it can clearly show where the user is in the site, what the related pages are, and how to get to them. There is a short discussion of user interfaces, and the diagrams in the paper will be of interest to anyone making a facet-based web site. This paper is clearly written, informative, and thought-provoking. Uta Priss's web site lists her other publications, many of which are related and some of which are online: http://www.upriss.org.uk/top/research.html.
-
Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Formale Begriffsanalyse von Literaturdaten (1992)
0.02
0.022949224 = product of:
0.0917969 = sum of:
0.0917969 = weight(_text_:c in 3141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0917969 = score(doc=3141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.6097744 = fieldWeight in 3141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3141)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Data analysis based on a conceptual file (1991)
0.02
0.02008057 = product of:
0.08032228 = sum of:
0.08032228 = weight(_text_:c in 3140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08032228 = score(doc=3140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 3140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3140)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Scheich, P.; Skorsky, M.; Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Conceptual data systems (1992)
0.02
0.02008057 = product of:
0.08032228 = sum of:
0.08032228 = weight(_text_:c in 3147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08032228 = score(doc=3147,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 3147, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3147)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Vogt, C.; Wille, R.: Formale Begriffsanalyse : Darstellung und Analyse von bibliographischen Daten (1994)
0.02
0.02008057 = product of:
0.08032228 = sum of:
0.08032228 = weight(_text_:c in 7603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08032228 = score(doc=7603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 7603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7603)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Lindig, C.; Snelting, G.: Formale Begriffsnalyse im Software Engineering (2000)
0.02
0.02008057 = product of:
0.08032228 = sum of:
0.08032228 = weight(_text_:c in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08032228 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Wille, R.; Wachter, C.: Begriffsanalyse von Dokumenten (1992)
0.02
0.01721192 = product of:
0.06884768 = sum of:
0.06884768 = weight(_text_:c in 341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06884768 = score(doc=341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=341)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Scheich, P.; Skorsky, M.; Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Conceptual data systems (1993)
0.02
0.01721192 = product of:
0.06884768 = sum of:
0.06884768 = weight(_text_:c in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06884768 = score(doc=5262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Vogt, F.: Formale Begriffsanalyse mit C++ : Datenstrukturen und Algorithmen (1996)
0.02
0.016227553 = product of:
0.06491021 = sum of:
0.06491021 = weight(_text_:c in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06491021 = score(doc=2037,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.43117565 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Das Buch soll den Leser, der an Formaler Begriffsnalyse als Methode der Datenanalyse und Wissensstrukturierung interssiert ist, in die Lage versetzen, eigene C++-Programme zur Formalen Begriffsanalyse zu schreiben. Die Vorgehensweise der Formalen Begriffsanalyse werden an einem Anwendungsbeispiel erläutert, so daß das Buch sowohl als Leitfaden für den interessierten Neueinsteiger als auch als Handbuch für den versierten Anwendungsprogrammierer und Projektleiter dienen kann
-
Conceptual structures : logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000 (2000)
0.02
0.016201654 = product of:
0.03240331 = sum of:
0.01721192 = weight(_text_:c in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01721192 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.114332706 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
0.01519139 = product of:
0.03038278 = sum of:
0.03038278 = weight(_text_:al in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03038278 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.043643 = queryNorm
0.15190414 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Computer scientists create models of a perceived reality. Through AI techniques, these models aim at providing the basic support for emulating cognitive behavior such as reasoning and learning, which is one of the main goals of the Al research effort. Such computer models are formed through the interaction of various acquisition and inference mechanisms: perception, concept learning, conceptual clustering, hypothesis testing, probabilistic inference, etc., and are represented using different paradigms tightly linked to the processes that use them. Among these paradigms let us cite: biological models (neural nets, genetic programming), logic-based models (first-order logic, modal logic, rule-based systems), virtual reality models (object systems, agent systems), probabilistic models (Bayesian nets, fuzzy logic), linguistic models (conceptual dependency graphs, language-based rep resentations), etc. One of the strengths of the Conceptual Graph (CG) theory is its versatility in terms of the representation paradigms under which it falls. It can be viewed and therefore used, under different representation paradigms, which makes it a popular choice for a wealth of applications. Its full coupling with different cognitive processes lead to the opening of the field toward related research communities such as the Description Logic, Formal Concept Analysis, and Computational Linguistic communities. We now see more and more research results from one community enrich the other, laying the foundations of common philosophical grounds from which a successful synergy can emerge. ICCS 2000 embodies this spirit of research collaboration. It presents a set of papers that we believe, by their exposure, will benefit the whole community. For instance, the technical program proposes tracks on Conceptual Ontologies, Language, Formal Concept Analysis, Computational Aspects of Conceptual Structures, and Formal Semantics, with some papers on pragmatism and human related aspects of computing. Never before was the program of ICCS formed by so heterogeneously rooted theories of knowledge representation and use. We hope that this swirl of ideas will benefit you as much as it already has benefited us while putting together this program
- Content
- Concepts and Language: The Role of Conceptual Structure in Human Evolution (Keith Devlin) - Concepts in Linguistics - Concepts in Natural Language (Gisela Harras) - Patterns, Schemata, and Types: Author Support through Formalized Experience (Felix H. Gatzemeier) - Conventions and Notations for Knowledge Representation and Retrieval (Philippe Martin) - Conceptual Ontology: Ontology, Metadata, and Semiotics (John F. Sowa) - Pragmatically Yours (Mary Keeler) - Conceptual Modeling for Distributed Ontology Environments (Deborah L. McGuinness) - Discovery of Class Relations in Exception Structured Knowledge Bases (Hendra Suryanto, Paul Compton) - Conceptual Graphs: Perspectives: CGs Applications: Where Are We 7 Years after the First ICCS ? (Michel Chein, David Genest) - The Engineering of a CC-Based System: Fundamental Issues (Guy W. Mineau) - Conceptual Graphs, Metamodeling, and Notation of Concepts (Olivier Gerbé, Guy W. Mineau, Rudolf K. Keller) - Knowledge Representation and Reasonings: Based on Graph Homomorphism (Marie-Laure Mugnier) - User Modeling Using Conceptual Graphs for Intelligent Agents (James F. Baldwin, Trevor P. Martin, Aimilia Tzanavari) - Towards a Unified Querying System of Both Structured and Semi-structured Imprecise Data Using Fuzzy View (Patrice Buche, Ollivier Haemmerlé) - Formal Semantics of Conceptual Structures: The Extensional Semantics of the Conceptual Graph Formalism (Guy W. Mineau) - Semantics of Attribute Relations in Conceptual Graphs (Pavel Kocura) - Nested Concept Graphs and Triadic Power Context Families (Susanne Prediger) - Negations in Simple Concept Graphs (Frithjof Dau) - Extending the CG Model by Simulations (Jean-François Baget) - Contextual Logic and Formal Concept Analysis: Building and Structuring Description Logic Knowledge Bases: Using Least Common Subsumers and Concept Analysis (Franz Baader, Ralf Molitor) - On the Contextual Logic of Ordinal Data (Silke Pollandt, Rudolf Wille) - Boolean Concept Logic (Rudolf Wille) - Lattices of Triadic Concept Graphs (Bernd Groh, Rudolf Wille) - Formalizing Hypotheses with Concepts (Bernhard Ganter, Sergei 0. Kuznetsov) - Generalized Formal Concept Analysis (Laurent Chaudron, Nicolas Maille) - A Logical Generalization of Formal Concept Analysis (Sébastien Ferré, Olivier Ridoux) - On the Treatment of Incomplete Knowledge in Formal Concept Analysis (Peter Burmeister, Richard Holzer) - Conceptual Structures in Practice: Logic-Based Networks: Concept Graphs and Conceptual Structures (Peter W. Eklund) - Conceptual Knowledge Discovery and Data Analysis (Joachim Hereth, Gerd Stumme, Rudolf Wille, Uta Wille) - CEM - A Conceptual Email Manager (Richard Cole, Gerd Stumme) - A Contextual-Logic Extension of TOSCANA (Peter Eklund, Bernd Groh, Gerd Stumme, Rudolf Wille) - A Conceptual Graph Model for W3C Resource Description Framework (Olivier Corby, Rose Dieng, Cédric Hébert) - Computational Aspects of Conceptual Structures: Computing with Conceptual Structures (Bernhard Ganter) - Symmetry and the Computation of Conceptual Structures (Robert Levinson) An Introduction to SNePS 3 (Stuart C. Shapiro) - Composition Norm Dynamics Calculation with Conceptual Graphs (Aldo de Moor) - From PROLOG++ to PROLOG+CG: A CG Object-Oriented Logic Programming Language (Adil Kabbaj, Martin Janta-Polczynski) - A Cost-Bounded Algorithm to Control Events Generalization (Gaël de Chalendar, Brigitte Grau, Olivier Ferret)
